The following appeared in the 1956 School Magazine:-
The School presented at Christmas "The Lady with a Lamp" by Reginald Berkeley.
Although written as a play in four acts, this work is really a chronicle of the
remarkable career of Florence Nightingale from 1848 to 1907. Florence is not
presented by Mr. Berkeley as a sympathetic character; we are given a glimpse of her
cutting wit, impatience with officialdom and red tape and ruthless over-riding of
obstacles. She is revealed as having driven to their deaths her admirer Lord Herbert
and the only man she loved, Henry Tremayne. And yet the last word remains with
Herbert's widow Elizabeth who says that the purgatory of some people may be to live
on after their senses have departed "unable to work, unable to die." In the final
scene the tragic truth is brought home to us when we see Florence, old and helpless,
being presented with honours she has earned but unable to appreciate their
significance.
This production was a joint effort of the Old Scholars' Association and the
School. It is extremely difficult for young people to present mature characters,
particularly where these characters have to age during the performance, and all
acquitted themselves creditably, especially so when we bear in mind the size of the
stage where three steps taken in anger are sufficient to land an actor in the
wings!
In the leading part of Florence, which she took on at five weeks' notice, Miss
Preston put across with conviction her ruthless character. On stage for all but a
small part of the two-and-a-half-hour performance, she earned the admiration and
praise of the audience. Pat Bevis as Elizabeth Herbert, friend, obstructor, rival
and finally antagonist of Florence, gave a performance which was noteworthy; it will
be a long time before we forget the pathos of the moment when she came in with the
news of her husband's death. This was a part which required moods, the flippant,
businesslike, ruthless, mourning and contemplative; they were all conveyed with
conviction.
As Lord Palmerston, John Meachen conveyed the elder statesman to the life. We
felt that he was completely master of the situation and really lived the part.
Malcolm Fry as the Scots Doctor Sutherland provided the needed touch of humour and
evoked admiration for his accent. Thomas Bradford as Lord Herbert was very natural
as the rising politician at the beginning and very moving as the rich man who would
be dead in a few weeks. Raymond Wright was particularly "lifelike" as the fatally
injured admirer of Florence brought in to die at her feet. Marion Godfrey as Mrs.
Nightingale gave us a convincing performance as the mother of genius, impatient at
first, then disbelieving and finally proud but ashamed of her original doubts.
Terence Nunn as the Corporal, a character whose purpose is the same as the Porter
in Macbeth, provided the much-needed comedy at the appropriate moment.
Other parts were played by Carol Beard, John Brown, John Cunningham, Sylvia Goodwin,
Peter Hough, Rosemary Kitchen, Susan Laban, Geoffrey Lane, Eileen Pratt, Margaret
Puttock, Barbara Reeves, Norman Rigo, Winnie Russell and Robert Williams.
The backcloth, which was provided by the Parent-Teacher Association, was designed
and painted by Miss Brooker, Tony Brace and Malcolm Fry. It was difficult to believe
that it was not a professional job. The beauty of the opening scene, in which the
backcloth figured, was enhanced by the properties made under the direction of Mr.
Cole, the masterpiece being a fountain that worked! Make-up was in the hands of Mrs.
Denman, Mrs Jenner, Mrs. Parker and Miss Stern. We are grateful to Mrs. Denman and
Miss Stern for taking this on at short notice. Many properties were loaned by the
Thermads, the Dramatic Society of the Eastern Gas Board, to whom we owe thanks. Mrs
Denman and Mrs. Godfrey altered the costumes. Thanks are also due to the noble band
of scene shifters who dealt capably with the great amount of scene shifting which
had to be done.
The play ran for three nights. The producer and those taking part were
disappointed by the small audiences and the poor support given by the parents and
old scholars. This was a difficult production which received high praise from those
well entitled to judge; it is discouraging to feel that such efforts are not
sufficiently appreciated.
|