cc://http://www.geocities.com/thirstforjustice/Categories_Index..html (O”Brien)
5/1/09 b.22     ,   ------                      n. 100

		  U.S. Court of Appeals
		   for the Seventh Circuit
R.J. More
			No. 01-3224      
v                         			Petition for Review of USDOL Case No. 01-044
U.S. Dept. Of Labor 
Document List (“D/L”) for Motion of  5/1/09 to Rescind Filing Restriction
1.	D/L of  5/1/09  C:5/1/09…n.100
2.	Proposed Settlement Offer of 5/1/09 C: 5/1… n.101 (not included – RJM will have transmitted a proposal in this regard to the counsel for R&L Carriers on or before 5/4/09)
3.	Proposed Order of  5/1/09  C: 5/1…n. 102
4.	Notice of Motion/Cert. of Service of 5/1….C: 5/1…n.103
5.	Motion of 5/1/09 C: 5/1…n.104

cc://http://www.geocities.com/thirstforjustice/Categories_Index..html (R&L)
5/1/09 b.22     c.R&L-----01-3224                     n. 104

			U.S. Court of Appeals
		   	for the Seventh Circuit
R.J. More
			No. 01-3224      
v                         			Petition for Review of USDOL Case No. 01-044
U.S. Dept. Of Labor 
     		     
Petitioner ("RJM"'S) Prelimary Component Of  5/1/09 Of  Verified  Motion Of  5/1/09  Filed Under The Most Vociferous Of  Protests, To Move This Court To Provide RJM A Signature On A “Declaration Of  Unconstitutionality…RJM”  To Which Reference Is Contained In This Motion Or If  This Court Would Not Provide Such, To Provide An Explanation Demonstrating That The Non-Provision Thereof Could Be Justified, And In Such Scenario In Which No Such Signature Would Be Provided,  To Rescind The Order Issued By This Court On 9/19/02 Imposing A Filing Restriction On Robert J. More & For Other Relief, Which Motion Of 5/1/09 Adopts  And Incorporates Herein The Entirety Of  The Contents Of All Petitions Filed In Regard To This Matter Prior To 5/1/09 

Now comes the Petitioner, RJM, to move this Court to grant the relief described in the title to this motion and in explanation and support whereof, RJM avers and explains as follows:
1.	According to the court docket maintained in regard to the appeal this document concerns (“this appeal”), the last motion which RJM filed in regard to the issue of  the rescission of  the filing restriction still in place upon RJM was filed on 3/2/07 and was denied on 3/19/07
2.	As  the SCOTUS has explained, “ perceived futility alone cannot constitute cause…deprive the…  courts” [of  the opportunity to correct their errors and/or eliminate unjust arrangements] Smith v Murray 477 U.S. 527.
3.	Continuing to proceed according to RJM’s subjective apprehension of  the requirements and implications of the mandate issued in Jn. 21:15, Matt. 28:20  as such have been delineated, described, defined and promulgated through the office Divinely instituted for such purpose (Matt. 16:18), most especially in  recent history, via  the content of  a number of  documents produced and disseminated during the pontificates of   Popes Leo XIII, Saint Pius X,  and  Pius XI, interpreted against the backdrop of  the substance and spirit of  among other instructionals, those of  Jn. 2:15, Magna Charta Clause 61 and the Christmas Message of 1956 of  His Holiness Pope Pius XII, RJM herein explains that the exigencies of  the circumstances within which RJM finds it necessary to continue to conduct activity in his earthly sojourn prevent RJM from explicating further than he herein has in regard to the context within which this motion has been filed. 
4.	Notwithstanding that RJM’s expectation in the filing of  this motion (or in the filing of any document in any court in this country at this time)  is not to procure any relief from any court conducting activity under the control of  the Edomite Supremacist Movement Banker Controlled Cabal that presently runs the world, but rather is to retain, what it is RJM’s understanding that he presently possesses in regard to the matters this appeal concerns, namely -  a morally legitimate claim to  participate in the rectification of   the injustice still presently prevailing in the matters this document concerns via vigilante means which would in no way lack legitimacy; nonetheless, RJM, in order to procure  a nihil obstat from the ISMA Common Law Tribunal in regard to the matter of such conjectural vigilante rectification,  subjectively apprehended that at this juncture, he was obliged  to file this motion.
5.	Any observations  provided from any source regarding  RJM’s subjective apprehension  in this regard, would be much appreciated, although it may take months for any response to be provided thereto. 
6.	This document and all documents which accompany it will be posted at: http://www.geocities.com/thirstforjustice/Categories_Index (R&L) &/or (R&L7thCCA).
7.	RJM is thoroughly convinced that there would be no just basis for this Court to not now simply provide RJM a signature on the “Declaration Of  Unconstitutionality…RJM”, a copy of  which can be accessed at: http://www.geocities.com/thirstforjustice/Categories_Index ((Master Document List)(“MDL”)  -  Document #8) since the provision of this relief would render it impossible for anyone to interfere with whatever vigilante means RJM and associates (“RJM et al”)  would utilize, were a signed  copy of such order provided to RJM et al, to confiscate and/or destroy sufficient property to eliminate the injustice which it is RJM’s understanding still prevails in the matters this document concerns in terms of the predations perpetrated by R&L Carriers, its attorneys and the U.S. Department of Labor in the matters the mishandling of which caused this appeal to be filed in the first place.
8.	The provision to RJM of a signed copy of  such document would also render RJM et al capable of acceptably resolving all of  the other disputes in which RJM has found himself entangled, attempts at the resolution of which through the court systems operative in  the State of IL at this juncture, both Federal and State, has resulted in such an enormous consumption of  resources and time – in the regard to the entirety of  which RJM will have to, in a matter of  minutes,  howsoever many or few,  invariably, provide an accounting. 
9.	If this Court would not now provide such relief, then in order to continue to proceed up the continuum delineated in the “Roman Catholic Litigation Chart” (MDL # 11), RJM would have to move it to rescind the filing restriction presently in place regarding the activity of RJM in Courts controlled by this Court.
10.	To eliminate the enormous burden of  paper filing and service, and the cost to all concerned –including, most especially those children born after the Feast of the Ascension of the Lord in 2004, RJM herein proposes that  this Court issue an order permitting the filing of  any and all  filings  ever needing to be filed in the  future in regard to this appeal and/or the rescission of  the filing restriction to be accomplished on the internet or via email or to provide an explanation for any conjectural refusal to provide such relief.
11.	To be continued, enhanced, augmented and/or superceded as the circumstances of  the permissive providence of His Majesty, Christus Rex permit. 
12.	This will be filed as a procedurally defective filing on 5/1/09.

Wherefore, the Petitioner, RJM, herein  moves this Court to  provide the relief described in the title to this motion.

Under penalty of  perjury, RJM avers to the truthfulness of all factual averments contained herein.
Respectfully submitted,
Robert J. More
312 545-1890

cc://http://www.geocities.com/thirstforjustice/Categories_Index..html (R&L)
5/1/09 b.22     c.R&L-----01-3224                     n. 103
                           
			United States Court of  Appeals for the 
				Seventh Circuit  
                     
Robert J More
Plaintiff-appellant
               v        	
				Petition for Review of
No. 01-3224                  			                  Dept. of Labor
U.S. Dept. Of Labor      		    		 No. 01-044
Defendant(s)-appellees 				
Notice of  Filing 
Notice is herein provided to the defendants’ counsel, Ms. L Chaves of  the U.S.D.O.L. that  on or before 
5/1/09, the Petitioner filed with the clerk’s office of  the U.S. Appellate  Court at 219 S. Dearborn St., Chicago IL the following documents: 
Petitioner ("RJM"'s) Verified Motion of  5/1/09….
Respectfully submitted, Robert More
Certificate of Service
I hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, that a  copy of each  instrument enumerated in the Notice of Filing, contained supra has been served upon all parties who have appeared and have not previously been found by the Court to be in default for failure to plead. Service was accomplished on or before 5/2/09 before midnite, via mailing first class postage prepaid to 
Ms. L.Chaves, Attorney                 						 Robert  J. More 
U.S.Dept. of  Labor
200 Constitutional Ave. N.W. 						2008 S. Blue Island #39
Room S-4004							Chicago IL 60608, 312545-1890
Washington, D.C. 20210 

cc://http://www.geocities.com/thirstforjustice/Categories_Index..html (R&L)
5/1/09 b.22     c.R&L-----01-3224                     n. 101

. 

			U.S. Court of Appeals
		   	for the Seventh Circuit
R.J. More
			No. 01-3224      
v                         			Petition for Review of USDOL Case No. 01-044
U.S. Dept. Of Labor 
                                           Petitioner’s Proposed Order  of  5/1/09
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1.	The Petitioner’s Motion to Rescind the Filing Restriction (“F/R”) issued in regard to the appeal this Proposed Order of 5/1/09 concerns on 9/19/02 is herein rescinded_____________or 
Such F/R I not rescinded for the following reasons: _____________________________, __________________________ 
2.	In the scenario in which RJM  and/or the U.S. Dept of  Labor might have to file any document in regard to the matter this document concerns in the future, in order to  eliminate the enormous burden of  paper filing and service, and the cost to all concerned (including, most especially those children born after the Feast of the Ascension of the Lord in 2004), this Court herein orders that the  filing of  any and all  filings  ever needing to be filed in the  future in regard to this appeal and/or the rescission of  the filing restriction may  be accomplished  via the posting of  any and all documents ever needing to be filed in regard thereto on the internet, accompanied by the provision of adequate notice of  the posting thereto in every case, and according to an arrangement in which  the non-accomplishment of  such objective would legally constitute the non-filing of whatever document would not have been adequately posted and/or in regard to which adequate notice of  a given posting would not have been provided, or via email amongst the parties (and to this Court) either via the transmission of emails to a.) _________________ or b. to an email address, which would be provided to this Court in regard to this case, accompanied by all necessary usernames, passwords, names of account holders, account questions and suchlike by either of the parties seeking leave to file and transmit documents via an email transmission arrangement. 
3.	This Court identifies the following procedural defects in the documents submitted in regard to the relief sought in the motion which this document accompanies ______________, ______________________, ________________, and requires that the following modifications be made before any  substantive relief would be provided in such regard ________________________, _______________________, _______________________,