We've all heard cover songs. They're the staple of bar bands, the appropriating of one already published song, tailored to a band's attitude and timbre. They've been a strong part of musical traditions for as long as anyone can remember, though their roles consistently change. I'm sure when man first bumped two rocks together in rhythm, someone down the street mimicked him and shouted "Oi Oi Oi!" Well, I love cover songs. Better yet, I'm obsessed with them thanks to Macster, a Mac port of the much-reviled Napster. You can hardly type in any famous song into their huge database without finding versions by different artists. What I began to find is that there other versions, for various reasons, usually appealed to me more. They were more fun, they fit into distinctive sounds of bands or genres I loved, maybe because I see the form of art as more important than the original ideas (qua Shakespeare or most great jazz) or perhaps because I self-consciously sought to follow in the steps of Pater and Oscar Wilde, who preferred art that was based on art (such as criticism) over art based on life because life was icky. Or maybe it's the appeal of wearing out and transforming the meaning of a song with continued use mirroring what Yeats did with words in Byzantium: "Before me I see and image, shade or man / more shade than man / more image than a shade" Sorry.... I was possessed by Dr. Sicker for a second. I'm obsessed with cover songs because they rock. But not all cover songs. There are thousands upon thousands of songs based on popular music, and a good obsession has gotta have limited scope. First we need to get something out of the way. Sampling is not covering. Sampling doesn't automatically make a song crap, but it doesn't help either. Puff Daddy is a privation, a cancer on the music industry. Here's a man so colossally stupid that the takes "Every Breath You Take," a song about stalking and --who knows?-- rape that the Police said in many interviews had nothing to do with love, and he turns it into a tribute to Biggy Smalls. Sting collected the checks, but you know he was laughing at how dumb the world was. Some cover songs are so ridiculously famous that they completely envelop the original. The Beatles "Twist and Shout" or Blues Brothers "Soul Man," anyone? These songs are good, but far too...discovered. Similarly others are famous enough to be the prime access to a song for a new generation: David Lee Roth's "Just a Gigolo" and the Brian Setzer Orchestra's "Jump, Jive, and Wail" dusted off Louis Prima; Run DMC revitalized Aerosmith and legitimized rap with "Walk this Way," and Red Hot Chili Peppers acknowledged just what Stevie Wonder said in "Higher Ground." Some then there's verbalization or instrumental songs, which tends to eradicate any original meaning. Try listening to Weather Report's "Birdland," itself a tribute to Charlie Parker's "Birdland," after listening to Manhattan Transfer's version without putting in the asinine lyrics. Those are good, but I like to look at the fairly obscure stuff. The underground communities of cover songs that play off each other and transform the world of popular music as we know it. Another exclusion to my obsession are most cover bands. Although "Apocalyptica," a Metallica cover band that plays with only cellos, is awesome, most bands get their sound settled with original work so they have more to bring to the table with interpretations of other music. The major exception to this is Backbeat, not the Beatles cover band, but the house band at 101 on the Village. They are amazing. If you've never heard "Stairway to Heaven," funked out and blended into a Prince melody, you haven't lived. So what do I spend far too much time listening to? There are a few categories: The first and largest is punk and ska, two related genres that are laden with covers, and do some of the best work. Cover songs often play opposites or extremes. If all a song has going for it is harmony and melody, in comes a hardcore punk band like Snuff (covering Spice Girls and Tiffany) or, to a lesser extent, Mxpx (Summer of '69) to drive it all out. You'd never think of the Ramones as melodic, but after listening to the Mxpx version of "The KKK took my baby away," they sound like a choir. Recommended is Goldfinger's "99 Red Balloons" , performing a cover of Nena in English AND German. Like Ska, Punk is obsessed with making fun music (80s pop, Christmas music and Grease) more fun. The Vandals' cover of Summer Lovin' is classic Some of the best cover songs ever performed are by ska band Reel Big Fish. They do lots of 80s hits ("Take on Me" for the BASEketball soundtrack, and fantastic covers of Duran Duran's "Hungry Like the Wolf" and Lita Ford's "Kiss Me Deadly" Their buddies Save Ferris are no slouch, either, with a ska cover of Dexy's Midnight Runners' "Come On Eileen" and a cover of "Build Me Up Buttercup" on the Mallrats soundtrack. This leads me to another cover phenomenon: Accidental homosexual lyrics. This tends to happen when a cover is done by a singer of a different gender. The archetype of this is The Beatles cover where Ringo Starr joyfully sings about "Boys." Following this are such oddities as Save Ferris imploring Eileen to take off her dress, and something running down the length of Veruca Salt's thigh due to "My Sharona." Cake narrowly avoided this in Gloria Gaynor's "I Will Survive" with an adept lyrics change. And with lesbians, we naturally have the opposite of punk. Folk and feminist music, who tend to cover songs valued only by their masculine rock drive. Foremost here is Tori Amos's virtually unrecognizable cover of Nirvana's "Smells Like Teen Spirit," followed by the girls from Bran Van 3000's rendition of Quiet Riot's "Cum On Feel the Noize." The next master of the cover song is Tom Jones. His covers were pointed out to me by cousin extraordinaire Mel Kelly O'Farrell. You can't mistake Tom, and, whether coupled with the Cardigans for Talking Heads's "Burning Down the House" or with the Pretenders for Iggy Pop's "Lust for Life" or alone, shaking his milquetoast sexuality in Prince's "Kiss," his work is magic. In this line are the other lounge acts performing odd covers, such as a version of Soundgarden's "Black Hole Sun" on Lounge-a-Palooza, or Ben Folds' Five's cover of Flaming Lips's "She Don't Use Jelly." These are the cream of the crop. There are other classics in other genres, but you have to really look for them (I have.) Picture Ice T and Perry Ferrel performing the Sly and the Family Stone song "Don't Call me Nigger, Whitey." Picture Matthew Sweet's cover of "Scooby Doo." Eric Cartman and Chef (Isaac Hayes) performing Styx's "Come Sail Away." They Might Be Giants performing the Allman Brothers' "Jessica" with accordion and synth. The Revolting Cocks cover of Rod Stewart's "Do You Think I'm Sexy?" And that's just for starters... God bless Napster. |
Tom Jones loves you |
![]() |
Yessir. I have decided to follow in the footsteps of great men such as Robert T. Missonis III, Andrew Touchette, James Belushi in The Principal: I, for at least another two weeks, have become an educator. Specifically I'm subbing for classes from K-12, though 7th graders are the youngest little bastards I've had yet. And, as someone who loves children because I am one, I've discovered some things from the other side.
Otherwise, I'm just waiting here in Saranac Lake for the weather in New Orleans to become less infernal. And, in related news, things with Veera are going swimmingly well, and life shall be perfect as soon as a I get a job down there. I'm still in the initial stages of my job search, but I have some good prospects. Here is the description of one of the first jobs I've looked at: Award-winning university publications staff seeks an editor with strong writing background, experience in copy editing and excellent organization skills. The editor will be part of the editorial team that produces a quarterly alumni magazine, an internal newspaper and other publications. Thinking creatively and independently, working well with different editorial teams and clients, and meeting established deadlines are important. Bachelor's degree and 2 years' writing and/or editorial experience required. Macintosh computer knowledge preferred. I think there was also a clause in there that said "Must be named Ryan Brenizer," but they took it out for legal reasons. In the meanwhile, I'm upstate, and it feels like I'm... |
![]() |
One of the things you have undoubtedly noticed if you are one of the (Ram-connected) people who get anywhere from two-ten updates from different people is that they are loaded (particularly Missy's, as Brendan has noted) with self-justification. There is a good reason for this: THEY BLOODY WELL NEED JUSTIFICATION. One of the few things that will ever shock Missy Frederick and Mike Forde into silence was the admission that I was stopping updates because they were too arrogant even for me. This is partly a personal problem--I prefer to grandstand in a medium where I can not allow people to talk back over one where they can't. I actually broke up a relationship once over my hatred of writing letters--I had to tell the girl I had a phobia of disgruntled postal workers (the days before AIM). But we all know that updates are the clearest sign of arrogance possible. Thus, I've changed media, and , to paraphrase McLuhan, the medium is the massage [sic] I have few illusions that the daily grind of my life is of earth-shattering importance more than anyone else's, but hey, you have gotten this far through tirade, right? (If you're just skimming through for News of the Week, save yourself the pain and click to your left.) But, I have done things I had reservations about for secondary benefits before--I won a graduation award for debate, for Crissake. So, here are five justifications for reinstating my updates, going in order from blind optimism to dank pessimism
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
There's something about updates. Just over one year ago, there was but one, Brendan, standing in the wilderness. He began it all as a clever way to, well, be clever. Then Mike picked it up as a clever way to be Brendan. (Brendan later returned the favor by being Mike.) Then I entered, and I had a dream: I dreamed of a time that all people would contact each other solely through updates in a new global community. My vision is well on its way. We've seen updates from Nick, Jerry, Jen Miller, Adriatik, Jonathan Selkoe (the Toeheaded Ramblings), President O'Hare, a talking bear and the ghost of Sir Edmund Hillary. In fact, even I receive a small minority of today's updates (though I hear I do receive the best ones, except for that of one A&E editor who shall remain nameless.) It's a strange secret society, made even stranger by the fact that it is neither secret nor a society. It is reminiscent of another man's vision: Fight Club's David Fincher. This is not an accident. I just watched the Fight Club DVD with the following missing footage: Tyler: Rule number one: You do not talk about updates. Rule number two: You do not talk about updates. Man: But isn't the whole point of updates relaying information? Aren't you in some sense talking when writing an update: Tyler: To paraphrase McLuhan... Man: The medium is the massage, right, that one was used in the last panel. Tyler: Screw it. I'm going to beat the crap out of you. |
![]() |
|
I have a theory. I call it the Brendan McGinley theory. If you are obsessed enough over something, no matter what, your friends will eventually obsess over it too. It is often a long, hard fight, but it happens. This is why I'm now into comics and ska, and why so many friends meld into OCB (One Composite Being) Well, my obsession is Right-Wing web sites, and as obsessions go it's slightly more addictive than heroin but probably not as bad for you. Maybe. You see, I watched Fight Club yesterday. For those who haven't seen it, the main character goes to various support groups for afflictions he does not have. He gets very angry when he sees other people doing the same thing. This is meant to be a farce, a twisted look at the ultimate in dependence, and most people laugh and feel slightly disturbed, because that's what Davis Fincher is good at making us feel. Well, I laughed, felt slightly disturbed at said, "Wait a second, I do that," My support groups are right-wing websites. The cream of the crop, the testicular cancer ward, if you will, is FreeRepublic.com. This site consists of the hundred thousand or so most conservative people in the country (A Bush supporter is regarded as liberal; Alan Keyes is their champion.) who are all addicted to the site. They'll spend six hours a day there reading articles, responding to them, and responding to the responses. Well, I used to just watch the group, but now 've joined in. I post articles likely to get them pissed off, and actually post conservative-sounding responses that can be read both ways. I can't post my screenname because, frankly, I'm scared of a lit of those people, but I have assumed the nature of a people to attain their cultural benefits. And I also get angered when I spot others doing the same. The first article I posted received two responses that were downright liberal. There people were later flamed by reactionaries, but it still disturbed me. They were trying to take away my fun. You can join in however. The experience is unlike anything you've ever seen before. If you're open-minded enough, you'll find yourself saying. "I agree with that. Okay, I see how someone could think that ... WTF?!? Are these people crazy?" At some level, they nearly all are. The right-wing is far more sites on the web than the left, most likely because the left gets the press in most cases anyway. So here is a guide to your right-wing experience. These are not hate-speech sites. Those are fun for different reasons. For good listings of these sites, you can go to HateWatch or TurnLeft: FreeRepublic.com: The mack-daddy. Once you come in, you're never coming out. Type in anything you want into the search field and prepare for a holiday. Recommended search strings: Liberal, Bible, Barf, Alert, ACLU, Dr. Laura Media Research Center: A listing of everything the media has ever said that has been liberal in any way, shape or form. Belief in a vast, left-wing conspiracy theory. Largely an overreaction-I could pull of a hundred things a day from the Fox news channel and say the press is all right-wing, but still mildly entertaining. Accuracy in Academia: Actually a good deal of stuff I agree with here, but there is a tendency, like all ideologues, to straw-man opponents' arguments. WorldNetDaily: Second-most addictive site. Doubles in size every few months. Apparently the average visitor spends four hours there. Weekly columns by such lovely figures as Alan Keyes, Lenora Fulani, and Lew Rockwell (more on him later.) NewsMax: Another news page. Good at seeing what conservatives think is important, but tends to falsify data. CNSNews: Another news page. Look for the cartoons by Kevin Tuma--the man is a sociopath. LewRockwell.com: Proof that at the heart of every libertarian lies insanity. Actually wants to privitize all roads. A must-read. Well, that's all for my obsession this time. If anyone has an obsession you'd like others to share, e-mail it to me and I'll put it in. |
|