THIRUVALLIKENI KANDENE
THIS SITE IS SUBMITTED TO THE HOLY FEET OF SHREE PARTHASARATHI EMPERUMAN
|
Sri
Parthasarathi thunai
Srimathe Ramanujaya Namaha
Sri Vara Vara MunayE Namaha
Sri VanAchala mahA munayE Namaha
SrisailEsa dayA pAthram deebhakthyAdhi gunArnavam Yateendra pravanam vandhE ramya jAmataram muni
RamyajAmatru yOgeendra pAdha rEkhA mayam sadhA thathAyath thAthma sadhdhAthim rAmAnuja munim bhajE On
the way of the long journey, thiruvenkata Jeeyer, anantAzhvan and others
involved in a deep discussion about the greatness of vanamamalai swamy as
follows: “Janaka, found piratti in his yaga shAla. He cared and brought up the child as his daughter and was immensely happy to give her in marriage to rAma piran. Vishnuchithar (“meimai peruvArthai ketturuppar”) found goda piratti under a tulasi plant in his garden. He brought up the child with great love and affection and gave in marriage to perumal with great joy. But janakan, king of mithilai, father of sita piratti or vidarpa raja, father of rukmani piratti or periyAzhvar, father of soodhikkoduththa nAchiyar will never equal the greatness of our swamy. Why
because, janakan considered sita piratti has his daughter and when perumal
himself (“rAmam sathya parAkramam) came and asked him to give her in marriage
to him, Janaka didn’t do it immediately but stubbornly said, “veerya
sulkEthi bhagavan nathathAmi sudha maham l thEsham jignAsamAnA nAm veeryam
thanarupAhrutham ll” and accepted for marriage only after perumal satisfied
his veerya sulkam (test for bravery) by breaking the siva dhanush.
So janaka was more concerned with his own promises even in front of
perumal. In
case of vidharpa raja though he knew that rukmani was in deep love with Krishna
paramatma (“sruthvAN gunAn bhuvanasundara srunvathAm thE nirvichya
karnavivarair hara thonga thApam l Roopam thrushAm thruchinmathA mahilAthma
lAbham tvai achchutavi sadhA chitthA mapathrapam mE ll”) and that only the two
suite each other and inspite of all the other relatives and friends voting for
the marriage, he listened to his beloved son rukmi and arranged for rukmani’s
marriage with sisupala . Periazhvar,
though being well versed in all sastras considered piratti to be his daughter
and hence had a doubt if perumal will accept her and with a abhimAnam that she
is his daughter gave her in marriage to perumal. In
all the above cases each one considered piratti to be their daughter but in the
case of our swamy, piratti who was found in thirumalai, considered him to be her
father and climbed over his lap in his dream, called him as her father and
requested him to take her along with him to vanamamalai and do her wedding with
deivanayaka perumal. Can janaka or
vidarpa king or periAzhvar be considered anywhere near swamy’s greatness? In
this way, they enjoyed exchanging views among themselves praising the divinity
of vanamamalai swamy and at one point taking leave of swamy and nachiyar
returned back to their places. (To
be continued) Alwar
EmperumAnAr jeeyar thiruvadigalE sharaNam Adiyen
Ramanuja dasyai Sumithra
Varadarajan
|