ANARCHY


okay... okay I've finally figured out what the problem is with anarchy. see, theres some of you out there who like it cus your oldschool or you're trying to be oldschool or whatever - those people are allright sometimes. Then, there's people out there that are hippie commies in disguise who think anarchy as a philosophy would work , that's where all the contradictions happen. See, anarchy exists, in certain places of the world I.E. after the fall of extremist politics - Germany post WWI, Russia post the fall of communism, Iraq post-getting Suddam the hell out of there - but it only exists for short periods of time. Oh haha though, people die... okay, so anarchy won't happen here unless we have some sort of civil war, and even then no... so stop yer bitching anarchy as philosophy is retarded!

and let me get one more thing out of the way - for you fuckin hippie punks out there ranting on about "oh look, I'm livin' in me squat and hoppin me trains and fakin' a cocknet accent, and the good of people can make anarchy work" - there's nothing to say. You people are moronic and I hope each of you die.

for those of you that get into anarchy because your oldschool or what have you - you too are also morons. Number 1, I'm pretty sure you weren't even born before 1977, and second - you suck.

what is anarchy? Why do you care? well anarchy by definition is an abscene of any form of government, however in my definition its just stupid. why? because like most everything taken over by prepubescent punk rockers, it makes no sence, contradicts physical laws of nature... need i go on. heres my opinion. anarchy is stupid. punk rock is stupid. skinheads are stupid. so why do i have this web site you might ask. good question, concidering i think its all stupid you'd think i'd have more to do with my time. thats where you are wrong, this takes hardly any of my time. i spend most of my time walking outside because i dont have a car, so when i walk i think "hmm, maybe i should write something on that website of mine" well i've decided its pointless, however, i think ill still write becausse it confuses you.

anarchy... i dont care what you hear anarcho syndicalists say, it won't work, never has, never will. mammals (and maybe some other classifications i dont know ) are born with the instinct of dominance. you see it everywhere in animal communities, take rabbits for example. anyone ever read Watership Down by Richard Adams? Well the book is about a band of rabbits in Wales, anyhow, Adams who wrote the book studies under rabbit know-it-all Robert. J.R. LOckely (i believe i have this write ), who wrote the book "The private Life of the Rabbit" . now if your al excited and rushing out to barnes and nobles to buy it, im sorry, but it went out of print in the 70s. good book though. anyhow, that was a load of crap cus it really didnt have anything to do with watership down. oh my god i want a cigarette so bad. watership down is about a warrn of rabbits, i guess the whole reason i wanted to tell you about Lockely was to say that everything in watership down (aside from the part about the rabbits building boats and talking to eachother) is absolute facts. remember the owsla in that book? yea that shits reall. rabbits live in colonies, or warrens, and each warren has what the text books call the King of the Colony (this would be your general woundwart for those of you still reading), anyhow, the rabbits have dominance within that small system. in fact, the bucks (male rabbits in the warren) make their placement on thir own. if a buck wants to be king of the colony he will fight the thing to the death and then mate with its slut. well, what does this have to do with anarchy? dominance, im making an example. even stupid rabbits have dominance in their systems. now with the exception of a few, humans have more inginuiety and intellegence than rabbits... we have domminance. look in societies, people's personalities are that way, there are people who take leadership of things, pushover so on.. if you have two guys stranded on a desert island, one of them is going to be more dominant. thats government right there for you. now of cource websters isnt talking about some phychological shit, they are talking about an established government

anarchy has excited in the past. has it worked. no. why? humans cant handle the system. for example - long ago before america was a fully developed nation we had a system called the town store, or the general store or something like that. anyhow the way it worked was people grew their crops, then they would give them to the store. well anyhow, they could go in the store and get food whenever they wanted, for free. because it worked on a system you put something in you get it out. did it work? no. why? 1) people are lazy 2) people are natural scam artists 3) people are stupid in general. i mean honestly, if there was a cd store, and all you had to do was go in and get free cds at no limits, and they "asked" you to give them cds, would you do it? of cource not, and don't sit there and say "yes" so you can rationalize in your own deminted mind that your slc punk beliefs might be right. mathew lillard is an asshole! dont follow him, i've talked to the guy in person before, hes tall and lanky, what is that. he has a cali accent. god i hate you people that belive in this shit

you know whats even more annoying than Green Day, or the Misfits, or even stone phillips? its listening to dumb people debate stupid things. example - war. jesus christ... for those of you with an IQ over 70, let me warn you... never EVER try to debate the war on Iraq with someone who listens to the Dead Kennedys religously... and if you do.. may god help you. its the most irritable debate ever. im not even fucking joking its just sick. why? because everyone is closed minded. especially queers like the jello followers and billie joe armstrong followers
>
. close mindedness - another reason anarchy is now and always has been bullshit. so there. if you belive in anarchy and dont see my side of the piont, than you are close minded. therefore proving my point that your belifs are bullshit. therefore by beliving what you belive, you are contradicting what you belive and ultimately destroying what you belive for you and everyone else. wow i wonder if thats a paradox.

final words? yes. i hate anarchy and i hate you. i love george bush, hes an excellent leader. and i know what i talk about so dont debate me on it unless you either want me to be so pissed off that i throw the computer at the wall and electricut myself (and yes... it has happened) man thinking of which electricution is hella fun. its like getting high kind of only it makes different limbs hurt because it fucks with your spinal chord. bye