And who is da wanker?

When one looks at the problem and the whole situation, he just can not catch the hidden wires. In the news by various papers and web pages(Most by extremist Hutu), the DRCongo is victim of invasion. Simply victim of invasion. Invasion by Rwanda. For 8 years now, Rwanda is responsible of the whole misery of Congolese. Rwanda? No, we mean Tutsi! And that is where everything goes wrong: Only the few Tutsi detain in hands the fate of hundred thousands of Congolese! Strange really! And for that reason the DR congo has no other choice than to caution the extermination of Tutsi as started in 1994! But a curious point is that the DR Congo interferred in the Rwandan problem since 1989 against Tutsi who never attempted nothing against Congo! so who created all this mess? with the help of the same DR Congo...

And Tanzania in the whole stuff? Why Tanzania is cautioning the killings of Tutsi in Burundi and the Great Lakes? Who helped Tanzania against the invasion of Idi Amin Dada? Not Tutsi? And then Criminals that fled Burundi in 1972, after killing their neighbors found the old crap Nyerere, as lawyer, for perpertrating their massacer untill the present day! Unless Tanzania explodes because of the fascism ideology that is building inside, it won't catch the face of the really thing! Do Tanzania and Dr Congo understand the fact that their ally is not interesting in peace whatsoever but in the extermination of Tutsi? Never Tutsi, in Burundi, discriminated against Hutu the way Hutu's reign in Rwanda treated Tutsi: Tutsi are interested in progress, compromise and survival but compromise with who, how and for what?

We saw Mobutu exiled like a dog; we saw Kabila killed like a rat; we saw Habyarimana killed like a fly; we saw Ndadaye killed like a cocroach; we saw Kayibanda dying like a shit... all of them applied the "pogrom anti-Tutsi ideology" and allowed massacers of innocent kids and ladies and History stopped them! Mobutu did not quite understand the question since his parliament led by an extremist Hutu (Anzuluni bembe and Mambueni Vangu) pushed him in a question that he did not like at all despite the pressure of his cheat Agathe Habyarimana...

Today DR Congo is still unable to solve its internal problems prefering the scapegoat of Rwandan invasion to legalise Racism and stupidity like " extremism hutu". What the extermination of Tutsi has to do with Congo? They invaded Congo? They exploited Congo? They killed millions of Congolese?... all this is rubbish lies and Hutu's fantasm always ready to continue with their 1994 plan but careless of what happens to Dr Congo, Burundi , Rwanda, Tanzania...

Why Congo can not try people who killed and the fact are known? To be "bantou" has nothing in common with killing your neighbors and steal their property! It is time that DR COngo reacts and join the concert of nation. Anyway these criminals cannot perform on the battle ground, they know only how to kill helpless old women! When they had the french army and Mobutu's army, they lost... When they had zimbabwean army, Angolan army, Botswana's army, Kabila's army and Tanzanian army , they always lost... So, what Congo has to do with them because the blood on their hands is such a malediction that never generation will escape: Million of death in 90 days is even worse than the Jews holocaust....

One will write the history of Great Lakes pretending to undertand the matter. He will tell you that Tutsi are from Ethiopia While Hutu are the landowner. He will tell you that Tutsi are minority and deserve no political right. He will also go through few text written by either white missionary the last century and who imagined some logical origin of people; either by black people reffering to white's text or defending unexpressed feelings. But once the name of "places" are taken in account, one thing is clear: most sites's names are related to kinyarwanda or Kirundi. A fact today is that Tutsi were not the kind of people to adopt someone else's culture: instead they usually imposed their own traditions.

One may be suprised and ask "how a minority could impose to majority?" There too is an enigma that false historians did not notice: Tutsi never been minorities in great Lakes! In the past, over centuries, the cattle owner TuTsi could occupy miles and miles of land. So from one family to another, there could be miles. And each family needed labourers on its property to carry the land work and take care of the herds. These worker could come from many part of Africa. Some followed just their lords on the movement of the herds and settled with him. Later on, some were slaves sold by their families, sold by Arabs or just on the run to escape the "slave traders".

So while Tutsi were from a defined origin, the labourers were without a particular roots. The solidarity between people of same conditions created people we know today as Hutus, a term to differenciate the master, the cattle owner, the Tutsi from the serf. But once the serf become rich from donations coming from the master, he could be accepted in the cercle of affranchised like a Tutsi though the feeling did not change... But these people were not only confined in Rwanda-Burundi: in Tanzania, in Uganda, in Kenya...

On the Eastern Congo today the same germ Tutsi-Hutu is spreading. Now HEMA in NorthEast are persecuted, they are assimilated to Tutsi... And the whole story is not told: Most people who pretend to be Nande, Shi, Bangu bangu... are just Tutsi who hide their origins or who don't know them! How will then, the whole story finish if no one can stop the "extermination" ideology?

Do not ask many questions, there is simply no answer! Look at people who call themselves "Babembe", who are they? some are "bembe", some have "banyamulenge roots" and most of those who remain are just the Burundian Hutu who fled in 1972 after a failed attempt of exterminating their fellow countrymates. The same killings ,as later in 1994, of kids, ladies, old men. ? They tried to rebel and started killing Tutsi before fleing when the army stike. Always people see the army as the sole organ that carry those kind of operations.The army, in its repression, focus on young men and activists and never kids and ladies: what is wrong with it. With Great Lakes, Hutu civilians are more dangerous and ferocious than the Evil when it comes to killing Tutsi only because they have been taught that way.

They have been told that unless Tutsi are exterminated, a Hutu can not proper! So first, they have to get rid of Tutsi, and later on, what? Liberation? ... Coming back to those who fled the repression of the army after killings their neigbors, they settled in Eastern Congo. Today more of them hide behind "bembe","nande""Shi""Katangais""Haut Congolais" and behind the concept "Congolese Patriotism", they spread only the ideology of "mille colline radio"!

Who will never go and check who is who? Congolese have no time to think about the Eastern complexity, they are happy with the "Anti-Tutsi" ideology and all lies about a "Hima Tutsi" empire. So let the extermination ideology make its way... " the Hema-Lendu conflict" is just one step far of a war that is going to explode all Africa in few Years! The "Tutsi history" have strong teeth and the "extermination ideology" and "spoliation philosophy" will realise it when all Tutsi, from all over Africa, will come together and react to this mess.

Those who havekilled their neighbors, those who have spolied any Tutsi propriety since 1959, those who have taught the "mille colline ideology", the sentence is on its way! Nowhere will be far enough to escape the Wind! No generation will escape! And no portion of land stolen since the 1950s will stay unrecovered! That is only how God justice want thing to be and the whole humanity knows what is right and what is wrong!

When english first occupied America,they imposed their culture; When Africa were occupied by European, African learned the culture of the master; Why only the history of Great Lakes has another logic? If Tutsi won battles against other people, why did they have to learn other culture? That is where the whole history is falsified. Tutsi never learn other culture: the culture and customs of Great Lakes belong to them but it has been adapted and modified with time, alliances and distance between different geography.

Negativism of "tutsi humanity", lies and mess won't help Africa!

In October 2002, Kagame had pulled his "boys" out from the DRCongo they have occupied from six years. So many lies have followed this step of Great Lakes history. Every thesis could be valid except the Truth! The occupation was a campaign to steal Congo's wealth; the occupation was the implementation of a Tutsi Empire; the occupation was a step in extermination of Hutu...

But never the occupation could be for the security of Tutsi. Easy truth but do Tutsi deserve justice? No! they deserve to die killed on the hand of any miserable; they deserve to die without right of defense; the deserve to die without wright to speech. And then will come up debate about the "Tutsi genocide". Has it happened? Whose fault was it? whose plan was it? Not a Tutsi plot? When Kosovo were persecuted by Serbs, they deserved to survive! When few thousand of American are killed misteriously, dozen thousands of Afghans could pay! When saddam strengthen his position, he must be punished... But when ,on the light of the day, kids, ladies are killed, raped, depossessed in Rwanda, Burundi, DrCongo because they are Tutsi, it is Tutsi's fault!

In the 1950s, rwandan Tutsi lost everything, they flee. Thye had no right to return or to justice!

in the 1990s, the same thing happened!

Has Burundi escaped? Western will pretend that Tutsi are ruling and therefore are the oppressor!

Tutsi do not oppress, they organize,they defend human values like life and property. What happened in 1972? 19888? 1993? the same hutu not interested in human life, not interested in property values, went on trying to apply what rwandans fellow had achieved ihe the early sixties: killing all their neigbors even new born!

compared to hutu rule in Rwanda since 1960s, the Tutsi'rule has a human face and despite all misinformations, hutu have not been oppressed. But being an imprevisible and irrational community, there had to be some form of ruling. What majority means in a country with only two communities?

To be "Hutu" or not?

How can a human be a "hutu"( killer of his neigbors)?

And since then, the same philosophy is spreading in Tanzania, DRcongo. Withdrawing troops from Congo could not secure the peace in Great lakes. one will come up pretending that Tutsi troops are still in Drc. Another will doubt Tutsi can withdraw from DRC...

Who's who?

Then the question of extermination of Tutsi will rise again pretending to fight the Rwandan invader. Manipulating Congolese opinion that rwandan troops are still on their position in the Congo has only one objective: get rid of any ethnic Tutsi living in Congo. And that is how "Tusi Banyamulenge" are on the knife edge while those ONU civil servant are discussing rubbish!

Why shoud Rwanda welcome 1994 killers like "Messiah"! Should Rwanda kneel to get the DRC rapatriate 1994 killers? Who gave these people the right to challenge DRC's decision?

How come 1994 rwandans suspects can kill Congolese soldiers on the Congo soil? If Congo decide to send them back to Rwanda, so what? They are just killers wanted for the 1994 massacers! They are not refugees!

And so goes the history: No justice for Tutsi! Banyamulenge are next on the DRC's list while in Burundi's countryside, so-called rebels continue to clear the country of any Tutsi beeing... What the purpose of ruling a country where innocent people are killed defenseless? Have Tutsi wonder on the reason of ruling if killing and expropriation has no issues? Is it to protect the killers? Can't sill "stupid rwandan ladies" read through the lines? Then let Bagaza have his say...

Tony Blair, Bush, Chirac don't give a damn who dies why!

We saw the transition in Burundi but what means the alternance on the top of the state? one time for Tutsis, another time for Hutus. But all this is bullshit. And the fighting goes on. And the massacer is systematic. Rape, spoliation and killing continue. Are they rebels? no they are bands of criminals without no aim. The sole thing they are interested in is disorder and Jungle. So what negociation for who?

Yes one will say, Rwanda and Burundi need democracy! rubbish. the Hutu band are not interested in that shit. They call themselves "majority" and they have a missionto accomplish. The misunderstanding between different hutu faction does not mean anything. All Hutu know what they want. Peace and prosperity are not on the agenda. Everyone knows that it willtake long before Rwanda, Burundi or even any other African country could expect some kind of prosperity. In meantime everyone does what he can.

That is how stupid guys like Buyoya or even museveni and Kagame lost the game trying to save no one knows what! Lets talk about it: can rwanda and Burundi become something else than the grave of Tutsi? Until this question is solved, these countries will only reprent a nightmare for Tutsi! Once they owned everything and ruled but today they have lost everything. Even "Hope" is impossible. And why? because no Tutsi leader could understand the real issues. Negociation with who and for what?

Tell them to stop wasting our time with stupidity of all kind. Burundi and Rwanda must become federal state or even confederal states. Tutsi and Hutu should not share the governance of the whole thing. But Rwanda should be divided in three where Kigali remains a neutral region. Burundi as well should be divided in three where Bujumbura remains the capital. In this federal repartition, Tutsi will have a region that they control totally and where they implement the criminal and civil law. They will be sovereign in most matter and will be able to implement order and their police. Hutu as well will have their own part to govern and implement their own rule. But at the difference of other federal state, security within each area will depend ojn the community that controls it. Lands and property also will depehnd on policy that will be implemented. The reason for such a political organisation will have the merit to s4ecure a everlasting peace where each community, essentially the Tutsi community, will feel at home and free to prosper.

There is no need for Tutsi to negociate with Hutu rebels. They can guarantee nothing. Their sole alibi is that Hutu are majority and therefore deserve to govern and rule. but behind these lies, there is the ideology of extermination of Tutsi. For any reason, Tutsi will be the scapegoat. Why then should Tutsi play the game wile killing can never stop? It is time that Tutsi stand up and feel at home and free to flourish: Cows, milk, investment and education... The central government should be essentially composed of equal number of both communities but "Hutsi" should deserve a place of choice in the central government and the joint military army.

in fact the federal army will be composed of a joint force of equal communities. Both communities in their respective regions will compete for the economical success but none will interfere with the policies of the other. the federal constitution will guarantee areas where competence is limited ar shared but Bujumbura will remain a cosmopolitan city. Each community will contribute for the maintenance of the federal institution. Then let Hutu continue with their disorder and see what they can achieve once things are clarified.

It is time for Tuti to learn that mediation from people like Mandela is a waste of time because he can not understand what is what and where these troubles are heading! Waiting for internstional forces? Yes we know what France did once in Rwanda. We have seen also what France did in Bunia when killing Hema militiamen who only tried to defend their own people! In Bunia, we saw the Lendu trying to apply the extermination of Hema on the model of Rwanda genocide. Western Journalist blame Rwanda and Uganda for the proliferation of weapons but do Lendus need weapons to exterminate Hema? They proceed on the Rwandan model of 1994. So let France help the Lendu who are attacking, they have given them the City already and no one ignores the agenda of France. Museveni, Kagame and all Tutsi along should be defeated: that is France politics. And who leads debates the UN council security on the Great Lakes questions? France lost the war to Iraq but as Africa is a forgoten area, then manipulation is on its way? And so, what Tutsi have to do with international forces? Yes, Tutsi need a land of hope, a land of peace, a land of security, a land of prosperity.

Israel has been in turmoil but Jews know where they stand!

Palestinians have known hard times but they know who they are!

And Tutsi? Then let bring this question on the front scene...

Contact us: Kafir1@hotmail.com