If it's true that two totally different ideas can never be meaningfully compared if they have nothing in common, as some people say, do we have to give up all scientific procedure?

Clashing paradigms

Since so many scientists in the past (and today) believed there was some positive way of proving a hunch true, there must be something in it, mustn't there? Well, as I say here, induction is an essential part of thinking, but that is not the same thing as being science...

Inductionism

Popper's definition of science seemed to rely on certain things being certain. If some things are unavoidably uncertain, what now? I scratch the surface...

Probability and Popperism






Back to main web page