Wednesday, March 31, 2004

Free Speech?

The National Post has an article about bill C-250 which will likely be passed through the senate soon.

Inciting hatred towards any human being is wrong. Jesus calls us to love one another, to love our enemies, to love God first and love others as ourself. So no where does it talking about hating others being a good thing.

According to the Bible, certain activities are sinful. And one of the most important steps in the Christian journey is recognizing that we all sin and fall short, and we need God's grace. But you know what the great thing is? When God looks at us, he doesn't see our sin ... he sees us as we truly are, His sons and daughters. And that is also how we should view ourselves and others.

But this is where things get sticky. Because not many people know/understand/accept this. They want to define themselves, to create their own sense of identity. They seek their identity through their marks at school (yes, I have done this), their careers, what others think of them (done this too ...), their sexual orientation, their physical abilities, etc.

And this is where the clash happens. Because when Christians comment on the morality of certain acts, they are speaking about acts, not persons. An act can be sinful and wrong, but the person who commits the act is still a child of God and is still loved by God. That doesn't mean it's ok to go out and sin, we will be held accountable to God and will answer for what we do with our lives. God will be the final judge of that.

But this is where the whole 'love the sinner, hate the sin' idea comes from, and why it meets such resistance. It all depends on where you seek your identity from. If you identify yourself as (as in, seek your identity in being) a homosexual person, and then someone comes along and says homosexual acts are sinful, you'll probably be upset. But if you identify yourself as a child of God who experiences an attraction to the same sex, and someone comes along and says that homosexuals acts are sinful, you are still at peace. Why? Because you are not your acts. There is a separation.

What will this bill accomplish, if it is passed? Will it put a freeze on free speech? Will priests and pastors end up in jail for sermons on sexual morality? Will my Bible be considered hate literature, and will I be jailed for expressing my opinion? These are real concerns; I'm not being flippant. If there ever comes a day where I will have to choose between denial of my beliefs or going to jail, I pray that I will have the courage to follow Jesus to the cross.

Tuesday, March 30, 2004

Atkins strikes again

The whole Atkins fad has taken yet another casualty ... no, I'm not talking about an individual having a heart attack due to the artery-clogging fat in the diet ... no, I'm referring to a much more tragic victim.

Subway's green olives.

Yes, it's true. There are readers who I know will be devastated. I'm upset as well, though not as much as I imagine others will be.

They have removed them from the array of add-ons to make room for the new toppings for their Atkins-friendly salads ... so there will be no more salty green olive goodness ... in its place are bacon bits and diced egg (hmmm ... I wonder if you could put bacon bits on your sub instead ... nah, they'd probably charge you for it)

Tuesday, March 09, 2004

I'm not ready to grow up yet

Tragedy struck an friend of mine the other night. Both her parents were killed in a car accident. She's my age. I went to high school with her. We used to sit on friends' beds and giggle about boys. It doesn't seem fair.

So six of us met at one of the girl's house to discuss what we could do. Could we help with the funeral arrangements? Send flower arrangements? Should we bring casseroles and muffins over so they don't have to cook? We made a phone tree so that any updates with regards to the arrangements would be disseminated quickly. It felt like a meeting. A somber, strange, adult meeting.

We all just wanted to be able to do something for our friend.

Thursday, March 04, 2004

Can someone please explain this to me?

Ok, so a CBC writer slams The Passion for being too gory and violent and full of blood, and then a week later CBC lauds an artist for his 'literal and personal', 'no-holds barred' art which included having him " [dig] a shallow grave, inserted a vial of blood into his anus and contorted himself so that the blood flowed into his mouth."

Now, I realize that these are most likely written by two different writers (one is credited, the other says written by CBC staff) But still, it seems a bit double-standard-ish to me ...

Please? anyone? I'm adrift in a sea of confusion and disgust.

Tuesday, March 02, 2004

Every year ...

Every winter I get a cold. I can never avoid it. Usually it strikes after exams are finished; right around Christmas. So far this year I've managed to avoid it, and I foolishly thought that I'd make it through this year without one.

No suck luck. I feel as though my throat has been ripped out, and I can barely talk. The rest of my body feels fine, no sniffles, no aches, no fever. But it hurts to swallow, talk, eat, drink. sniff.

And I'm out of herbal tea :( double sniff.

Listening to: Delirious - Touch

Monday, March 01, 2004

Passion

I saw the Passion of the Christ this weekend, and it had a profound impact on me. I'm still assimilating it, really. I had read all the reviews, and had prepared myself for the worst: 2 hours of non-stop gore and violence. I actually walked into the theatre with a sense of dread, of not really wanting to watch this movie, but knowing deep in my heart that I had to. However, given all the reviews, it was not what I had expected. At all. It's like we were watching completely different movies.

Despite, or perhaps because of the controversy, it appears to have done very well by the world's standards. It even beat out Star Wars I: The Phantom Menace for top 5-day opening, coming in second overall behind The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King. Not bad for a religious movie, rejected by all the major distributors, released during what is known to be the dryest time for movie releases, subtitled, shot in two dead languages, and where everyone already knows how it ends. No, the Holy Spirit didn't inspire this movie at all :) Of course, the true way to judge this movie is not by how much money it rakes in, but how many hearts it touches.

First of all, some comments on discussions I have had with people who have not seen the movie, and either don't plan to/don't want to/aren't sure. This is not a movie that you can hope to understand until you have seen it. I can tell you about parts of it, I can tell you how it affected me, but you will never understand it until you experience it.

I had even heard from some Christians that, based on the reviews, they don't want to 'put themselves through' watching two hours of Christ's crucifixion. To which I ask: If you believe that Jesus died for you and for your sins, if you believe that He endured this suffering and death to pay for your wrongs, then, upon reflection, how can you say that you can't bear to *watch* it? Let me say this again: He endured it for twelve hours, you watch it for two hours. Is that really asking so much?

I won't lie: there were parts that I could not bear to see. I closed my eyes at one point during the scourging. Do I think that Mel went overboard? No. He did his research, and guess what? Crucifixions are not pretty. I think that we Christians, myself included, have this rose-coloured view of the crucifixion: sure he was whipped, yeah he had to carry this large wooden cross, was nailed to it, and then died for our sins. La dee da. Now that unpleasantness in dealt with, here is out darling little children's choir, singing, "Jesus loves me, this I know, because the Bible tells me so."

This movie causes us to confront the reality of what it meant for Jesus to die on the cross. And it's not pretty. Would you expect it to be?

Critics complain that this movie is about violence, not love. Again, I think they were watching a completely different movie. In a flashback (which the movie is full with, provided just at moments when you can't bear to watch anymore) Jesus tells his disciplines that there is no greater love than one who lays down his life for his friends. That's what this is about; but its even more than that. Jesus is not only laying his life down for His friends, but for His enemies as well. When the guards are whipping him with the cat-o-nine-tails, Jesus' blood splashes on them and their clothes ... which evokes the cleansing image from Revelation 7:15 "they have washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb"

The symbolism was breathtaking. I'm not much for understanding symbolism at all, but I got this: during the actual crucifixion, the flashbacks went to the last supper. As Jesus is being stripped of his garments, it flashes to the unwrapping of the bread. When Jesus is raised up on the cross, it flashes to Jesus blessing the bread and raises it up. It's almost like going to Mass (but not quite, Mass is much better :P ) Three cheers for the Eucharist!

I loved Mary; I loved the flashback scene of Jesus making a table, playfully spashing her and the kissing her on the cheek. Watching the relationship of Jesus with his mother meant so much to me. I loved the resurrection at the end, because without the resurrection, Christianity is nothing. I loved Mary Magdalene and John, I loved Simon of Cyrene and Veronica. I especially loved the part where Pilate addresses Jesus in really halting Aramaic, and Jesus responds back in perfect Latin.

I pretty much cried the whole way through, so it was good that someone brought an extra kleenex box for me (yes, box. I shared it with another girl, between the two of us we nearly finished it) I started tearing up during the agony in the garden, which surprised me (didn't expect the waterworks so quickly, this was barely 3 minutes in). By the time that Jesus meets Mary (fourth station of the cross, over an hour in) I was all-out crying. But it didn't take away from my ability to watch.

My overall thoughts: This is not a movie, it is a masterpiece. I highly recommend seeing it, if you have already heard and understand the Gospels. Despite what many are hoping, I do not believe that this movie will be a tool to evangelize those who have never heard the Christian message; it relies heavily on the assumption that you already know the story. And to accept it. If you do not believe that God became Man to die for your sins, this will likely be 2 hours of violence and gore. Which is pretty much what all the critics said.

That's not to say that you need to be a 'believer' to see or appreciate the movie; it can (and has) open dialogue about many other aspects that the movie touches: the meaning of suffering, and the depth of evil that the human race has wrought on itself. It has opened up doors for interfaith dialog, which is always good.

I have often heard (and believe) that "If I was the only sinner on earth, Christ still would have come and died for me" He died for everybody, but he also died for me, personally. Going to Mass the next day was a profound experience. During Mass, I thought about parts of the movie and all I could think was, "I don't understand. This doesn't make sense. Why did He endure that for me? I don't deserve that kind of sacrifice. I'm not worthy of it. I don't understand. I don't understand." After receiving communion, insight came to me: I don't have to understand, I just have to accept.



Powered By Blogger TM Weblog Commenting by HaloScan.com