Shock
Absorbers Aren't
If the
readers here do not mind, I would like to post an article that talks
of shock absorbers in an effort to remove any mystery about what they
do and how they work. Safety issues are often merely technology issues
- once you understand the technology.
To
begin with, they do not absorb shocks - your springs do that.
When
your bike hits a bump in the road your wheels can do nothing but
follow the curve of that bump. Your tires compress fractionally, but
not enough to make a meaningful difference in the effects that bump
will have on the rest of the bike, and you. If the wheels of your bike
were connected directly to the frame, without springs and shocks, the
bike would rise at least as high as the bump, almost instantly. The
effect, of course, is that, if severe enough, when the bike came back
down you would be left in the air. Your hands would probably not be
jerked off the grips, so they would be pulled forward with the rest of
the bike while the rest of you was still in the air - and then, worse,
you would come down.
Obviously,
the fix to that problem is to keep as much of the bike other than the
wheels from rising in reaction to that bump (ie, make as much of the
bike as possible 'sprung weight'.) There is a tremendous amount of
kinetic energy imparted to the wheels when they hit that bump. That
energy must be captured before it is transferred to the bike's frame.
And that is exactly what the springs do. By compressing, the springs
absorb the energy from the wheels.
Remember
pogo sticks? If all you had between the wheels and the frame of your
bike were springs, then the only difference the springs would make
would be a short delay before the bike was tossed into the air after
hitting the bump. That is, once compressed the only thing the springs
can do is decompress (that's the law). The energy the springs will
exhert during decompression is almost equal to the energy that went
into compressing them in the first place. (A token amount of the
kinetic energy will be converted to heat to make up the difference.)
Now we
can understand what the shocks do. They DRAMATICALLY slow down the
decompression of your springs (and in the process they convert much
more than a token of the total kinetic energy stored in those springs
into heat.)
A shock
absorber consists of a tube filled with oil, which acts as a hydraulic
fluid, and a piston (which is not physically connected to any part of
the tube) that slides up and down within that tube, pushing its way
through the oil. The piston is connected to one end of the shock
absorber via a steel rod, the tube is connected to the other. One end
of the shock absorber is connected to the frame of the bike while the
other end is connected to the wheel hub (or to a swing arm that is
connected to the hub.) Thus, when the wheel moves up towards the rest
of the bike the piston is pushed thru the oil. The oil provides
resistance to the movement of the piston which slows it down. In the
process kinectic energy is converted to heat. (This is why you must
change your shock absorber oil regularly - the heat breaks it down.)
The oil in these tubes would totally stop the movement of the piston
were it not for the existence of a valve in the piston that allowed
the fluid to pass thru it. This is because, like water, the oil cannot
itself be compressed. That valve can be made to allow fluids to flow
faster in one direction than the other. For example, you would
probably want your springs to compress faster than they are allowed to
decompress. Without that valve your springs would not compress at all,
leaving you as bad off as if the wheels were directly connected to the
frame. Similarly, if the springs are too strong for the load they are
carrying, too much of the kinetic energy will be conveyed directly to
the frame of the bike, because they will compress too slowly, if at
all.
But
just as slowing the compression rate of the springs too much results
in ineffective control of bumps, allowing their decompression to
happen too quickly is just as bad. Were that to happen you would have
'pogo stick' reactions to bumps. So, it is essential that the design
of the springs and shocks on your bike take into account how heavy the
bike is and what kind of riding you do. But all such designs are
compromises, and you can do things to totally frustrate the designers
intentions - and end up hurt or worse as a result.
For
example, when you put a passenger or heavy luggage on your bike you
should increase the tension of the springs surrounding your shocks.
Failing to do that can overload the system and get you close to the
'pogo stick' level of responses from them. Taking a street machine
into the country, off road, and pretending it's a motocross machine
can do the same.
But
even assuming you don't do anything that extreme you will find that
the design of your shocks is not perfect. (If it was, you would never
feel a bump in the road.) The fact is, sometimes the road surface
changes from perfectly level to bumpy. And some of those bumps (and
potholes) can be awesome. This is where a few dollars can make a
difference. You can replace the springs that come stock on your bike
with a set that are called 'progressives'. These provide a normal soft
ride until they are confronted with an unusually severe bump, at which
point they get harder and harder to compress. And while the oil in the
shocks cannot be compressed, air can be. So some shocks (aren't
GoldWings wonderful?) are 'air assisted' - in addition to the oil they
have a small amount of air in the tubes. These 'air assisted' shock
systems are sometimes attached to an onboard compressor that can be
used to increase or decrease the pressure of the air, thus making the
shocks either harder or softer without having to change the
compression of the springs when your load weight or the road surface
changes substantially. (Also, of course, you can increase the weight
of the oil in the shocks to slow them down.)
The
shock absorber 'system' on your rear wheel tends to have larger
springs and have them mounted on the outside of the hydraulic tubes
while the one on your front wheel have the springs within the tubes.
The ones in the front are contained within the 'forks'. If you take a
close look at your shocks you will find that the ones in the rear are
typically angled forward from the wheel to the frame of the bike while
the ones in the front are angled backwards. These angles tend to be
directly in-line with weight shifts resulting from acceleration and
braking.
The
angle of the front shocks (forks), usually called the bike's 'rake',
is essential to maintain! It establishes, along with the front-end
'offset', the bike's 'trail' which determines the bikes handling and
steering control. The more extreme the rake is on your bike, the
'slower' your steering will be. (Except at extremely slow speeds -
where extreme rakes often result in the wheel 'flopping' over and
dumping the bike if you do not have your hands firmly in control of
the grips.) If you were, for example, to lower your bike by shortening
the front and back shocks, the wheelbase would also be shortened (the
distance between the front and back tires). Since your front wheel
would touch the ground closer to directly under your handlebars, your
steering would 'quicken' as a result. In fact, even shortening the
shocks by only one inch could result in steering that was so fast that
your steering damper (another small shock absorber) could not safely
handle it. The result, known as a 'tank slapper', would be violent
swings of the wheel from side to side, and absolutely no doubt about
it, a dumped bike. (That is an overstatement. If you stiff-arm your
controls you will dump the bike, but relaxing and lifting your body
weight off the seat or towards the back of the bike can save it.)
Your
shock absorber systems make your bike controllable. Make sure they
receive factory recommended oil changes, do not modify them, adjust
them for major changes in the weight of your vehicle or expected road
conditions, and they will do their jobs reliably.
Return
to

|