cc://http://www.geocities.com/thirstforjustice/ob154..html
4/16/09, b.6, c. RJM-Ob047072066797 m.   n.154

Robert J. More
P.O. Box 6926
Chicago, IL 60680
312 545-1890, anselm45@yahoo.com
	
        The Honorable Michael Dobbins
           Clerk of  the Court of  the 
           United States District Court For the Northern District of IL
           Suite 2000
           Dirksen Federal Bldg.
           219 S. Dearborn St. 
           Chicago, IL, 60604
							4/16/09
Dear Mr. Dobbins, 

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that according to the script according to which I am presently conducting whatever activity I conduct, that I am obliged to include you as a defendant in a lawsuit which is presently pending in the Circuit Court of Cook County, IL in Case # 08CH 9978 before the Honorable Peter Flynn, if  the  entirety of  the documents which I have presented and/ or any documents which in the future I would  present,  to your office for filing, do not get docketed into the electronic docket maintained for the case whose caption is included herein infra.. 

Beyond that,  the issue of whether I am morally bound to endeavor to have any persons who would rely upon any  filing restriction(s) which have been or ever would be  imposed against me, criminally prosecuted after any such type person would have been informed of the alleged illegitimacy of  any such type filing restriction(s), as a basis for the implementation of  affirmative acts which prevent the entrance into the electronic docket of  documents which would be submitted for filing to the Clerk of  this Court, is a matter upon which I continue to pray and perform research. 

For now, I am alleging, as I have been ever since the first filing restriction was imposed upon me in September of  2002,  that there is not now and never has been any filing restriction which has ever been imposed upon my capacity to file either a complaint or any other document  with the Clerk of  the USDC for the NDI, which has possessed any legitimacy at all, and this is the case because no such type filing restriction(s) has (have) ever been imposed as the result of  a proceeding conducted in regard to the matter of a proposed filing restriction against the capacity of  RJM to file any type of entity, which has been conducted according to a standard of accountability high enough for the result emanating therefrom to possess any legitimacy.  A more complete explanation of  the basis upon which RJM makes this claim would be provided upon RJM’s receiving a request therefore.

It is the position of  RJM that nothing in this letter  could possibly be justifiably claimed to  constitute any type of admission that prior to whatever would be the  date upon which anyone who would read this document , would read it, that  anyone responsible for the enforcement of  such filing restrictions could have enforced them without having incurred civil and/or criminal liability. 
From the time such filing restrictions have been imposed, respectively, RJM has never ceased to endeavor  have them removed and to provide explanation(s)  to whomever would listen explicating the basis upon which RJM has continued to complaint that there has never been any filing restriction imposed upon RJM which has possessed any legitimacy.
Regarding the state of mind of  those who have claimed that they have been bound by court orders which RJM has never ceased claiming have been meritless, the SCOTUS has made it very clear in Wecker v National Enameling and Stamping Co. that: "knowledge will be imputed where a person neglects to investigate evidence easily within his reach" (_U.S._).  

Please ensure that any and all documents filed by  RJM get docketed into electronic files maintained for the purpose of  the maintenance of  a record of a given case accessible to the public. 
Sincerely, 

Robert J. More

Robert J. More
P.O. Box 6926
Chicago, IL 60680
312 545-1890

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Under penalty of perjury pursuant to the provisions of  28 USC 1746, the undersigned affirms that he did cause to be served upon _____________________________,at the ________________________________________________________, a copy of  this document on 4/16/09, at or before_______________-.

Robert J. More

Refusal to sign; Under penalty of perjury pursuant to all applicable federal and state statutes, I aver that on 4/16/09, I, Robert J. More, did leave copies of all of  the documents enumerated supra  (Letter of  4/16/09) with: ____________________with ______________________________________, at ____________________, at ______________________. (Who refused to sign for them ______________________________).