New attitude needed for sewer system to be a success

Letter by Gail Hall to the Sooke News Mirror, July 23, 2003

Editor:

Some thoughts left over from the sewer "information" meetings of July 7-8:
Several residents expressed the view that because all of Sooke will benefit from sewers, all of Sooke should pay.

It was a thought I shared, wondering if with an attitude adjustment at the council table, the whole community might indeed get behind the project.

This idea quickly fell victim to some sober second thoughts.

The federal and provincial governments have awarded $11.6 million to the District of Sooke, not to the few who reside in the specified area, but to all of us.

Accordingly, my family donates our share to the sewer project, and feel quite sure that it will cover any benefits which we may gain from the project.

The Sooke News Mirror of July 16 stated that Councillor John Farmer became frustrated during the meeting because many of the questions were being asked by people who do not reside in the specified area.

This is indeed true, and if and when we receive answers to our questions, should we also behave like petulant children because those supplying the answers will be elected officials or staff members, the majority of whom also reside outside the specified area?

For the first time since incorporation, our administration will not be able to railroad a decision through. If the referendum is to succeed, council and staff must accept the public as equal partners, involve them in the process, provide information in a clear and complete manner, and respect that there are differing opinions on this huge initiative.

Council will have to dig their way through a mountain of mistrust, cynicism and fear. It will take a serious attitude adjustment, and a more conciliatory approach than we have witnessed to date.

Councillors Barry, OBriain, Morino and Stephen have put the process in motion by standing up for a referendum. It is a promising beginning.