Slutty teen stars are making their way into headlines all over the United States. Jessica Biel took her clothes off for a men's magazine to get fired from her show "Seventh Heaven"; Britney Spears flaunted a scantily clad number at the American Music Awards; and Mandy Moore's video shows a teenage girl in her room parading around in sexy little outfits and fantasizing about her love interest. More "girly teenie boppers" are making their way into today's pop culture, with media fat cats savoring every delicious detail. But the question is, should the public care about what these girls are doing? Absolutely not! Teen pop star images are all based on sexuality and fabricated fantasies, exposing young cleavage and pouty lips, Catholic schoolgirl uniforms and sexy lyrics. What disturbs parents about the image of these young girls is that they are flaunting themselves so sexually at such a young age and even worse, girls younger than these stars idolize these teen sex objects. Parents are so afraid their young daughters will act just like these sexy teen icons, but parents do not realize that they should worry about worse teen extremes like shootings and drugs. It is bad enough that Jon-Benet Ramsey's pageant photos are haunting tabloids all over the U.S., but now the public has to take issue with sexy teenage stars as well? Famous, wealthy teens are acting out in the most extreme ways: breast implants, adolescent sexuality portrayed in their songs or messages about manipulating men. They express a need for attention from the opposite sex and achieve this attention through bare midriffs and uttering "oh baby baby." Their images off stage are not much different than what is presented on stage; their signature low cut dresses, worn at award shows and celebrity benefits, resemble the lastest trends in prostitution. Their overt sexuality reflects how teens act out today, right? Far from it. Real teens are not allowed to get breast implants nor are they allowed to pose nude in men's magazines. The problems that real teens deal with every day matter a lot more than Britney Spears' breasts. Drug addiction, peer acceptance, shootings and abuse are just a few issues that teens have to cope with. These famous teens, on the other hand, merely have to deal with how big is too big when they decide to get implants, or what type of car will mummie and daddie give them. Doesn't the world have to deal with more pressing problems than teen overexposure? These young girls certainly do not redeem their "good name" in their music on MTV. Neither do any of the stars cause less attention when they address the issue in teen magazines. Britney Spears supposedly calls her mother crying when she hears another "Britney boobie" joke on Letterman. But Britney Spears is not trying to change her image, is she? Her mother is not putting her foot down against the image that her own daughter is putting out to the public! The reality is that their scarred image is actually feeding their parents' wallets, their plastic surgeon's bills, as well as the rest of the media that gains profits from them. Most of all, it just does not matter what these girls are doing. Why should we care if Britney Spears has real breasts or not? It does not reflect her lack of talent any more than her music already has. Why should we care if Jessica Biel takes her clothes off in a magazine just to try to get fired from "Seventh Heaven"? The only real audience these young girls have are hyperactive 12-year-old girls, horny 12-year-old boys and equally horny adult pedophiles. We should not care about what these narcissistic teens are doing to their bodies. Let them balloon up their breasts at 17; let them portray themselves as sex objects and let them do what they want. Just because they are famous does not mean their stupidity should matter any more than important issues like teen pregnancy and suicide. Listen to your mother's advice: if you ignore them, they will go away.