|
Most importantly:
Review career goals of staff and send certain staff members (who so choose)
on study/training leave. Training incentives ought to be funded by Government
as well as financial support during time of study. Employer hires unemployed
and trains them or the unemployed person has already been trained in anticipation
of this job coming up by identification of job bottlenecks in certain
industries.
The maintenance of
a bully free work environment with good career opportunities, supportive
managers and family friendly work policies guarantees the loyalty of staff
and a job rotation scheme supported by training increases job satisfaction
and greater cooperation in bigger companies. All these measures supported
by ethical management must have a positive influence on the health and
well being of staff.
The union's role needs
to be more promoted and it should be extended to focus on building liaisons
and networks with other key players interested in creating a new model
of work and economic strategies to increase growth.
What we need is:
A
change of attitude and culture at work.
Human beings do not exist first and foremost to produce a profit and in
return receive the right to live. Human beings release most of their creativity,
good will, loyalty and energy when treated with the respect they deserve,
not just as exchangeable contributors to profits. Human resources are
the best asset, an insurance for higher returns, if invited to participate
and encouraged to advance their careers. (newest HRManagement research
welcome, please send a link!)
From Griff Foley's
(2001) book: 'Strategic Learning - understanding and facilitating organisational
change'; Centre for Popular Education: Sydney, stem the following seven
characteristics of successful organisations. These give an indication
how the culture in Australian workplaces could change through the facilitation
of learning environments in workplaces and more investment and support
for lifelong learning of staff linked to career development and advancement.
Foley (2001, p.45)
quotes Jeffrey Pfeffer (1994, 1998) who argued that "high commitment/performance/involvement"
organisations have seven characteristics:
1. Self-managed teams and
decentralised decision making;
2. Extensive training;
3. Extensive sharing of
information;
4. Employment Security
5. Compensation linked
to performance ;
6. Selective hiring of
new personnel;
7. Reduced status distinctions
and barriers.
See also Jeffrey Pfeffer's
article on The Real Keys to High Performance, in 'Leader to Leader,
No. 8 Spring, 1998. Go to http://www.pfdf.org/leaderbooks/L2L/spring98/pfeffer.html
Here are the beginning sentences:
It appears that the old
aphorism, "people are our most important asset," is actually true.
Compelling evidence suggests that organizational success comes more
from managing people effectively than from attaining large size, operating
in a high-growth industry, or becoming lean and mean through downsizing
-- which, after all, puts many of your most important assets on the
street for the competition to employ. But while many leaders believe
that putting people first makes strategic sense, all too few of their
organizations do it.
Professor Michael Beer teaches
at the Harvard Business School and has extensively researched how organisations
can change and what could be considered useful learning and change.
Some of his very interesting articles are available at the publication
site of the Harvard Business School. One of his latest articles: "Promise
and Peril in Implementing Pay for Performance: A Report on Thirteen
Natural Experiments" is very interesting as are his other
articles. It is best if you pick what you are interested in.
The following is a link to
an overview of his work at the Harvard Business School site:
http://dor.hbs.edu/fi_redirect.jhtml?facInfo=pub&facEmId=mbeer@hbs.edu
A
change to the Industrial Relations system is suggested by the
United Trades and Labor Council of SA
The UTLC is running
the FairGo Campaign and other campaigns. Keep up to date
Visit http://www.utlc.org.au
The
introduction of a shorter 35 hours working week (go
to our home page and follow the links) See also Australian
Options, a left magazine and their special editions on unemployment
and full employment.
Reasonable
working hours in Australia: Go to
the ACTU campaign web site at http://www.actu.asn.au/public/campaigns/reasonable.html
and read up about it on
LaborNet in the international
context.
Australian
Options, the left quarterly magazine had an insert about unemployment
and in one of last year's edition
articles on employment policies. Take a look!
Read also about the working
unemployed on Pillar 4 under Reclaiming
Ethics
Parental
leave provisions and family friendly workplaces (The
ACTU campaigns for maternity leave at http://www.actu.asn.au/public/campaigns/maternity.html,
UPM believes the campaign should include paternal leave provisions as
well, or more generally be fought over parental leave provisions in order
to distribute the caring more evenly between men and women and to avoid
discrimination against women's employment on the basis they could become
pregnant. Parental leave provisions will diminish such discrimination
as anyone can become or take on the role of a father.
In order to maintain flexible
work places and job sharing permanent part time employment conditions
need to be preserved with the same rights as full time permanent positions.
All casual positions should
be made permanent after 6 months of a regular, even if varying, employment
schedule. After 12 months the same conditions of employment should be
applied to permanent part time workers as to full time workers, including
benefits such as car usage, working from home and pro rata leave provisions
Message from
Jeff Heath,
Democrat's Candidaye for the Senate at the last State Election in SA:
(Thanks, Jeff!)
You may find this information
of use. There are various documents related to the Democrats
position at the last election on work and family. The first
is at http://www.democrats.org.au/policies/index.htm?request=policy+issue+sheets
scroll down to the heading "Industrial Relations" and the sub-heading
"Work and family"
There is a second statement
located at .... http://www.democrats.org.au/campaigns/index.htm?request=work+and+life&campaign_dir=work
at the bottom of this page is a link to download a PDF of the full statement.
Hope you find these of use.
The web site also has other information about other employment issues,
but I found these to be proposals that the two major parties had not
picked up on. Jeff
Study/professional
development leave to advance career aspirations
(see
Mary Jenkins, Secretary Un(der)employed People's Union WA letter)
.In Denmark all employers were
asked to undertake a training needs assessment of their employees and
to consider their employee's career ambitions together with future trends
of their business. The employees were supported to undertake training
and/or study by being granted study leave and the employers were supported
in employing and training a long term unemployed person for any job which
became available as a result of the absence of the employee on training
leave.
The result was that those employees
who were trained or studied returned to the workplace in a new function,
and the employee who started in their place was usually able to maintain
their new job or even climb the career ladder in the organisation. The
employers were greatly satisfied with the results as their business grew
and the expertise grew as well. Employees remained loyal to employers
due to greater job satisfaction.
It took Denmark only a few
years of this regime to bring unemployment amongst the Danish population
down to 4.5%. Denmark did not so well however, integrating its foreign
unemployed, the refugees and migrants. Under the current right wing government
it is introducing harsh participation measures for the unemployed.
While the Australian situation
cannot be compared to the Danish situation, it is possible to introduce
this kind of measure, especially in view of the recently predicted shortfall
of skilled labor Australia is facing.
For more information about
the Danish Model and many other ideas on the issue look at the European
Union's employment strategy clearing house and the reports from the European
countries about their successes and failures. Go
to http://europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/empl&esf/ees_en.htm
A redefination
and redirection of the union movement followed by a stronger role
of the unions in the negotiations of social contracts. The
Workers Democratic Network has released a statement which indicates
the direction, UPM against Poverty believes, the unions ought to take,
however, we would include a role of the unions in negotiating social contracts
which includes other sections of the working population previously excluded
such as the unemployed workers, self-employed contractors and sole business
owners who deliver services to a limited number of clients, such as a
cleaner or cab driver, and other disadvantaged employment seekers. However,
the following statement serves as a starting point:
Statement of Agreement
The goal of the Workers Democracy Network is to organize a democratic
workers movement that unites all workers, on an equal basis, around
our common interests. We oppose business unionism and all cooperation
with the corporate elite. We will build neighborhood, city-wide, regional
and continental organizations that unite the entire working class: union
and non-union workers; students, employed, self-employed and unemployed;
immigrants and native-born; men and women of all ethnic backgrounds.
We stand in solidarity with workers all over the world and oppose all
nationalism, oppression and bigotry, which pit one group of workers
against another.
In the process of building
this movement, we will create a politics independent of the corporations,
breaking with all parties of the bosses, and seeking to run independent
workers' candidates as soon as possible.
The network will be truly
democratic with the power in the hands of the members. We will have
no permanent division into leaders and led.
By building a democratic,
unified workers movement, we will lay the basis for a new world, free
of capitalism, where workers will democratically run society and control
their own lives.
from http://www.labornet.org
Employees need to revive
the union movement once again. Without a strong union movement one side
of the scale is gaining too much weight. Employers, producers, industrialists,
shareholders, are sitting on one end of the scales and those who are
working for them and make a living from their work are sitting on the
other end. Politicians and bureaucrats are supposed to sit in the middle,
but more often than not rush to the 'owners/shareholder' side of the
scales. Workers and employees need to come together and have a strong
voice. Unions need to become the peak body of the workers, not just
a service provider.
However times have changed.
It is not that easy any more to differentiate between the interest of
employees and shareholders, when employees' super annuation is invested
in shares, when the top employees are given share options in the company,
and when ordinary employees are encouraged to purchase shares as investments.
Union membership is declining
due to changes in the labor market. Big comapnies with numerous employees
are much more lucrative for the union movement to service. Yet they
are the ones laying workers off, the big companies have shed far mor
jobs than they have created. The small business sector is hard to organise,
workers know each other more intimately and union membership may be
a blemish on the chance to advance the career.
Many employees have seized
being employees and have become contractors. I am not talking about
the high earning variety but about the adult educators who work as hourly
paid instructors, the teachers, who work on short contracts, the temporary
employees hired out by labor hire companies, etc.
Part time workers, unemployed,
small business people who mainly supply one big company, they are all
on the receiving end and get little support from both ends of the scale.
The union movement could play a role here.
Is there anything
else we have overlooked? Does the role of political parties in the defense
of social justice need to be discussed?
Please send
us your contributions to any of the themes and more ideas and links!
Up
to the top Back
to Model Overview On
to Pillar 2 Pillar 3 Pillar
4
|