From
Me To You
An essay
on its recording and construction
Rohan Byrnes
|
This is a
post which appeared in rec.music.beatles. I
suggested to Rohan that he store it here while he
gets the other 199 Beatlesongs completed. To
which he agreed, in part. It's a fine piece of
detective work and reconstruction. |
|
Introduction
Like many people, I often find myself frustrated
with the lack of fine detail in Mark Lewisohn's Recording
Sessions book. I can understand it though - he did have
to make it readable after all. But for many sessions it
would be really nice to have the full details on how a
particular released track was constructed. From
Me To You is one of those tracks. The only
details that can be gleaned from Lewisohn's work is that
on the 5th of March 1963 the Beatles recorded the song in
"seven takes, then six additional edit piece
takes". On the 14th of March, an edit of unknown
take numbers was made and this was then mixed into both
mono and stereo. I believe that there is a lot more to
this story than that.
Twin-track
Recording Method
During this era, the Beatles' EMI sessions were
recorded on twin-track tape. In general they would record
a basic rhythm track on the left channel and live vocals
on the right. Additional instrumentation (such as
harmonica) would have to be added by overdubbing, and the
only way to do this with twin-track facilities was to
make a tape-to-tape copy of the backing track while
simultaneously recording the new sounds. The new
recording would then be one tape generation away from the
original and would therefore suffer from an increase in
tape hiss - a side effect of analogue tape
copying. For more complicated recordings, in order to
minimise the number of tape generations (and therefore
the tape hiss), they would often record additional
overdubs as edit pieces only - new sounds added
to only a small section of the backing track (for example
say, the middle eight of a song). These small sections
would then be edited in to the final master.
From Me To You
is a good example of the Beatles' recording method on
twin-track tape. It's also a good example of a session
that is not detailed enough in Lewisohn's book.
Fortunately the entire session has been bootlegged for us
to listen to. And careful listening to the tapes can fill
in the details that Lewisohn was unable to include.
Basic Track
Recordings
The first part of recording this track involved
laying down a basic rhythm track and vocals. This was
done in the usual way of having the rhythm on the left
and the vocals on the right. The following takes were
recorded:
|
|
Take 1 |
|
Breakdown |
|
|
|
Take 2 |
|
Complete |
|
|
|
Take 3 |
|
Complete |
|
|
|
Take 4 |
|
Complete |
|
|
|
Take 5 |
|
Complete |
|
|
|
Take 6 |
|
False start |
|
|
|
Take 7 |
|
Complete - Best |
|
Overdub Recordings
Overdub Take 8 (onto Take 7) complete - best (intro
vocals, middle eight harmonica, ending harmonica)
The next step was to add the opening "da-da-da
da-da-dum-dum-da" vocals, middle eight harmonica and
ending harmonica. This was done in a single overdub take,
taking the recording to second generation. Interestingly,
the overdubs were added to both channels of Take 8,
making them appear in the centre of the stereo image.
Usually such overdubs were added to the right (vocal)
channel only.
Edit Piece
Experiments
Lastly, the Beatles' experimented with a number
of edit piece takes, and these are possibly the most
fascinating part of the whole session. The key to the
construction of the final master is in this section as
well - because the available tape of edit pieces is
incomplete! Let's start at the beginning.
Opening and
Middle Eight Harmonica Experiment
Edit Piece 1, Take 9 (onto edit of Take 7) complete
The first edit piece is an extremely curious one. This is
another go at overdubbing harmonica onto Take 7. This
time to the beginning and middle eight only. Curious
though is the fact that the harmonica is added to both
these sections in one continuous go. It appears that they
are adding it to an edited down version of Take 7 (an
edit of just the beginning and middle eight - the take
begins with the count-in and opening of Take 7 then
switches immediately to the middle eight from Take 7. The
harmonica overdub on top of this is totally seamless).
Why would they do this? Perhaps to achieve a better (more
consistent) harmonica sound between the opening and
middle eight?
I'm calling this edit
piece as part of Take 9 even thought it has no take
number designation on the session tape.
Ending
Harmonica
Edit Piece 2, Take 9 (onto Take 7)
breakdown
Edit Piece 3, Take 10 (onto Take 7) complete
The next two edit pieces are attempts at overdubbing
the ending harmonica again (seems like George Martin
thought they could do better than the previous Take 8).
In the first attempt John misses his cue. An important
point now is that the second attempt has been cut out of
the session tape! You can hear the end of the backing
tape (Take 7) come up to speed again, but just before the
harmonica would come in it cuts off abruptly. I therefore
conclude that this edit piece has been cut out of the
session master tape.
Hummed Intro
Edit Piece 4, Take 11 (onto Take 7) complete
The final three edit pieces are experiments with the
song's opening. The first of these is a hummed version of
the "da-da-da da-da-dum-dum-da" opening vocals.
Harmonica
Intro
Edit Piece 5, Take 12 (onto Take7) complete - best
The next edit piece is again missing from the
session tape, and again I believe it has been
deliberately cut out. You can hear the take number
announcement and then the tape cuts straight away to the
first verse of the song (just after where the opening
phrases would have finished). I believe that this would
have been another version of the opening with harmonica
overdubbed.
High Register
Vocal Intro
Edit Piece 6, Take 13 (onto Take 7)
complete
The final edit piece is a strange attempt at a
vocalised introduction at a higher register. It sounds
awful!
Editing and Mixing
So now we come to the mixing stage. We all know that
George Martin and his engineers considered mono to be the
primary version to mix for (with stereo only being given
cursory attention). And we all know that in many cases
the stereo mixes were sometimes done without much
attention to detail. And From Me To You
is a good example of such a case.
Mono Mix (from edit of
Takes 8, 10 and 12)
The primary difference between the mono and stereo
versions of From Me To You is that the
mono version contains harmonica in the introduction in
addition to the opening vocalisation. We also know that
two edit pieces have been cut out of the session tape
described above (Take 10 - ending harmonica and Take 12 -
intro harmonica). I believe that these two edit pieces
were used, along with the major part of Take 8, in the
construction of the mono master. Normally the engineers
would copy the edit pieces and takes for the master
version, so as to preserve the session master tape. In
the case of the mono version of From Me To You
I believe they copied Take 8 as per normal but used the
edit pieces from the session tape itself - hence their
absence.
A special note about the
opening of the mono mix: since the opening of this mix
contains both the vocalised intro (from Take 8) and the
harmonica intro (from Take 12) the engineers must have
had both takes running in synch for the mix. Brennan
notes a slight phasing effect towards the end of the
intro as the synchronisation slips (see The Usenet
Guide to Beatles' Recording Variations reference in
bibliography).
Stereo Mix (from Take
8)
But what about the stereo version with only the
vocalised intro? Given that stereo was of secondary
importance in this era, I would have to concur with
Brennan again, who says that the stereo version appears
to be a virtually unmixed copy of Take 8 by itself.
And that's it. If you've
managed to read this far I thank you. And I look forward
very much to having my theory shot down in flames :-)
So fire away!!
Rohan Byrnes
Bibliography:
|