A sequel to Presidential Treason 101.
The stage is set.
It’s time to connect more dots. . .
By Gretchen Glass
Section 1. Introduction -
Reviewing the President’s ‘accomplishments’
from Presidential Treason 101.
The President successfully staffed
his Administration with key figures of like mind who have/had
connections to Communist China and/or Russia to create the
permissive environment necessary to 1) accept illegal campaign
contributions from the Chinese military; 2) cover-up the ongoing
Chinese espionage at the National Labs, and 3) facilitate
the transfer, legal or covert, of sensitive satellite, defense,
and computer technology to Communist China and Russia.
The President has, indeed, earned
an A+ in Presidential Treason 101. Now it’s time to move
on to the possibility of a national emergency, martial law,
suspension of the Constitution and an end to our form of Government
. . .
Section 2. Imagine the following
long-term KGB game plan developed and set in motion in Moscow
December 1969.
1. Select a bright, personable
young man from an out of the way place in America who loathes
the military, is protesting against America, has no moral
or ethical values and has an insatiable hunger for power -
one who has his heart set on becoming the President of the
United States.
2. Select the only target date,
determined by computer experts, that can be predicted with
certainly to be a time of turmoil in America - say in 30 years,
at the turn of the century.
3. Set up the appropriate connections
to provide the capital and influence to propel him along the
path to the White House.
4. When the President is in place,
continue to provide capital in return for the 1) transfer
of secret technology to strengthen the Communist military
and 2) increased trade revenues and monetary ‘aid’
to strengthen the economic structures of the Communist countries.
5. The President will cut defense
spending which will not only weaken the American military
and defense capabilities, but also create the illusion of
a strong economy that will, at the ‘correct’ time,
have the stock market in the most vulnerable position in decades.
6. As the target date approaches,
the President will put in place the necessary combination
of Executive Orders, Presidential Decision Directives and
additional key figures to ready the Administration for the
declaration of a national emergency and, if need be, martial
law.
7. Sometime during 1999, the
President will put the finishing touches on the ‘mission
plan’ with a diversion that will continue through the
end of the year. It must tie up the media and the Congress
and, preferably, further exhaust the military and defense,
divide the country and act to support other phases of the
mission. A war will be the perfect solution. Select an area
of continuous unrest where the timing of such an engagement
will be optional and will enable the calling of reservists
who will then be required to participate if martial law is
declared.
8. By mid-1999 the stage will
be set and the clock will be ticking on to the end of the
century, a national emergency and the end of our form of Government.
Section 3. Selecting key figures
to implement the plan.
1. National Security Advisor
(a.k.a. The Assistant to the President for National Security
Affairs and the #1 person at the National Security Council
(NSC)): Samuel ‘Sandy’ Berger. Mr. Berger was
a paid lobbyist for the Chinese while he was a partner in
the international law firm of Hogan and Hartson where he headed
the firm's international trade group. Mr. Berger is still
listed as an attorney with Hogan and Hartson, therefore, as
a partner, he is still receiving benefits, directly or indirectly,
from dealings with China and Russia. This clearly is a conflict
of interest (allegiances) which, by law, should deny him a
security clearance and access to classified material. Mr.
Berger participated in illegal Chinese fundraising, promoted
and facilitated the transfer of sensitive technology to Communist
countries, facilitated the cover-up of Chinese espionage,
and dutifully supported Clinton’s China ‘policy’.
Mr. Berger is also chief advisor in charge of the botched
war in Kosovo and was second in charge of Clinton’s totally
failed transition team for National Security.
2. Senior Director
for Nonproliferation and Export Controls at the National Security
Council and Special Assistant to the President: Gary Samore.
Mr. Samore worked at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
from 1984-1987. From the New York Times 4/8/99: The Chinese
tested a neutron warhead in 1988 using "secret data stolen
from the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory." It
appears that Mr. Samore, as a senior National Security Council
official, operated with Berger in facilitating the cover-up
of the Chinese espionage at the National Labs. According to
the New York Times 4/21/99: "After receiving more detailed
evidence of Chinese spying in the summer of 1997, the National
Security Council sought a quick, narrowly focused analysis
from the CIA and used it to cast doubt on the troubling conclusions
reached by the Energy Department analysis, officials said."
"Samore overstated the degree to which the CIA 1997 analysis
cast doubt on the Energy Departments findings, according to
an Administration official." "At the time, Samore
and Berger were deeply involved in planning the agenda of
a U.S.-Chinese summit meeting." The meeting was used
to "elevate the relations between the two nations".
3. Secretary of Commerce:
William S. Daley. Mr. Daley was Clinton’s 1992 Illinois
Campaign Manager, who appears to have been involved in questionable
activities in the Chicago area involving fraud, the IRS and
the FBI (http://www.crl.org/daleygeo.html). The lawsuit against
Daley and his firm Daley and George, that dragged on for five
years, (1992-1997) was suddenly dropped by the ‘prosecutor’
exactly one month after Daley was sworn in as Secretary of
Commerce on 1/30/97. Also, he may have misrepresented himself
in his Senate confirmation hearings. Mr. Daley is/was a partner
in the international law firm of Mayer, Brown & Platt
where he was "concentrating in the area of corporate
and government relations matters" (paid lobbyist?). The
firm has offices in Moscow and Beijing, with emphasis on Communist
China. If he is still a partner, on leave of absence or not,
he is benefiting from the firm's dealings with China and Russia
and hence has a conflict of interest (allegiances) which,
by law, should deny him a security clearance and access to
classified material.
4. Inspector General
of the Department of Commerce: Johnnie E. Frazier. (Nominated
3/25/99) Mr. Frazier had been the Assistant Inspector General
at the Commerce Department where he supervised complex reviews,
including trade promotions and export licensing. Freely translated,
he supervised the export licensing when sensitive technology
was transferred to China and Russia.
5. Under Secretary of Commerce
for International Trade: Stuart E. Eizenstat. Mr. Eizenstat
was Vice Chairman at the Washington office of the international
law firm of Powell, Goldstein, Frazer and Murphy. According
to their newsletter they have a keen interest in the U.S.-China
trade policy and the shifting of licensing to the Commerce
Department. Also of interest, Patricia Daley is the Senior
Policy Advisor for their Government Relations Group (lobbying).
According to her bio: "Ms. Daley has over two decades
of political involvement ranging from Chicago mayoral campaigns…"
The mayor of Chicago is the brother of William Daley, Secretary
of Commerce. Also, Frank Kruesi, named Assistant Secretary
of Transportation for Transportation Policy 5/11/93, was Chief
Policy Officer in the Administration of Chicago Mayor Richard
Daley. A small world?
6.The Director of the Critical
Infrastructure Assurance Office (CIAO): Jeffrey A. Hunker.
(The CIAO is a planning arm of Clinton’s new bureaucracy
mandated by his Presidential Decision Directive #63 discussed
in Section 9.) Prior to joining the office, Dr. Hunker served
as Deputy Assistant to the Secretary of Commerce, where his
responsibilities included issues relating to China. The timeframe
places Dr. Hunker at the Commerce Department, dealing with
China, at the time the illegal transfer of sensitive technology
occurred.
7. Director of the
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA): James Lee Witt.
Mr. Witt, a native of Arkansas, was part of Governor Clinton’s
corrupt, Chinese-backed, Administration in Arkansas. In February
1996, President Clinton elevated Mr. Witt to cabinet status
- a first for a FEMA Director. (As of this writing, there
is limited information available on Mr. Witt.)
8. The number two man
at the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA): Raymond
Lloyd "Buddy" Young. (WND 2/2/99) To quote his official
bio from the .gov website: Mr. Young is a native of Arkansas
and "is a veteran of 26 years of service for the Arkansas
State Police. He joined FEMA after serving as director of
security for then-Governor Bill Clinton, a post held since
1983. During the 1992 presidential campaign, Mr. Young coordinated
state security matters for the governor’s office."
"As Director of Security for the Office of the Governor,
Mr. Young formed a close professional relationship with President
Clinton and FEMA Director James Lee Witt." Mr. Young
also served in the Arkansas Highway Patrol. This is the same
Buddy Young involved in ‘Troopergate’ and about
whom the President was questioned in the Jones Case, as published
in the New York Times 3/15/98.
9. Secretary of Energy:
Bill Richardson, from New Mexico - home of the Los
Alamos National Laboratory. White House Press Release of 9/18/98:
"As a senior member of the Commerce Committee, he took
a leadership role in the U.S. Department of Energy’s
Los Alamos and Sandia National Laboratories." Mr. Richardson
stated on the Chris Mathews’ program that China was not
a Communist country, that China is our friend, that China
could be trusted to control a port in Southern California
and that China could be trusted with its presence in Panama
where it could control both ends of the canal.
10. Assistant Secretary
for International Affairs at the Energy Department: David
L. Goldwyn (Nominated 4/7/99) Mr. Goldwin was an associate
with the international law firm of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton
and Garrison, with offices in Communist China, where he was
a member of the international practice committee. He is the
principal advisor to the Secretary, Deputy Secretary and Under
Secretary on all international policy issues at the Energy
Department.
11. Assistant Secretary for
Non-Proliferation and National Security at the Department
of Energy: Rose Eilene Gottemoeller. According to The
Center for Security Policy on 4/26/99 regarding the years
of warnings about penetration of some of the United States’
most sensitive facilities: "warnings that were suppressed
by, among other superiors, Rose Gottemoeller, to whom the
intelligence office reported until a reorganization last Fall".
For this, Ms. Gottemoeller was promoted to her new post on
September 18, 1998.
12. Secretary of the
Army: Louis Caldera. Mr. Caldera was with the international
law firm of O’Melveny & Myers that has offices in
Communist China.
13. Deputy Secretary of State:
Strobe Talbott. Mr. Talbott was at Oxford as a Rhodes
Scholar at the same time his friend Clinton was there dodging
the draft, demonstrating against America, visiting Russia,
etc.
14. Inspector General of the
Department of Justice (DOJ): Michael R. Bromwich who is/was
a partner in the Washington D.C. office of Mayer, Brown &
Platt. The firm has offices in Moscow and Beijing, with emphasis
on Communist China. If he is still a partner, on leave of
absence or not, he is benefiting, directly or indirectly,
from the firm's dealings with China and Russia.
15. Associate Attorney General
at the Department of Justice: Raymond C. Fisher. Mr. Fisher
is/was a partner in the international law firm of Heller Ehrman
White & McAuliffe with offices in China. If he is still
a partner, on leave of absence or not, he is benefiting, directly
or indirectly, from the firm's dealings with China.
16. Chairman of the Intelligence
Oversight Board (IOB): Anthony S. Harrington. Mr. Harrington
is a senior partner of the international law firm of Hogan
and Hartson (with Berger) and, as a senior partner, receives
benefits, either directly or indirectly, from dealings with
China and Russia. Mr. Harrington is still listed as an attorney
with Hogan and Hartson.
17. Chairman of the President’s
Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board (PFIAB): Warren B. Rudman.
Mr. Rudman is a partner in the international law firm of Paul,
Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison with offices in Communist
China and who, as a partner, receives benefits, either directly
or indirectly, from dealings with Communist China.
Section 4. Review the existing
US Code
1. Implementing a National
Emergency: US Code Title 50, Chapter 34, Subchapter II,
Sec. 1621. Declaration of national
emergency by President. (a) "With respect to Acts of
Congress authorizing the exercise, during the period of a
national emergency, of any special or extraordinary power,
the President is authorized to declare such national emergency.
Such proclamation shall immediately be transmitted to the
Congress and published in the Federal Register."
US Code Title 50, Chapter 34,
Subchapter III,
Sec. 1631. Declaration of national
emergency by Executive order. "When the President declares
a national emergency, no powers or authorities made available
by statute for use in the event of an emergency shall be exercised
unless and until the President specifies the provisions of
law under which he proposes that he, or other officers will
act."
2. Terminating a National
Emergency: US Code Title 50, Chapter 34, Subchapter II,
Sec. 1622 (a) Termination methods.
"Any national emergency declared by the President in
accordance with this subchapter (II) shall terminate if -
(1) there is enacted into law a joint resolution terminating
the emergency; or (2) the President issues a proclamation
terminating the emergency."
3. Martial law: Title
32, Chapter V, Part 501,
Sec. 501.4. "Martial Law
depends for its justification upon public necessity. Necessity
gives rise to its creation; necessity justifies its exercise;
and necessity limits its duration." "In most instances
the decision to impose martial law is made by the President,
who normally announces his decision by proclamation, which
usually contains his instructions concerning its exercise
and any limitations thereon." When the Federal Armed
Forces have been committed, "the population of the affected
area will be informed of the rules of conduct and other restrictive
measures the military is authorized to enforce. These will
normally be announced by proclamation or order…"
"Federal Armed Forces ordinarily will exercise police
powers…"
Sec 501.1 (e) "Units and
members of the Army Reserve on active duty may be employed
in civil disturbances operations in the same manner as active
forces."
Sec. 501.3 (a) "In the enforcement
of the laws, Federal Armed Forces are employed as a part of
the military power of the United States and act under the
orders of the President as Commander in Chief."
Note: Taking the subject of martial
law from the realm of absurdity to that of a very real possibility:
Senator Robert Bennett, Chairman of the Special Senate Committee
on the Year 2000 Technology Problem asked Deputy Defense Secretary,
John Hamre: "In the event of a Y2K-induced breakdown
of community services that might call for martial law,"
will the military be ready? Hamre’s reply: "We’ve
got fundamental issues to deal with that go beyond just the
Year 2000 contingency planning. And I think you’re right
to bring that up." WND 6/18/98
Section 5. Evaluate and determine
current situation and what must be changed.
1. Implementing a National
Emergency: No problem - it is guaranteed that there will
be at least minor disruptions and since the President determines
the ‘need’, a national emergency can be declared.
All the necessary Executive Orders and Presidential Decision
Directives must be in place, with tight control established
and maintained by ‘loyal’ participants. (See Section
3.)
2. Terminating a National
Emergency: Since the Congress can enact into law a joint
resolution to terminate a national emergency, the emergency
must be declared while Congress is on recess or on Christmas
break. Measures must be taken to prevent Congress from voting
on such a joint resolution by taking control of communication
and/or transportation systems.
3. Martial law: The disruptions
guaranteed at the turn of the century will justify the declaration
of martial law. Tight control must be established and maintained
by ‘loyal’ participants. The Army Reserve must be
put on active duty prior to the declaration to guarantee their
participation. (Just recently the calling up of reserves began.)
Section 6. Clarification of
facts relating to Sections 7, 8 and 9.
Note: The reader should keep
in mind the following facts when reviewing Executive Order
#12919 and Presidential Decision Directives #62 and #63:
1) Sandy Berger is the number
one person at the National Security Council, he is the National
Security Advisor and he is the Assistant to the President
for National Security Affairs. These names are interchangeable
- the reader should not be confused by the smokescreen created
in these documents.
2) Gary Samore, occupying a high
post at the National Security Council, coordinated with Berger
(a) the facilitation of the espionage cover-up, (b) the transfer
of sensitive technology to Communist countries and (c) the
promotion of U.S.-Chinese ‘relations’.
3) This is critical: Care
must be taken when reading the text of the following documents.
Remember, Berger ‘sat on’ the espionage for a year
before reporting it to the President. When you read that everyone
‘reports to the President through the National
Security Advisor’ - think what that means. Since the
President is to give the orders, if Berger decides not to
pass the information ‘through’ to the President
as he did with the espionage, then Berger will, in the President’s
name, be giving the orders - that is an assignment of authority
of the first order! Therefore, it is a fact that Sandy Berger
has total control over all situations and information. Similarly,
when various department heads act as his advisor, Mr. Berger
is at the top making the decisions. While the National Security
Council provides the guidelines, Mr. Berger gives the approval
to FEMA and other participating agencies - that is, the ‘interpretation’
of those guidelines is up to Berger. Although power appears
to be assigned to the National Security Council, Mr. Berger
has the last word. Mr. Berger, as the last filter, has absolute
power and control!
Section 7. Executive Order
#12919 - NATIONAL DEFENSE INDUSTRIAL RESOURCES PREPAREDNESS
- June 6, 1994 - (US Code Title 50 Appendix - War and National
Defense, Title VII, Sec. 2153) (This Executive Order revokes
9 previous EOs, revises 4 others and significantly changes
Title 50 of the US Code.)
In times of national emergency,
it delegates authority to the National Security Advisor to
use Federal departments and agencies to take total control
of our lives, our property and our government, with Congress
receiving only ‘after the fact’ reports.
Enormous Federal Bureaucracy
with Extreme and Absolute Power at the Top: The plan is
for total control established through the use of Federal departments
and agencies. For example: 1) The following is repeated numerous
times in delegating authority to various Federal departments
and agencies: The authority of the President "to require
acceptance and priority performance of contracts or orders
(other than contracts of employment) to promote the national
defense over performance of any other contracts or orders,
and to allocate materials, services, and facilities as deemed
necessary or appropriate to promote the national defense"
2) Federal departments and agencies "in the event
of a potential threat to the security of the United States
to take actions necessary to ensure the availability
of adequate industrial resources and production capability,
including services and critical technology for national defense
requirements." 3) "responsible for defense acquisition
(or for industrial resources needed to support defense acquisition)".
4) "control and coordination of civil transportation
capacity regardless of ownership" 5) "control the
general distribution of any material (including applicable
services) in the civilian market" 6) "control, and
distribution (including pipelines) of all of these forms of
energy." 7) "usable water, from all sources, within
the jurisdiction of the United States, which can be managed,
controlled, and allocated to meet emergency requirements."
It appears that every known non-elected
Federal ‘official’ has an assigned duty under this
order. Here is a list of those involved, in the order of appearance
in the document: The National Security Advisor, Director of
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Secretary of Agriculture,
Secretary of Energy, Secretary of Health and Human Services,
Secretary of Transportation, Secretary of Commerce, Secretary
of Defense, President and Chairman of the Export-Import Bank
of the United States, Secretary of the Treasury, Director
of the Office of Management and Budget, each Federal Reserve
Bank, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Secretary
of State, The United States Trade Representative, the Arms
Control and Disarmament Agency, the Director of Central Intelligence,
"and the heads of other departments and agencies as required",
Administration of General Services, Director of Selective
Service "and such other persons as the director of FEMA
shall designate", National Labor Relations Board, Federal
Mediation and Conciliation Service, Attorney General, Secretary
of each military department and "heads of other appropriate
Federal departments and agencies", Bureau of the Census.
Plus, a National Defense Executive Reserve (NDER) is established
with units in other departments or agencies and a huge coordination
effort is to get underway. Then each of the aforementioned
Federal departments or agencies can hire consultants.
This Executive Order is the most
convoluted piece of work imaginable - and could never be implemented
in the case of a national emergency, or any other time.
On the surface it appears to make sense but the coordination
of the various Federal departments and agencies would be impossible.
It would require a fully functional coordinated network to
be in place before the emergency occurs. It does not
take a genius to figure out that an attempt to implement this
order, in its current form, would create unimaginable chaos.
(If you get nothing more from this writing, it is that you
should not be financially exposed near the end of 1999.) So,
if the order, as it stands, can’t be implemented, what
is the purpose of its existence? Let’s take a look at
the assignment of authority under this order and see who is
at the top of the food chain.
Enter Sandy Berger - remember
Mr. Berger is the number one person at the National Security
Council, he is the National Security Advisor and he is the
Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs.
1) "The head of every Federal department and agency
assigned functions under this order shall ensure that
the performance of these functions is consistent with National
Security Council policy and guidelines" (HOWEVER)
2) The Director of FEMA will "provide guidance and procedures
approved by the Assistant to the President for
National Security Affairs to the Federal departments
and agencies under this order." 3) "The National
Security Council is the principal forum for consideration
and resolution of national security resource preparedness
policy." (HOWEVER) 4) "if not resolved, such issues
will be referred to the Assistant to the President for
National Security Affairs for final determination"
5) The Director of FEMA shall "serve as an advisor
to the National Security Council on issues of national
security resource preparedness and on the use of the authorities
and functions delegated by this order." 6) "The
Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs
is hereby delegated the authority under subsection 101(c)(3)
of the Act, and will be assisted by the Director, FEMA, in
ensuring the coordinated administration of the Act."
7) "The National defense Executive Reserve (NDER) shall
notify, in writing, the Assistant to the President for
National Security Affairs". Is there any question
who is in charge?
While the Director of FEMA appears
to be given far-reaching authority, the final determination
of policy always goes back to "the Assistant to the President
for National Security Affairs" - in effect, the Director
of FEMA ‘assists’ the National Security Advisor.
Although the laws appear to have
been ‘reworked’ to assign more power and control
to the Secretary of Commerce, he too must report to the National
Security Advisor: "The Secretary of Commerce shall administer
the Defense Priorities and Allocations System ("DPAS")
regulations"; "The Secretary of Commerce will redelegate
to the Secretary of Defense, and the heads of other departments
and agencies as appropriate" "The Secretary of Commerce
shall act as appropriate upon Special Priorities Assistance
requests in a time frame consistent with the urgency of the
need at hand." "the Secretary of Commerce, who shall
redelegate to the Secretary of Energy"; "The Secretary
of Commerce shall make the finding". It appears that
the Secretary of Commerce is near the top of the food chain.
Is there a way out of this?
Although it would take a lawyer with the parsing talents of
the President to determine a legal ‘finding’, we
ask you to review the following:
US Code TITLE 3, CHAPTER 4 -
DELEGATION OF FUNCTIONS
Sec. 301. "General authorization
to delegate functions; publication of delegations.
The President of the United States
is authorized to designate and empower the head of any department
or agency in the executive branch, or any official thereof
who is required to be appointed by and with the advice
and consent of the Senate, to perform without approval,
ratification, or other action by the President (1) any function
which is vested in the President by law, or (2) any function
which such officer is required or authorized by law to perform
only with or subject to the approval, ratification, or other
action of the President: Provided, That nothing contained
herein shall relieve the President of his responsibility in
office for the acts of any such head or other official designated
by him to perform such functions. Such designation and authorization
shall be in writing, shall be published in the Federal Register,
shall be subject to such terms, conditions, and limitations
as the President may deem advisable, and shall be revocable
at any time by the President in whole or in part."
This is the law, clearly cited
in EO #12919, that gave the President the power to assign
duties under this order. However, since Sandy Berger has been
delegated the ultimate function in this order and Sandy Berger
has never been confirmed by the Senate, there appears
to be a problem with the legality of this Executive Order!
This could also bring into question the delegation of authority
of Berger over the functions outlined in PDD #62 and #63.
(Source: The Senate Armed Services Committee who confirm appointees/nominees
said Berger has never been confirmed by the Senate and that
"no advisors to the president are confirmed." The
Senate Library search showed that Berger has never been confirmed.
Similarly, a gentleman who deals with such matters for one
of the leading Senators said that Berger had never been confirmed.
In addition, the Parliamentarian’s Office of the U.S.
Senate assured us, regarding ‘confirmation’ and
‘advice and consent of the Senate’ that "they
are used interchangeably".)
Where was our Congress when
this destructive, and probably illegal, Executive Order 'floated’
into our US Code? It’s up to them to act now to rectify
this situation - time is running out . . .
Section 8. Presidential Decision
Directive #62 - Combating Terrorism. May 22, 1998. This
PDD is classified, with only a brief summary available. "This
Directive creates a new and more systematic approach to fighting
the terrorist threat of the next century." Of importance:
"PDD-62 establishes the office of the National Coordinator
for Security, Infrastructure Protection and Counter-Terrorism."
The National Coordinator oversees the key agencies and offices
established in Presidential Decision Directive 63 (Section
9). "The National Coordinator will work within the National
Security Council, report to the President through the
Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs".
This is critical - Mr. Berger is again at the top of the food
chain - in charge of everything involving PDD #62 and PDD
#63!
Section 9. Presidential Decision
Directive #63 - Protecting America’s Critical Infrastructures
- May 22, 1998. This directive is also a classified
document with only a brief summary and a white paper available
to the public. (The information contained here is from those
two public documents and the two official websites: http://www.nipc.gov/
and http://www.ciao.gov/). "The National Coordinator
for Security, Infrastructure Protection and Counter-Terrorism
shall be responsible for coordinating the implementation of
this directive. The National Coordinator will report to the
President through the Assistant to the President
for National Security Affairs."
Valid Concerns: PDD #63
addresses the issues of "physical and cyber-based systems
essential to the minimum operations of the economy and government.
They include, but are not limited to, telecommunications,
energy, banking and finance, transportation, water systems
and emergency services, both governmental and private."
The emphasis in this Directive is on cyber-based systems,
specifically computer systems.
New Government Bureaucracy
with enormous power: PDD 63 sets up a new bureaucratic
structure, with each component reporting to the National Coordinator
established in PDD-62 who reports to the National Security
Advisor. The most powerful part of this structure
is the "National Infrastructure Protection Center (NIPC)
at the FBI which will fuse representatives from the FBI, DOD,
US Secret Service, Energy, Transportation, the Intelligence
Community and the private sector in an unprecedented attempt
at information sharing among agencies in collaboration with
the private sector".
Intrusive and Regulatory:
This PDD authorizes control to be taken of communications,
including the internet, with interception of information and
monitoring, as implied by the following quotes: 1) The Information
Sharing and Analysis Center (ISAC) "could serve as the
mechanism for gathering, analyzing, appropriately sanitizing
and disseminating private sector information to both industry
and the NIPC." 2) "the U.S. government should, to
the extent feasible, seek to avoid outcomes that increase
government regulation or expand unfunded government mandates
to the private sector", 3) "a shared responsibility
and partnership between owners, operators and the government",
4) "it is preferred that participation by owners
and operators in a national infrastructure protection system
be voluntary." 5) "private sector owners
and operators should be encouraged", 6) "certain
functions related to critical infrastructure protection that
must be chiefly performed by the Federal Government (national
defense, foreign affairs, intelligence, law enforcement)."
7) "PDD-63 calls for the establishment of a public-private
partnership to accomplish its goals. This is the crucial component
of this effort. As envisioned by the PDD, this partnership
will demand a new level of trust, cooperation, and mutual
understanding between the government and private sector."
And again, enter Mr. Berger:
(Please review Section 6 for interpretation of this paragraph.)
1) "The National Coordinator
for Security, Infrastructure Protection and Counter-terrorism
shall be responsible for coordinating the implementation of
this directive. The National Coordinator will report to the
President through the Assistant to the President
for National Security Affairs." 2) The National
Coordinator "shall provide an annual report on the implementation
of this directive to the President and the heads of departments
and agencies, through the Assistant to the President
for National Security Affairs." 3) In order to
engage the private sector fully, "The National Coordinator
will be appointed by and report to the President through
the Assistant to the President for National Security
Affairs, who shall assure appropriate coordination
with the Assistant to the President for Economic Affairs."
4) "The National Security Advisor shall
appoint a Senior Director for Infrastructure Protection on
the NSC staff." 5) The President on 1/22/99 stated that
he and Berger have been working on this plan "for
the better part of 6 years".
National Emergency and/or
Martial Law? When the inevitable Y2K computer disruptions
occur, it will be impossible to distinguish them from terrorist
attacks on our ‘cyber-based’ systems, which will
automatically activate all the enforcement arms involved in
this PDD. The details are: 1) "The full authorities,
capabilities and resources of the government, including law
enforcement, regulation, foreign intelligence and defense
preparedness shall be available, as appropriate, to ensure
that critical infrastructure protection is achieved and maintained."
2) President 1/22/99: "It is helping us to ready armed
forces and National Guard units in every region to meet this
challenge."3) The National Plan Coordination (NPC) has
now moved from the Defense Department to the ‘infamous’
Commerce Department 4) the President has authorized the FBI
to expand its current organization to a full scale National
Infrastructure Protection Center (NIPC) which includes "the
FBI, U.S. Secret Service, and other investigators experienced
in computer crimes and infrastructure protection, as well
as a representative detailed from the Department of Defense,
the Intelligence Community and Lead Agencies (law enforcement
and internal security)." "to provide warnings of
cyber-threats and attacks, and the capability to respond to
such incidents." 5) "No later than the year 2000,
the United States shall have achieved an initial operating
capability.", "an interim security capability by
the year 2000."
Conclusion: PDDs 62 and
63 draw into the scenario those enforcement agencies not mentioned
in EO #12919. The lead agencies now under the direction of
Sandy Berger, National Security Advisor, for
purpose of this PDD are Commerce, Secret Service, Treasury,
EPA, Transportation, Justice/FBI (emergency law enforcement
services), FEMA, HHS, Energy, Lead Agencies for Justice/FBI
(Law enforcement and internal security), CIA (foreign intelligence)
and National Defense.
Section 10. The Real
Story. PDD-63 is the enforcement arm of Executive Order
#12919. The orchestration of Executive Order 12919 and Presidential
Decision Directives #62 and #63 is left to National
Security Advisor, Sandy Berger. Through the three
instruments outlined above, the President has assigned total
control of every body of our government to his obedient National
Security Advisor. These three instruments mandate complete
control of our life and our freedom using every enforcement
means available (FBI, Secret Service, Armed Forces and Reserves,
CIA, etc.) - all under the dictatorship of the President and
his National Security Advisor. While Mr. Berger’s ‘titles’
are mentioned numerous times throughout these documents, our
elected officials were conspicuous by their absence. We ask
you again to review Mr. Berger’s ‘qualifications’
as outlined in Section 3.
Section 11. As Vernon Jordan
would say, "Mission Accomplished".
Is it a coincidence
that the two 'appointees', who have authority over the dissemination
of information to the President regarding National Security,
Berger and Harrington, are both partners in the same international
law firm that has dealings with China and Russia? And that
these two 'appointees' are currently listed as attorneys in
the Washington branch of Hogan and Hartson (website updated
August 1998), where they are, as partners, directly or indirectly,
receiving benefits from dealings with China and Russia. This
clearly is a conflict of interest (allegiances) which, by
law, should deny them a security clearance and access to classified
material.
Is it a coincidence
that the Inspector General of the DOJ Michael R. Bromwich
and the Secretary of Commerce William S. Daley were both partners
in the international law firm of Mayer, Brown & Platt,
working out of the firm's Washington office? The firm has
offices in Moscow and Beijing, with emphasis on China. If
they are still partners in the firm, on leave of absence or
not, they are benefiting, directly or indirectly, from the
firm's dealings with China and Russia and hence have a conflict
of interest (allegiances) which, by law, should deny them
a security clearance and access to classified material.
Is it a coincidence
that the Assistant Secretary for International Affairs at
the Energy Department, David L. Goldwyn and the Chairman of
the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board (PFIAB),
Warren B. Rudman, were/are both with the international law
firm of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison with
offices in Communist China?
Is it a coincidence,
that the top two positions at the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) who play a key role in national emergencies
and martial law are held by Clinton’s cronies who participated
in the then-Governor Clinton’s highly questionable Administration
in Arkansas?
Is it a coincidence
that, even using the highly edited White House biographies,
it is clear that nearly all of the key people in this grand
scenario, who would be integrally engaged in a national emergency
or martial law, fall into one or more of the following categories:
1) Have previous, or current,
ties to Communist China and/or Russia,
2) Were, or are, involved in
the transfer of sensitive technology and/or its cover-up,
3) Work, or have worked, for
international law firms with offices in Communist China and/or
Russia,
4) Were tied to the National
Laboratories where the espionage took place?
And, is it a coincidence
that, after meticulously flowcharting through the smokescreen
of diversions and deception in Executive Order #12919 and
Presidential Decision Directives #62 and #63, that Sandy Berger,
a man of, at best, questionable allegiances, emerged in charge
of it all?
This summary of events does not
begin to scratch the surface, as we only have access to limited
White House-edited bios on the individuals mentioned here.
A full investigation of the entire Administration should prove
enlightening . . .
The evidence appears to suggest
that Clinton has loaded the key positions in his Administration
with individuals who are either his old time cronies of like
mind and/or individuals who have a keen interest in promoting
Clinton’s grand plan, or simply incompetents who would
represent no barrier to any of his plans.
The information in this summary
was obtained from official websites:.gov, AOL yellow pages,
and webpages of the law firms mentioned herein, with limited
use of the regular AOL search of highly reliable sources.
(All quotes with no source given are from official .gov websites.)
While the information included herein is certainly believed
to be factual, the readers are left to ponder the evidence
and implications and to draw their own conclusions. While
we do not state that any of the above mentioned persons are
consciously involved in any illegal activity, the facts are
certainly curious.
This summary, of a possible preplanned
scenario and the ‘enabling environment’ that has
been created, is an attempt to bring to light the ease with
which a corrupt President could destroy our fragile Republic.
Hopefully, Congress will exercise every option to stop the
damage.
Add this information to ‘Presidential
Treason 101’, the Cox Report, the Thompson Report, the
Judicial Watch investigations, the cover-up of espionage,
and other treasonous 'accomplishments' of this Administration
and the question must be asked:
Is this all a coincidence,
Or a carefully crafted plan
to change our form of Government?
Footnote: While many people have
reported their concerns regarding Y2K, EO#12919, PDD #63,
a national emergency, martial law and the suspension of the
Constitution, we have not read an accounting of ‘to whom’
the power will be assigned. Who will be in control of this
country? Not an elected official, not even a person confirmed
by the Senate, but the choice made solely by a corrupt and
traitorous President - a man the President worked with in
politics in 1972, shortly after returning from Moscow. We
ask you to review, one more time, Mr. Berger’s ‘accomplishments’
in Section 3 and ask yourself if you want this man to be in
charge of your life and freedom, and our Country. There is
so much research to be done, and so little time to warn the
American people…
Time is running out! It’s
up to all concerned citizens to go after their elected representatives
and to demand a review of Clinton’s Executive Orders
and Presidential Decision Directives and to put a stop to
this insanity!
This summary was prepared by:
Gretchen Glass, May 6, 1999
Please feel free to post and/or distribute
this document at your ‘pleasure’, with appropriate
credit given.
Gretchen Glass is a mathematician,
systems analyst, computer programmer, and a mother and grandmother,
who loves our Country. She believes that our fragile Republic
is in serious trouble and that the treasonous activities of
the Clinton Administration must be exposed and stopped. Gretchen
recently visited the ‘Conservative Ring’ where she
was "overwhelmed by the great talent and good people
involved in this mission". She firmly believes that if
all these people can work together, the message will be heard.
Her contribution is to present undisputed facts and to connect
the dots to provide the ‘American People’ with something
they cannot easily dismiss. Her effort continues…
Gretchen Glass is a free
lance political writer and can be reached at Bink995210@aol.com
Published in the May 7, 1999 issue
of Ether Zone Online! Ether Zone Online (http://etherzone.com).
Reposting permitted with this message intact.
|