From:  The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Reply-To:  Steven Ertelt <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Subject:   New Bush Policy Promotes Medical Care for Unborn Children
Source:   New York Times; July 6, 2001

New Bush Policy Promotes Medical Care for Unborn Children

Washington, DC -- The Bush administration has drafted a policy that would
allow states to define an unborn child as a person eligible for medical
coverage under the Children's Health Insurance Program.

Federal officials said the change would increase insurance coverage for
prenatal care and deliveries, improving medical care for pregnant women
and infants alike.

But pro-abortion critics said the change was a backdoor attempt to advance
the administration's opposition to abortion and to establish another legal
precedent for recognizing the unborn child as a person.

The administration's plans are set forth in an undated draft letter to
state health officials from Dennis Smith, who supervises the program as
director of the Center for Medicaid and State Operations at the Health
Care Financing Administration. "The purpose of this letter is to announce
a new opportunity to provide health care coverage to low-income children,"
Smith writes.

The draft letter states that Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy
Thompson wants to allow an unborn child to qualify as a "targeted
low-income child" eligible for the Children's Health Insurance Program.
The program, popularly known as CHIP, was created in 1997.

"This would mean that regardless of the age of the mother, eligibility for
the unborn child may be established, thereby making services including
prenatal care and delivery available," Smith said.

In his draft letter, Smith, a former Medicaid director in Virginia, says
the Bush administration intends to issue the new policy in a notice of
proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register in the near future.

William Pierce, a spokesman for the Department of Health and Human
Services, confirmed that Thompson is considering the change. "The purpose
is simple," Pierce said. "This will increase access to prenatal care for
pregnant women, the ultimate goal being healthier babies and healthier
children. It could help many pregnant women who are not eligible for
Medicaid or the children's health program."

Douglas Johnson, legislative director of the National Right to Life
Committee, endorsed the goal, saying, "An unborn child ought to be
recognized as a full-fledged member of the human family in law and public
policy."

But Laurie Rubiner, vice president of the National Partnership for Women
and Families, a pro-abortion group, said: "This is a backdoor attempt by
the Bush administration to perpetuate its opposition to abortion rights.
The real goal is to establish a legal precedent for granting personhood to
fetuses."

Pierce said Thompson was not trying to make a philosophical statement on
abortion, but "wants to give states as much flexibility as possible to
increase access to prenatal care."

The letter does not say how old an unborn child would have to be to
qualify. Some officials want to specify that an unborn child could qualify
at a very early stage of development, soon after conception.

About 3.3 million children participated last year in the children's health
program, which covers a wide range of doctors' services, hospital care and
prescription drugs.

States set eligibility criteria for the program within broad guidelines
established by federal law. Under the new policy, Smith said, states would
not have to extend coverage to unborn children. But, he added, "It is well
established that access to prenatal care can improve health outcomes over
a child's life."

--
Home

The Pro-Life Infonet is a daily compilation of pro-life news and
information. To subscribe, send the message "subscribe" to:
infonet-request@prolifeinfo.org. Infonet is sponsored by Women and
Children First (http://www.womenandchildrenfirst.org). For more pro-life
info visit http://www.prolifeinfo.org and for questions or additional
information email ertelt@prolifeinfo.org