Cincinnati Enquirer |
Editorial Page
|
April 23, 1998 |
According to Tom Teepen, creation science is to science what the $10 imitation
Rolex is to the real thing. Give me a break.
Tell that to great scientists such as Isaac Newton, who was a creationist.
The evolutionists claim that creation has no evidence, and then launch
into insults to the intelligence of those who claim otherwise. maybe instead
of the insults they could focus on their logistical problems, like explaining
the "missing links."
|
happened quickly in one large change (the punctuated-equilibrium theory.) And this is just one example of the rifts between evolutionists. Mr. Teepen is correct in saying that creation is not science, but neither is evolution. Neither theory can be observed (in the present), nor can they be reproduced. So both will remain theories forever, since proof remains impossible. However, there is much evidence that would seem to make evolution impossible. Some even admit that evolution is logically impossible, but retain their beliefs anyway. So, next time Mr. Teepen thinks about insulting creationists, he would do well to present some of the overwhelming evidence he claims to have. Rob Lewis
|
 |
 |
