| Religious zealousness seems
unable
to cope with complex subject matter like homsexuality -often times this
is judged "wrong" purely upon the premise that normal sexual acts that result
in procreation are the arbiter of what is correct -or some subjective aversion
to other people's sexuality is based on an emotional reaction rather than
thinking how human sexuality works and what it entails.In actual fact the
process of biology is tad a hit and miss and the psychological make-up of
someone and their sexual choices is a very complex subject.Rational people
are able to discuss dispassionately such subjects without fears and prejudices
affecting their emotions -often times one finds the bigoted and fearful are
largely collected under a religious umbrella where a simple-minded morality
has been impressed into a simple mind that cannot cope with complex
ethics and has not discerned how their own ideas
of what
is natural have come about.When one takes the time and trouble to
research human sexuality
one finds that the brain's sexual identity is rather more varied than
one imagines - all of us have an anima and animus in
our psyche - that is - a male and a female part of our mind - this is explained
as the archetypes that appear in
dreams.Because
of the complex nature of genes and the effect of previous history and experience
or event the fact that maybe the mentality of one gender can end up in another
body -human sexuality is a lot more varied than man and woman - and the idea
that books such as the bible purvey - such as God made man and woman creates
a fixed idea of sexuality that constrains the actual circumstamces of human
behaviour into too narrow a field of view - it is the religious that
speak of "unnatural acts" and yet they know not of what they speak,morality
should be determined by facts and reasoning,not by fairy stories and belief
systems. |