The Unforgettable Philippine Study Tour 2000

 

By Takashi Nishitate

 

 

Introduction

 

From the media reporting on the Philippines in television, newspapers, magazines, books and the Internet, I do not smell the stench from the Smokey Mountain and expect to use pooled rainwater for the toilet and shower because of lack of modern water supply system.  In the media, neither street children nor poorest people living in small houses along the railroad would beg things from me. 

 

Through the Philippine Study Tour 2000 (PST 2000), I actually experienced a part of the miserable lives and poverty in the Philippines, especially in Samar Island, one of the poorest islands.  At the same time, I found out what official political actors had done to alleviate poverty and how the Shitaba seminar has been able to and will be able to do, all of which I did not get to know from the media in Japan.

 

On this point, PST 2000 was a special 10-days intensive lecture for me.  What I learned from the lecture is that there are two types of poverty, which we define as the lack of necessary resources that prevents the social system from functioning in an expected way.  One is social poverty, a situation wherein the social system cannot achieve its own goals.  The other is personal poverty, wherein people cannot meet their minimum conditions to live with basic human needs. 

 

The next thing that I found was that both direct and indirect actors act to alleviate the poverty.  The difference between direct and indirect actors is on whether they directly alleviate poverty or not.  Indirect actors impact on both direct actors and indirect actors.  The Shitaba seminar effectively helps to address the poverty issue by supporting both direct and indirect actors. 

 

I propose in this paper several key points to address the poverty issue, after determining the connection between poverty and the actors.  PST 2000 gave me a ground for understanding what poverty is in real life, and a chance to think of an ideal resolution, knowing the essence of our seminar activities and the involved governments.  I also propose points for a better PST in the future. 

 

1  Poverty

 

1-1   What is poverty?

 

Throughout the PST 2000, I discovered there are two types of poverty, which we define poverty as the lack of necessary resources that prevents a social system from functioning in an expected way.  (NOTE:  In this essay, we do not touch the resources related to poverty in detail.).  One is social poverty, a situation wherein the social system cannot achieve its own goals.  Particularly in Samar Island, some municipal governments and hospitals do not work well effectively.  And long stretches of roads are also not paved (concreted). 

 

The other type is labeled personal poverty.  This poverty means people cannot meet their minimum conditions to live with basic human needs.  Safe water and sanitation and so forth are crucial problems for the people in Samar Island.  Lack of modern irrigation systems directly impact on the food supply for them.  And street children in Manila showed how they lack basic human needs.

 

1-2  Social Poverty and Personal Poverty

 

In Samar Island, I found many faces of social and personal poverty.  Social poverty is found in the facilities of a hospital, a municipal government, and the unpaved roads.  Among them, an experience in a hospital where I stayed one night is unforgettable.  At the hospital, they lack medical equipment, especially for surgical operations.  In addition, the hospital lacks medicines.  The number of beds are also few.  The toilet in the ward I stayed in was almost out of order because of a broken water supply system.  I was totally shocked about them.  If I was not ease when I used toilet in the ward, how could the hospital provide a comfortable place for the patients?  One of the nurses told us that some patients needed to go to a hospital in a city far away for emergency operations.  But, it frequently happened that patients died on the way to city.

 

The sad incidents (deaths) occur not only because of lack of medical stuff, but also of lack of well-paved road and, possibly, of an effective local government system.  In just a part Samar Island are the roads well paved through official development assistance (ODA).  In other words, the roads in most parts of the island are rough and bumpy.  It rained heavily once (when we were there), and the roads became useless.  In a municipality called Quinapundan, its government officers still use an old typewriter.  Unless the office is made a workable place, the officers could neither work on development for the municipality nor assist the hospital with its needs.

                

Personal poverty in the area is also serious, which totally shocked me.  One of the students in the School of Health Sciences (SHS) told me that, among many sick people in Samar Island, the cause of death is diarrhea.  This implies that people’s sanitation and health care are in awful conditions.  My experiences in using pooled rainwater for toiletry and observing the lack medicines in the hospital surely prove the shortage of minimum basic needs. 

 

The smiles and the laughter while we were having dinner together made me want to move.  My heart started pumping hard, “What can I do for you?”

 

1-3   The Interconnections of the Two Types of Poverty

 

Social poverty and personal poverty are related to each other.  This relation is really similar to a combination of an artery and a vein in our body.  Without an artery, a vein cannot work well; likewise, an artery is useless in the absence of a vein.  In the same way, social and personal poverty mutually influence each other. 

 

For example, a hospital that is not working competently cannot achieve its aims to keep people healthy.  Well-paved roads are essential for the people to access the hospital.  Without these amenities, thus, the poor becomes poorer and poorer. 

 

Another example is the insufficient irrigation and water supply systems.  In general, these systems are consolidated by an effort of the local government.  But the local government faces financial deficit, besides having a less-equipped work place.  In such a condition, how can the local government take the proper steps to address the problems?  What’s worse, the irrigation system is crucial for the food supply and the water system is needed to provide safe water for the people.

 

On the other hand, personal poverty impinges on social poverty.  There are two reasons.  The first point is, a social system can, needless to say, work only with healthy officers and educated people.  Whether the social system is a hospital or a school that works well or not is a crucial example of this viewpoint.  Secondly, as the number of the poor increases, the social systems have to exert more efforts to address the need of the poor.  For instance, the food supply need is greater if there are many poor people.  This means that the present irrigation system needs to become more sufficient and modernized.  Thus, as personal poverty becomes worse and worse, this would also increase the incidence of social poverty.

 

2        Direct and Indirect Actors to Alleviate Poverty

 

2-1  The Actors I Came Across in the Philippines

 

In this study tour, I found many kinds of actors who try to change the miserably poor situation for the better.  Inside the Philippines, there are five main actors: the School of Health Sciences (SHS), some municipal governments, Manila, the media and an artist group.  Outside the Philippines, there are two major actors: Tokyo and Washington.

 

The students of SHS study medicine and health care to become doctors and health workers who would support people in their hometowns and other rural areas.  The municipal governments make local policies and work in problem sites.  Manila domestically makes guidelines that municipal governments are supposed to follow.  Internationally, Manila asks industrialized countries like Japan and the U.S for financial assistance, and uses the money for needed developmental programs.  The media and the artist group can change people’s consciousness through mass communication and art exhibitions. 

 

Outside the Philippines, some countries, especially Tokyo (Japan) and Washington US), can exert influence on some projects that Manila launch to address the poverty on Samar Island.  They support such projects financially and skillfully through their official development assistance (ODA). 

 

2-2  Direct Actors and Indirect Actors

 

In the previous section, I briefly described the actors I came across in the Philippines.  However, there is one thing we should note.  All the actors do not have the same roles to put an end to poverty.  They are categorized into two types.  The first actor is an actor who actually alleviates social or personal poverty.  We call this the “direct actor.”  On the other hand, we have an “indirect actor” who does not directly alleviate poverty.  But this actor helps other actors, whether direct or indirect, through financial support or some other ways. 

 

The School of Health Sciences (SHS), Manila, and the municipal governments are identified as direct actors.  The SHS has a curriculum that expects the students to go back to their hometowns - in most cases, remote areas from cities – for health care work.  On rotation, the students study for about three months at the SHS and work about three months in their hometowns right at the first step of the curriculum. 

 

Besides, the SHS often launches projects to alleviate personal poverty such as human health problems and sanitation.  The “ACA-SHS Barangay Project” is the latest project that the SHS is initiating.  (NOTE:  ACA stands for Asian Community by the Asians, an international NGO created in 1997.)  This project tries to improve “preventive health care,” support socio-economic projects, maintain the local cultures and environment, and promote peace education, according to the Prof. Borrinaga from the SHS.  Not only the students from the SHS, but also some of the graduates, faculty members and other people involved in health care are expected to take part in this project.

 

Manila and the municipal governments are also identified as direct actors.  Manila seems focused on helping improve social systems rather than targeting personal poverty.  Not only providing medical equipment and computers, but also building facilities, schools, and paved roads is necessary to let the social system work effectively.

 

Successive cabinets (national governments) in the Philippines have tried to solve its social poverty since WWII through import substitutions policy and requiring ODA.  The Marcos Bridge between Leyte and Samar Island is a good example of this.  Because of the bridge, access to hospitalization and commercialization improved in both islands of Leyte and Samar.  (NOTE:  The Marcos Bridge was built in 1972, upon the initiative of Pres. Marcos.  Generally speaking, the bridge was made because Eastern Visayas is Mrs. Imelda Marcos’s home.  However, this essay does not touch on political matters; we focus only on the poverty of the region and the ways to solve it from the experience in the Philippines.)

 

In contrast, municipal governments do not have enough money and resources to solve social poverty.  But they target upon personal poverty.  They get to the bottom of personal poverty and attempt to distribute resources equally based on the people’s minimum needs.  In Sta. Fe town Leyte, there is a huge bulletin board that tells us which family needs more basic human improvements such as sanitation and health care.  Using this board, the local officials are effectively providing services for each family.  Moreover, the town puts great importance on people’s education, helping people to find out the problems and to cope with them.  Thus, it is possible to say that the municipal governments try to meet what people need for their daily lives while Manila tends to help social systems work effectively.

 

The Palo Artist Group, the media, Tokyo and Washington are identified indirect actors.  The artist group and the media, Leyte Samar Daily Express, have an impact on people at the consciousness level.  The theme of this artist group’s exhibit is “Peace, Democracy and Equality.”  Art never discriminates people in terms of economic status.  This is one of the benefits of the artist group, when it tries to spread their theme around its community.  To spread the theme and let people think about it is an indirect way to put an end to social and personal poverty.  Bringing peace, democracy and equality is one of the main conditions in order to get over poverty.

 

The media also influences the people’ s mind.  Our PST 2000 was featured twice in the newspaper twice as a unique happening in Leyte and Samar Islands, which Japanese hardly visit.  A professor of the University of Philippines (Tacloban), whom I met in the Atitipalo Art Exhibition, told us how our visit had caught people’s attention.  Surprisingly, she mentioned her students and her consciousness towards Japanese and Japan are gradually changing towards the positive.  Through such an effort, a tie between people in Leyte and Samar Islands and the Japanese can be milestone to build firm relationship on between the Philippines and Japan in the future.  This can help Japan’s ODA projects to be used in the island effectively, supported by the local people.  The media can also touch people in the world and international NGOs.  World opinion and some of the famous international NGOs are powerful in influencing change in world politics and each country’s politics toward positive developments.

 

The main strategy of Tokyo and Washington to solve poverty in the Philippines is through ODA.  Using ODA, multinational corporations or Philippine companies build roads, airports and facilities such as schools and hospitals.  In this sense, Tokyo and Washington are not direct actors but indirect actors.  A unique point in Tokyo’s and Washington’s ODA is the tendency to target upon social poverty.  In Samar Island, JICA’s irrigation projects still remain useless, as what it was in the 1960s.  In spite of this, in the Philippines, there are many big projects such as bridges and ports constructed through ODA over the past few decades.

 

(NOTE:  Unlike Tokyo, Washington has more interest in government management or policy-making rather than on providing aid.  Here we can see some political reasons, but do not touch such things in this paper.)

 

3        The Shitaba Seminar as an Indirect Actor  

 

Which type of actors is the Shitaba Seminar is, direct or indirect?  The seminar is actively trying to help solve the poverty in Samar Island, which I unfortunately did not know before I joined the PST 2000.  Like the artist group, the media, Tokyo and Washington, which impact on the direct actors, it is possible to say that the Shitaba Seminar is an indirect actor. 

 

The Shitaba Seminar, as an indirect actor, acts in two ways.  One way is through Peace Development Fund (PDF) and the other is through the media.  PDF is a bank account in the Philippines, which was opened in 1999 and receives funds from the royalties of four books that the seminar has published and some personal donations. 

 

About the media, we once went to the Leyte Samar Daily Express office in Leyte and talked to the publisher through the effort of Prof. Borrinaga, a writer for this newspaper.  That was a great chance for us to spread our message to society through the media. 

 

Using PDF funds, we support the SHS and the artist group.  By 2000, we have donated books and computers to the SHS.  The library of SHS is much smaller than that library we have in our school (School of International Relations, Tokyo International University).  The number of books is small, which totally shocked me.  Books are necessary for students.   A shortage of books means that students have limited means to study, even though the students are very earnest in their studies.  It is also bad for community-based developments because many prospective doctors and health workers cannot learn about the latest trends in medical and health sciences.  To learn such things through computers may be a good way.  However, there are only a few computers at the SHS.  In this sense, to donate books and computers from the PDF is a wise way to help put an end to poverty, especially personal poverty, which is the target of SHS.  

 

Towards the artist group, we support its activities financially.  At the time of this writing, the artist group has held exhibitions three times using the money of PDF.  One of them was held in March in 2000, during our visit to the Philippines.  At that exhibition, we met a professor of University of the Philippines (Tacloban).  She was astonished upon hearing from the Japanese students that a bank account for PDF has been opened and support for the exhibition has been taken from it.  According to her, her students and she had some kind of prejudice against Japan and Japanese.  But despite this prejudice against the Japanese, she seemed glad about the effort to make a good society together.  With the theme “Peace, Democracy, and Equality,” the artist group has spread its message to society through their exhibition, a partnership that was built with us.  In this way, I think a base of the society is gradually made to help solve the poverty problem.

   

The art exhibition and our visit to the Philippines caught the media’s eyes.  The Leyte Samar Daily Express has reported our seminar activities, which we did not expect, frankly speaking.  But actually the news might have had some impact on people toward our actions.  This must be one of the instruments, in addition to the PDF, to change the society and the world, bridging the Philippines and us. 

 

In Japan, we also use the media to send our message towards society.  We expect that people’s opinion will help change the thrust of Japan’s ODA towards Asia including the Philippines. 

 

We hardly try to solve the poverty in the Philippines directly, but indirectly we are trying to do this! 

 

4-1  From the Relation between Two Types of Poverty and Two Types of Actors

 

We discussed poverty and the actors in two previous sections.  Now we discuss whether or not some connection exists between the poverty and the actors.  Table 1 shows us two interesting points among them.  Firstly, national governments such as Manila, Tokyo and Washington have a tendency to try to solve social poverty, no matter how they are as direct or indirect actors.  On the other hand, smaller actors such as the SHS, the artist group, the media and the Shitaba Seminar (compared to national governments in terms of financial and structural scale) are better at addressing personal poverty.  Secondly, the media and the artist group actually have a possibility to impact on both types of poverty, helping people realize what poverty is and pushing them to solve this problem.

Table 1. Poverty and Actors

 
 


 


SHS

Municipal

Government

Manila

Media

Artist Group

Tokyo

Washington

Social

Poverty

Personal

Poverty

* and means effective to solve social or personal poverty.

* and means ineffective to solve social or personal poverty. 

*White mark stands for direct actors and black mark is for indirect actors. 

 

 

 

 

 



These two points give us two implications for a successful resolution of poverty.  The first point is building a partnership with national governments and the other is using the media and the artist group. 

 

          Build a Partnership with National Governments

 

No matter how the non-national governmental actors such as the SHS, the media, the artist group, the Shitaba Seminar and the municipal governments directly try to solve poverty, their efforts are perhaps limited, to just targeting personal poverty.  For these actors, to make a link with national governments is a creative alternative, because the national governments are good at working on social poverty.  The link helps the national governments and the other actors to work on both social and personal poverty.  In this way, successful products of actions to alleviate both types poverty can be probable because social and personal poverty are related with each other.

 

                    Using the Media and the Artist Group

 

The media and the art never discriminates people in terms of economic status.  Particularly in the Philippines, where there are big gaps between the poor and the rich, using the media and art can be the best instrument to send messages to society.  Furthermore, using media and art is wise to let people not only in the society that we visited around Leyte and Samar Islands, but also in Manila and other cities, to know the region’s miserably poor situation.  Thus, the SHS and the municipal government might get more support through the efforts of the media and the artist group.  

 

4-2  Further Implications

 

From the above discussions, we draw several hints concerning how to set up strategies.  There are three levels: before the actions, during the actions, and after the actions.

 

First of all, before we start to act, we should analyze the actors and ourselves, and foresee results after the actions.  As Table 1 shows us, the actors have different characteristics from each other.  Therefore, the actors need to know which other actors could be made partners for achieving alleviation of poverty.  Likewise, when we want to accomplish our own goal, we probably try to find a proper actor who has a similar goal or complements our insufficient parts and work together.  The other point is that actors need to identify themselves in a whole system around a problem.  For example, poverty has two types, social and personal poverty, and they impinge on with each other.  In addition, poverty causes some other problems (political, economic or social).  Therefore, to foresee the result of the actions is needed to ensure successful outcomes.  Otherwise, the actors’ efforts might only worsen the poverty situation in some aspects, although the actors may think they are trying to solve the problem.

 

Secondly, during the actions, we should not only in the country or region we are targeting, but also in our own country or hometown.   Why do Tokyo and Washington give aid to the Philippines?  Because the Philippines is an important nation for both of them, and the problems in the Philippines are made from our daily lives.  Ironically, our lifestyle characterized by “mass production, mass consumption and mass disposal” also shifts poverty to the Philippines.  On the one hand, from the Philippines, we import banana, tuna, natural resources and so forth that are very significant for our lives.  On the other hand, in the shadow of our lives, there is the life of poverty in the Philippines.  Therefore, to act in both sides, targeting country and hometown, is a wise way to complement the solution of poverty-related problems.

 

Finally, after the actions, we should determine what happen in the form of results.  From this observation, we lay out the achievements and the next tasks to pursue.  Reflecting on our own actions is a next step for other actions, by all means.  In sum, such considerations before, during and after the actions are essential for successful future actions.  This I strongly feel about at this time of writing. 

 

5  Conclusion

 

What the PST 2000 gave me could not be said in one word, but in many words.  Firstly, I think it told me what poverty is and the relationship between poverty and our life.  Secondly, there are many kinds of actors who could alleviate poverty, whether indirect or direct, and target on personal or social poverty.  Thirdly, what the seminar is doing is to help alleviate poverty in order to make peace in Japan, the Philippines, the Asian countries and all over the world.  And fourth, it made me think of the strategies for successful actions. 

 

I found out one of the reasons why I study, which seems to be the best gift for me from the PST 2000.  I study in my life for myself and for world peace.  A peaceful society and world promises bright and happy future for all people on earth.  In it, my future life also lies.

 

Finally, from my learning, I propose two things for more successful PST in the future.  Firstly, students should study hard before they take part is the tour.  The seminar has been doing many kinds of things both in Japan and the Philippines.  What kinds of actions has it done and why?  Who supports us?  There seems to be a lot of things to cover before the PST.  I bet such kind of preparatory study is necessary for good learning in the Philippines.  Secondly, in the Philippines, it is better for us to have opportunities to talk with officials from the central government regarding development in the Philippines, and some officials from dominant companies, whether local or multi-national.  Because, as we discussed in this paper, there are many kinds of actors and their roles are also very different from each other.  I strongly believe that the points I mentioned promise a better product of the PST and actions for the resolution of poverty and for promoting peace.  

 




Home
.