Lori J. Scott
Shasta County Treasurer-Tax Collector
P.O. Box 991805
Redding, CA 96099-1805
John L. Loomis
Deputy County Counsel
Office of the County Counsel
County of Shasta
1815 Yuba Street, Suite 3
Redding, CA 96001
Re: Parcel No.
AFFIDAVIT OF CONSTRUCTIVE
NOTICE OF DEFAULT TAKEN
FOR FAILURE TO ANSWER
Dear Ms. Scott, and
IN TIMELY MANNER
Mr. Loomis:
This is a NOTICE OF DEFAULT upon the instrument titled CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE AND ANSWER TO NOTICE OF POWER TO SELL; and SHASTA COUNTY 2000-2001 PROPERTY TAX BILL; and DEMAND FOR BILL OF PARTICULARS, dated January 8, 2001, mailed by Certified Mail on the 10th, and signed as received on January 12, 2001.
CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE was given, and notice that, "Failure of interested parties to correct or rebut any given matter of law or fact will be construed as confession of correctness, with the consequence of general application as presumed fact for legal purposes." As of this date no response or rebut has been received, so DEFAULT is taken, and so the matters raised therein are considered as correct as to matters of law. According to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and attending State rules, "He who remains silent consents," or "are admitted when not denied."
By your DEFAULT, you are deemed to be in bad faith, and in violation of your Oath of Office, Bond, ministerial duty to do that which is right, that you have instanter waived, yielded up any claim to immunity from prosecution. Remember, you have taken a solemn and binding oath to protect and defend the Federal and State Constitutions. Violation of that oath is perjury and perhaps treason!
"Every citizen is a minority member of society, and the form of government which the people of the several states have adopted guarantees to each minority member, as well as to the majority, a republican form of government in his own state. Such form of government has long since passed through the experimental stage. . . . Our system has maintained democratic processes, improved the condition of the people, preserved liberty, promoted justice, encouraged the arts and sciences, and served the needs of changing peoples. All this in spite of an occasional administrative failure to adhere to the Constitution of the United States, due to incompetence or criminal design of some individual." Steiner v. Darby, 88 Cal.App.2d 481. (See Vogel v. County of Los Angeles (1967), 68 Cal.2d 18, 26: 434 P.2d.961; 64 Cal.Rptr 409.) My question, is your violation of your oath "due to incompetence or criminal design?" Ms. Scott, you are the one who took the oath and are responsible to keep that oath, and not rely on another to answer these questions for you. You took the oath and you should understand and uphold both the Federal and State Constitutions.
You have used Police State action against the citizens, and used extortion to obtain money from the citizens, by threats to sell their property to obtains funds, that a wealthy county does not even need. I complied under the threat of force by the county, out of the fear of having my property stolen and sold by police state action, by a county operating under color of law rather than following the United States or California Constitutions.
Therefore, an unrebutted Constructive Notice, was an affidavit that I signed under penalty of perjury, and a unrebutted affidavit stands as Truth. No request for an extension of time for good cause was sent or received, thus the doctrine of "estoppel by acquiescence" will prevail. Without a judgment of due process of law, the threat of seizure of property from me is only possible by extortion, in application of color of law or rules and regulations instead of the rule of law under the Constitution, where private property (real) is sacred, as stated in Title 42, United States Code, §1982, where it states: "All citizens of the United States shall have the same right, in every State and Territory, as is enjoyed by white citizens thereof to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold, and convey real and personal property." This gives absolute jurisdiction over both real and personal property to the citizen.
By your silence and failure to rebut any issues as stated in my letter of January 8, 2001, all issues stated therein stand as Truth.
I declare under the penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California, that the facts and statements quoted herein are true, honest, factual and correct to the best of my knowledge and information.
UCC 1-207, Without Prejudice