| Rate This Article E-mail your rating of this story to our Writers' Voice address dkrrs@cqc.com and Angela Carnes, points director, will have the critiques and scores sent to her so they will be reported on next week's points page. Rate this story from a 5 (the best)to 1 (the worst). If you wish, give a short critique of the story, and if you want your name with the review on our critique's page, please put that with the review. If you don't want your name known, that is all right. Reviewers are limited to just one critique per story. Once a story earns 200 points, it will reach Legend status and be eligible for a cash award for the writer. 100 points earns 4-star legend status.
Please continue to review and rate the articles so the authors can become legends. |
|
|
To do this with such an issue is sickening. What really makes me angry is having them blame and discuss everything and everyone when they don't know all of the information they before they report the story.
The day of the incident almost all the media, certainly the national networks, began reporting before they had the basic facts. The one major exception was Channel 1 (a news show that is broadcast in our school five days a week). Two days after the tragedy, they did an excellent job; they had all the information and all of the facts.
A couple days later, showing their need for ratings only, a local television station did a report describing the Columbine Killers; they were described as being the sort of gothic type that is in love with Marilyn Manson, who was just happening to be performing a concert that night at Market Square Arena in Indianpolis. The report used the fans as examples of people the killers were like and that only the Manson fans had the potential to start a killing spree.
What made me angry was that the reporters were portraying these fans as killers and everyone else as normal. They blamed music, Marilyn Manson's music, for being the main cause of the tragedy. Do they know that for sure? Did they interview one or both of the killers?
I admit I like some of Manson's songs; I don't agree with most of his views, but he is an individual who is entitled to his views and what he does is his perogative. Each of us may do things that others may dislike and that is their perogative.
The media is trying to explain that Manson fans are bad, psychotic people, and everyone else is normal. In this sense, to me, there is no normal. Everyone is different mentally, physically, and emotionally. We don't know what makes a person extremely happy, mad, or sad. A simple flick of a finger could make one person raging with anger and another laugh until his stomach hurt.
No one can really tell how anyone feels unless they were inside their minds, and since we are unable todo that, everyone is left to themselves as individuals. Sometimes people can go for help and consultance. It all depends on a person's subconscious ideas and how their environment affects them. In most teenagers' lives, their minds are on fitting into social groups and peer pressure.
In our society, it's actually practical for a teenager to lose it faster than most adults because peer pressure has a huge impact on teenagers. But just like everything else, it affects us all differently. Basically, the media cannot blame just one thing on such a tragedy like Columbine. They need to get the facts and realize everyone is different.