MULTIPLE WAY STREETS
Freedom of Mediums = Freedom of Thought and the Multiple Way Street.

TV is a dogmatic medium. TV is a controlled medium. It is controlled with money, with an elitist’s power of the corporate world. A television is watched, it is a one way radio. It is a dictatorship of communication. That is not communication. When freedom of media is acheived freedom of thought will happen. Freedom of mediums is freedom of communication. The exchanging of ideas. Learning, thinking, expressing, is all something that happens on TV. But it dosn’t happen to the watcher. Learning, thinking, expressing are all multiple way streets. Not one way, not two but many. I am communicating now. You can read this, I want you to respond. I want you to discuss. I want you to think about what I’m saying. I don’t care if you agree. But I do want you to tell me that you you do. A TV dosn’t want that. CBS dosn’t want that. NBC dosn’t want that. But I do, and so do many others. You have to find them. I’m one, you may be too (two). She might be three, he might be four, they might be five, six and seven. But how will you find out? Talk to them. Communicate with them. I don’t care how just make it a multiple way street when you do.

“When a philosophy becomes fasionable it is either not a true one, or it is being used for extraneuous perposes.” Heidegger.

Heidegger is talking about this multiple way street I’m talking about. TV makes philosophy fasionable, uses it for an extranious purpose called profit. Gaining profit from communicating is wrong, corupt and selfish.
HOw easy is it to give feedback to CBS? Whne you do, do they listen? The problem is that I have to use the word “they”. These businesses that run the communication are too large and diverse. They’re multiple under one name, that is dangerous. A factory is similar. A nation is similar. A corporation is similar. Look at the problems of those three things. All the problems that are there are due to a lack of receiving communication. Not neccessarily a lack of communication itself, just not the receiving of it and then the re-communicating of it followed by the re-recieving of it. This cycle is what would help open up the individual. You can’t do that with the multiple under one name.
Nor can you do that on a one way street.

Press the back button because I'm to lazy to make a link for you.