The Basur IS Asur |
|
Tevilat Kelim
What does tevilat
kelim mean? Tevilat Kelim is an additional purification for vessels that are
beyond kashering by fire and is done in a mikvah. We learn the source of tevilat
kelim from the war that was fought with midyan and there was question about the
kashering of the spoils of war and the pasuk says: “Everything that may come
into fire you shall pass through the fire and they shall be clean, except it
must be cleansed with the water of separation.” (Bamidbar 31:23)
In 75b
it says the
tevilat kelim only applies to utensils that are used in preparing food (or
eating) and those utensils that come into direct contact with food. The cdj
yrp, hud hrwy 120:1,
citing the abcr,
explains that we learn this from the pasuk: “Whatever was used over
fire must be put through fire and purged.” Only food utensils are used over
fire and they alone absorb the forbidden food which therefore requires tevilah.
The ryzn ynba
adds that utensils which were not used for food by a non-Jew before the
Jew purchased it does not need kashering, however it does require tevilah if it
will be used in the preparation of food.
The armg
further adds
that since the pasuk in the torah refers only to metal utensils, only metal
utensils need tevilah. Also since the pasuk only refers to utensils captured as
spoils of war, which then become the property of the victors, tevilat kelim
therefore only applies when there is an actual transfer of ownership fro a
non-Jew to a Jew. Therefore exempting lent or rented utensils. In regards to
glass utensils, the armg
says that Rav
Ashi says that glass utensils do require tevilah since they can be repaired in
the same way as metal utensils using fire.
Eating and drinking
utensils which require tevilah include the following: plates, glasses, cups,
cutlery and utensils used for cooking, frying and baking ( pots, pans, ladles
and skewers). Theses utensils require tevilah only if manufactured or purchased
by a non-Jew. Whether the utensils are new or old, used for hot or cold it
doesn’t matter, if manufactured or purchased by a non-Jew, it requires tevilat
kelim.
Utensils made from
metal, meaning anything made of aluminum, iron, tin, gold, copper, silver,
steel, lead and others from glass and earthenware require tevilah (only those
actually used for food and that come in direct contact with food require tevilah).
Those utensils used in the initial stages of food preparation such as, kneading
utensils, meat grinders and hfyjc
knives should be
immersed in the mikvah without a blessing. The ]wru jlc 120:5
says that some exempt a hfyjc
knife from tevila, but he says others disagree and
say it does require tevila, so he says it is best to immerse the knife with a
blessing.
If you have a utensil
which is made of 2 different materials and only one of those materials require
tevilah, such as, wood and metal it requires tevilah only if the non-exempt
material comes into direct contact with food and without the metal it would be
unfunctional. The amr
120:7 says, that
a wooden utensil with a small amount of iron on the inside doesn’t require
tevilah if it can function without the iron. However, if the utensil is held
together with nails on the inside it requires tevila since it can otherwise not
function. Also, if you have a utensil made of a material that does not require
tevila, such as earthenware and is coated inside and out with metal, this
requires tevila as well. Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach says, that paint is
considered a part of the utensil and that added color is insignificant.
Bottles or containers
used for storing food or drink require tevila if the food stored in them is
unwrapped. Also shape doesn’t make any impact as to whether or not the utensil
requires tevila. A portable utensil or a utensil that is secured to the floor or
wall requires tevila. Some poskim don’t require tevila for utensils which are
designed to function more effectively when “fastened to the ground.” The
Mishnah says that since those utensils manufactured specifically to be secured
to the floor or wall are not susceptible to hamwf
therefore not
requiring tevila.
If a utensil was
manufactured in a factory owned by a non-Jew is bought by a Jew, it requires
tevila without a blessing. It doesn’t matter if the factory is owned by a
public corporation, a private corporation or the government (according to the hud
hrwy, trga hcm #239 even if not an individually owned factory it’s
owned by a non-Jewish state therefore it’s considered as if the factory was
owned by non-Jews, that’s what being owned by the government means) or if the
workers are Jewish. However, if you purchase a utensil from a factory owned by a
Jew it does not require tevila even if the employees are composed of non-Jewish
hourly workers, but if the employees are non-Jewish piece workers then tevila
without a blessing is necessary. If the factory is owned by both a Jew and a
non-Jew, the utensil would require tevila with a blessing. Meaning if a utensil
is manufactured in a factory owned by a public or private corporation, that has
Jewish and non-Jewish shareholders, tevila with a blessing is necessary. The amr
120:11, says that tevila is not required when a Jew and non-Jew purchase
a utensil together. The ]c
120:6, however says that if the Jew purchases
the share of the non-Jew at a later point in time, tevila with a blessing is
required. The argh
yqsp and \th
rpws say that from this we see that when a Jew purchases a utensil partially
owned by a non-Jew, it requires tevila with a blessing. The hcm
trga says, that
if you are unable to identify the manufacturer, tevila is required whether the
majority of factories in the country are owned by Jews or non-Jews. The blessing
is only recited if majority of the factories are at least partially owned by
non-Jews. For example, if you have utensils from China and Japan it requires
tevila with a blessing but, utensils that come from Israel don’t need tevila,
as long as it wasn’t purchased from non-Jewish middlemen.
If a utensil
commissioned from a non-Jewish artisan and is made from metal which was supplied
by a Jew it requires tevila without a blessing. However, most poskim say, if
part of the metal was supplied by a non- Jew it requires tevila with a blessing.
If most of the metal was supplied by a non-Jew all poskim require tevila
with a blessing. The zf
120: 12 says, that if non-Jew supplies a small
part of metal, his share is insignificant therefore no blessing is required.
However, the ]c
120:22 says, that once the non-Jew supplies part of the metal, it’s a
significant share and therefore requires a blessing.
If a utensil is
damaged to the extent, that it can no longer perform it’s designated function
(like a bowl with a hole, that it can’t hold fruit or a drinking utensil that
can’t even hold a tyuybr
of liquid),
it’s no longer considered a utensil. However, if it’s repaired by a non-Jew
with his own metal then you need tevila with a blessing and if the metal is
supplied by a Jew you need tevila without a blessing.
If a utensil whose
original design included holes, it does not require tevila if the holes are
filled in by a non-Jew. According to the [swy
dy cited by the hbwct
ykrd 120:54,
since the utensil was not broken, by filling in the holes it’s not considered
manufacturing. A utensil coated by a non-Jew with material that requires tevila
like re-silvering, should be immersed without a blessing . The ]wru
jlc 451:70 and the hrwrb
hncm 451:77 say
that it’s tevila without a blessing because there is a tqwljm
as to whether
the coating changes the status of the utensil.
A drinking utensil
with holes that’s being used for another purpose, like to hold fruit does not
require tevila when repaired by a non-Jew even if later that utensil is used for
drinking once again. If the handles of the utensil are repaired by a non-Jew, it
should be immersed with a blessing. If the non-Jew repairs the utensil for free or receives payment in advance, he acquires no partial ownership, therefore not requiring tevila. However, based on “An artisan acquires a share in the article he improves”, according to the extent of repair done, he becomes part owner. So, when a Jew pays a non-Jew for his work he is purchasing the share of the non-Jew, therefore requiring tevila. |