Presentation Evaluation Rubric
Biomes

Title of Article ___________________    Author's names __________________________

Barely Accetable
1
Developing
2
Accomplished, at standard
3
Exemplary
4
Score
Introduction & Conclusion
No introduction or conclusion in presentation, just starts and then stops.
Introduction and/or conclusion has few details with no lead in or wrap up statements.
Introduces the biome in general terms with sudden wrap up.
Article clearly defines biome and goes on to give a concise all inclusiove wrap up to the project.

Focused Topic
The article's information rambles and does not pinpoint one particular aspect of the biome.
Briefly mentions a topic for concepts, but gives few details
Describes the biome in general terms
Article clearly defines biome and goes on to give specific details

Gives information that is unique to the biome
Never mentions any unique information
Gives very little unique information
Gives some information that is unique to biome and selected species
Gives a great deal of interesting and unique information

Well organized Flow of Presentation
Lacks topic sentences and has no logical sequence. Does nto follow given outline
Presentation has rambles and is somewhat out of sequence &/or is confusing
Presentation follows the correct flow and is somewhat sequential
Every section begins with a clearly stated topic and the sections follow a logical sequence and each new topic has a proper lead in

Use of Diagrams
Map Food Web as
Part of Presentation
No use or direct comemments on diagrams or they haappen to be missing
Diagrams are very limited with limited use in presentation
Diagrams are used in presentation satisfactory
Diagrams are intricately interwoven into the presentation in a concise fashion.

Items 2 thru 10 per Check List
Has little information, or too much time is spent on an individual item

Has some information but several points missing.
Rambles on and on or very limited information.
Complete, all points covered satisfactorily but ....
doesn't have it.
Very appealing and entertaining
Each item introduced clearly
X2

Clear and Understandable Presentation
Very difficult to follow and rambles.
Makes comments to or banters with listeners
Mostly difficult to follow and understand. Improper pronunciation of terms. Just reads from a script
Mostly easy to follow and understand. Little reading from a script
Easy to listen as the information is presented, very engaging and maturely presented

Use of Language
Frequent mispronunciations and use of slang.
Limited use of scientific terms
Some mispronunciations and/or slang.
Improper use of terms
Uses correct scientific terminologies where required.
High level language used throughout.
Frequent and proper use of scientific terms.

General Appeal
Has little appeal.
Boring
Some appeal.
Has few interesting moments
Entertaining and enjoyable;
some humour
Very appealing and entertaining
Two thumbs up for this presentation.

Total