![]() |
A
Little Chat with Little Stevie An Interview By Aaron Carson, published in the 10th anniversary edition of "NZ Musician", June 1998 [Note: This is the full, unabridged transcript] |
|
Hey Little Stevie, AC:Your
new album " Generations", theres a lot of dark, minor, synth kind of
stuff on it but it's mangled with lounge overtones.Like leonard Nimoy
& Alister Crowley collaberating on a film soundtrack. Are you familiar
with the works of Alister Crowley? LSM:Not
his soundtrack work [Crowley], but ah, the dulcet tones of Nimoy, now
there's a voice. "Mangled" is a bit pejorative by the way, 'interspersed',
'intertwined' or 'intrinsically interlaced' would perhaps be a little
less abrupt. Q:Everyone who creates something has an idea of the vibe
they're trying to establish, if not when they embark on the project,
then once it's rolling. In five words or less describe what you've tryed
to achieve with "Generations" A: Five words or less is a big ask...
Options: AC:I understand that you will be playing some "selected live engagements" LSM:Yes, these TBA (contact John Baker). AC:Have you ever played at a generic dead divorce? LSM:I don't recall, but there's a lot I don't remember. Probably, je ne regret rien. AC:When you undertake these "selected live engagements" will you be supported by a band or silicone chips & 32 bits? LSM:A finely-honed 32 bit computer beats a 2 bit band any day, and even if it crashes it's generally more reliable than a group of two or more rock musicians in a room. I am endeavouring to involve other live performers in my current show; the computer is, however, a part of it for the forseeable future. I have nothing against bands or fellow musicians but have learnt not to place undying faith in them. I can 'whip out' a tidy score if anyone ever wanted to produce a full orchestrated version of any of my current works, but I'm not a stage producer, my energies are better focussed in other areas. Why burn yourself out doing something when someone else can do it better, and actually enjoy it (ie. 'run' a band, beg for money for performances and/or performers, convince so-and-so at such-and-such authority that your work deserves their suppport more than some other entity)? AC:It sounds as though the demise of the Axemen was a pivotal development in your career. How slippery was the post-Axemen-slope, has it changed your attitude to being part of a "band" & just how mean were the mean streets? LSM:It was a hard lesson that even the things you hold most dear, the relationships you think are absolutely universal and unfoundering can just disappear in the twinkling of an eye, without a bye-your-leave. It strengthened me by showing me the righteous path of self-reliance and instilled in me a fierce and altered sense of reason and purpose,and enabled me to break free from the entity that was into the entity which is. This is here, this is now, that was but a trifling moment ago, lest we forget. A band is a band, and your commitments wax and wane like the fickle moon, but yourself is yourself, indivisible as a quark. The streets were mean, mother, I cut my jib on those streets an' it wuz the makin' of me. I soon learnt what was what and how many nickels you need to eke together a dime. The street tells you what is what and sorts out the mothers from the others. AC:Why are we conducting this interveiw via the internet? LSM:It's a publicity stunt by my John Baker, patron & promoter of "Generations". I have absolutely no qualms whatsoever about doing a live interview. Anytime, any place. You name it, I'll be there.
AC:Do you think that our auras might clash if we met face to face? LSM:Absolutely not (well not mine anyway) AC:is this an indication of the cracks that are opening in the paint on the social canvas of Little Stevie McCabe? LSM:If it is, it's not a bad thing. I never had much of a social canvas anyway, and don't regret that. For me, minimal contact leads to maximum results. It stems from the urgency of the small amount of contact which does eventuate, if things are around all the time you take them for granted and don't use them. If you keep them restricted, all of a sudden there's a demand for them. AC:Or maybe you just like the internet? LSM:It serves its purpose, to provide me with instant resources (ie soundbites, pictures, etc.) if and when I need them, 24 hours a day, 8 days a week. It serves this purpose exceedingly well, better than any person would. AC:If you were forced at gunpoint to purchase a new release album tomorrow, what would that album be? or would you take a bullett? LSM:Anything recent by Beck, maybe Prince or one of those "Ill-behaviour" remixes; there'd probably be a bunch of Frank Sinatra albums getting re-released that I could cheat and get, too, and I probably would. Give me a CD voucher and I'll let you know. AC:Please list the equipment you've utilised to create generations. LSM:P166
Mhz PC (Windows 95); These connected via home-made
patchbay to: AC:: One of your passions is to attempt to record everything that can be recorded. If you stand back & look at recording information, from a non-musical point of view, all this capturing of information is really capturing time. Do you think that the fact that some people are driven by the personal passion of capturing time, is a reflection of another part of their personality, for instance a need to establish an identity by way of accumulating a stock pile of recorded information as a representation of an identity? LSM:Yes, this is capturing time and moments in time. Capturing moments in time is exactly what artists have been trying to do for millenia, all of a sudden it's a little easier [ie. better, more reliable and less time consuming storage/transfermedia] , but the momentum and drive is still there to do it. It's pretty natural, I would have thought, maybe people already take it for granted (ie. - How many people expected to hear - "What a bummer - no-one bothered to record Woodstock!" - 40 years earlier it would have been impossible. 20 years earlier it would have been difficult. 20 years later it would have been digital. Forty years later than that it would be live on the Net and no-one would actually be at the gig). I just appreciate the fact that it is possible, and never want to get to the point when I take it for granted. Beethoven and Mozart would have killed for a computer and a DAT recorder , orobably even a tape deck, now you or I can go and buy one for a few weeks pay. Don't you forget it. If that's a reflection of my personality, it's just that. As for a representation of an identity, yes, it's as good a representation of the identity I want to portray as any, and probably a better representation than many, due to its breadth. What I mean is, I'd rather have my memopry judged by this representation of what I have produced than, (for example),the 3 Flying Nun Axemen Releases only. NOT recording surplus when it is possible to do so for a few bucks seems decadent and opulent. I don't know what will happen to the surplus material when I die, but it has more chance of something happening with it than relying on the kindness of others [to record your gigs, songs, etc.]. I don't really mind what happens to it, but it seems a crime to not do it because you can't be bothered, though I've done that myself. If you have any faith in the theory of Relativity, you must also accept that time and space are equivalent and interchangeable, and by indelibly recording a period of time I have therefore staked out future space, which will more than likely unrecognizable as the same entity (ie. the experience of a song recorded in 1998 in a room in Herne Bay, Auckland may be transformed into a series of sound waves being transmitted through a loft apartment in New Jersey or North Carolina in 2008 - it is a similar yet different experience which would not have occurred if not for the diligent recording of the dull but persistent recorder of pieces. Remember,anytime, any place (time permitting). I'd like to talk to you, you have interesting questions. Don't be a stranger. |