In search of the truth.


The following text is reprinted with expressed permission of Dr John Coleman from his book titled Conspirators Hierarchy: The story of the committee of 300 (America West Publishers, PO Box 3300, Bozeman, MT 59772)

The book is available from Dr Coleman.  Please see ordering details at the bottom of the page.

While this may be hard to believe, I don't deny its plausibility.  Many bands are 'created' these days.  Look at Milli Vanilli, The Spice Girls, etc etc.  Why couldn't this have happened.  Paul McCartney has received a Knighthood, and if the Queen is the head of the Committee of 300 talked about below, then maybe it was a reward for services rendered.??

And I certainly don't deny the plausablility of the whole brainwashing thing either.  With the money and power that this Committee of 300 has, and with all the other stuff I've read, it seems very scary, but possibly true.

Have a look at the Martin Bryant stuff also, as it is this (according to Joe Vialls) Tavistock Institute that is (supposedly) guilty of his manipulation/brain washing, resulting in the Port Arthur Massacre.

Also remember that even the best misinformation contains elements of the truth to make it more believable.

NB: I should point out that there is some debate around the internet about Dr Coleman and his claims, so do a search around and find out what some people have dug up/think about him.



As an added interesting note, I found the following article in a Melbourne newspaper (either the Herald-Sun or The Age.  Unfortunately I didn't date the clipping)

Magical Mystery Force
LONDON, Thursday - Sir Paul McCartney believed his songwriting might be guided by some kind of magic force.  Sir Paul has no idea what helped him pen classics like Yesterday and Eleanor Rigby.  "I'm a musical primitive.  I don't know the formal stuff, so I prefer to think of myself as a primitive," he told Radio 4.  "When I sit down to write ... There's a sort of dark space in front of me and from that space I just try to conjure something."



And this piece also, taken from Parascope(in turn quoting Dave Marsh in Rolling Stone magazine Feb 24, 1977), linking the rise of The Beatles with the Kennedy assasination - seen as a ritual assasination, "The Killing of the King".

"The Beatles have always had an intimate connection to the JFK assasination.  He was shot the week before Thanksgiving 1963.  By February 1964, The Beatles were number one in the national charts and the climactic appearance on Ed Sullivan's TV show occured.  Even Brian Epstein (the manager of The Beatles) believed the Kennedy assasination helped their rise -- The Beatles appeared to bind our wounds with their messages of joy and handholding ... And the way was paved, replacing Camelot with Oz."



And now to the quote from the book...)

"An outstanding example of social conditioning to accept change, even when it is recognised as unwelcome change by the large population group in the sights of Stanford Research Institute, was the "advent" of the BEATLES.  The Beatles were brought to the United States as part of a social experiment which would subject large population groups to brainwashing of which they were not even aware.

When Tavistock [Institute for Human Relations] brought the Beatles to the United States nobody could have imagined the cultural disaster that was to follow in their wake.  The Beatles were an integral part of "THE AQUARIAN CONSPIRACY," a living organism which sprang from THE CHANGING IMAGES OF MAN," URH (489)- 2150-Policy Research Report No. 4/4/74.  Policy Report prepared by SRI Center for the study of Social Policy, Director, Professor Willis Harmon.

The phenomenon of the Beatles was not a spontaneous rebellion by youth against the old social system.  Instead it was a carefully crafted plot to induce by a conspiratorial body which could not be identified, a highly destructive and divisive element into a large population group targeted for change against its will.  New words and new phrases - prepared by Tavistock - were introduced to America along with the Beatles.  Words such as "rock" in relation to music sounds, "teenager," "cool," "discovered" and "pop music" were a lexicon of disguised code words signifying the acceptance of drugs and arrived with and accompanied the Beatles wherever they went, to be "discovered" by "teenagers."  Incidentally, the word "teenagers" was never used until just before the Beatles arrived on the scene, courtesy of the Tavistock Institute for Human relations.

As in the case of gang wars, nothing could or would have been accomplished without the cooperation of the media, especially the electronic media and, in particular, the scurrilous Ed Sullivan who had been coached by the conspirators as to the role he was to play.  Nobody would have paid much attention to the motley crew from Liverpool and the 12-atonal system of "music" that was to follow had it not been for an overabundance of press exposure.  The 12-atonal system consisted of heavy, repetitive sounds, taken from the music of the cult of Dionysis and the Baal priesthood by Adorno and given a "modern" flavor by this special friend of the Queen of England and hence the Committee of 300.

Tavistock and its Stanford Research Center created trigger words which then came into general usage around "rock music" and its fans.  Trigger words created a distinct new break-away largley young population group which was persuaded by social engineering and conditioning to believe that the Beatles really were their favorite group.  All trigger words devised in the context of "rock music' were designed for mass control of the new targeted group, the youth of America.

The Beatles did a perfect job, or perhaps it would be more correct to say that Tavistock and Stanford did a perfect job, the Beatles merely reacting like trained robots "with a little help from their friends" - code words for using drugs and making it "cool."  The Beatles became a highly visible "new type" - more Tavistock jargon - and as such it was not long before the group made new styles (fads in clothing, hairstyles and language usage) which upset the older generation, as was intended.  This was part of the "fragmentation-maladaptation" process worked out by Willis Harmon and his team of social scientists and genetic engineering tinkerers and put into action."

...

Following the Beatles, who incidentally were put together by the Tavistock Institute, came other "made in England" rock groups, who, like the Beatles, had Theo Adorno write their cult lyrics and compose all the "music."...

Tavistock  and  Stanford Research  then  embarked on  the second phase of the work commissioned by the Committee of 300. This new phase turned up the heat for social change in America. As quickly as the Beatles had appeared on the American scene, so too did the "beat generation," trigger words designed to separate and fragment society. The media now focused its attention on the "beat generation." Other Tavistock-coined words came seemingly out of nowhere: "beatniks," "hippies," "flower children" became part of the vocabulary of America. It became popular to "drop out" and wear dirty jeans, go about with long unwashed hair. The "beat generation" cut itself off from main-stream America. They became just as infamous as the cleaner Beatles before them.

The newly-created group and its "lifestyle" swept millions of young Americans into the cult. American youth underwent a radical revolution without ever being aware of it, while the older generation stood by helplessly, unable to identify the source of the crisis, and thus reacting in a maladaptive manner against its manifestation, which were drugs of all types, marijuana, and later Lysergic acid, "LSD," so conveniently provided for them by the Swiss pharmaceutical company, SANDOZ, following the discovery by one of its chemists, Albert Hoffman, how to make synthetic  ergotamine,  a  powerful  mind-altering  drug.  The Committee of 300 financed the project through one of their banks, S. C. Warburg, and the drug was carried to America by the philosopher, Aldous Huxley.

The new "wonder drug" was promptly distributed in "sample" size packages, handed out free of charge on college campuses across the United States and at "rock" concerts, which became the leading vehicle for proliferating the use of drugs. The question that cries out for an answer is, what was the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) doing at the time? There is compelling circumstantial evidence that would appear to indicate that the DEA knew what was going on but was ordered not to take any action.

With very substantial numbers of new British "rock" bands arriving in the U.S., rock concerts began to become a fixture on the social calender of American youth. In tandem with these "concerts," the use of drugs among the youth rose in proportion. The devilish bedlam of discordant heavy beat sounds numbed the minds of listeners so that they were easily persuaded to try the new drug on the basis that "everybody is doing it." Peer pressure is a very strong weapon. The "new culture" received maximum coverage from the jackal media, which cost the conspirators not one single thin dime.

Great  anger  was  felt by  a  number of civic  leaders  and churchmen over the new cult but their energies were misdirected against the RESULT of what was going on and not against the CAUSE. Critics of the rock cult made the same mistakes that had been made in the prohibition era, they criticized law enforcement agencies, teachers, parents   anybody but the conspirators.

Because of the anger and resentment I feel toward the great drug plague, I make no apology for using language which is not customary for me to use. One of the worst drug slobs ever to walk the streets of America was Alan Ginsberg. This Ginsberg pushed the use of LSD through advertising which cost him nothing, although under normal circumstances it would have cost millions of dollars in TV advertising revenues. This free advertising for drugs, and LSD in particular, reached a new high in the late 1960's, thanks to the ever-willing cooperation of the media. The effect of Ginsberg's mass advertising campaign was devastating; the American public was subjected to one cultural future shock after another in rapid succession.

We became over-exposed and over stimulated and, again, may I remind you that this is Tavistock jargon, lifted from the Tavistock training manual, overwhelmed by its new development and, when we reached that point, our minds began to lapse into apathy; it was just too much to cope with, that is to say, "long range penetration had taken hold of us." Ginsberg claimed to be a poet but no greater rubbish was ever written by anyone who ever aspired to becoming a poet. Ginsberg's designated task had little to do with poetry; his main function was to push the new subculture and force acceptance of it upon the large targeted population group.

To assist him in his task, Ginsberg coopted the services of Norman Mailer, a writer of sorts who had spent some time in a mental institution. Mailer was a favorite of the leftwing Hollywood crowd and so had no problem with getting maximum television time for Ginsberg. Naturally Mailer had to have a pretext--not even he could blatantly come out with the true nature of Ginsberg's television appearances. So a charade was adopted: Mailer would talk "seriously" on camera with Ginsberg about poetry and literature.

This method of getting wide television coverage at no cost to themselves was followed by every rock group and concert promoter who followed the example set by Ginsberg. The electronic media moguls had big hearts when it came to giving free time to these dirty verminous creatures and their even dirtier products and filthy ideas. Their promotion of horrible garbage spoke volumes and, without abundant help from the print and electronic media, the drug trade could not have spread as rapidly as it did in the late 1960's-early 197O's, and probably would have been confined to a few small local areas.

Ginsberg was able to give several nationally televised performances extolling the virtues of LSD and marijuana, under the guise of "new ideas" and "new cultures" developing in the art and music world. Not to be outdone by the electronic media, Ginsberg's admirers wrote glowing articles about "this colorful man" in the art and social columns of all of America,s largest newspapers and magazines. There had never been such an across-the-media-board free  advertising  campaign  in  the  history of newspaper, radio and television and it cost the promoters of the Aquarian conspiracy, NATO and the Club of Rome not one red cent. It was all absolutely free advertising for LSD, only thinly disguised as "art" and "culture."

One of Ginsberg's closest friends, Kenny Love, published a Five-page report in the New York Times. This is in accordance with  the  methodology  used by  Tavistock and  Stanford Research: If something is to be promoted which the public has not yet been fully brainwashed to accept, then have someone write an article, covering all sides of the subject matter. The other method is to have live television talk shows in which a panel of experts promotes the product and or idea under the pretext of "discussing", it. There are point and counter-point, both pro and con participants airing their support or opposition. When it is all over, the subject to be promoted has been dinned into the public mind.  While  this  was  new in  the  early 1970's, today it is standard practice on which talk shows thrive.

Love's Five-page pro LSD pro Ginsberg article was duly printed by the New York Times. Had Ginsberg tried to buy the same amount of space in an advertisement, it would have cost him at least $50,000. But Ginsberg didn't have to worry; thanks to his Friend Kenny Love, Ginsberg got the massive advertising all for free. With newspapers like the New York Times and the Washington Post under the control of the Committee of 300, this kind of free advertising is given to any subject matter, and more especially to those promoting decadent life styles--drugs-hedo-nism--anything that will confuse the American people. After the trial run with Ginsberg and LSD, it became standard Club of Rome practice to call upon major newspapers in America to give free advertising on demand to people and ideas they were promoting.

Worse yet--or better yet, depending upon the viewpoint-- United Press (UP) picked up Kenny Love's free advertising for Ginsberg and LSD and telexed it to HUNDREDS of newspapers and magazines around the country under the guise of a "news"  story.  Even  such  highly  respectable  establishment magazines as "Harpers Bazaar" and "TIME" made Mr. Ginsberg respectable. If a nation-wide campaign of this magnitude were presented to Ginsberg and the promoters of LSD by an advertising agency, the price tag would have run into at least $1 million in terms of 1970 dollars. Today the price tag would be nothing less than $15-$16 million dollars. It is no wonder that I refer to the news media as "jackals."

I suggest that we try to find any media outlet to do an expose on the Federal Reserve Board, which is what I did. I took my article,  which was  a good expose of the greatest swindle on earth, to every major newspaper, radio and television station, magazine  house  and  several talk-show  hosts. A few  made promises  that  sounded  good--they  would  definitely  air  the article and have me discuss it--give them about a week and they would get back to me. Not one of them ever did, nor did my article ever appear in the pages of their newspapers and journals. It was as if a blanket of silence had been thrown over me and the subject  I  was  endeavoring to promote,  and indeed that was precisely what had happened.

Without massive media hype, and without almost around the clock coverage, the hippy-beatnik rock, drug cult would never have gotten off the ground; it would have remained a localized oddity. The Beatles, with their twanging guitars, silly expressions, drug language and weird clothes, would not have amounted to a hill of beans. Instead, because the Beatles were given saturation coverage by the media, the United States has suffered one cultural shock after another.

The men buried in the think tanks and research institutions, whose names and faces are still not known to but a few people,  made sure that the press played its part. Conversely, the media's  important role  in  not exposing  the  power behind  the  future cultural shocks made certain that the source of the crisis was never identified.  Thus  was  our society  driven  mad  through psychological shocks and stress. "Driven mad" is taken from Tavistock's  training manual. From its modest beginnings  in 1921, Tavistock was ready in 1966 to launch a major irreversible cultural revolution in America, which has not yet ended. The Aquarian Conspiracy is part of it.

Thus softened up, our nation was now deemed ripe for the introduction of drugs which was to rival the prohibition era in scope and the huge amounts of money to be made. This too was an integral part of the Aquarian Conspiracy. The proliferation of drug usage was one of the subjects under study at the Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU) at Tavistock's Sussex University facility. It was known as the "future shocks" center, a title given to so-called future oriented psychology designed to manipulate whole population groups to induce "future shocks." It was the first of several such institutions set up by Tavistock.

"Future  shocks"  is  described  as  a series  of events  which come so fast that the human brain cannot absorb the information. As I said earlier, science has shown that there are clearly marked limits to the amount of changes and the nature of them that the mind can deal with. After continuous shocks, the large targeted population group discovers that it does not want to make choices any more. Apathy takes over, often preceded by mindless violence such as is characteristic of the Los Angeles street gangs, serial killers, rapists and child kidnapers.

Such a group becomes easy to control and will docilely follow  orders  without rebelling,  which is the object of the exercise. "Future shocks," says SPRU, "is defined as physical and psychological distress arising from the excess load on the decision-making mechanism of the  human mind."  That  is Tavistock jargon lifted straight from Tavistock manuals--which they don't know I have.

Just as an overloaded electrical circuit will activate a trip  switch, so do humans "trip  out," which is a syndrome that  medical science is only now beginning to understand, although John Rawlings Reese conducted experiments in this field as far back as the 1920's. As can be appreciated, such a targeted group is ready to "trip out" and take to drugs as a means of escape from the pressures of so many choices having to be made. This is how Drug  usage  was  spread  so  rapidly  through America's "beat generation." What started with the Beatles and sample packages of LSD has grown into a flood-tide of drug usage which is swamping America.

The drug trade is controlled by the Committee of 300 from the Top down. The drug trade started with the British East India Company and was closely followed by the Dutch East India Company. Both were controlled by a "Council of 300." The list of names of members and stockholders of the BEIC read like something out of Debretts Peerage. BEIC established the "China Inland Mission," whose job it was to get The Chinese peasants, or coolies, as they were called, addicted to opium. This created the market for opium which the BEIC then filled.

In much the same way the Committee of 300 used "The "Beatles" to popularize "social drugs" with the youth of America and The Hollywood "in-crowd." Ed Sullivan was sent to England To become acquainted with The first Tavistock Institute "rock group"  to  hit the  shores  of the United States. Sullivan then returned to the United States to draft the strategy for the electronic media on how to package and sell the group. Without the full cooperation of the electronic media and Ed Sullivan, in particular, "The Beatles" and their "music" would have died on the vine. Instead, our national life and the character of the United States was forever changed.

Now that we know, it is all too clear how successful the "Beatles" campaign to proliferate the use of drugs became. The fact that "The Beatles" had their music and lyrics written for them by Theo Adorno was concealed from public view. The prime function to "The Beatles" was to be discovered by teen-
agers,  who  where  then  subjected  to  a non-stop  barrage of "Beatle music," until they became convinced that they liked the sound and adopted it, along with all that accompanied it. The Liverpool group performed up to expectations, and with "a little help from their friends," i.e., illegal substances we call drugs created a whole new class to young Americans in the precise mold ordained by the Tavistock Institute.

Tavistock had created a highly visible "new type" to act as their drug-runners. The China Inland Mission "Christian mis-sionaries" would not have fitted in with the 1960's. "New type" is  social-science scientist jargon;  what it meant was that the Beatles created new social patterns, first and foremost being to normalize and popularize the use of drugs, new tastes in clothes and hair styles which really distinguished them from the older generation as was intended by Tavistock.

It is important to note the deliberate fragmentation-inducing language used by Tavistock. The teenagers" never once dreamed that all the "different" things they aspired to were the product of older scientists working in think tanks in England and Stanford Research. How mortified they would have been if they had discovered that most of their "cool" habits and expressions were deliberately created for their use by a group of older social science scientists!

Conspriators' Hierarchy: The Story of The Committee of 300; Dr John Coleman; America West Publishers; 1992; pp 88-97



About Dr John Coleman.

 In my career as a professional  intelligence officer, I had many occasions to access highly classified documents, but during service as a political science officer in the field in Angola, West Africa, I had the opportunity to view a series of top secret classified documents which were unusually explicit. What I saw filled me with anger and resentment and launched me on a course from which I have not deviated, namely to uncover what power it is that controls and manages the British and United States governments.

I was thoroughly familiar with all of the well known secret societies such as the Royal Institute for International Affairs (RIIA), the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the Bilderbergers, Trilaterals, the  Zionists, Freemasonry, Bolshevism-Rosicrucianism and all of the spinoffs of these secret societies. As an  intelligence officer, and even before that as a young student in the course of my studies at the British Museum in London, I had cut my eye teeth on all of them, plus a good number of others with whom I imagined Americans were familiar.

But when I came to the United States in 1969, I found that names like the Order of St. John of Jerusalem, Club of Rome the German Marshall Fund, the Cini Foundation, the Round Table, the Fabianists, the Venetian Black Nobility, the Mont Pelerin Society, Hellfire Clubs, and many others were at best totally unknown here, or else their true functions were at best but poorly understood, if at all.

In 1969-1970 set about remedying the situation in a series of monographs and cassette tapes. Much to my surprise I soon found plenty of people willing to quote these names as if they had known of them all of their writing careers, but who were not in  the  least bit knowledgeable about the subjects,  yet quite unwilling to state the source of their lately acquired information. I consoled myself with the thought that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

I pursued my  investigations,  pressing  on  in  the  face of severe risks, attacks on myself and my wife, financial losses, continual harassment, threats and calumny, all part of a carefully-crafted and orchestrated program to discredit me, run by government agents and informers, embedded in the so-called Christian  rightwing,  the  "Identity  Movement"  and rightwing "patriotic"  groups.  These  agents  operated, and  still operate, under cover of strong  and fearless outspoken opposition to Judaism their main enemy, they would have us believe. These agent-informers are led and controlled by a group of homosexu- als who are well-liked and well-respected by political and religious conservatives all across the United States.

Their program of calumny, lies and hatred, disinformation about my work, even lately attributing it to other writers, continues unabated but it has not had the desired effect. I shall carry on with my task until I have finally ripped off the mask of the entire secret upper-level parallel government that runs Britain and the U.S. This book is a part of that ongoing effort.

Dr. John Coleman, November 1991

Full text of book - well worth the read.

To order any of Dr. Coleman's books, his news magazine World In Review or any of his monographs, or to receive a copy of his catalogue, please telephone or write to the following:

1 (800) 942-0821
W.I.R.
2533 North Carson St.
Suite J-118
Carson City, NV  89706
USA

The enhanced and updated 4th edition of Conspirator's Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300 is only available directly from Dr. Coleman.
World In Review is a 40 page bi-monthly publication and is the only political, science and economic news magazine that carries no advertisements!


Take me home