In Memoriam: Stanley Kubrick

 

  Stanley Kubrick died on Sunday, March 7, 1999 at Childwickbury—a vast manor house on a 172-acre estate north of London. With his passing, one of the world's great directors has ended a career that, with the planned release this summer of the controversial Eyes Wide Shut, will have spanned five decades. All of Mr. Kubrick's films were notable, some of them truly deserving the appellation great. Some have called Mr. Kubrick's new film "the most ardently awaited event in modern film history" (Peter Lennon, "Kubrick's Secret," World Press Review 43, no. 8 [August 1996]: 45-47).

As a callow young college student, I was completely bowled over by 2001, A Space Odyssey. This film and a few others I first saw in college (Blowup, Bonnie and Clyde, The Graduate, Midnight Cowboy, and Jules and Jim) engendered in me an abiding love for film and convinced me that film was an art form equal to that of the novel. I also acquired then a deep respect for film as a medium of social protest and a vehicle for political change.

Stanley Kubrick at work
 
 
 
Director Stanley Kubrick at work
on Full Metal Jacket, 1987
 

 

  After seeing 2001, I became a Kubrick fan, and I have been one ever since. Many of his films are justly considered film classics: Paths of Glory, Lolita, Dr. Strangelove, 2001: A Space Odyssey, A Clockwork Orange, The Shining, and Full Metal Jacket. His latest film, the still unreleased Eyes Wide Shut, is, true to form, a topic of controversy. As Bernard Weinraub describes it in The New York Times ("All Eyes for a Peek at Kubrick's Final Film" [March 10, 1999]), the film, starring Tom Cruise and his wife Nicole Kidman, is "a psychosexual drama . . . loosely based on Arthur Schnitzler's 1926 novella 'Dream Story.' Ms. Kidman and Cruise play psychiatrists. [As Terry Semel, the co-chairmen of Warner Brothers, puts it, the film is] 'the story of a married couple and their sexual exploits. The part that also blew us was it's a terrific suspense thriller. It's a wonderful film. It's a film that's really challenging and is filled with suspense.'"  

 
  Film critics have differed widely on the merits of several of Kubrick's films, especially The Shining and Barry Lyndon. Most dismiss Barry Lyndon as a film that just doesn't rank with Kubrick's others. Stephen Holden mirrors this attitude when he writes, "Dr. Strangelove, 2001, and A Clockwork Orange were the high-water marks in a career that stumbled with Barry Lyndon (1975), a visually stunning but static film" ("Stanley Kubrick, Film Director With a Bleak Vision, Dies at 70," The New York Times, March 8, 1999). One critic who believes that Barry Lyndon integrates evenly with the rest of Kubrick's films is Thomas Allen Nelson, whose Kubrick: Inside A Filmmaker's Maze (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1982) is both sympathetic and astute. Nelson writes of Barry Lyndon that "Unlike the first person involutions of Nabakov's Lolita and Burgess's A Clockwork Orange, Thackery's use of the unreliable narrator [which Kubrick successfully captures in the film] turns into a thinly veiled disguise for more encompassing satire directed against the excesses of the romantic imagination. His novel mourns [as does Kubrick's film] the loss of eighteenth-century dream of order rather than his narrator's shallow ambitions or personal tragedy (166)."
Jack Nicholson in The Shining
 
 
 
Jack Nicholson in
"The Shining"
 

 
  While it may be true that Barry Lyndon—to me a fine film in the tradition of Tony Richardson's Tom Jones (1963)—has not been as popular as other Kubrick films, either critically or at the box-office, The Shining has occasioned more heated critical debate. Greg Smith argues cogently that "with The Shining Stanley Kubrick has created a film that is unnerving precisely because of the tension produced by the conflict among the horror film conventions in its surface plot, the indictment of American racist and sexist ideology in its subtext, and the satirical streak that runs throughout this political commentary and surrounding time-honored Gothic trappings. Perhaps most impressively, Kubrick also manages to implicate us as an American audience in this tragi-comic scenario in many ways, some visceral and some intellectual, all of which serve to expose our race and gender stereotypes; and it is no surprise that Kubrick, a director who indulges his penchant for using mirrors as cinematic devices in The Shining, ultimately suggests that his film is horrific not because it's about ghosts, but because it reflects us, its audience, as Americans" ("'Real horrorshow'": The juxtaposition of Subtext, Satire, and Audience Implication in Stanley Kubrick's The Shining," Literature/Film Quarterly 25, no. 4 [1997]: 300-306).  

 

  Stanley Kubrick the film maker was a man whose work was viewed and enjoyed—or at least considered important and energetically discussed—by the entire world. But Mr. Kubrick himself was somewhat of an enigma. As Patrick Goldstein, writing in the Los Angeles Times ("The Kubrick Mystique," 3-10-99) states, "Like Joe DiMaggio, who was Kubrick's boyhood idol growing up in the Bronx and who died within a day of the director, Kubrick had a fierce sense of privacy that gave him built-in mystique. He was as imperious as Hitchcock, as aloof and mysterious as Garbo. When he drove, he wore a safety helmet. He refused to fly after a near-fatal crash landing at an airport in New Jersey. In later years, he stayed up most of the night and slept during the day."
On the Set of Dr. Strangelove
 
 
 
On the Set of
"Dr. Strangelove"
 

 
  But other people contend that this popular view of Kubrick as obsessed and introvertive—a spiritual brother to the notorious Howard Hughes—is simply not true. Bernard Weinraub ("All Eyes for a Peek at Kubrick's Final Film") provides contradictory testimony from Warner Brothers executive, Julian Senior (senior vice president for European marketing). Mr. Senior reported: "To say [Kubrick] was reclusive is not true. He didn't want a photo spread about himself in Hello magazine, but he was aware of everything going on and especially with what was going on with his beloved New York Yankees. He loved life, he loved chess, he loved documentaries. You'd go over to his home and there'd be John le Carré in his kitchen. He was not reclusive at all."  

 

  Perhaps we should remember Mr. Kubrick as a great filmmaker, and set aside his reclusiveness and eccentricities for a closer look at his masterpieces. Those interested in Mr. Kubrick's "tortured" soul, his neuroses and treatment of women, "the ambiguities of character and motive" (J. G. Ballard, "Prospero in Herts," New Statesman 10, no. 473 [Oct 3, 1997]: 43-44) are well served by biographies by John Baxter, Vincent LoBrutto, and others. And how did Mr. Kubrick's films move people?

Quoting Los Angeles writer Harlan Ellison, Patrick Goldstein ("The Kubrick Mystique") provides a sample of the effect of one Kubrick film on a viewer. Ellison "recalled seeing Paths of Glory, Kubrick's antiwar film in 1958 when he was a soldier stationed in Kentucky. When the lights came back up after the screening, Ellison noticed that a colonel seated in front of him was in tears. The officer ripped the eagle from his uniform lapel and threw it on the ground."

 

 

Stanley Kubrick - Film Director - 1928—1999

 
 
Stanley Kubrick
 
 
Director Stanley Kubrick
in action
 

 

Photographs Copyright © by The New York Times

 


 

 
Copyright © 1999-2001 by T. Larry Verburg
navigation logo - breezing up  
  Go to Top of Page  

 

 
 
Please send any comments or suggestions to:
clickable mailbox
lverburg@mindspring.com
This Page Last Updated September 10, 2001