|
Barely Accetable 1 |
Developing 2 |
Accomplished, at standard 3 |
Exemplary 4 |
Score |
Introduction & Conclusion |
No introduction or conclusion in presentation, just starts and then stops. |
Introduction and/or conclusion has few details with no lead in or wrap up statements. |
Introduces the biome in general terms with sudden wrap up. |
Article clearly defines biome and goes on to give a concise all inclusiove wrap up to the project. |
|
Focused Topic |
The article's information rambles and does not pinpoint one particular aspect of the biome. |
Briefly mentions a topic for concepts, but gives few details |
Describes the biome in general terms |
Article clearly defines biome and goes on to give specific details |
|
Gives information that is unique to the biome |
Never mentions any unique information |
Gives very little unique information |
Gives some information that is unique to biome and selected species |
Gives a great deal of interesting and unique information |
|
Well organized
Flow of Presentation |
Lacks topic sentences and has no logical sequence. Does nto follow given outline |
Presentation has rambles and is somewhat out of sequence &/or is confusing |
Presentation follows the correct flow and is somewhat sequential |
Every section begins with a clearly stated topic and the sections follow a logical sequence and each new topic has a proper lead in |
|
Use of Diagrams
Map Food Web as
Part of Presentation |
No use or direct comemments on diagrams or they haappen to be missing |
Diagrams are very limited with limited use in presentation |
Diagrams are used in presentation satisfactory |
Diagrams are intricately interwoven into the presentation in a concise fashion. |
|
Items 2 thru 10 per Check List |
Has little information, or too much time is spent on an individual item
|
Has some information but several points missing.
Rambles on and on or very limited information. |
Complete, all points covered satisfactorily but ....
doesn't have it.
|
Very appealing and entertaining
Each item introduced clearly |
X2
|
Clear and Understandable Presentation |
Very difficult to follow and rambles.
Makes comments to or banters with listeners |
Mostly difficult to follow and understand. Improper pronunciation of terms. Just reads from a script |
Mostly easy to follow and understand. Little reading from a script |
Easy to listen as the information is presented, very engaging and maturely presented |
|
Use of Language |
Frequent mispronunciations and use of slang. Limited use of scientific terms |
Some mispronunciations and/or slang.
Improper use of terms |
Uses correct scientific terminologies where required. |
High level language used throughout.
Frequent and proper use of scientific terms. |
|
General Appeal |
Has little appeal.
Boring |
Some appeal.
Has few interesting moments |
Entertaining and enjoyable;
some humour |
Very appealing and entertaining
Two thumbs up for this presentation. |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|