ROMAN CATHOLIC LITIGATION CHART – SECOND ROUGH DRAFT UNDER CONSTRUCTION AND SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVISION AND/OR MODIFICATION AS OF 12/13/07 –REVISED FROM ORIGINAL VERSION OF SUCH DOCUMENT (NOTE – THE POSITION OF THE ISMAF IS THAT IF MARTIAL LAW WERE TO BE IMPOSED AND/OR A FULL SCALE SLAVE-UPRISING/DOMESTIC INSURRECTION COMMENCED, NO ONE WOULD BE BOUND TO PETITION A COMMON LAW TRIBUNAL FOR ANY NIHIL OBSTATS UNLESS CIRCUMSTANCE WOULD PERMIT SUCH AND OTHER DISPENSATIONS MIGHT ALSO BE AVAILABLE IN A GIVEN CASE ACCORDING TO MORALLY LEGITIMATE PRINCIPLES OF EPIKEA).

A – ROMAN CATHOLIC NON-DESERTER, NON-DEFRAUDER OF CATHOLIC CHURCH, ANTIGENOCIDIST*******

B- JEWISH SUPREMACIST MOVEMENT CONTROLLED GOVT AGENT AND/OR ANY TALMUDIZED ADVERSARY WHO WOULD OPPOSE THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CONDUCTING HIS ACTIVITY IN GOOD FAITH

Stage 13 Post-Entrance Into Eternity Judgment Of The Soul Of A Given Actor/Individual Who Would Have Been Involved In The Adjudication/Resolution Of A Given Dispute

Stage 12 Post-Resolution Of A Given Dispute Activity And Developments In The Theatre Of Earthly Existence Which Might Necessitate In A Given Instance The Complete Overhaul Of The Outcome Of A Given Dispute And Re-Adjudication Thereof, So That The Problems That Have Plagued Individuals And The Social Order From The Horrendously Destructive Activity Of The Presently Operative Court Systems In Jewish Supremacist Movement Controlled America (“JSMCA”) Are Not Replicated In Pre-Post JSMCA And/Or Post JSMCA

Stage 11 Outcomes From One Or More Of The Four Types Of Trials Listed Infra

Which Might Result In An Appeal or Series Of Appeals Of Various Type(s)

Stage 10 Criminal Trial Of A Criminal Trial Of B Civil Trial Civil Trial #

By JSM Controlled Govt** By Anti-Genocidists Wrongful Death Wrongful Death

or Personal Injury Of A *** or Personal Injury Of B***

Stage 9 B Captures A A Captures B A – Is Injured Or Killed* B Is Injured Or Killed

Stage 8 Conflict Involving The Use Of Some Type Of Force (CQC, HHW, Firearms, Projectile Launches, Explosives, Etc) Involving A&B

Stage 7 Confiscation Or Destruction Of Property Or Combination Thereof Either Via Vigilante Means As A Component Of A Given Vigilante Injustice Rectification Project Or As A Component Of A Domestic Insurrection Waged According To Nothing Less Than At The Very Least The Barest Minimum Of Compliance-Accomplishment Threshold Standards Regarding Vigilantism And/Or Domestic Insurrections/Civil Wars Based Upon The Examples Of Among Other Endeavors Conducted By Catholics Which To The Extent Of The Knowledge Of The Author Of This Chart Have Never Been Declared To Have Been Morally Unacceptable By Either The Magisterium Of The Catholic Church Nor Any Representatives Of The Holy Office Nor Any Canonized Saint (Some Of Having Been Lauded), Conducting Activity At A Given Juncture In History; Those Of The Procurers of The Magna Charta (Circa 1215 A.D), and of the Declaration Of Arbroath 1320, respectively, of the Gunpowder Plot 1604, Uprising in the French Vendee 1793, Mexican Civil War 1926-29, Spanish Civil War 1936-39, Von Stauffenberg ‘s Endeavor To Eliminate Hitler (1944) {An Analysis of the Endeavors of Those Such as Michael Collins in Ireland (1918-) Who It is RJM’s Understanding Never Sought the Approval of the Catholic Church Regarding Endeavors In Regard to Which RJM Would Understand That Such Approval Ought to Have Been Sought Prior to the Implementation Thereof Would Require Too Much Effort to Assess for References to Such Endeavors to Be Included Herein at This Juncture} And Amongst Those Conducted By Non-Catholics, Those Of The Battle Of Lexington Bridge 1775, John Brown’s Raid Of Harper’s Ferry (1859), The Battle For Athens Tn (1946) Each of Which Constituted a Slavery-abolishing Endeavor, Even if the Intended Effect was not Immediately Accomplished in a Given Example.

Stage 6 ISMA****** Common Law Tribunal of Similar Entity Issues Nihil Obstat (Confirming That “Nothing Stands In The Way” Ie That There Would Be Nothing Such Tribunal Would Have Found To Be Morally Unacceptable In A Proposed Order For The Issuance Of A Given Nihil Obstat Which Would Have Been Submitted Along With A Petition To Such Tribunal For A Given Nihil Obstat Authorizing the Use of Force to Rectify a Given Injustice***** (Ie That A Given Cause Would Have Been Found To Have Been In No Way Morally Unjustified, And The Petitioner(S) In A Given Case Would Have Committed Himself And/Or Themselves To Restrict Any And/Or All Utilizations/Applications Of Physical Force For The Purposes Of The Rectification Of A Given Injustice, Solely To What Would Constitute In A Given Collection Of Circumstances, The Bare Minimum Quantum Of Force Necessary To Accomplish An Objective In Terms Of The Prevention Of A Given Evil – The Importance Of The Prevention Of Which Would Have Been Found To Have Been Of Such Importance That Such Conjectural Evil Prevented Would Have Been Found To Have Been Worse, All Relevant Factors Considered, Than The Foreseeable Evil(S) That Might Or In A Given Case, Most Certainly Would, Result From The Utilization/Application Of Force Necessary To Prevent The Evil Certain Or Likely To Result From Not Resorting To The Use Of Force In A Given Case Under Consideration***** (Declarations Of Post Facto Non-Presence Of Sinful Culpability For Measures Implemented In Exigent Circumstances For Predation Prevention/Injustice Rectification Without Pre-petition For Nihil Obstat And Other Type Declarations And Writs Are Also Available But Explanations And Forms Therefore are provided Elsewhere)

Stage 5 Relief Would Have Been Sought From U.S. Supreme Court According To Compliance-Accomplishment Formula For The Petitioning Thereof Described And Delineated In What Are Considered To Constitute The Definitive Treatises Published Upon The Subject Of Petitioning Such Tribunal.****

Stage 4 Petition Of Some Sort is Filed In Highest Court Of A Given State Which Does Not ______ Grant Relief Upon Petition Therefore To Such Court********

Stage 3 Appeal Filed In Federal Appellate Court Or In State Appellate Court

Stage 2 Case Filed In U.S. District Court Trial Court Or In State Trial Court

Stage 1 Endeavors Not Involving Any Government Entity Are Undertaken To Rectify A Given Injustice, Remedy A Given Injury

Unjustifiably Caused that Involve Proposals Re. Settlement Etc, (as Distinct from Morally Justified “Occult Compensation”).

START HERE: Problem – A Malefaction/ Injustice Is Perpetrated Causing An Unjustified Injury To A Given Actor “A” By Any Individual or Collection of Individuals Whose Activity Would Have Left Him, Her or Them Classified As A Type “B” Actor/Individual. (It Would Be Hoped That No Type A Would Ever Have To Sue Any Other Type A).

http://www.oocities.org/thirstforjustice/rclc1214.html

*The Bounty Arrangement for Post-Entrance of “A” Into Eternity Injustice Rectification of Dec. of 2007 is promulgated and described in a separate document posted here: http://www.oocities.org/thirstforjustice/rclcpeeb.html

** The Proposal of Nov. 2007 For The Implementation Of Measures Which Would Make Provision For The Conducting Of A Criminal Trial In A Given JSM Controlled Court Without The Need For Any Subjection Of The Accused In A Given Case To Arrest And/Or Detention… (nor any of the other abusive and worse type predations for which this JSM controlled system has so distinguished itself), so that an acquittal might be procured which would render it unnecessary for a given vigilante protector/rescuer of the rule of law/insurrectionist/antigenocidist/not-altogether reprehensible and un-stalwartlike individual who would have rectified a given injustice via morally legitimate vigilante means and/or participation in an insurrection in a given case to spend his or her post-injustice rectification days in the earthly theatre “on the lam” with the correlative need to restrict his or her conducting of activity to underground agendas, objectives and approaches is posted here: http://www.oocities.org/thirstforjustice/rclctwad.html

***The Explanation Of Nov. 2007 Regarding The Disparities Between The Measures Of Legal Consideration Available… to those not members of the Predatory Class in JSMCA at this juncture in its continued descent into complete barbarity, and what was available to those to whom was accorded the measure of consideration provided by the English Common Law of 1791 is posted here:

http://www.oocities.org/thirstforjustice/cltjrdsj.html

****The Notice of Non-legitimacy Non-finality (cf. Matt. 22:22, Acts 5:29, et al) of June 2002, in which is contained notice that _____________ does not accept edicts, orders, judgments and/or mandates that are not demonstrably morally legitimate is posted here:

http://www.oocities.org/thirstforjustice/nnlnfj02.html

***** The ISMACLT Rules of Dec. 2007 are posted here: http://www.oocities.org/thirstforjustice/ismru07.html

******The Charter of the Institute of St. Michael the Archangel is posted here: http://www.oocities.org/thirstforjustice/ismdoc01.html

*******Nihil obstats are most definitely available for Non-catholic individuals whose record of conduct would demonstrate that any given petitioner therefore could not justifiably be classified as the type of swine to which reference is made in Mt. 7:6, but are not available to individuals who would not have demonstrated at least enough respect for the identifiable “rights of God”, general probity of conduct and rectitude of intention in regard to a given form of relief that would ever be sought, to ensure that no nihil obstat would ever be issued on grounds less legitimate than were those upon which edicts and orders of the Holy Office of the Roman Catholic Church were issued in times past, unless and until a given not non-swine petitioner therefore would have jettisoned priorities, approaches, agendas and/or modus operandis which would indicate that no nihil obstat could be justifiably issued to a given petitioner therefore and remained separated from whatever would have prevented the issuance of the nihil obstat in a given case for a period of time to be designated from the adjudication of a given petition therefore .

********Challenges to the Constitutionality as Applied of Nov. 2007 of statutes of limitations and various other deadlines given the unprecedented measure of control which the devil now exerts over the minds and wills of almost everyone involved in the activity of the legal system at this time are posted here: http://www.oocities.org/thirstforjustice/ismdoc01.html

# Criminal and/or civil proceedings may also be prosecuted against any judge, clerk, security officer, court reporter, attorney or anyone else conducting activity in any office or position who would commit in a given proceeding an unjustified injury causing duty breach which would proximately cause a miscarriage of justice to result in a given criminal or civil proceeding involving “A” as there is no such thing as absolute immunity of any type in Roman Catholic morality nor is there any provision therein for any type of unconditional and/or unlimited abstention from the use of force against any predator of any sort, in circumstances in which means not involving the use of force would not have accomplished an objective, which at any given juncture, would have to have been accomplished in order for a given individual to ensure that his moral liability in regard to a given matter would not have been left not adequately covered.