For more than six years, Analytical
Consumer has provided prospective customers with priceless information on the pros
and cons of analytical instrumentation manufactured for use in scientific laboratories
all over the world. The newsletter conducts wide-ranging surveys of analytical equipment
users to ascertain which instrument vendors have the most satisfied customers and
why. On-going information is gathered by telephone, summarized and presented in the
monthly newsletter. Analytical Consumer reports what the end-users say and ranks
the manufacturers on customer satisfaction. One lab manager has characterized the
newsletter's surveys as "a reality check for vendors claims." This is an
excellent forum to learn what companies won't tell the customer including, but not
limited to: 1) the real problems with a particular instrument, 2) what to expect
realistically from the vendor's support & service departments, and 3) whether
the newest advertised claim really works or whether it's a bunch of hype!
We
have included below some excerpts from an article by Jo Rita Jordan entitled "The
Best Suppliers: A Five-Year Summary" which appeared in the August/September
1995 issue of the Analytical Consumer newsletter. Unfortunately, it will be difficult
for most of our readers to procure a copy of this article since a one year subscription
will set you back a sizable $260 (US dollars). Therefore, we have gleaned the information
of most interest to our audience and presented it herein.
Table 2 of
the report summarizes those companies that satisfy their customers very well (>80%)
across all their product lines. From the top in descending order, they include: Amray
(SEM), TA Instruments (Thermal Analysis), KVB Analect (FTIR, NIR), Spectro (ICP,
robotics, Hg), Metrohm (Auto titrators), Philips (XRF, EM), Beckman (HPLC, pH, UV-VIS),
JEOL (SEM, TEM, NMR), Hach (UV-VIS, GC, pH), Leica (SEM), ASOMA (XRF), and Gow Mac
(GC).
Table 4 of the article describes those vendors who only dominate a given
technology and satisfy users of only one instrument type. In ascending order, they
include: Perkin-Elmer (Hg analyzers), ASOMA* and TN Spectrace* [*tie] (XRF), Nicolet
(GC-FTIR), Perkin-Elmer (FIA), Dionex (Ion chromatography), TJA (ICP), Varian (NMR),
Philips (TEM), Finnigan (Mass Spectrometers), Hewlett-Packard (GC), Amray (SEM),
and Shimadzu (UV-VIS). (If you decide to buy one of the new Shimadzu UV-2401
or UV-2501 spectrophotometers, be sure to inquire about that special "flexible"
plastic sample compartment. It's not an option.... it's STANDARD!)
Table
5 of the report lists product satisfaction factors. Noteworthy comments include:
Hewlett-Packard Company
"many labs report routinely buying from
HP without considering others"
"rugged, reliable instruments"
Finnigan
Corporation
"quality and good service for quadrupoles"
Nicolet
Instrument Corporation
"in a survey where only 36% of the users were completely
satisfied,
Nicolet's 81% score is outstanding."
Thermo Jarrell
Ash (TJA)
"reliability and ruggedness"
Varian Associates
"standard
computer hardware, service and simple operation"
The report concludes that "users repeatedly invoke the magic qualities
of good service and support" and "reliable, dependable instruments."
In all of the surveys conducted, the term "workhorse" commands respect,
praise and widespread approval. It is highly recommended that you purchase a workhorse
from a reputable vendor!