A  Dwelling  Without  A  Dog
             Is  Not  A  Home !

   It is Positively the most disgusting miscarriage of justice , when people must part with their beloved Companions in order to qualify as a suitable tenant of an apartment or because of the decisions made by incompetent judges who serve to fulfill  the immoral desires of inhuman landlords .

    The medical profession has recognized that Companion Animals are very beneficial to humans , but because of the inflated cost of living and the housing shortage in our
society , apartment dwelling masters of Companion Dogs have, in the past , been denied the privileges granted to those living in houses , which establishes them as Second-Rate Citizens .
And in some cases , they are still denied those privileges and are harrased because they have Companion Dogs .
Very often tenants are Forced to sign , Under Duress , rental contracts with a NO PETS Clause .

    The No Pets Clause is a cause of dissention in our society because there is no  justifiable purpose for this clause in any rental contract , as pets are already adequately covered in the Landlord and Tenant Act , the amount of pets allowed per household Law , the Antinoise Law , the Vicious Dog Law the Leash Law , and the Stoop & scoop Law .
Therefore , the No Pets Clause is Redundant , Detrimental and Unconstitutional , and must be Eliminated from "All" rental contracts so that this injustice can never happen to "Anyone" ever again .

    Everyone in Canada must have an equal right to have a reasonable number of Companion Animals , of their choice ,
( Excluding wild or exotic types ) in whatever type of dwelling they may choose to live .
( In Toronto , canada .  The law says that there may be as many as six Companion Animals per household , with a limit of three dogs . )
Provided they are capable and willing to care for these Companions properly .
This decision must not be based on expediency , but rather on what is Just .

                                                 (Comments Please)