Introduction

Constitution
Union Profile
Activities 
Reports
Nationality Laws
News Update
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Introduction:

The current crisis which has been afflicting Bhutan since last ten years is the fruit of the seeds sown by the inherent unsecured political institution of absolute monarchy. Alarmed by the tremor of the global upsurge of democratic movement in the eighties it experienced, government enacted some biased laws and regulations victimizing the Southern Bhutanese directly. This strategy essentially to divert national attention from the outside and prevent any possibility of nation wide call for democratic reforms and ensure the continuity of privileges of a selected few guaranteed by absolute monarchy.

Some Biased Acts and Discriminatory Policies:

  1. Census Policy:The crux of current crisis is the fundamental issue of, nationality right of citizens. the Citizenship Act of 1985 which was implemented in 1988 making 1958 as the cut off year, requiring everyone to produce and land tax receipt of 1958 as a proof of domicile in country. The malafide intentions of the government became fully stark when the census team refused to acknowledge receipts issued prior to 1958.
  2. Driglam Namza - A Cultural Invasion: To further add to the woes of southern Bhutanese, Driglam Namza, a code of etiquette of the ruling class was imposed in 1988. It directly interferes with one's personal rights as one has to follow, the prescribed culture, and tradition. The use of the weapon of Driglam Namza to invade the culture and tradition of other ethnic groups is an unprecedented cultural genocide in the history of mankind and an open non-compliance to Article 27 of UDHR.
  3. Greenbelt Policy: In contradiction to government's plan to give priority to the agricultural sector in order to achieve self sufficiency in food grain, the "green belt" policy, which aimed at converting one kilometer wide east and west arable southern border into forest was advocated.

    If implemented, the policy would have displaced around 30% of the population from their original settlement. So, it was more a policy, with utter political motive, has now become clear with the government felling down immature forest plantation in the south to meet its financial needs.

  4. Forced Labour: Though serfdom or slavery was completely abolished, in 1986 the National Assembly resolved to form "National Workforce" a force of Workers to meet labour requirements of the country This discriminatory policy required, at times coerced people, to enter into a contract for two years, which in   many instances the contract never expired. The labour conscription from southern  Bhutanese for government  and private estates lasts from fifteen days to a year. And those who are demanded labour for having shown their sympathy towards the Human Rights activists or having participated in the demonstration or given donations are never paid. This policy has greatly affected people's economy in the south and has added to their misery and has made the mockery of Article 4 at the UDHR.
  5. Education Policy: As in other departments/ministries, like Foreign Affairs, Civil Administration, Druk Air, Immigration and Census, Education Department is one, where government never given jobs to a Southern Bhutanese. Even the post of a school principal is reserved for the ruling class.

The Right to Education constitutionally guaranteed in the civilized nations does not prevail in Bhutan. Even the limited available schools facilities are not distributed fairly; for e.g. out of ten high schools only two are in the south and two in the east. Nepali language is removed from the school curriculum and Nepali books were burnt and Dzongkha the language of 12-15% population is made compulsory and the only limiting factor for getting admission in the schools and college and seeking employment.

The college offers very limited subjects and the scholars are compelled to study as per the interest of the Government. The study of Human Rights, Political Science etc. are unimaginable. The government in Bhutan has grossly violated Article 26 of UDHR.

Public dissent and governments counter action

The worst part of the policies was Government's high-handedness in implementation by over zealous officials which prompted a cohesive reaction from the students and led to the formation of SUB on March 23,1988 in Sherubtse College, Kanglung Bhutan. This was followed by similar action by students in other institutions like Deothang Polytechnic and National Institute of Education(NIE) Samchi, Mr. Tek Nath Rizal, the then Royal Advisory Councilor, has to flee the country after three days of harrowing interrogation and torture for having dared to apprise the King about the high handedness of the census team and seeking his intervention into improper conduct of census exercise.

Immense tolerance and every attempt by southern Bhutanese to adjust to the way of life conditioned by the government, failed to win any sympathy. Instead, the government carried with greater intensity and brutality, the plan designed towards the accomplishment of ultimate crime "Cultural genocide".

The students volunteers were compelled to come out in the streets to voice against the draconian policies and regulations of the government in 1990. But the Government instead of recognizing the genuine cause of the people resorted to gun solution and came down hard against the display of public dissent.

Between October 20th to November 1990 the King and his close hard-line associates sat chalking out master plan for countering the crisis. It was decided that the army should be raised to over 20,000 strong men. The difference in land shown by the cadastral survey and the earlier survey with the excuse of illegal land encroachment would be confiscated.

The development activity in the south have been frozen in order to shield southern Bhutanese from exposure to external visitors and also to meet Government expenditure to handle the crisis. The Government started giving arms training in six newly opened training centres to other groups and started instilling in them a feeling of hatred against the Nepali speaking Bhutanese. Thus arousing passions and promising suitable rewards like allotment of lands and other opportunities specially to Sarchops in the east, if they supported the monarch.

At the same time the Royal Government of Bhutan made hue and cry about the non-violent movement and tried to label it as an anti-national terrorist movement by illegal economic immigrant and a handful of politically motivated people. It further tried to justify its every sinful deeds in the name of preservation of unique culture, natural environment and pursue sustainable development in the international fora.

  1. Clamp Down: The government started hunting down the demonstrators. The security forces opened fire on the demonstrators. State terrorism like rape, loot, plunder, arrest without warrant and prolonged detention without trial, was a strategic move by the government to quell the voice of the people. Today southern Bhutan is under army rule with huge force of army stationed at various points.
  2. Closure of Schools and Other Facilities: After the demonstration by SUB, the government became more hostile, towards the Students. Schools in Southern Bhutan were immediately closed down and were converted into army barracks and temporary prisons, directly affecting the career of over 40,000 students. This was followed by withdrawal of public facilities like health and essential commodities. To further ensure that, students are punished, all southern Bhutanese students are asked to produce No Objection Certificate (NOC) from authorities, certifying his/her or even his/her relatives on involvement in the movement. The government even went up to the extend of concealing scholarship of there who were studying in India.
  3. Destroying of leadership: In order to destroy the leadership and give death to the movement, Govt. arrested village head, National Assembly members and prominent citizens of both Nepali and Sarchop origin who would have taken effective leadership in the movement. Virtually all village headman and assembly members of southern Bhutan are either in prison or in exile.
  4. Eviction and Mass Exodus: When the fully unleashed security forces went on the spree of mass torture, arrest, loot, plunder and other forms of intimidation, the people succumbed to the government's hostile regulations and terror tactics. Seeing no point in desperately sticking to their homes under continuous threat and uncertainty for life, people started fleeing the country leaving behind everything they owned. The government also started systematically evicting people after forcing them to sign "voluntary migration forms". This resulted in the mass influx of people seeking refuge in Nepal.

Plight of Bhutanese Students:

Students are the hardest hit group and the maximum sufferer and this struggle after the peaceful demonstration, the government intensified its hunt for the student activists. All schools in southern Bhutan were closed down, and served as prisons and barracks. Students studying in the other areas were also denied education on grounds of his relatives participating in the demonstration. Those who wish to look for jobs to earn his/her living were also denied on same ground.

With the unleashing of terror and violence by the repressive Thimphu regime, the number of Bhutanese evicted or fleeing the country increased, today there are over 85,000 Bhutanese sheltered in the UNHCR monitored eight camps in Nepal.

Because of the tremendous influx of students, SUB had to re-orient its activities and take initiatives to open school in various camps before any agency turned up for help. Today these students are benefiting from the Refugee Education Programme financed by CARITAS Nepal and UNHCR. However, there are thousands who, for some reasons cannot dream continuing their studies in order to make their life a meaningful one.

Conclusion:

Ten years have passed since the problem in Bhutan first began. The government however, failed or has shown little interest to resolve the problem. Instead, the government has been trying to malign those who are struggling for human rights in Bhutan with baseless charges. The government is using all the machinery at its disposal to misinform the world about the genuine cause for dissent, and making every effort to quell the voice for justice.

Government has already planned to open army wings and training centres in the South at Pinjuli, Ghumauney, Sarbang etc.  with the help of Indian Government. The Thimphu regime's determination to suppress its citizens and continue with it repressive policies has become clear with the non-inclusion of human rights issue anywhere during Nepal-Bhutan talks, and not taking the Bhutanese dissidents group in confidence. In Thimphu's context human rights activism is a punishable act. The agreement to categorize people into ''Bhutanese who have committed criminal acts' has complicated the issue of Bhutanese refugee repatriation and pushed it into uncertainty.

This utter disregard for the origin for the rights of its own citizens, including Conventions which Bhutan has committed to respect is not only a crime but also challenge to all the justice loving people of the world.

The SUB appeals to all justice loving people, human rights groups and government to exercise their influence with the RGOB and persuade it:

  • to take the refugees back home in dignity and honour;
  • to release all human rights and political prisoners unconditionally;
  • to extend full support and solidarity in our endeavor to usher human rights and democracy in Bhutan.


[Introduction] Profiles] [Activities] [Reports ] [News]

   
 
 
   
© 1999-2000 Student Union of Bhutan
For further information contact :Biswanath Chhetri (President)
Kamal Dhittal (General Secretary)
Webmaster