THIS IS A PUBLIC APOLOGY ISSUED BY JOHN KILPATRICK IN RESPONSE TO THE FALSE
PROPHECY GIVEN ON APRIL 6, 1997. THE COMMENTS IN CAPITAL LETTERS ARE MINE...

T. SMITH JUNE 22, 1997
===================================

PUBLIC STATEMENT ISSUED BY PASTOR JOHN KILPATRICK
AT THE BROWNSVILLE REVIVAL, JUNE 18, 1997

Dear Hank,

I called your office yesterday (6/17/97) at 12:30 Pacific Time. I talked with 
your secretary Lisa and wanted to speak with you personally. When Lisa asked 
what the purpose of my call was, I told her I wanted to apologize to you 
personally. She relayed the message to you and she got back with me and said 
you'd return my call last evening or today A.M. It's now been more than 24 
hours since I made contact, so I want to send this communiqué.

Hank, I do sincerely humble myself and ask your forgiveness for unchristlike 
behavior. I repent before Jesus and I've asked Him to forgive me. I pray you 
will forgive me and I also ask the Body of Christ to forgive me. I was wrong. 
I take full responsibility for my words and behavior.

The statements I made in April were made in an inflammatory way against you 
and CRI. They were spoken during a message I was bringing to my local 
congregation entitled "God's Ears." I was emphasizing how God said that all 
that Israel had said in His ears he would do to them. It was taken from 
Numbers chapter 14, especially verse 28.

You had just appeared on Larry King Live that Friday night before and had made 
reference to a church in Pensacola and it was in the context of a discussion 
about cults and especially the Heaven's Gate Cult in California where scores 
of people had just committed suicide – with our nation feeling such disgust 
and I myself feeling nauseated with such deception, that well meaning people 
were so deceived that they took their own lives to meet up with a space ship. 
When I heard our church linked with such cultic deception, it caused me to 
feel anger and indignation. It's much like a mother dog – when her puppies are 
fooled with she bites. I bit you and it wasn't right. I should not have 
responded to the criticism. But most of all I felt indignation and anger and 
it was not appropriate to link my negative feelings with a sermon. I called 
you (and by implication, others) a devil – that was wrong. I said, "Let Hank 
Hanegraaff and all the other devils, etc." – that was wrong of me. I ask your 
forgiveness.

When I said, "I'm going to prophesy as a man of God that the Lord bring you 
down in 90 days," I was not speaking that as a prophet but as a shepherd 
putting something in the ears of God. I did not say, "Thus saith the Lord"; it 
was a "Thus saith John Kilpatrick," putting these words into God's ears in the 
context of the message I was bringing. Let me reemphasize again that was me 
speaking.

I don't want to be a "son of thunder" and have Jesus turn to me and say, "You 
don't know what spirit you are of." I had a wrong spirit. I was a son of 
thunder. That was wrong.

I know my congregation. I've pastored Brownsville Assembly of God for the last 
15 and ½ years, through thick and thin. I have buried their dead, married 
their living, cried with them, laughed with them, dedicated their babies – and 
in April got in the flesh and lashed out at you.

I want to emphasize also that I did not wish you any harm personally. I was 
talking about your ministry, I was saying, "God bring down your platform for 
crying out and associating us with a cult." I did not nor do I wish you any 
harm. I ask your forgiveness if you thought I meant any harm to you 
personally. Honestly, before the Lord, I had your platform in mind, not the 
person Hank Hanegraaff.

This is by no means to be interpreted as an attempt to wiggle out of a 
prophecy. I would like to grant you the right to continue to count down the 
days and continue to comment about the 90 days. It's ammunition that I gave 
you in April. I only want you to know it was me speaking that and not a 
"thus saith the Lord."

Hank, I hope we can get together personally where I could meet you face to 
face. I have never heard your program on radio, but I would like to sit down 
with you as a brother. Please also allow me the opportunity to speak a 
blessing over you. If you would let me I would be honored to. Peter tells us 
in his first epistle, chapter 3, verses 8-11:

Finally, be ye all of one mind, having compassion one of another, love as 
brethren, be pitiful, be courteous: Not rendering evil for evil, or railing 
for railing: but contrariwise blessing; knowing that ye are thereunto called, 
that ye should inherit a blessing. For he that will love life, and see good 
days, let him refrain his tongue from evil, and his lips that they speak no 
guile: Let him eschew evil, and do good; let him seek peace, and ensue it. 

Hank, I bless you, your wife, your children, and your ministry at CRI, that 
God raise you up as a voice for good to this generation. May every concern and 
trouble that perplexes you be met with God's abundant wisdom and resources to 
continue what He has called you to do. May the grace of our Lord be with you 
and upon you. May His blessings overtake you.

Finally, I would like to ask the Body of Christ to forgive me for 
unnecessarily polarizing us by attacking Hank. I realize I attacked a man that 
is beloved by his followers and peers. I ask you to forgive me. I also know 
the Body of Christ has had to endure this kind of stuff for years and it has 
turned off many and hurt the cause of Christ. Now I have been guilty of doing 
what has hurt us all through the years.

What's going on at the Brownsville Revival is about holiness and repentance. 
Those themes are the most prevalent characteristics of this visitation of the 
Holy Spirit. Every revival brings to the surface impurities. It has brought 
impurities in my life to the surface – and it's ugly to have to deal with 
them. In keeping with the spirit of this revival I want to lead the way with 
public repentance.

Even though there is a revival going on here of great magnitude that is 
touching the world, it is being pastored and led by human beings that are 
flawed. I guess that's the way it's always been, and that's the way it will 
always be. We strive to demonstrate integrity, impeccable character, and 
dignity. Those are the ideals. Yet this treasure is in earthen vessels.

This communiqué and public statement of repentance has been entirely my own 
doing. I have not been instructed or constrained to do this. I am accountable 
to the leadership of my church and to the Assemblies of God, whom I love and 
respect, but this statement has been my own doing. I have been wrestling with 
this for some weeks and finally pinned my pride to the mat. I hope this brings 
healing and relief to the Body of Christ.

====================================================================

COMMENTS

IF JOHN'S INTENT WAS TO CLEAR THE AIR, AND TO CORRECT WRONGS OF
HIS PROPHECY, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN SIMPLE TO HAVE ISSUED A STATEMENT OF ERROR, 
AND APOLOGY FOR THE WRONG, RATHER THAN TO TRY TO GET A SHOT IN AT HANK WHILE SO
DOING.

HE CLAIMED TO BE PROPHECYING SOMETHING INTO GOD'S EARS AND STATED THAT GOD SAID 
THAT IT WOULD HAPPEN. HE ALSO STATED AT THE VERY START OF THE MESSAGE THAT IT 
WAS A WORD FROM THE LORD. IN LIGHT OF EZEK 13, I FIND SUCH STATEMENTS TO BE OF 
GREAT CONCERN. THE FACT THAT JOHN APPARENTLY IS TRYING TO ALTER WHAT WAS SAID 
BY SUGGESTING THAT HE NEVER SAID THAT HE CLAIMED IT TO BE FROM GOD ALSO RAISES 
CONCERNS ABOUT HIS INTENT IN ISSUING THIS STATEMENT. AGAIN, IF HE HAD ACKNOWLEDGED 
THAT HE WRONGLY CLAIMED TO SPEAK A PROPHECTIC WORD, IT WOULD HAVE MADE THE APOLOGY 
MORE CREDIBLE.

IT IS MY SINCERE HOPE THAT JOHN WAS TRULY ACKNOWLEDGING THAT HE ACTED AS A FALSE
PROPHET IN CLAIMING WRONGLY TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF GOD.

FALSE PROPHECY IS A VERY SERIOUS ISSUE. (EZEK 13, DEUT 18:20-22)

TOM SMITH

    Source: geocities.com/smithtj.geo