HR-keting Cusmoyees
A strategic approach to control software turnover

Abstract

The single most important characteristic of the Indian software industry is the supply-demand gap. In this context, the authors have tried repositioning HRM by proposing a marketing mindset to attract and retain the best. The mindset has been explained by introducing two concepts - HR-keting and Cusmoyees. The concepts are explained based on the 4 P's of marketing. The implementation prescriptive is aimed at redesigning the six generic functions of HRM.

Introduction

Indian software companies find it difficult to attract and retain quality talent. This affects the competitive advantage enjoyed by them in the world market. As a result of high demand-supply ratio, employees can afford to leave organizations that fail to provide acceptable rewards, satisfy their desire for participation, provide challenging work and freedom to perform. This paper presents a new concept, HR-keting, a marketing mindset for HR, targeting reduction in attrition rates.

HR-keting

HR-keting is a strategy, an idea, a program, a practice, or a system that provides an insight into aligning the six generic functions of HRM (recruitment & selection, performance management, training & development, rewards & benefits, organizational design and communication) with the organizational goals. The motives of HR-keting could be employee reduction, train a better workforce and beyond. This paper concentrates on the existing Indian software scenario where the need of the hour is 'employee retention'.

Employee retention - threats and causes

The top threats to employee retention as identified by research are higher salaries offered by competitors, dissatisfaction with career development plan, lack of appreciation and job burnout. The main causes for employee turnover according to researchers are compensation, career development, work hours, job fit, manager-employee relations, corporate culture, recognition, family obligations, physical work environment and employee communications. (www.pstc.com) HR-keting is a way to look at these threats.

Repositioning HR

The concept of HR-keting is repositioning HR in an organization. The situation is further complicated as the role of the HR department is not limited by organizational boundaries and this brings forth the sharing or partnering role. The HR department has to team up with the 'loyal long term high performing' employees in order to determine those aspects of the company:
a)  to which they have developed an admiration; and 
b)  which have helped them retain their association with the company.

The information from the exit interviews can also serve as a resource to help identify what to avoid and what to treasure. This information gathering will help in organizational design.

Internal

Instead of getting constrained by working within the framework and aligning itself to the organization strategy, the HR department has to position itself as HR-keters by marketing the company to it’s employees. Since software companies have no existence apart from their employees, marketing the company essentially means marketing the employees to themselves. Moreover, it is much more than a one-time sale; rather it is an every day affair.

External

HR professional also has to decide how (s)he will sell the company to its potential employees. The role of HR executive according to the new concept of HR-keting includes making the company relevant to the potential employees. It aims at positioning the image of the company as a living, learning, growing and adapting group of people who are proud to own the company and proud to be owned and not one of a dead dry organization.

This concept of creating value by applying the marketing angle to HR has got special relevance in the light of the future where a shakeup is imminent and which will see the firms who don’t shape up being shaken out of the competition.

Describing HR-keting in terms of the four Ps of Marketing

While conceptualizing and implementing HR-keting, it would be logical if this concept is looked at from the marketing perspective also. (McCarthy, 1979)  Thus HR-keting from the viewpoint of the employees can be described as follows:
a)  Price : the price they would be willing to pay remain with the company;
b)  Product: the product that they would like to be;
c)  Promotion: the image of the company including their own that they would like to uphold; and
d)  Place: the extent to which the employees would trouble themselves to keep on owning the product.

The striking similarity between the relations between HR and employees and the marketer and the customer is evident.  Once the HR department has made up it's mind on the 4 P’s, the onus lies on it to communicate the same to its employees.

This concept is embodied in the term 'HR-keting'.

However, HR-keting is different from traditional marketing.

 

Traditional Marketing

HR-keting

Product

Ø  No life
Ø  Man-made
Ø  Control over design/shape
Ø  No resistance
Ø  Alive
Ø  Company, the past & present manpower
Ø  Relatively less control
Ø  Votes with its feet

Customer

Ø  The people who buy

Ø  The present & future manpower

In HR-keting, the product being marketed includes the image of the company, which includes the present employees also. The customer base we are trying to present is a mix of potential and present employees. But this throws up an interesting situation: the existing employee should be thought of as the customer besides being an employee of the company.

Since the existing employees are both customers and employees at the same time the present manpower would be aptly called 'cusmoyees'

Implementing HR-keting

The implementation of the HR-keting concept can be visualized as shown below 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The two salient points in the model are:
a)     The six generic functions are not discrete. They blend into one another.
b)     There is an interrelationship between the generic functions and HR-keting.

Since HR-keting is at a higher level of abstraction, the implementation has to be explained in terms of the six generic functions.

Recruitment and Selection

Assessment ought to be a two way process - management assessing the extent to which candidates meet the position's selection criteria and the candidates gathering data about the organization and the available position. Since candidates frequently share this information with their peers, negative information can reduce the pool of qualified candidates who might apply or accept employment with an organization. (Jones, 1991)  On the other hand, positive impressions can do just the reverse, providing the organization with an edge over others. Hence:

"Communication on selection should reflect efficiency of operation"

Maintaining open communication with candidates throughout the selection process ensures that they understand the rational for each step in the procedure. Being precise, explicit and clear about the selection criteria with candidates also benefit the organizations, as the applicants perceive the process as fair. If any testing has to be done, it needs to be made certain that constructive feed back is provided for, since lasting impressions of the company's character are formed during recruitment. Hence:

"Recruitment impressions, though first time are lasting impressions"

Hiring future cusmoyees as smart as or smarter than the present cusmoyees and getting out of their way after making the organisations' expectations clear enhances organisational commitment. The cusmoyees also need to be encouraged in recruiting future ones as smart as they are. This is logical since smart hard working people have smart hard working friends. Hence:

"Create the Pygmalion effect and follow the chain downward and outward"

Performance Management 

The liberation of the work force or a drastic cut in the number of managers for supervision in the organizations and giving control to those actually doing the work is now a  'competitive necessity'. The role of a manager has shifted to that of a coach. Hence:

"Employee performance should not be managed"

The software industry is transcending the era of the ‘information based organization of knowledge specialists' to the era of 'knowledge creating companies'; companies that are defined by the knowledge they create. Cusmoyees in these companies are more than just human resources, but rather are the resources, the source and carrier of the company’s knowledge. The knowledge worker thus becomes a uniquely differentiating organizational asset in which the only intelligent human resource strategy is that of continuous reinvestment i.e. development. Hence:

"The viable workforce strategy is workforce development or reinvestment"

A high level of individual and organizational performance cannot be sustained without an actively managed context. Organizational support is an important component in their performance equation:

Performance = Individual Attributes * Work Effort * Organizational Support

In order to achieve the organizational support mentioned in the equation the management ought to focus on coherent support for the cusmoyees by providing information about organization goals, resources, technology, structure and policies. Thus the management is able to create a context for work which has a multiplicative impact – a context in which individual attributes (competency to perform) and work effort (willingness to perform) gets augmented exponentially. In short managing context is entirely about helping people understand the organization, themselves and their potential. Hence:

"Manage the context where performance occurs rather than performance"

Training and Development

From the above changed concept of performance management, continuous development is the key to retaining the competitive advantage in a knowledge industry. This should not be solely linked to the company’s strategic goals.

Researchers have pointed out the false distinction between selection and development and have argued that selection is development because the selection of a cusmoyee for an assignment is the major influence on his/her development. The different jobs in an organization differ in their development potential. Just like a cusmoyee is fitted to a job on the basis of his/her competencies, the fit should be attained also between his/her development needs and the development potential of the job.  The development potential of the job depends on the challenging situations or 'development components' one will face as part of the job. Such situations stimulate development because they provide two important aspects of a learning situation: the opportunity and motivation to learn. Any job can be classified on development potential on the basis of five broad headings: Transition, Creating change, High level of responsibility, Non authority relationship and Handling external pressure. (McCauley et al., 1995) Thus, the development of a cusmoyee will depend on his/her selection to a job that offers him/her development potential. (S)he learns 'on the job'. Hence:

"Experience is the best teacher" 

The cusmoyee should be empowered as far as possible to decide the fit between his/her development and the job according to the 'job's development potential'. Irrespective of the job's and its development potential, the cusmoyee should be held responsible to see that he culls out rich experiences from his job. Make sure every one knows they are responsible for training their own replacements. Make bench strength a prerequisite for promotions.  Hence:

 "Cusmoyee is the chief architect of his/her development"

Organizational Design

The organisational design needs to have a human component resulting in a human-organisational architecture. Two crucial issues in organisational design are:
a) Task structure design
b) Task allocation to cusmoyees

The first issue can be suitably handled by shifting the work paradigm from that of a military description of management actions to that of a team game or a sports race. Cusmoyees need to be given 'moments of truth' so that they remember the company. This can be achieved by adopting an event strategy by which every interaction with the cusmoyee is a positive one. Only if the company treats its' cusmoyees well, they will treat customers well. Customer loyalty comes from cusmoyee loyalty. Cusmoyees who feel mistreated will not work that extra mile for the consumer. (Miller, 1993) Hence:

"Shift the work paradigm by better mutual treatment enhancing loyalty"

The second issue is typically not asked in business process engineering. It is assumed that the cusmoyees will do what it is told to; usually it is never corroborated by observation.

An organisation should conduct an activity system managed and controlled to satisfy a set of organisational objectives. This requires purposeful behaviour as the activity system would also be related to external relationships (satisfying customer demands, producing returns to investors), or internal ones (improving processes, resource usage)

This activity system is constrained by the organisation’s resources as well as its' own functional capabilities. The organisation needs to follow and not just appear to be following this system while monitoring the effectiveness of the results achieved. If the system fails in some way, then the activities or the objectives need to be modified. For example an activity system of true empowerment for a dynamic organisation would mean people having knowledge of the appropriate time to break rules, take initiative and take corrective action. (Bernus et al., 1999)

Hence:

"Develop an objective based activity system for task allocation"

Rewards and Benefits

People work the hardest to achieve ideas they believe in. And not surprisingly people have the strongest belief in their own ideas. Innovation is not a command performance. Policy makers, no matter how wise, cannot make it happen. But they can make decisions that encumber or encourage it. Advocate sensible policies that maintain and enhance the incentive to innovate. (Jones, 1991) Hence:

 "Reward ideas, both quality and quantity"

The compensation should be reviewed as and when necessary, at least twice a year. The total compensation has to be thought of as a unique mix of benefits and incentives apart from the base pay to fit each cusmoyee. Consult the cusmoyee to know his inclination. (www.hewittassoc.com) Hence:

 "Forget about historical pay standards"

Reward individuals and reward teams that help get star performers so that the company gets star teams. To augment the concept of selection by referrals and hence teamwork:

"Link the reward system with recruitment by referrals"

Communication

A critical task for the leaders is to shape and articulate their visions and expectations to all cusmoyees. The competitive organisations have the capacity to listen to and learn from suppliers, customers, employees and other stakeholders. Special emphasis should be laid on keeping the cusmoyees informed about the new initiatives in the company in a timely fashion (not too early and not too late). It should be done in a manner that will assure clarity and thoroughness as opposed to journalistic hype. Company’s internal magazine, newsletter, special articles featuring a value theme etc can be used to augment the culture effort. Other media like visuals, bulletin board etc can be used for spreading the word.

Though the new initiatives might be quite clear in the minds of the HR and the top management it may come across as quite vague, general or abstract to a majority of the people in the organisation. (Theus, 1995) Using a symbol may help not only to simplify and clarify the change goal but also to capture cusmoyees’ imagination and enthusiasm. For instance, a mouse or mouse-pad on which a message is inscribed is a symbol. Hence:

 "Effectively use symbols for communication" 

Conclusions: The Marketing Mindset  

HR-keting's basic function is to maximize the effective and efficient use of people's work to support the organization's mission and indirectly to enhance cusmoyee satisfaction by providing trained customer-focussed cusmoyees who can provide high quality products and services. HR is a supplier of people; it provides the services necessary to sustain and improve cusmoyee capabilities (Hart et al. 1991) . It must also serve each and every individual cusmoyee by creating a satisfying work environment and providing tangible rewards.

The HR must adopt a new vision of itself as a cusmoyee-focussed service provider. It clearly has multiple constituencies or multiple customer groups: existing employees and potential employees. As a service provider HR must understand the needs of each 'customer group' and work towards maximizing each group's satisfaction and contribution. Each constituency requires something from HR at each stage of the life cycle from recruitment, hiring and ongoing career development. One cannot determine how effective HR practices are, unless the needs at each stage of the customer groups are defined and goals based on these needs are set.

In evaluating HR-keting functional performance, in serving these needs, two overriding concerns are
a) setting 100% cusmoyee satisfaction as HR's ultimate goal
b) developing systems to help achieve these goals and it's components

To recap the basics of HR-keting orientation, one needs to identify markets; segment these into customer groups, listen to each group, design products and services that meet the customer need, create systems to ensure performance, and continually monitor the satisfaction of every group.

References

1.   Bernus, Peter & NemesLaszlo. 1999. Organisational Design: Dynamically creating and sustaining integrated virtual enterprises. (Also available with: bernus@cit.gu.edu.au)

2.   Hart, Christopher & Leonard Schleisinger. 1991. Total quality Management and the Human Resource professional: Applying the Baldridge Frame work to Human resources. Human Resources Management. , Vol. 30, No. 4, Pg. 450

3.   Jones Thomas W. 1991. Performance Management in a changing context: Monsanto pioneers a Competency–Based Developmental Approach, Human Resource Management, Vol. 34, No. 3

4.   McCarthy, Jerome E. 1979. Essentials of Marketing. Richard D. Irwin Inc. Illinois

5.   McCaulley, Cynthia D., & Eastman, Lorrina J., & Ohlott, Patricia J. 995.  Linking Management Selection and Development through Stretch Assignments. Human Resources Management, Vol. 34, No. 1. Pg. 113

6.   Miller, James B., 1993, The Corporate Coach, St. Martin's Press: New York

7.   Theus, Katheryn T. 1995. Communication in a power Vacuum: Sense Making and Enactment during Crisis-Induced Departures. Human Resources Management, Vol. 34, No. 1, Pg. 38

8.   Waterman, Robert H., Jr. 1987. The Renewal Factor. Bantam Books: New York

Internet sites

1.   http://www.hewittassoc.com

2.   http://www.pstc.com