RESTRAINING CLERICAL MISCONDUCT
EXCERPTS FROM CYPRIAN
EXCERPTS FROM EARLY CHURCH FATHERS
The discipline of the Church
13. On
the removal of schismatical priests.
14. Restraining clerical misconduct.
15. On the rebaptism of heretics.
16. On an arrogant bishop of bishops.
17. On false martyrs and false prophets.
18. In expectation of the end of the world.
14. RESTRAINING CLERICAL MISCONDUCT.
Among the priests there was no devotedness of religion; among the ministers there was no sound faith: in their works there was no mercy; in their manners there was no discipline ... Not a few bishops who ought to furnish both exhortation and example to others, despising their divine charge, became agents in secular business, forsook their throne, deserted their people, wandered about over foreign provinces, hunted the markets for gainful merchandise, while brethren were starving in the Church. They sought to possess money in hoards, they seized estates by crafty deceits, they increased their gains by multiplying usuries (On the Lapsed, 6).
Let the frequent groanings of the penitents be heard; let faithful tears be shed from the eyes not once only, but again and again, so that those very eyes which wickedly looked upon idols may wash away, with tears that satisfy God, the unlawful things that they had done ... unfaithful is the scar which the physician has too quickly produced; and the healing is undone by any little casualty, if the remedies be not used faithfully from their very slowness. The flame is quickly recalled again to a conflagration, unless the material of the whole fire be extinguished even to the extremest spark; so that men of this kind should justly know that even they themselves are more advantaged by the very delay, and that more trusty remedies are applied by the necessary postponement (Epistle 25.7).
You have acted advisedly and with vigour, dearest brother, in excommunicating the deacon who has often abode with a virgin; and, moreover, the others who had been used to sleep with virgins. But if they have repented of this their unlawful lying together, and have mutually withdrawn from one another, let the virgins meantime be carefully inspected by midwives; and if they should be found virgins, let them be received to communion, and admitted to the Church (Epistle 61.4).
Therefore, dearest brother, endeavour that the undisciplined should not be consumed and perish, that as much as you can, by your salutary counsels, you should rule the brotherhood, and take counsel of each one with a view to his salvation (Epistle 61.5).
They desire gifts, and offerings, and gain, for which formerly they watched insatiably. They still long also for suppers and banquets, whose debauch they belched forth in the indigestion lately left to the day, most manifestly proving now that they did not before serve religion, but rather their belly and gain, with profane cupidity ... . That such persons may not return again to the profanation of the altar, and to the contagion of the brethren, we must keep watch with all our powers, and strive with all our strength, that, as far as in us lies, we may keep them back from this audacity of their wickedness, that they attempt not any longer to act in the character of priest (Epistle 63.3).
On reading your letter in which you complained of your deacon, that, forgetful of your priestly station, and unmindful of his own office and ministry, he had provoked you by his insults and injuries ... all we your colleagues would regard it as a matter of satisfaction, whatever you should do by your priestly power in respect of an insolent deacon, as you have in respect of men of this kind divine commands (Epistle 64.1).
But deacons ought to remember that the Lord chose apostles, that is, bishops and overseers; while apostles appointed for themselves deacons after the ascent of the Lord into heaven, as ministers of their episcopacy and of the Church. But if we may dare anything against God who makes bishops, deacons may also dare against us by whom they are made; and therefore it behoves the deacon of whom you write to repent of his audacity, and to acknowledge the honour of the priest, and to satisfy the bishop set over him with full humility (Epistle 64.3).
Geminius Victor, our brother, when departing this life, had named Geminius Faustinus the presbyter executor to his will, although long since it was decreed, in a council of the bishops, that no one should appoint any of the clergy and the ministers of God executor or guardian by his will ... they who are promoted by clerical ordination in the Church of the Lord may be called off in no respect from the divine administration, nor be tied down by worldly anxieties and matters (Epistle 65.1).
Cyprian
was a Carthaginian bishop who deserted his flock no sooner Decius initiated his
clampdown on the Christian communities; although the Decian decree was not long
enforced, he never regained office. His alleged letters obscurely reported that
when a disturbance arose the Lord bade him withdraw. An exile or else a
concealed fugitive, his patrimony and his episcopal power stood nonetheless
undiminished throughout the epistolary narrative. Both absent and present, he
imperturbably ruled the African Church, presided over large councils and played
an outstanding role in Roman, Gallic or Iberian conflicts. Sometimes he solemnly
declared that bishops were only accountable to God, but on other occasions he
urged other prelates, or even the laity, to remove them. A Novatus whom he often
mistook for Novatian ruthlessly resisted him. Entirely unaware of the existence
of any previous African martyrs –not even in Tertullian’s time– when
Valerian selectively persecuted upright churchmen while sparing his schismatic
opponents, he proclaimed that such dire events had long been foretold.
An
entirely different perspective is submitted in Did Tertullian really exist? Did
Cyprian? Did Hippolytus? ,
which contends that the aforesaid apologists were no more than literary
champions brought down from the preceding century to uphold either of the
religious factions that struggled for the control of the churches after
Diocletian’s resignation. Whereas 4th-century African and Roman
rigorists denounced an entrenched clergy intent on preserving its former
pre-eminence despite the reprehensible conduct of many of its members, the
hierarchical organization under attack disparaged them as raging and unmerciful
apostates. Caecilian and Donatus fought each other through the writings of
Cyprian and Tertullian.