|
HIV is not AIDS says peter duesberg There are 500 scientist out there who share the hypothesis that HIV is not the actual cause of AIDS. They have a Nobel price in their number and also world famous virologist Peter Duesberg, who says that HIV is a harmless retrovirus. According to him cocaine and heroin has increased the population of intravenous drug users two hundredfold in the last ten years alone. He says AIDS is the bill for that drug use and include AZT in it. The drugs are the poison that make people sick, not sex. He says that if you have tuberculosis and leprosy antibodies or sometimes flu shots you will test positive for HIV. He says African AIDS and American-and-European AIDS are totally different things and only share in common the same name. African AIDS is equally distributed between men and women. European and American AIDS is 90 percent male. That's epidemiologically as different as day and night. In addition, he says that most of the African AIDS diseases are tuberculosis, chronic fevers, diarrhoea, while 80 to 90 percent of the European/American diseases are pneumocystis pneumonia, Kaposi's sarcoma, dementia and that wasting disease. The African epidemic, in my opinion, is caused by malnutrition, parasitic infection and poor sanitation, while the European and US epidemics are caused by recreational drug use and AZT. Now if that is true (AND I THINK IT IS) then is the aids test in Osho commune another way to spread misinformation and make people pay for it also ? If you got HIV + you might not be afraid to die, chances are that your life will be as long as if you tested HIV -.I think this is an issue that deserve MUCH consideration, since a HIV + person is not only banned from Osho communes but also get scared of 'dying' when the people with AIDS who do test HIV - are perfectly allowed to walk in and out any commune. It appears that the aids that homosexuals got is due to the poppers and sniffers and essentially nitrates which they use in the sex act to facilitate penetration. According to Duesberg that is AIDS. He is supported by a group that calls itself The Group for the Scientific Reappraisal of the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis. There are three hundred fifty or five hundred scientists in that group. The most famous among them is Kary Mullis, who won the Nobel Prize for the polymerase chain reaction last year. Better we start thinking again. --------------------- . Its presence by itself says nothing about your risk for AIDS. Remember that this is my hypothesis, and not yet that of most scientists. Now, roughly one person in 250 in the United States is HIV-positive. So it's rare. But if you're positive, then you are either one of the 250 people who, in the general population, appear to be positive, or you are in a risk group that has practiced enough risk behaviour to actually become HIV-positive. So, HIV then could be, in that sense, a wake-up call as a marker for risk behaviour. But it's not unique in that regard. Other rare viruses are also markers of risk behaviour.
click here for peter Duesberg site on the real story behind HIV.
To all sannyasins doctors; get yourself better informed on HIV and AIDS by asking your questions to : Info & Comments:
| |
