This is merely the first article to be posted on this website. I hope to get more soon. As I am currently writing these on my own, in my spare time, it may take a while. If the readers wish to help, please send me any articles you wish published. I will review them, then, if deemed relevant, I shall post them.
It disgusts me to think that the communists...er...socialists...no, the uh...liberals, that's it, that the liberals feel that they are doing this country a favor by taking firearms out of the hands of honest, law-abiding citizens. Now we all know that the liberals are wrong on a level incomprehensible to them, but it appears to be impossible to make even a flicker of this truth apparent to them.
They are slowly taking away our right to keep and bear arms. Unfortunately, there are not enough people on our side who are actually doing anything about it. This article is barely a scratch on the surface of what needs to be done. Hopefully, however, this will help some of you to see the light, or to motivate you to do something about the infringment upon your right to keep and bear arms.
It is, naturally, logical to start at the beginning. So we shall. This is what the Second Amendment says:
"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
Let's break this down, shall we?. "A well regulated militia..." meaning that the people are trained to arms and are prepared to take up a weapon at a moments notice to repel an attacker. "...being necessary to the security of a free state..." which means that it is impossible to keep the people free without it. "...the right of the People" 'right' meaning that the people are entitled to it, as the words "right" and "priviledge" have completely different meanings and 'the People' meaning each and every individual, with exceptions, of course. "...to keep and bear arms..." to keep means to own, and to bear translates to 'carry'. "...shall not be infringed." means that they will not violate the right.
Of course, there are politicians (every liberal in existence) who believe that "the People" does not mean each individual. Well, not in the Second Amendment, anyway. The courts, (including and most importantly the Supreme Court) on the other hand, have ruled many times over, on occasions involving the First and Fourth Amendments, in specific, but within the entire Constitution itself that "the People" means each individual. Yet, the liberals (socialists) don't seem to get the point.