The Results.txt file of CpuIdle gives this results:
(in degree centigrad)
| CPU and it speed: | K6 166 at 166 | K6 166 at 200 | K6 166 at 208 | K6 200 at 200 | K6 200 at 210 |
| Normal Temp | 33 | 45 | 53 | 37 | 45 |
| CpuIdle Temp | 26 (-21.21%) | 34 (-24.44%) | 35 (-33.96%) | 25 (-32.43%) | 32 (-28.89%) |
| K6 200 at 225 | K6 200 at 262 | K6 233 (3 results) | K6 233 at 250 (3r) | 6x86 P166+ | 6x86 P200+ |
| 52 | 64 | 70 / 51 / 35-40 | 49 / 56 / 70 | 52 | 33 |
| 39 (-25%) | 43 (-32.8%) | 52 / 32 / 29 (-27.88%) | 38 / 32 / 49 (-31.77%) | 41 (-21.15%) | 19 (-42.42%) |
| P5 166 at 166 | P200 MMX at 200 | PII 233 at 233 | PII 300 at 300 |
| 62 | 64 | ?? | 98* |
| 53 (-14.52%) | 54 (-15.625%) | 15 *(lower than without) | 80* (-18.37%) |
This results show that a iP200MMX runs hotter than a K6-200, but it
is not true.
The text in results.txt explains tha the tests had been made with different
environments.
Don't worry about the 15-80 degrees of the PII too.
My Opinion :
I understand that if you have an AMD K6 you should use CpuIdle (or DosIdle)
because you can have a decrease superior to 20% and even 30% in the half
of the cases. If you want to overclock your AMD CPU it is a good choice
to download CpuIdle.
You can download CpuIdle:
THIS SOFTWARE AND THE ACCOMPANYING FILES ARE DISTRIBUTED "AS IS"
AND WITHOUT
PLEASE: READ also the other LEGAL TERMS before using CpuIdle (in the files contained by cpuidle252.zip). |
All Intel tests show approximatively the same results (about 15%) and
is due to the low temperature of Intel products even without CpuIdle. And
Intel products don't allow all of the CpuIdle features.
As you can see in my P200MMX test it is
also an improvement of the FPU under Dos (7.00). (but not with K6 200)