Invoking
God at Our Peril:
Comments on the removal of "Under God" from the Pledge of
Allegiance
In response to the commentary article titled "
Erasing
God at Our Peril" in the Sunday, November 16, 2003 Oregonian.
The words "Under
God" in the Pledge of Allegiance
are not "a historic monument of faith." The pledge was written by
Francis Bellamy, a socialist minister, in 1892. In its original
form it read: "I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic
for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice
for all." It was written not specifically for Americans, but for
citizens of any nation to express pledge their allegiance to liberty
and justice. In 1923 the pledge was altered, against Bellamy's
wishes to say "the flag of the United States of America" instead of the
generic "my flag." The pledge was further altered in 1954 during
the anti-Communist fervor of McCarthyism, to include the phrase "Under
God."
This phrase is more an expression of the hatred of
the Soviets in our recent past than any significant historic value
dating back to the times of Franklin and Lincoln, who were quoted in
the article. Our country was not founded on religious
principals. The Declaration of Independence refers to a Creator,
and to "Nature's God." At the time this document, and others
important to our nation, were drafted there had been little scientific
investigation to origins and many natural events were unexplained, so
it was with this spiritual language of the day that the concepts of
equality and justice had to have been presented.
Most of our "Founding Fathers" expressed sentiments
that religion, specifically Christianity was false, but, as the people
of the time were generally religious, they used spiritual language to
appeal to the masses. Benjamin Franklin said "In the affairs of the
world, men are saved, not by faith, but by the want of it." He
was a man of science who believed the only way to understand our world,
and to live together as rational human beings was through reason and
scientific investigation. Thomas Jefferson wrote, in 1813
"History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people
maintaining a free civil government. This marks the lowest grade of
ignorance of which their civil as well as religious leaders will always
avail themselves for their own purposes." Obviously, he felt that
religion had no place in a Democracy or Republic where the people were
charged with determining their own destiny through independent thought
and democratic voting. Lincoln, who was an atheist in his early
years, later came to believe in God, but he was against organized
religion. He stated "The Bible is not my book nor Christianity my
profession. I could never give assent to the long, complicated
statements of Christian dogma."
The most important issue at hand is the separation
of Church and State, and the degree of this separation. It is a
misconception that the idea of setting apart matters of state and
region is recent in origin. Since this country's inception, we
have had the goal of total secular governing, our Founders were driven
to prevent the divine rights that had accompanied kings in Europe from
infecting a government for the people, by the people. James
Madison reiterated this most clearly when he said in 1822 in a letter
to Edward Livingston, "Every new and successful example, therefore, of
a perfect separation between the ecclesiastical and civil matters, is
of importance; and I have no doubt that every new example will succeed,
as every past one has done, in showing that religion and Government
will both exist in greater purity the less they are mixed
together." Madison, and our other Founding Fathers would
whole-heartedly support Newdow, and his aim to re-secularize the
country. The real travesty is not the abolition of religious
values, but the the intertwining of church and state compounded by the
mistake in thinking this is how our country was meant to be.
It is apparent that the phrase "Under God" in
the Pledge of Allegiance is not a historic monument that reminds us of
our religious heritage, but a reflection of recent political thought
and a shifting away from the secular values our country was founded
upon. It was more a "slap in the face" when it was first added to
the Pledge than when Americans wanting to bring this country back to
the ideals of Democracy and the values of our founders attempt to
right this mistake. A mistake that was allowed to happen because
of fear and
paranoia, not Patriotism.
Christopher Rhodes
Franklin High School Student