 |
Hello, Rosa_McGee [ logout ] profile | register | faq | search | forum home (Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 ) << next newest topic | next oldest topic >> Marilyn Manson BBS > Marilyn Manson > To all the openminded I say welcome. The great theology thread has returned! Author Message Årren187º Member 466 Posts Member since: 01-21-2001 Very important question... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ You all know ehat anarchy means right? It is anti- government...Well, you probably all know by now i am a jew, and on my backpack for school, I have all those 'A's all over my back pack.Well, my question was, are anarchists anti jew? Do they hate jews? Dang, I must be stupid if they do, I got all sorts of a's standing for anarchy at home, school, computer, everywhere... "When the boy is still a worm it's hard to learn the number seven" +Official Founder Of Anti-Nazi Aim-Arren187 Personal E-mail-AK_504@yahoo.com BBS E-mail-Arren_187@angels666.zzn.com posted 03-15-200106:37 PM OrganicMachine Member 1132 Posts Member since: 09-03-2000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ fuck everything Foreigners by birth, the legionnaires have become Frenchmen by the blood they have spilled. If you⤙re a bored suburban white kid sporting an ⤜official issueâ¤? mushroom cut, you might as well kill yourself because your already dead. Luck is where the prepared person and opportunity meet. posted 03-15-200107:01 PM devilmunchkin Member 3003 Posts Member since: 08-19-2000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ i wish i could answer your question but alas....i cannot. if your definition is correct then, perhaps they wouldn't dislike american jews since they arn't techically an oficial government. BUt perhaps they would dislike the jewish members of the Israeli government? i dunno....much of church hierarchies can be viewed as a government and also tyrannical. so..perhaps it's up to the individual on what you want to define as a government. THROUGH ME YOU GO INTO PAIN THAT IS ETERNAL, THROUGH ME YOU GO AMONG PEOPLE LOST. JUSTICE MOVED MY EXALTED CREATOR: THE DIVINE POWER MADE ME, THE SUPREME WISDOM AND THE PRIMA LOVE. BEFORE ME ALL CREATED THINGS WERE ETERNAL, AND ETERNAL WILL LAST. ABANDON EVERY HOPE YOU WHO ENTER HERE. Dante's Inferno, Canto III posted 03-15-200107:18 PM freegrace Member 945 Posts Member since: 10-31-2000 Hey Everybody ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Arren187º...I'm afraid I don't know the answer to that question. Rosa...As you know, I am very sorry to hear that. You know that I care very deeply about you and I hate to see that you are hurting (or devilmunchkin for that matter). If there is anything I can do, please let me know. As I said before, don't worry about answering the questions I asked you. I asked them because you asked me to. I was interested in hearing your response but understand that there are many other things going on in your life. I hope you get to feeling better. Devilmunchkin and Grump...Thank God that truth is not based on a popularity contest. The message of the cross is a very unappealing one to many. However, many things that are true are equally unappealing (death, famine, rape, incest, poverty, etc). I wish those things were not true but they are part of life. Maybe for your sakes, I am wrong about this (although I believe the cross gives a great deal of hope to those who do not believe they can earn salvation), but if I am right the result will not be positive. Also Devilmunchkin, as I said before there are also a great number of deaths that can be attributed to atheists. Probably many more than Christians (e.g. Stalin, Hitler, Communist China, Cambodia, etc). More Christians were martyred for their faith in the 20th century then all the other centuries combined. Adolph...Hey buddy. It's good to see you. God Bless, freegrace 2 Thes 2:16 "Now may our Lord Jesus Christ Himself and God our Father, who has loved us and given us eternal comfort and good hope by grace, 17 comfort and strengthen your hearts in every good work and word." "The reason true atheists (not your average "I-don't-like- what-mommy-and-daddy-say-so-I-hate-God" rebellious teen) are depressed is because atheism offers no hope, only proof. Proof of no hope." Mike Sorrow posted 03-16-200108:34 AM devilmunchkin Member 3003 Posts Member since: 08-19-2000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ what did i say??!!!! THROUGH ME YOU GO INTO PAIN THAT IS ETERNAL, THROUGH ME YOU GO AMONG PEOPLE LOST. JUSTICE MOVED MY EXALTED CREATOR: THE DIVINE POWER MADE ME, THE SUPREME WISDOM AND THE PRIMA LOVE. BEFORE ME ALL CREATED THINGS WERE ETERNAL, AND ETERNAL WILL LAST. ABANDON EVERY HOPE YOU WHO ENTER HERE. Dante's Inferno, Canto III posted 03-16-200102:55 PM freegrace Member 945 Posts Member since: 10-31-2000 Devilmunchkin...This is the quote I was addressing ------------------------------------------------------------------------ quote: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ As far as the whole saved thing that you stated..wow..you put into layman's term alot of what i think except on a simplerlevel. It DOES seem ridiculous; at least to me, that the hypocrites who believe in perhaps a fictious god go to heaven though the mihgt have committed hideous crimes and injustives. And yes, i know that many become TRUE believers but that shouldn't erase everything. I see myself as a pretty forgiving person, but c'mon. at least send em to Purgatory for a littl ewhile. see..dante had some awesome ideas.a ------------------------------------------------------------------------ I wasn't angry at you devilmunchkin...I was simply saying that truth is not always the way we'd like it to be. I was addressing the reocurring issue of hypocricy and the hideous crimes that are committed by supposed Christians. I think you weren't talking about that directly (although you have mentioned it before) but possibly talking more about a murderer that goes to heaven because he was saved. I'm not really sure. Nevertheless, that is neither here nor there...freegrace 2 Thes 2:16 "Now may our Lord Jesus Christ Himself and God our Father, who has loved us and given us eternal comfort and good hope by grace, 17 comfort and strengthen your hearts in every good work and word." "The reason true atheists (not your average "I-don't-like- what-mommy-and-daddy-say-so-I-hate-God" rebellious teen) are depressed is because atheism offers no hope, only proof. Proof of no hope." Mike Sorrow posted 03-16-200104:26 PM freegrace Member 945 Posts Member since: 10-31-2000 I'll address this here ------------------------------------------------------------------------ quote: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ oh, i haven't had much time here lately, and certainly my *intelligence* is very debatable according to some of my fiends on here... [ROTFLMAO!] but 4 reals, I used to try to argue with Prictus and FreeSpace-between-the-ears when this pathethic queery-ass thread was still "To Rictus, I have been Closed Out from Responding to You"-- that stupid ass thread started like in October or something. I mean, get this, in that first thread, Freespace goes on and on about how Homosexuals are Bad cause the bible says so, and I'm like, well, Prictus is Bi! How did that make you feel Prictus, especially since you really didn't manage to destroy Freespace's Fucked up lack of reasoning skills. It's like, so how are you retards gonna carry on and TRY to have a civilized conversation about Christianity when one of you is actually trying to defend the most ridiculous assertion that Gay people are Bad and Evil? How can you defend that assertion? YOU CAN'T! Only christian morons will insist that is true, just because.... why??? THE BIBLE SAYS SO. and what makes the Bible True? BECAUSE GOD WROTE IT! How do you know God wrote it? BECAUSE THE BIBLE SAYS SO! So where is God now, if he wrote this piece of shit that all of us suckers on the planet eart are going to have to live by? HE'S IN HEAVEN! Ok, why can't we see him. BECAUSE YOU CANT. Why not? YOURE BEING BLASPHEMOUS< NOW GO TO HELL! Why am I going to have to go to hell because I want to see your god? BECAUSE I SAY SO. What made you the arbiter of my soul's destiny? I DID BECAUSE I"M A CHRISTIAN AND THAT"S WHAT THE BIBLE SAYS. That is only one point among many that was not answered to my satisfaction. And the mushroom? OMFG. RETARDS! thanks for the opportunity to vent on theology morons!!!!! --Demianna-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ First of all, I never said any of this but I think it is important to address why I consider the bible to be an accurate measure of truth in light of misconceptions of my belief system as well as the accusation by Prarie that I did not answer his question. I have addressed some of these thoughts on previous posts, but I'll talk about it here. Many philosophers argue that an objective means for determining truth is evaluating the system based on the following characteristics: Internal Coherence-I consider the Bible to be highly coherent and inerrant in its original autographa. As evidenced by some of our discussions, the Bible has adequate explanations for the alleged contradictions that were brought forth. Ockham's Razor - William Ockham argued for the "principle of parsimony" that if a system is too complex that it is often inaccurate. The message of salvation in the Old Testament and New Testament is fairly straightforward and simple. As I said before, I have often heard that to truly understand Buddhism one has to have a PhD in philosophy. While many of you do not agree with the cross and dismiss it as ridiculous I have found that people on this bbs are hard-pressed to argue for a system that preserves both God's justice and love without diminishing either. The cross does. As I mentioned before, the Bible offers the most comprehensive yet internally coherent explanations for the notions of origin, destiny, sin, and salvation. Experiential Relevance - The Christian worldview description of sin and the impacts of sinful behaviors (e.g. you reap what you sow) is much truer experientially than those of other systems. Man's need for relationship with His creator is equally described with a great deal of accuracy in the Bible. Not mentioned here are the evidences of divine inspiration found in the over 300 prophecies in the Bible that were fulfilled by Christ, the prophecies of Daniel and many other archaelogical facts that were proven true by the bible. I hope this clears up my opinion on this matter. I do not think the portrayal of my views are accurate but I wanted to dispell the rumors nevertheless. God Bless you all and remember you are loved...freegrace 2 Thes 2:16 "Now may our Lord Jesus Christ Himself and God our Father, who has loved us and given us eternal comfort and good hope by grace, 17 comfort and strengthen your hearts in every good work and word." "The reason true atheists (not your average "I-don't-like- what-mommy-and-daddy-say-so-I-hate-God" rebellious teen) are depressed is because atheism offers no hope, only proof. Proof of no hope." Mike Sorrow posted 03-16-200105:03 PM freegrace Member 945 Posts Member since: 10-31-2000 I've got to go ------------------------------------------------------------------------ I hope you all have a great evening! Freegrace 2 Thes 2:16 "Now may our Lord Jesus Christ Himself and God our Father, who has loved us and given us eternal comfort and good hope by grace, 17 comfort and strengthen your hearts in every good work and word." "The reason true atheists (not your average "I-don't-like- what-mommy-and-daddy-say-so-I-hate-God" rebellious teen) are depressed is because atheism offers no hope, only proof. Proof of no hope." Mike Sorrow posted 03-16-200105:10 PM Lord of the Nazgúl Member 1369 Posts Member since: 02-02-2001 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Anarchy is just absense of a ruler. I always take this to mean at all. If there is no ruler, it would imply that no individual is in charge (ruling) his own life. What anarchists really want is autonomy - self-rule. Just an inconsistency I find with anarchists, though it can be debated. As far as I know, it is aimed at the leaders in general, not at a racial or other group... posted 03-16-200107:33 PM Mike Sorrow Member 2179 Posts Member since: 10-08-2000 Why religion fails the tests... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Internal Coherence - The bible contradicts itself. You need to look no further than the first two chapters of Genesis (one describes God creating man and woman together and explaining the rules; the next describes God creating woman from man). Freegrace has brought up many logical points such as a variety of mis-translations, but anything that has been translated over and over again is going to be butchered and incoherent. Plus, The Cat In The Hat is coherent, and that doesn't make it a reliable source of truth. Ockham's Razor - Ockham's razor is a silly argument. One may need a PhD to understand Buddhism, but many people need someone (i.e. Freegrace) who has studied the bible for years to interpret its contradictions. There are, however, extremely complicated math and science formulas that are widely accepted by both religious and non-religious people alike. Because they are complicated, doesn't mean that they are false. It means they require thinking. Just because the universe is a complex place doesn't mean one should dismiss its complexity in lieu of an "easy way out" (i.e. creationism). Just because 2 + 2 = 5 is simple, doesn't mean that people should ignore the fact that 1.26 + 2.24 + 1.5 = 5. Experiential Relevance - While many people "reap what they sow", many don't. There are hundreds of thieves running free. Thousands of murderers on the street. And Millions that violate the "sin" of gluttony or greed. These people are reaping the benefits of what they sow. Nothing with as much proof as evolution would be disregarded as only a "theory" were it not for religious fanatics. There are hundreds of fossils that point to that direction. The only thing is that it contradicts the bible, and that is why it isn't accepted as scientific law. We see the affects of chaos and patterns everyday, when we chose various paths in life. There's something with experiential relevance. Freegrace has many times tried to dismiss science as being an equal to religion. Here is a question that I haven't gotten an answer to: Why then is science accepted by many people of many different religions? It is because there is logical PROOF of its laws and theories. That is one test Christianity will never pass. That is one test Judaism will never pass. That is one test Islam will never pass. That is one test God will never pass. I may not be here for a while. I just wanted to answer the question of the "tests". - Mike Sorrow - posted 03-16-200108:12 PM freegrace Member 945 Posts Member since: 10-31-2000 Mike Sorrow...Thanks for the input ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hey buddy it is always good to see you. I'm not sure how much more time I want to spend on here either. I think this thread may be seeing its last days and a lot of people are getting frustrated. Funny you should argue for internal coherence. If you used the same standards for science that you used for the bible, science would be demonstrated to show little or no coherence. It is riddled with contradictions. I quote proof from a noted Harvard scientist saying that the fossil record does not have any transitory fossils, you quote scientists who say it does. They are both looking at the SAME PROOF. You'd probably say they're looking at it from different perspectives. If you used the same standards for the Bible I'm sure your alleged contradictions would be resolved...including Genesis 1 & 2...the answer is in the text. So having two supposed descriptions is a sign of contradiction? How about the hundreds of different theories science has? Some argue for transpermia theory, while you argue for chaos. Ockham's razor is a valid proof in logic and one that is used in scientific as well as religious circles. Yes, there are specialists in any field. The same is true of science. Granted you may ask for me to help explain the Bible, but I also need experienced scientists to explain science. Once again, if you use the same argument to evaluate science it falls short. Experiential relevance...Here is where we get to science's problems. When asked about origin, scientist offers many theories but when it comes down to it they really don't have an answer. When asked about destiny, the best science has to offer is a rotting grave. When asked about sin, there really is none but science can analyze thanks to Freud how everyone really wants to sleep with their mothers. When asked about the solutions to man's condition (i.e. salvation), they can offer many medical miracles but science can't save the soul. Science can't even give much hope, only proof. Why is science accepted by cultures around the world? I really don't see it as science or religion. I see the two as being complimentary. Science alone offers no hope; however, science has done much to validate many religious beliefs. As I mentioned before, truth is not a popularity contest so I am actually thankful that the popularity of science is not enough to prove that it is true. Mike, I'm not really trying to prove the bible to you all. I am simply pointing out why I believe in it. I don't expect you all to do the same. I just resented the notion that Demianna thought that I only believed the bible because with no objective reason. You may not like my standards, and I'm not 100% wild about yours, I am only stating what I believe...that's all. God Bless you my friend...freegrace 2 Thes 2:16 "Now may our Lord Jesus Christ Himself and God our Father, who has loved us and given us eternal comfort and good hope by grace, 17 comfort and strengthen your hearts in every good work and word." "The reason true atheists (not your average "I-don't-like- what-mommy-and-daddy-say-so-I-hate-God" rebellious teen) are depressed is because atheism offers no hope, only proof. Proof of no hope." Mike Sorrow posted 03-16-200109:20 PM Grump Member 1967 Posts Member since: 01-11-2001 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ freegrace, when you wrote: quote: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Maybe for your sakes, I am wrong about this (although I believe the cross gives a great deal of hope to those who do not believe they can earn salvation), but if I am right the result will not be positive. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ were you implying that devilmunchkin and i will go to hell or something for not accepting christ as savior/ etc? not sure i understand that post. grump. ##I'm not afraid to admit that I masturbate club: member no. 648,294,024.## ## officially sick of sig files of all kinds##1 posted 03-16-200110:39 PM Mike Sorrow Member 2179 Posts Member since: 10-08-2000 I did forget to say my obligatory "hello"'s, so hello, Freegrace. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Internal coherence- Scientific theories are independent of themselves. Panspermia theory is not chaos theory. They aren't related. Panspermia does have internal coherence with itself. Chaos theory does as well. The Bible is an all-or-nothing piece of religious text, yet it contradicts itself. If you took all theories in science, there is no doubt that they would contradict. That is why science is not religion. Theories are independent of each other. Ockham's Razor- I wasn't saying science passed this test. I think it is a non-valid argument. Trying to discredit something because one cannot understand it is ridiculous. Experiential Relevance- There is NO PROOF of destiny, pre-determined sins, or salvation from sins. That is why science doesn't offer solutions for them. But just because there is no proof of these things doesn't mean that one should just make these things up. Religion makes up a problem and solves it in the same sentence. It created the problem of "sinning" and came up with the solution of "salvation". You mentioned that science has no hope. That is why religion was created. Religion gives hope. That is why so many people accept it. Just because science doesn't give you a warm and fuzzy feeling, doesn't mean it should be by-passed as the truth. I wasn't trying to say that because science is widely-accepted that proves that it is true. You mentioned once that science should be held by the same standards as religion. I disagree because no other "religion" is believed to be true by other religions. I was just stating why the three points you mentioned don't work in the context of proving religion. - Mike Sorrow - posted 03-16-200110:43 PM LYNYRD SKYNYRD Member 311 Posts Member since: 03-07-2001 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ LOL. There miserable lifestyles are getting to them freegrace The miserable mob mentality morons swarm like vultures They are like a pack of wolves nipping at your heels until you stumble a little bit ...then they all move in for the kill!!!!! I stand by what I've always said............. YOU PEOPLE ARE HATEFUL,VENGEFUL ASSHOLES THAT FEEL LIKE OUTCASTS IN THE REAL WORLD. THAT'S WHY YOU COME HERE. HOPEFULLY, THE REAL WORLD WILL NEVER HAVE A MAJORITY OF HATEFUL, MISERABLE ASSHOLES...LIKE THIS SITE DOES. AND............. IF IT DOES................. HOPEFULLY........THEY WILL NEVER COME INTO POWER. THE COWARDLY SCUM WOULD NOT TALK TO MY FACE .....LIKE THEY DO HERE. THEY DON'T RESPECT ANYTHING FREEGRACE!!!!! HOW CAN THEY RESPECT ANYONE/OPINIONS/ANYTHING......... WHEN THEY DON'T EVEN RESPECT THEMSELVES????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? I AM FREE AS A BIRD. AND THIS BIRD YOU CANNOT CHANGE. posted 03-17-200105:50 AM WorthlessHuman Member 1921 Posts Member since: 04-28-2000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ wow thats a lot of posts posted 03-17-200105:53 AM LYNYRD SKYNYRD Member 311 Posts Member since: 03-07-2001 SCIENCE ------------------------------------------------------------------------ There is a prominent science proffesor who wrote a book on how he was outcast for not believing in evolution. He believes that more than just one theory should be taught. He saw students getting cast out and bad grades because they didn't believe in the theory of evolution.Talk about being narrow minded!!!!!!! The ego's of these people is extraordinary! I think the book was called....."Time to leave the plantation"......... You people are the real slaves. SLAVES TO PRIDE OF INTELLECT!!!!!!!!!! SLAVES TO PRIDE OF INTELLECT!!!!!!!!!!! SLAVES TO PRIDE OF INTELLECT!!!!!!!!!!! SLAVES TO PRIDE!!!!!!! SOME OF YOU AREN'T EVEN SHOCKED BY ACTS OF PERVERSION AND OTHER MORAL TRAVESTIES. YOU DON'T VIEW IT AS SIN. YOU SEE IT AS NORMAL. THAT'S HOW YOU CAN BE INTELLIGENT BUT STILL WARPED/TWISTED/INSTABLE I AM FREE AS A BIRD. AND THIS BIRD YOU CANNOT CHANGE. posted 03-17-200106:24 AM Rictus Member 3203 Posts Member since: 06-05-2000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ quote: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Yes, I know of several initiatives that Christians are doing in Africa and I think they do have a positive impact on the world. However, people often reflect on the bad. Oh well. Talk to you soon! ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Pepole often reflect on the bad? You're the one who believes mankind is inherrently evil, not me. The point I raised about Catholisism was a valid one, and once my position was clarified freegrace you agreed with me. Did you miss the part were I talked about the existance of hope in the midst of dispair? I have faith in humanity, in people, to trancend the circumstances of their birth, to find self worth, to learn to love life, themselves and each other, to reject hatred and biggotry, jealousy and greed. I don't believe this to be possible, I KNOW it to be possible, from my own personal experience. The only thing we are all so scared of is the awsome potential we all posess. The fact remeians that, however well intentioned, the Catholic church is partially responsible for innocent children being born with a virus that will kill them before their tenth birthday, and that is wrong. I am well aware of the various christian initiatives over there that are helping to feed children, although such initiatives are also using part of the donation money to build churches.This to me shows a lack of priorities. These people need farming equipment, fresh water sources, the means to support themselves, not handouts and preaching. Save the body first, that is my view. Also, I have to mention that abstinance may not be enough to prevent HIV infection, as there is still the problem of 'dirty' blood being used in transfutions. Would you also preach not taking blood in hospital? Abstinance I believe to be an unrealistic goal, because the majority of people won't want to practice it. Prevention, is better than cure, I feel, and you can't cure people of being horney. Even you preacher, who practices celebicy, will feel the same urges as the rest of us, you just choose not to act on them. God can't cure the sex drive, nature is too damn strong. Me. Please take a moment to post your Manson story on this thread . Thank you. Random Quote club 2001 - member No. 1 "All the drugs in this world Won't save her from herself..." *^*Co-founder and proud member of the blackjack appreciation society. She's tiny but she rules.*^* "Kill The Cheese!!!" posted 03-17-200107:03 AM Grump Member 1967 Posts Member since: 01-11-2001 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ adolf, you wrote: quote: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ THE COWARDLY SCUM WOULD NOT TALK TO MY FACE .....LIKE THEY DO HERE. THEY DON'T RESPECT ANYTHING FREEGRACE!!!!! ------------------------------------------------------------------------ i don't know about mike sorrow but i for one would say everything i've ever said to you online to your face. that is assuming, of course, that you conducted yourself in person the way you conduct yourself here. i wouldn't try to make trouble with you if you weren't abusing people; if you were, i would say everything i've said here. i have been threatened with physical violence before for my words, and probably will be again. it doesn't deter me. even having a gun pulled on me and my friends by a self-professed good christian last halloween didn't keep me from saying what i wanted to say. i am not a coward in "real life" and neither are the most articulate people on this thread, i would bet (that would include rictus, mike sorrow, freegrace, rosa mcgee, devilmunchkin, etc.). but maybe you were using this forum to tell freegrace about the cowards elsewhere on the board? don't know. i respect that which deserves my respect and even sometimes that which i'm not sure does, to give the benefit of the doubt. i've tried to respect you in the past on this BBS. i just wish you'd stop screaming and hurling abuse at people. mike sorrow and freegrace seem to me to be having a perfectly civil argument about theology and science... what's the problem there? jesus would be such a better role model for people if he'd acted like you: pushing their buttons, trying to get them angry and defensive in order (ostensibly) to test their powers to ignore or withstand abuse. quite a military tactic you've got there, adolf. does it work for you in "real life"? why not practice a little christian tolerance and charity once in a while? maybe you're actually making some of us into better christians by forcing us to learn to "turn the other cheek" rather than to engage with your abuse. pretty pathetic strategy to engage with other humans. i wish you'd reconsider because you obviously have a brain and you think about things... why must you be so hostile to everyone on here except the chosen few upon whom you bestow your occasional words of support or affection? i honestly wonder about this, and wonder how you can consider yourself a good christian when you act the way you do on here. i don't consider myself a "good christian" because i don't believe in christ's divinity and i don't believe in god but i am a pretty moral and ethical person. i help people, i care about people, i respect myself. what about you, adolf?Ñœ ##I'm not afraid to admit that I masturbate club: member no. 648,294,024.## ## officially sick of sig files of all kinds##1 posted 03-17-200108:57 AM LYNYRD SKYNYRD Member 311 Posts Member since: 03-07-2001 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rictus: Hope the job is going well!!!!! Just wanted to say one thing........... The difference between Humans and animals is that we don't have to act on our compulsions!!!! We don't have to act like animals. Some people think that nothing is wrong (less than murder)though. We have the reasoning and intelligence NOT to let our animalistic urges take over. Anyway........I'm disgusted at how everyone is attacking freegrace......now that I'm mostly gone........ or....... now that I mostly just ignore the assholes who try to flame. I think you assholes will finally disgust freegrace to the point of leaving too. GONE I AM FREE AS A BIRD. AND THIS BIRD YOU CANNOT CHANGE. [This message was edited by LYNYRD SKYNYRD on 03-17-2001 at 09:16 AM.] posted 03-17-200109:10 AM Mike Sorrow Member 2179 Posts Member since: 10-08-2000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Who the hell is attacking freegrace?! - Mike Sorrow - posted 03-17-200103:41 PM All times are PST . << next newest topic | next oldest topic >> | Page:Next Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 |