23	                      JAMES OTTE
	24	having been first duly sworn to tell the truth, the whole
	25	truth, and nothing but the truth, testified as follows:

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


255
	1				DIRECT EXAMINATION
	2	BY MR. CORGAN:
	3	Q	State your name please, sir.
	4	A	James Otte, O-T-T-E.
	5	Q	Mr. Otte, what is your business, profession or
	6	occupation?
	7	A	I'm a senior agent with the Oklahoma State Bureau of
	8	Investigation.
	9	Q	What is a senior agent?
	10	A	It's the -- I guess the highest rank that you can
	11	reach as an agent before you got into supervisory rank.
	12	Q	All right, sir. How long have you been employed with
	13	the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation?
	14	A	Just under 10 years.
	15	Q	And would you tell us, Mr. Otte, your educational
	16	background and training please, sir?
	17	A	Yes. I was with the police department, Webster
	18	Grove's police department in Saint Louis County back in
	19	Saint Louis, Missouri, for over 10 years. I was trained
	20	through the Saint Louis police academy consisting of 16
	21	weeks dealing with all facets from patrol procedures on
	22	through crime scene investigations. I attended various
	23	classes while working as an officer in Saint Louis,
	24	in-service type training. One course was a forensic
	25	pathology class I attended at the Saint Louis University.

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


256
	1	I attended the Saint Louis Community College and got an
	2	associates degree in criminal justice. I then attended
	3	Tarkio College in Saint Louis and received a bachelor's
	4	degree in criminal justice management. I joined the
	5	Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation in 1981 and hired
	6	on as an agent and worked as a resident agent in Idabel,
	7	Oklahoma, before moving to Tulsa, Oklahoma, and being an
	8	agent out of the Tulsa regional office. I've received 12
	9	weeks of O.S.B.I. training through their academy here upon
	10	arriving in Oklahoma, and various schools throughout my
	11	term here with the Bureau, various in-service training,
	12	one of which was a two week homicide investigation school
	13	put on by the University of Louisville.
	14	Q	Mr. Otte, during your time and experience as a law
	15	enforcement officer, have you had occasion to both be
	16	involved in and to work homicide investigations?
	17	A	Yes, I have.
	18	Q	Now, when I say be involved in and work, do you make
	19	a distinction as to those two?
	20	A	Yes, I do.
	21	Q	And what distinction do you make?
	22	A	With the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation we
	23	have what is known as a case agent. The homicide
	24	investigation of that particular case within our agency is
	25	assigned to a particular agent and he is a case agent.

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


257
	1	could be assigned the case agent, be responsible for that
	2	particular homicide, or I could assist another agent who
	3	is a case agent, assist him on running leads on what he
	4	may be a case agent and work on maybe a homicide he has
	5	assigned as well as work on my own cases.
	6	Q	Can you tell us how many homicides you have been --
	7	have been involved in in the past?
	8	A	That would be real hard to estimate. I work
	9	predominantly homicide. I guess 70 percent of my time is
	10	homicide investigation the entire 10 years I've been with
	11	the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation. I'd have to
	12	number into the hundreds if not thousands of different
	13	homicides I've had some variation of contact with.
	14	Q	Mr. Otte, how is it that you came to be involved in
	15	this case?
	16	A	I was contacted at my residence by the Oklahoma State
	17	Bureau of Investigation communications center advising me
	18	that there had been O.S.B.I. assistance requested in
	19	Bartlesville.
	20	Q	Tell us a little bit about the O.S.B.I. as far as how
	21	it operates and how your agency would get involved in a
	22	case of the type issues as far as your jurisdiction.
	23	A	The O.S.B.I. is set up as an assisting agency. That
	24	is we don't have original jurisdiction in many cases. If
	25	a crime happens, for us to step in and take over, for us

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


258
	1	to get involved in a case it takes the request of another
	2	law enforcement agency. We have to be requested by either
	3	a police department, district attorney's office or
	4	attorney general, something like that. We cannot open a
	5	case on a private citizens' request. So we have to have a
	6	request from another law enforcement agency and we will
	7	come in to assist them to whatever degree that requesting
	8	authority desires. It could be just a couple of technical
	9	assistance, do a couple of interviews and then get out, or
	10	conduct the entire investigation. It ranges the entire
	11	gamut of assistance.
	12	Q	So obviously there was some request that got you
	13	involved, is that correct?
	14	A	Yes, there was.
	15	Q	Okay. Upon getting that call, what did you do?
	16	A	I contacted by supervisor, Joe Collins, the inspector
	17	with the northeast regional office of the O.S.B.I., and he
	18	instructed me who to contact to go with me and advised me
	19	that he would go to the scene and instructed me to respond
	20	to the request.
	21	Q	And did you do that?
	22	A	Yes, I did.
	23	Q	And when did you arrive in Bartlesville?
	24	A	It was right around four a.m. in the morning, give or
	25	take a few minutes.

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


259
	1	Q	And Mr. Franchini came as well, is that right?
	2	A	Yes, he did.
	3	Q	And he arrived in a separate vehicle?
	4	A	Yes. I met him in Broken Arrow. We both live just a
	5	couple miles apart. I met him there and he was in his
	6	vehicle and I was in mine but we came up together.
	7	Q	What about Mr. Collins?
	8	A	I heard him on the radio some distance back and he
	9	arrived shortly after I did.
	10	Q	Now, I assume that you're the case agent in this
	11	case?
	12	A	Yes, I am.
	13	Q	Tell us -- You've told us generally about case agent,
	14	but tell us specifically in regard to this case what have
	15	been your responsibilities as a case agent?
	16	A	Well, as a case agent not only in this case but any
	17	case agent for any case, it's our responsibility to
	18	coordinate O.S.B.I. efforts with whatever the requesting
	19	authority, whatever the police department is doing, to
	20	coordinate it so we're not both running on the same
	21	things, to make sure, as far as our agency is concerned,
	22	the leads that are assigned to us or what we pick up get
	23	done, that the proper paperwork or interviews, if they're
	24	done, that the proper paperwork is submitted and more or
	25	less coordination and checking the case to make sure that

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


260
	1	our responsibilities are met as far as what to do in the
	2	case.
	3	Q	Now, in regard to your responsibilities in the case,
	4	I assume that there was other personnel from the O.S.B.I.
	5	involved in this case, is that correct?
	6	A	That's correct.
	7	Q	Can you just name some of the people for us and the
	8	way in which they were involved?
	9	A	Well, Agent Franchini was obviously involved in the
	10	case as being -- working my crime scene. I believe Deputy
	11	Inspector Dave Page helped conduct some interviews and
	12	transported some evidence. I believe Agent John
	13	Hunnington and I believe possibly Inspector Joe Collins
	14	helped transport some evidence as well as numerous people
	15	from the O.S.B.I. laboratories analyzing evidence
	16	submitted to the various labs.
	17	Q	And what would be your capacity in regard to the
	18	laboratory work and that type of thing?
	19	A	Answer any questions they have as far as what they're
	20	looking at or if they need other pieces to go along to
	21	look at the evidence. For example, we talked about
	22	earlier known samples. If they need some known samples to
	23	look at some stuff that they have it would be my
	24	responsibility to see that they have what they need to
	25	work with and to get their final reports together with the

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


261
	1	investigative reports and so forth and provide all of that
	2	to the prosecutorial authority.
	3	Q	Now, Mr. Otte, you mentioned that a part of your
	4	responsibilities would be coordination with local law
	5	enforcement I guess so there wouldn't be, in effect,
	6	duplication of effort or that you wouldn't be working on
	7	the same areas, is that correct?
	8	A	That's correct.
	9	Q	Did you, in fact, have that type of coordination in
	10	this case?
	11	A	Yes, we did.
	12	Q	And would you tell us how that was accomplished and
	13	what was done in that regard?
	14	A	Well, at the very outset upon arriving we met with
	15	the authorities from Bartlesville Police Department, Chief
	16	Holland, and talked about the case, who was going to be
	17	doing what. I guess job assignments or tasks were given
	18	out such as Agent Franchini and Steve Gardella.
	19	Throughout the case we had numerous meetings, going over
	20	leads that needed to be done or areas that needed to be
	21	checked, what department would be responsible for handling
	22	what areas or what leads and seeing that they were
	23	covered, so to speak.
	24	Q	Now, I believe that you told us that you arrived at
	25	the scene here in Bartlesville about four a.m. on June the

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


262
		1	12th of 1990, is that correct?
		2	A	That's correct.
		3	Q	Tell us what you did once arriving at the scene.
		4	A	Well, as soon as we arrived at the scene I meet with
		5	Chief Holland of the Bartlesville Police Department and
		6	Steve Gardella. I mainly met with them. There were
		7	numerous other officers present, but my main talk or
		8	conversation was with Chief Holland and Steve Gardella.
		9	They kind of very briefly told us what they had and that a
		10	lady had been found beaten in her house and that she had
		11	died and that they had some problems with it. And at that
		12	point they said we want to walk you through the scene and
		13	see what you think.
		14	Q	So did you walk through the scene?
		15	A	Yes. Agent Franchini, myself, Chief Holland and
		16	Steve Gardella walked through the scene, did a walk
		17	through as has been referred to, through the scene, just
		18	walking through and looking at the scene to see what we
		19	had.
		20	Q	And what observations did you make at that time?
		21	A	Well, as I walked into the -- we entered through the
		22	door next to the garage doors and through the utility room
		23	and came in through the kitchen into the dining area. The
		24	first thing that I noticed that really struck me was the
		25	large amount of blood in the dining room. On the floor,

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


263

	1	on the walls, on the table, the furniture, and even on the
	2	ceilings in the dining room. We kind of walked around the
	3	edge of that area and --
	4	Q	And why did you walk around the edge of it?
	5	A	Trying to stay out of the major portion of the blood.
	6	Q	Okay. Please continue.
	7	A	Walked through the doorway into the living room or
	8	den area where the television set and the couch was.
	9	Looked at that room and stepped over towards the door
	10	leading out of the den onto the patio.
	11	Q	What, if any, observations did you make there?
	12	A	Well, as I stepped through the den I obviously saw
	13	the television set all broken out, the mirror above the
	14	television set was broken, the door was standing ajar and
	15	the pane of glass was broken out of the door.
	16	Q	All right. Please continue.
	17	A	I became concerned at that point about the scene and
	18	I immediately began to discuss with them our legal right
	19	to be there at the scene.
	20	Q	And did you receive some assurance about being there?
	21	A	Yes, I did. I discussed that due to the scene being
	22	there, some of the things that I had seen about the scene,
	23	by this time they had expressed that they were having
	24	problems with it, what they were being told that with Mr.
	25	Allen --

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT 


264
	1				MR. CARLSON: Your Honor, we'd object to
	2	the hearsay nature of what the officers are telling him.
	3				MR. CORGAN: Judge, it's not -- if I might
	4	respond. It's not offered for the truth of the matter
	5	asserted but rather what this officer was acting upon as
	6	he made his conclusions and went about this task.
	7				THE COURT:. Overruled. I assume that's the
	8	extent of his lead in to your question.
	9				MR. CORGAN: Yes.
	10	Q (By Mr. Corgan) Continue.
	11	A	Due to the fact that Mr. Allen lived in the house
	12	and he could be a suspect, I was concerned whether we
	13	needed a search warrant for the residence or not, and I
	14	ascertained that a signed consent to search had been
	15	obtained.
	16	Q	Now, Mr. Otte, based upon your observations at that
	17	time, what concerns did you have about the scene?
	18	A	Well, the first impression I got when I walked in and
	19	saw the blood was there was too much scene. There was too
	20	much blood, there was too much blood on the walls, on the
	21	floor and all of that to be just a simple burglary,
	22	someone surprising a burglar.
	23	Q	Now, why?
	24	A	Usually if you surprise a burglar he attacks you and
	25	a person goes down and he's going to be out. The scene

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT  


265
	1	looked more, with the amount of blood, that there was a
	2	lot of violence there rather than just striking someone to
	3	get out of the house. Almost like that the goal was
	4	rather to inflict on the victim rather than to burglarize
	5	the house. I don't know that I can describe it very -- in
	6	the right terms, but there was just so much scene that it
	7	was a very -- first indication was is that the victim
	8	here, that they went in for the victim or the attack on
	9	the victim was on the victim, not just as an accidental
	10	bumping into the victim or her surprising them, and that
	11	there was so much violence that very likely the victim
	12	would have known her assailant.
	13	Q	What else concerned you about the scene?
	14	A	Things didn't look right. The television was broken
	15	sitting on a stand but yet you could see the stand on the
	16	carpet hadn't been moved. It struck me that a screen of a
	17	television set is very thick and would be very difficult
	18	to break, but yet it hadn't been moved from where it
	19	obviously was.
	20		On the wall behind the television was a
	21	broken mirror, but yet the television was not moved. The
	22	mirror had been broken. There was nothing laying on the
	23	floor that had obviously been thrown across a room, struck
	24	the mirror and bounced back out on the floor. So I
	25	couldn't identify anything obviously in there that would

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


266
	1	have broken these items, and the TV not being moved. I
	2	tried to determine whether or not the door ajar was that
	3	way when they first arrived because the position of the
	4	door bothered me.
	5	Q	And why did that position bother you?
	6	A	Well, the position of the door bothered me because it
	7	was not opened far enough. to walk out. It was only open,
	8	oh, a foot and a half. It would be a very -- there was
	9	carpet there to where it wouldn't swing on it's own. It
	10	took some kind of pressure to move it one way or another,
	11	and it would be very unlikely that someone would run out
	12	it and the door close behind them, but yet it's not open
	13	wide enough. So the position of the door bothered me.
	14	The glass being broken out on the door and I'm being told
	15	that the storm door was locked bothered me.
	16	Q	Anything else cause you concern about the scene?
	17	A	Well, the books from the bookshelf bothered me.
	18	Q	Why?
	19	A	The books from the bookshelf were in a big pile at
	20	the end of the bookshelf at the base coming out from the
	21	bookshelf and laying kind of in the door way. And I
	22	thought in my mind if there's a fight and you fall against
	23	a bookcase how could the books be right there by the
	24	bookcase if there is a person standing there. The books
	25	would have to hit the person and leave a void right by the

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


267

	1	bookcase because they couldn't fall through that person,
	2	but all of the books were piled up against a bookcase all
	3	right out there in the floor like they had been pulled off
	4	and fell at the feet of someone rather than being knocked
	5	off.
	6	Q	So you're making a lot of assumptions at that point?
	7	A	Yes, I am.
	8	Q	You don't -- you didn't know obviously what had
	9	happened, but you're making assumptions?
	10	A	That's correct.
	11	Q	Now, based on those assumptions did you get with law
	12	enforcement and say, hay, let's forget about this suspect
	13	outside?
	14	A	No, I did not.
	15	Q	Why not?
	16	A	I didn't know whether the suspect that did this for
	17	whatever reason may have still be outside running around.
	18	I didn't know who the suspect was at that point. I still
	19	had -- anybody could be the suspect at that point in my
	20	mind.
	21	Q	What did you do then?
	22	A	At that point I received the information about the
	23	hammer.
	24	Q	Tell us about that.
	25	A	Officer Mason came in and I learned that the hammer

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


268
	1	was suppose to be in the attic. At that point I walked
	2	out into the attic, and I don't recall whether it was
	3	Chief Holland or Detective Mason or myself who pulled the
	4	ladder down or whether the ladder -- I think the ladder
	5	might have already been down, and went up into the attic
	6	to check this hammer's location, to see if we could locate
	7	it.
	8	Q	And were you successful in that?
	9	A	Yes, I was.
	10	Q	And you've had an opportunity to see these pictures
	11	that have been introduced?
	12	A	Yes, I have.
	13	Q	And would those pictures show the scene, and I'm
	14	referring to State's Exhibits 49 and 50, and would those
	15	show the scene before you got the hammer and showing it in
	16	its location before those items were moved?
	17	A	Yes, they do.
	18	Q	Now, after finding the hammer and the towels, what,
	19	if anything, did you do with them?
	20	A	Well, upon locating them up in the attic we took the
	21	photographs of them, we measured where they were laying in
	22	the attic, and then I picked them up and put them into a
	23	paper sack.
	24	Q	Now, were they in the same sack or a different sack?
	25	A	No, they were both sacked separately, the towels in

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


269
	1	one sack and the hammer in another sack.
	2	Q	Did you put any type of covering around them other
	3	than the sack?
	4	A	I don't recall whether I stapled the sack shut
	5	partially or not. I don't recall exactly how the sack was
	6	sealed.
	7	Q	After placing those items, the hammer and towels,
	8	into the sacks, what was done with those items?
	9	A	I retained those.
	10	Q	And did you ultimately do something with them?
	11	A	Yes. I secured them in my vehicle until I got back
	12	to my office the next morning. We were there at four
	13	o'clock in the morning, so that following day after we
	14	were done. I guess it was some time after five o'clock on
	15	the 12th in the evening I guess it was. When we left
	16	Bartlesville and went back we stopped by our office and I
	17	placed both these items in our evidence room.
	18	Q	And after you placed those items, the hammer and
	19	towels, in your evidence room, did you have further
	20	contact with them?
	21	A	Only the next day to go in the evidence room while
	22	Dennis was preparing stuff that he had seized to go to the
	23	lab and to point them out to Dennis and tell him to take
	24	those to the lab also.
	25	Q	Now, Mr. Otte, did you have occasion to have any

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


270
	1	contact in the chain of custody of the chain of evidence
	2	with any articles of clothing?
	3	A	Yes, I did.
	4	Q	And tell us the facts and circumstances surrounding
	5	that, please.
	6	A	I believe it was a day or so later on the 14th, I was
	7	at the Bartlesville Police Department and speaking with
	8	Officer Mason, and I received from him a pair of shorts, a
	9	T-shirt and a pair of tennis shoes.
	10	Q	And upon --
	11	A	And I believe a chair.
	12	Q	What type chair?
	13	A	Dining room chair without the arms. A regular dining
	14	room chair.
	15	Q	And upon receipt of those items, what did you do with
	16	those?
	17	A	I transported those back to the office of the
	18	O.S.B.I. that same day, gave the clothing items to
	19	Inspector Joe Collins to transport to the O.S.B.I. lab the
	20	following day because he was headed that way, and I placed
	21	the chair into the evidence room at the Tulsa office.
	22	Q	At some later point did you do something then with
	23	the chair?
	24	A	Yes. I transported the chair to the O.S.B.I.
	25	laboratory in Tahlequah, Oklahoma.

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


271
	1	Q	And when did you do that?
	2	A	I don't recall the date. It was approximately a
	3	month or so later.
	4	Q	And until you transported it from the evidence room
	5	in Tulsa to the lab, where was that item, that chair?
	6	A	It was secured in the Tulsa evidence room or evidence
	7	vault.
	8	Q	Okay. Other than the hammer and towels, the chair
	9	and the clothing that you've referred to, have you had
	10	custody of any other type items of evidence?
	11	A	I've had the custody, I believe, of the personal
	12	affects, rings, contact lens, some of the personal affects
	13	that were listed on the medical examiner's stuff.
	14	Q	And what was done with those items?
	15	A	I transported -- well, a number of the items I
	16	transported to the Tahlequah lab and was present while
	17	defense counsel was able to view them. On another
	18	occasion I transported the contact lens -- well, I
	19	packaged it up and shipped the contact lens via Federal
	20	Express to Mr. Peter Barnett in California.
	21	Q	Now, Mr. Otte, have you had occasion, as a result of
	22	your involvement in this case, to interview the Defendant,
	23	Stephen Lee Allen?
	24	A	Yes, I did.
	25	Q	And can you tell us, sir, when you did that and where

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


272
	1	that	took place?
	2	A	That was at the Bartlesville Police Department on the
	3	early morning hours of the 12th of June. I really can't
	4	give	an exact time other than about 5:30, six o'clock.
	5	Q	Who was present at that interview?
	6	A	Stephen Allen, Eddie Mason and myself.
	7	Q	And prior to your interview of Mr. Allen did you
	8	advise him of his rights in any manner?
	9	A	Yes, I did.
	10	Q	And how did you do that?
	11	A	I advised him verbally of his rights according to the
	12	Miranda decision. We also had a Bartlesville Police
	13	Department rights and waiver form that he was allowed to
	14	read	and sign.
	15	Q	Now, other -- was there any type of record made of
	16	that	particular interview?
	17	A	My notes and my written report of that interview,
	18	yes,	sir.
	19	Q	Was it taped in any manner?
	20		          MR. CARLSON: Objection, leading, Your
	21	Honor.
	22		          THE COURT: Overruled. You may answer.
	23	A	No, it was not.
	24	Q	(By Mr. Corgan) Why not?
	25	A	Immediately upon entering the interview room Mr.

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


273
	1	Allen asked if the interview was being taped. I told him,
	2	no, did he want it to be taped, and I can't remember if he
	3	answered out loud or nodded his head or what, but I can't
	4	remember how he answered, but I got -- I got the
	5	impression he didn't want it taped so I did not tape it.
	6	Q	So you did not tape it?
	7	A	No. I did not tape it.
	8	Q	Now, during the time that you interviewed Mr. Allen,
	9	did he appear able to respond to your questions?
	10	A	Yes, he did.
	11	Q	Did he appear to understand your questions?
	12	A	Yes, he did.
	13	Q	Did he appear to be delusional in any way?
	14	A	No.
	15	Q	Did he appear to be hallucinating?
	16	A	No.
	17	Q	Did he appear to be incoherent?
	18	A	No.
	19	Q	Did he appear to be in any type
	20		         MR. BUCHANAN: Your Honor, I'd object to
	21	the leading nature of these questions.
	22		          THE COURT: Sustained.
	23	Q	(By Mr. Corgan) What did you notice about his
	24	demeanor and appearance as you interviewed him?
	25	A	He was quiet and calm. You could tell he had been

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


274
	1	through a rough night. You could tell that he had been
	2	through some upsetting stuff, but he was calm. You
	3	couldn't tell whether it just because he missed his sleep
	4	or whether he was greatly upset, but he seemed to be
	5	collected.
	6	Q	And did you then talk to him?
	7	A	Yes, I did.
	8	Q	What did he tell you?
	9	A	I went through what he did that day all the way
	10	through, I believe, starting with when he left for work
	11	that morning. He told me that he went to work and got
	12	there at 7:30 or 7:50, I believe. I don't recall the
	13	exact time he told me when he arrived at work. He worked
	14	that morning. At lunch time he went out and walked in
	15	town and got some type of greeting card or something from
	16	the card shop and returned to work. He got off at 5:00 or
	17	very shortly thereafter. He went straight home driving
	18	his blue Oldsmobile.
	19		When he arrived home his wife, Sandra, was
	20	at the house. She had some pork fritters, I believe it
	21	was, and something else, I think possibly a salad fixed
	22	for him, ready for him. She was ready for work and they
	23	had very little time together because she was leaving for
	24	work and he was coming in. And she went on to work and he
	25	ate. I believe he fixed french fries to go along with it

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


275
	1	or something, and then he went out and mowed part of the
	2	yard, took care of the child that was there, came back in
	3	the house, cleaned up. I believe he bathed the child. I
	4	don't recall which one first, the child getting bathed or
	5	him taking a bath. Whatever.
	6		That then he left and went over to Dillards
	7	to see his wife. He saw his wife at work with the child.
	8	She held the child. She got busy so he went down another
	9	portion of the mall, stayed there a little while. When he
	10	came back his wife had a customer. He went over and
	11	bought some things, I believe some Arimis or
	12	antiperspirant stick or something from one of the other
	13	counters and returned to where his wife was working.
	14	Talked to her a little bit about a strange phone call that
	15	she had gotten there at Dillards that night, conversed a
	16	little bit. He then told her he was going to go by church
	17	and get a drink, and she asked him to get her a drink.
	18		He left and went -- left Dillards and went
	19	to the church and stopped by the church. Went into the
	20	church office, picked up some papers with his being
	21	involved as treasurer or something for the church. After
	22	picking up the papers he went back out, got in his car and
	23	went to the Sonic on the west side of town. He got three
	24	drinks, and when he got the three drinks he drove back to
	25	Dillards to check to see if his wife's car was still

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


276
	1	there, to see if she had gotten off work yet, and didn't
	2	see her car so he passed right on through the lot and
	3	returned to his residence.
	4		And as he pulled into their driveway of his
	5	residence and his headlights flashed across the backyard
	6	patio portion of his residence, he saw a figure change
	7	directions. He got out of the car and went in and found
	8	his wife. Left the child in the car. When he found his
	9	wife he went over to her, he called to her, went over to
	10	her, picked her up or held her. Her arm went up over his
	11	shoulder. He then later backed down. He stepped into the
	12	other room just a foot or so and saw the TV and the mirror
	13	and the door and the books and then he stepped back over,
	14	and I don't remember whether he wiped his hands first or
	15	whether he saw the hammer and slammed the hammer and then
	16	wiped his hands, but he wiped his hands and he saw the
	17	hammer and hit the counter with the hammer.
	18		He then thought, oh, now I've got blood on
	19	the hammer. He then took the hammer and the paper towels
	20	up into the attic and put them in the attic. He came back
	21	downstairs and called 911 and said he was on the phone
	22	with 911 until the police officers arrived.
	23	Q	Did he tell you what time he left Dillards that
	24	evening?
	25	A	I'm sure he did, but I don't recall the exact time.

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


277
	1	He told me. I think it was about 8:30, but I'm --
	2		MR. CARLSON: Your Honor, I'm going to
	3	object unless he can give us -- I've let it go with what
	4	he thinks and he's supposing various things. I mean, I
	5	tried to keep from objecting in that regard.
	6		THE COURT: I don't know which time he's
	7	talking about also.
	8	Q	(By Mr. Corgan) Okay. The first time he was at
	9	Dillards after visiting with his wife prior to going to
	10	the church, do you recall if he told you what time he
	11	left?
	12	A	I don't recall what time he gave there. He gave me
	13	various times, but I don't recall what that was, no, sir.
	14	Q	You say that he told you he went where from Dillards?
	15	A	From Dillards he went to the church and picked up the
	16	papers.
	17	Q	Do you recall if he told you what time he was at the
	18	church?
	19	A	A minute or two after nine o'clock or right at nine
	20	o'clock.
	21	Q	Did he tell you how he was able to determine that?
	22	A	He said he saw a clock, I believe, in the church
	23	office.
	24	Q	Did you have any discussion with him as you
	25	interviewed him if he was familiar with or he knew when

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


278
	1	his wife, Sandra, normally got off of work in order to
	2	drive home?
	3	A	Yes.
	4	Q	And what did he tell you in that regard?
	5	A	That she got of f work or the store closed at nine and
	6	would normally get home 9:15 or 9:20, give or take a few
	7	minutes.
	8	Q	Did he tell you what time he got home that evening?
	9	A I believe he stated that he got home at 9:25, give or
	10	take a few minutes.
	11	Q	Was there any discussion about where [his son] was or
	12	what happened to [him] during the time after he arrived
	13	home?
	14	A	Yes. He told me that he had left [his son] in the front
	15	seat of the car when he went in to check the house for his
	16	wife, and that after the police had come he told me that
	17	he had Mr. Herring take [his son], take care of [him].
	18	Q	Well, was there any discussion about, as he
	19	approached his wife there on the floor, about shaking her?
	20	A	I believe he said he shook her at one point, yes.
	21	Q	Did you have any discussion about how hard that was
	22	done or the force with which he shook her?
	23	A	I don't believe we discussed the force, no.
	24	Q	Did he describe the hammer to you?
	25	A	No. Other than a small hammer.

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


279
	1	Q	Did he tell you where it came from or how he was
	2	familiar with the hammer?
	3	A	The only think I remember is that it was their
	4	hammer, it belonged in the house.
	5	Q	Tell us what he told you he did with that hammer.
	6	A	That he put it in the attic.
	7	Q	And did he do anything with the hammer prior to
	8	putting it in the attic?
	9	A	I remember him talking about wiping it off with the
	10	towels at that point when he was talking about the hammer,
	11	and it wasn't clear from my discussion with him whether he
	12	was wiping the hammer or wiping his hands.
	13	Q	Did he tell you why he was wiping something?
	14	A	There was blood on it.
	15	Q	And then what was done with those towels?
	16	A	They were put in the attic with the hammer.
	17	Q	I believe you say he called 911, he told you that?
	18		          MR. CARLSON: Objection, leading, Your
	19	Honor.
	20		          THE COURT: You may answer.
	21	A	Called the police. I don't know whether he said 911
	22	or the police.
	23	Q	 (By Mr. Corgan) And did he tell you when in
	24	reference to hiding the hammer he did that?
	25	A	Afterwards.

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


280
	1	Q	Mr. Otte, do you see the person in the courtroom
	2	today that you had occasion to interview and talk to the
	3	early morning hours of June the 12th, 1990?
	4	A	Yes,I do.
	5	Q	And for the record, would you point to that person
	6	and describe how they're dressed today?
	7	A	He's wearing a blue suit, blue shirt. He's wearing
	8	glasses and he's sitting at the defense table closest to
	9	the rail.
	10	              MR. CORGAN: Might the record reflect the
	11	witness has identified the defendant, Stephen Lee Allen?
	12	              THE COURT: It may reflect.
	13	              MR. CORGAN: That's all. Thank you, sir.
	14	---------------------------------------------------
	15	                   CROSS-EXAMINATION
	16	BY MR. CARLSON:
	17	Q	Mr. Otte, did I understand you correctly you said
	18	since you've been in Oklahoma you have been involved in
	19	thousands of homicides, is that correct?
	20	A	In one degree or another. I'm just estimating a
	21	number. Could be over a thousand.
	22	Q	Would you estimate closer to two thousand probably
	23	from your experience?
	24	A	It's impossible to get -- I'd say probably over a
	25	thousand. Whether it's close enough to two thousand or

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


281
	1	not I don't know because I have no way of verifying it 
	2	Q	You've been here since 1981. That's correct, is it
	3	not?
	4	A	That's correct.
	5	Q	Let's do something for a minute. We know that since
	6	1981 that would be about 10 years.
	7	A	That's correct.
	8	Q	And we know that there's 365 days in a year. We know
	9	that, don't we?
	10	A	Yes, sir.
	11	Q	Times 10 years, and you would agree with me that that
	12	would be 3,650 days in ten years?
	13	A	That's correct.
	14	Q	All right. And if you have a thousand homicides and
	15	we cut it down to a thousand just for purposes of our
	16	calculations, if we have a thousand homicides and we
	17	divide that into 3,650, would you agree with me that a
	18	homicide every 3.65 days? 
	19	A	Yes, sir.
	20	Q	I'm sorry, sir, but do you have any statistics that
	21	we have a homicide every 3.65 days in the last 10 years in
	22	Oklahoma?
	23	A	No, sir.
	24	Q	Now, let's talk about the method in which you
	25	interview a particular individual. And the way that's

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


282
	1	conducted is that in this particular case you talked to
	2	the individual but you don't write down your questions, do
	3	you? In other words, you don't write down the questions
	4	that you ask a particular individual.
	5	A	No, I do not.
	6	Q	And what you do is you make a determination when you
	7	talk to that individual what you're going to write down,
	8	isn't that correct?
	9	A	As far as my notes, yes, sir.
	10	Q	All right. And no one else was taking any notes in
	11	the room, were they?
	12	A	Not to my knowledge.
	13	Q	Okay. And you never allowed Steve to turn around and
	14	read the particular notes that you took, did you, sir?
	15	A	I was sitting at one side of the table and he's
	16	sitting across the table from me. I'm writing them in
	17	front of me. I guess he'd have to read them upside down,
	18	but he could see them.
	19	Q	And those were handwritten notes, is that correct?
	20	A	That's correct.
	21	Q	All right. Now, let's talk about some of the things
	22	that Steve told you. Steve told you that he went to the
	23	Sonic, didn't he?
	24	A	Yes, he did.
	25	Q	Okay. And there was a receipt that verified that

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


283
	1	Steve was at the Sonic, isn't that correct?
	2	A	Yes, there was.
	3	Q	And Steve told you that he went by the church and he
	4	was there a few minutes after nine. I think 9:05 was
	5	actually what you said, wasn't that correct?
	6	A	It was a couple minutes of nine o'clock. I don't
	7	think it was right on nine,. I don't recall whether it was
	8	9:04 or 9:05.
	9	Q	All right. And from the Sonic he said he went by
	10	Dillards and when he was going by Dillards he said he saw
	11	an individual named Mark, didn't he?
	12	A	Yes, he did.
	13	Q	And so we'll be able to determine what time that Mark
	14	was getting of f, won't we?
	15	A	We should, yes, sir.
	16	Q.	All right. And whenever Steve was telling you times,
	17	he wasn't telling you specific times, he was telling you
	18	within certain time frames. Isn't that a correct
	19	statement?
	20	A	That's correct. We weren't talking exact times. We
	21	were trying to nail it down as best we could, but we
	22	weren't talking exact times.
	23	Q	So when you gave us this time of 9:25, you're not
	24	sure that Steve really told you 9:25. It's somewhere
	25	within that range. Isn't that a fair characterization of

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


284
	1	his testimony?
	2	A	If my notes read 9:25 that's what he told me, but
	3	we're talking in that range as far as the conversation.
	4	Q	We're talking give or take some minutes, are we not?
	5	A	That's correct.
	6	Q	Now, and Steve also told you that he was at Dillards
	7	at around 8:30 the second time, didn't he, when he went
	8	down past the pet store and came back to see his wife?
	9	Didn't he tell you that?
	10	A	I believe it was 8:30.
	11	Q	All right. And we know that he went by and his wife
	12	was busy and we know that he then told you that he went
	13	over and he bought some deodorant, didn't he?
	14	A	That's correct.
	15	Q	And we know that we have a receipt that says that
	16	Steve bought deodorant at 8:33, isn't that correct?
	17	A	I don't recall the time on it, but we have a receipt
	18	with the time on it, yes, sir
	19	Q	Okay. It's the one introduced into evidence here.
	20	Here's a copy of it. And it says 8:33, does it not, sir?
	21	A	20:33, yes, sir.
	22	Q	And Steve told you that that night when he first got
	23	home that he mowed the lawn, and we're able to verify that
	24	he mowed the lawn, didn't he?
	25	A	Yes, sir.

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


285
	1	Q	As a matter of fact, from what Steve has told you,
	2	sir, with regard to the particular times and where he went
	3	that night, we've been able to check those out, isn't that
	4	true?
	5	A	That's correct.
	6	Q	And they verify with what Steve told you, isn't that
	7	correct?
	8	A	Yes, sir.
	9	Q	You made certain assumptions that you walked through
	10	the house that night, and those assumptions -- and I want
	11	to go over those and talk to you about those for just a
	12	moment. With regard to the books and the bookcase, I want
	13	you to give me your first assumption, sir.
	14	A	As I stated earlier, the first thing that struck me
	15	about the bookcases was that there was no void in the
	16	middle of the pile where someone would have been standing
	17	or something as the books fell down around them; that the
	18	books covered the entire floor in front of the bookcase
	19	without a void where a body or the body of a human
	20	standing there or falling -- falling against the bookcase
	21	would have prevented them from falling right there in that
	22	spot.
	23	Q	You're not telling us though, are you, sir, and based
	24	on that assumption, that something could not have been
	25	thrown on those books and those books have been knocked

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


286
	1	out there? You're not telling us that, are you?
	2	A	I don't know how the books came out of there.
	3	Q	That's my point. Tell me what other assumptions you
	4	made about the books other than you talked about a void.
	5	Did you make other assumptions about the books?
	6	A	There were a number of shelves on the bookcase where
	7	the books obviously came from, not just one shelf, but yet
	8	the shelves were not broke.
	9	Q	Well, you're not telling us, are you, sir, that the
	10	shelves would have to be broken for those books to have
	11	come out of there, are you?
	12	A	No, I'm not.
	13	Q	What other assumptions did you make about the books?
	14	A	That's about all.
	15	Q	Now, with regard to the television set, you said that
	16	you made an assumption, and you did make some assumptions
	17	about the television set, isn't that correct?
	18	A	Yes, sir.
	19	Q	And you made an assumption that that particular
	20	television set was not moved. Was that your statement?
	21	A	That's correct.
	22	Q	It was sitting on a stand, was it not?
	23	A	That's correct.
	24	Q	And that particular stand had sort of a little raised
	25	place around it, does it not, which the television set sat

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


287
	1	down into. Do you recall that?
	2	A	I don't recall that.
	3	Q	You wouldn't quarrel with me if I said that though,
	4	would you?
	5	A	I wouldn't quarrel about it. I should say I can't
	6	remember.
	7	Q	All right. You're not telling us that that
	8	television set, the screen could not be broken without it
	9	being moved, are you, sir? That's not what you mean to
	10	tell us.
	11	A	I would find it hard to believe that that screen
	12	would be broken without moving the TV.
	13	Q	What if the back of the TV was sitting against the
	14	wall and you hit the screen, something hit the screen?
	15	You would agree with me that it would break the screen but
	16	the TV or stand might not have any place to go? Wouldn't
	17	you agree with that, sir?
	18	A	If it had been against the wall, yes, but it wasn't.
	19	Q	Now, you got there at four o'clock approximately, is
	20	that correct?
	21	A	That's correct.
	22	Q	Do you know how many people had been in the house
	23	before you got in there?
	24	A	Quite a few.
	25	Q	I agree with that.

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


288
	1			MR. CORGAN: Your Honor, I'm going to
	2	object to counsel testifying.
	3			MR. CARLSON: I'll withdraw that.
	4			MR. CORGAN: That's twice.
	5	Q  (By Mr. Carlson) So we agree there was quite a few
	6	people in there.
	7			MR. CORGAN: There again, Your Honor,
	8	counsel is testifying.
	9			THE COURT: Sustained.
	10	Q  (By Mr. Carlson) We don't know and you don't know
	11	whether that particular TV was moved before you got there,
	12	do you, sir?
	13	A	No, I do not.
	14	Q	Now, I think you said that you made an assumption
	15	with regard to the mirror that was broken and it was on
	16	the wall, is that correct?
	17	A	That's correct.
	18	Q	All right. Now, you're not telling us that something
	19	couldn't have been thrown and hit that mirror and broke
	20	it, are you?
	21	A	No, sir.
	22	Q	I want to hand you a photograph and ask you if you
	23	recognize this photograph, sir?
	24	A	Yes, sir. It's a photograph of the television set in
	25	the family room.

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


289
	1	Q	And would you hold it up so the ladies and gentlemen
	2	can see it. And wouldn't you agree with me that the
	3	picture tube of that particular TV is against the wall?
	4	A	No. I can't tell from the angle of this shot whether
	5	it's against the wall or not. There's a cable that runs
	6	down behind it here and it looks like it goes behind it.
	7	Q	Wouldn't you agree with me --
	8	A	I can't tell whether that's all the way against the
	9	paneling or there's some space between the paneling. I
	10	can't tell from this photo.
	11	Q	Wouldn't you agree with me it's very close to the
	12	wall then?
	13	A	Yes.
	14			MR. CARLSON: Your Honor, we'd move
	15	introduction of this particular photograph.
	16			THE COURT: Is it marked?
	17	Q  (By Mr. Carlson) Now, tell me what assumption you
	18	made, sir --
	19			THE COURT: Excuse me. You moved the
	20	introduction. Is it marked? I don't know if we have a
	21	number on it.
	22			MR. CARLSON: Yes, we can put one on it.
	23			THE COURT: What's the number?
	24			MR. CARLSON: Defendant's 5.
	25			THE COURT: Any objection to Defendant No.

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


290
	1	5?
	2			MR. CORGAN: No, Your Honor.
	3			THE COURT: Defendant 5 allowed.
	4	Q (By Mr. Carlson) Tell me what other assumptions you
	5	made about the mirror on the wall, sir.
	6	A	The mirror itself was hanging level. It wasn't
	7	cocked one way or another,, yet the mirror was broke. I
	8	observed that and the glass was broke -- whatever -- there
	9	was nothing laying on the floor immediately out in front
	10	of the mirror that appeared to have been the object that
	11	broke the mirror.
	12	Q	Well, you're not telling us though, sir, from that
	13	assumption that some object that broke the mirror would
	14	have to be laying there, are you?
	15	A	No, sir.
	16	Q	Okay. As a matter of fact, you wouldn't expect that,
	17	would you, when there's been a struggle?
	18	A	You said an object and then a struggle. If there
	19	would be a struggle then I got to talk mirror and
	20	television set. If an object -- yes, I would expect the
	21	object to be laying somewhere in the vicinity.
	22	Q	Well, okay. Let's -- since we're going to assume for
	23	a minute let me assume along with you. That if I throw a
	24	crowbar, if I throw a poker at you and I miss you and I
	25	hit that particular mirror and I break that mirror and the

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


291
	1	poker falls down and then I in turn knock you down and you
	2	get hold of the poker or if I knock you down and then I
	3	pick the poker up and hit you, the poker might not be
	4	there.
	5	A	Yes, sir.
	6	Q	My point, sir, we can assume any number of scenarios
	7	as to how that mirror got broken. Wouldn't you agree with
	8	that?
	9	A	Well, yes, sir.
	10	Q	And we can assume a lot of things as to how things
	11	got broken in there. Don't you agree with that?
	12	A	That's correct.
	13	Q	All right. So the mere fact that you walked through
	14	there and you made certain assumptions, those assumptions
	15	may be well based or they may not be well based. That's a
	16	fair statement, isn't it?
	17	A	Yes, sir.
	18	Q	You retrieved the hammer from the attic, is that
	19	correct?
	20	A	Yes, sir.
	21	Q	And when you retrieved the hammer from the attic you
	22	did not have any gloves on, did you, sir?
	23	A	I believe I did, but I can't say for certain.
	24	Q	Let me ask you, sir, do you recall testifying at the
	25	preliminary hearing in this matter?

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


292
	1	A	Yes, sir.
	2	Q	And that was back in March, is that correct?
	3	A	I forget the date. About that time, yes, sir.
	4	Q	I want to read you at page 36, counsel, line 7 and 8
	5	or I'll start with line 3. I'm sorry. This question was
	6	asked of you, sir:
	7			"QUESTION: And that would have been the
	8			same way with the hammer?
	9			ANSWER: That's correct.
	10			QUESTION: Now, you are the one that physically
	11			picked those up?
	12			ANSWER: Yes, I was.
	13			QUESTION: You were not gloved at the time?
	14			ANSWER: No, I was not I don't believe. I
	15			don't believe I was, but I can't recall. I
	16			might have been."
	17	So you don't know whether you were gloved at that
	18	particular time.
	19			MR. CORGAN: Same testimony. We're going
	20	to object.
	21			MR. CARLSON: Well, here, Your Honor, he
	22	says I don't believe I was. No, I don't believe I was.
	23	Then he goes on to say I can't recall.
	24			THE COURT: Sustained to the form of the
	25	question.

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


293
	1	Q	(By Mr. Carlson) Fair characterization is that you
	2	do not recall?
	3		         MR. CORGAN: It's been asked and answered.
	4		         THE COURT: You may answer.
	5	A	I don't recall.
	6	Q	(By Mr. Carlson) All right. Thank you. Now, at the
	7	time that you picked up those gloves you also picked up
	8	the paper towels along with them, isn't that correct?
	9	A	At the same time?
	10	Q	Well, shortly thereafter.
	11	A	Yes.
	12	Q	And the paper towels were not wet, were they?
	13	A	I don't believe so, no.
	14	Q	Were you ever furnished with a crime scene log, sir,
	15	of who was in that crime scene before you arrived there
	16	that night?
	17	A	No, I was not.
	18	Q	Were you ever furnished with a photographic log of
	19	what photographs were taken, had been taken prior to your
	20	arrival?
	21	A	No, I was not.
	22	Q	Were you aware as to whether or not there was any
	23	video or any photographs taken prior to your arrival at
	24	the scene there that night?
	25	A	I believe there was, but I can't say for certain.

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


294
	1	believe there was.
	2	Q	Okay. It has come to your attention that there has
	3	been or was a video taken prior to your arrival, isn't
	4	that correct?
	5	A	I think there was, yes, sir.
	6	              MR. CARLSON: That's all we have, Your
	7	Honor. Thank you.
	8	              THE COURT: Redirect.
	9	-------------------------------------------------------
	10	                 REDIRECT EXAMINATION
	11	BY MR. CORGAN:
	12	Q	Mr. Otte, when you went to this crime scene or you go
	13	to any other crime scene, why is it that you make
	14	assumptions?
	15	A	Trying --
	16	              MR. CARLSON: Objection, Your Honor. All
	17	we did was touched on his assumptions, we didn't ask why.
	18	And we touched on the assumptions he did on direct.
	19	               THE COURT: Sustained.
	20	Q (By Mr. Corgan) What's the process that you go
	21	through as you look at that crime scene?
	22	               MR. CARLSON: Same objection, Your Honor.
	23	               THE COURT: Sustained.
	24	Q (By Mr. Corgan) Mr. Otte, as you talked to the
	25	defendant those early morning hours, you were able to

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


295
	1	confirm a lot of things, weren't you?
	2	A	Yes.
	3	Q	And that was information that came from the
	4	defendant?
	5	A	Yes.
	6	Q	Told you about buying the stuff at Dillards?
	7	A	Yes.
	8	Q	Were you able to ever confirm what he told you about
	9	an intruder being in the area?
	10	A	No, sir.
	11	Q	Was there anyone other than Stephen Allen that had
	12	any information as to an intruder?
	13	A	No, sir.
	14	Q	Did he ever tell you that evening that between the
	15	time	that he left Dillards after talking to his wife and
	16	going to the church that he went back by the house?
	17		          MR. CARLSON: Objection, Your Honor,
	18	leading and beyond the scope of cross.
	19		          THE COURT: You may answer.
	20	A	No, sir.
	21	Q	(By Mr. Corgan) And did you receive some information
	22	that between 8:30 and 9:05 that he was in the area of his
	23	house?
	24	A	Yes, sir.
	25		          MR. CORGAN: That's all.

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


296
	1	---------------------------------------------
	2	                  RECROSS-EXAMINATION
	3	BY MR. CARLSON:
	4	Q	And the information that you received was that he
	5	drove by his house, correct?
	6	A	One occasion, yes, sir.
	7	              MR. CARLSON: Thank you. That's all we
	8	have.
	9	----------------------------------------------
	10	                 REDIRECT EXAMINATION
	11	BY MR. CORGAN:
	12	Q	Well, you received other information as to him
	13	driving by his home, is that correct?
	14	              MR. CARLSON: Objection, Your Honor. Now
	15	we're really beyond the scope of recross.
	16	              THE COURT: Sustained to the form of the
	17	question.
	18	Q (By Mr. Corgan) Did you receive information that he
	19	was at his home other than driving by?
	20	               MR. CARLSON: Objection, Your Honor. Same
	21	objection.
	22	               THE COURT: Sustained.
	23	Q (By Mr. Corgan) You tell us you've received
	24	information as to him driving by his home, is that
	25	correct?

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT


297
	1		  MR. CARLSON:	Objection, leading. He's
	2	still --
	3		  THE COURT:	He's answered it.
	4		  MR. CORGAN:	That's all.
	5		  THE COURT:	Thank you, Officer. You may
	6	step down.  Let's take a 10 minute recess, please.
	7	(FOR FURTHER TRANSCRIPTION, SEE VOLUME II
	8	OF JURY TRIAL PROCEEDINGS.)
	9	---------------------------------------------------------
	10
	11
	12
	13
	14
	15
	16
	17
	18
	19
	20
	21
	22
	23
	24
	25

DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA
OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT 


 

lh1998-99, 2000