TRUE WORLD HISTORY

1. INTRODUCTION

Assuming that Jesus Christ survived the crucifixion, for what purpose would he travel, far away from his homeland, to Kashmir? Perhaps the answer might be found in the Bible:

“These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, ‘Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.’”
(Bible, Matthew 10: 5 & 6)

Even Christians believe that one of the Disciples, Thomas, did precisely that: he traveled to India and set up the first Christian communities there. During the ministry of Jesus Christ in Israel there were only two tribes of the Jewish people in his homeland: Yehuda and Binyomin (Judah and Benjamin). The other ten tribes had been scattered away during the First Temple Era. Proponents of the Jesus-in-India theory state that the “lost sheep” mentioned by Jesus Christ in the Bible referred to the ten tribes that had been scattered, and that the term “lost sheep” did not just mean wayward Jews who no longer followed the path of God.

So, after the Ascension of Jesus (or, according to the Jesus-in-India theory, after he began his travels through Asia), the Apostles met in Jerusalem and, in obedience to the above-mentioned Biblical instruction of Jesus Christ to go and preach his message to the remaining Jewish tribes, portioned all the countries of the world amongst themselves. India, which at that time included all Middle East to the present India, was given to Thomas.

The Acta Thomae, an apocryphal book that is historically dated around the end of the first century, shortly after the martyrdom of St. Thomas, gives an account of Thomas’s efforts. Thomas is said to have traveled to India with one Habban, taking a sea route and landing in a port called Sandruk Mahosa. Thomas traveled throughout India spreading the word of Jesus Christ. To this day, local tradition in India supports the accounts located in the Acta Thomae.

3. KASHMIR: THE TRUE PROMISED LAND

[The Evangelical movement within Christianity has recently made the news, as many of you are fully aware. This movement, headed by the likes of American Christian ministers such as Pat Robertson, and former Moral Majority minister, Jerry Falwell, has pumped tens of millions of dollars into the State of Israel, TV advertisments, and to American-born Jews who decided to migrate to Israel to the Israeli settlements. Their activity in Israel was documented some weeks ago [the date at the time of writing this update is October 13, 2002] on the popular 60 Minutes TV program produced by the CBS television network.

[At the root of this Evangelical activity is their belief that Israel stands as the staging ground for the imminent "return" of Jesus Christ, whom they believe will set up the long-awaited Kingdom of God. This Kingdom of God will be one populated only by "Christians," all other peoples [including, and especially, the Jews] having been either wiped off the face of the earth, or converted to Christianity.

[Needless to say, Jews are now divided over this Christian "help" that they are now receiving from Evangelicals. Some Jews welcome the help. But others have become offended by this new Evangelical thrust, due to the fact that the apocalyptic drama that the Evangelicals believe will unfold has, as its finale, the destruction or conversion of Jews, more precisely, of the Jewish (and all other) religions. Obviously, this apprently contradictory desire of Evangelicals to, on the one hand, assure the continued existence of the State of Israel, while on the other hand openly stating their desire to see the end of Judaism at the advent of the "return" of Jesus Christ, has enraged a section of the Jewish community, and caused division within the Jewish community as regards this powerful "support" that has been offered by the Evangelicals.

[The influence of the Evangelicals cannot be underestimated. Their activity in supporting Israel (the staging ground for their apocalyptic aspirations) is organized, efficient, politcal and backed by big money. It is openly stated, within political circles, that President Bush is very aware of the support he receives from the Evangelical movement, and it is speculated that his backing away from demands on Israel that he had lodged is directly tied to his fear of losing the support of the Evangelical Christian movement.

[Another important part of their apocalyptic drama is the recognition of the land of Israel as the "Promied Land" that was given by God to the Jews. To the Evangelical, every part of this drama is tied to Biblical verses that, they believe, are immutable, since the Bible is perceived by them to be the very Word of God. In their viewpoint, all parts of this drama must stay intact: the status of Jews as the Chosen People; the status of the State of Israel as the Promised Land of the Jews; the existence of the State of Israel as the final staging ground for the return of Jesus, and, finally, the actual return of Jesus to set up the Kingdom of God, must all be intact.

[Before continuing, let us state, for the record, that we at The Tomb of Jesus Christ Website are not concerned with whether or not the State of Israel continues to exist or not. Those are geo-political matters.

[What we wish to do in this section, though, is present some interesting information concerning the issue of "The Promise Land." This is simply food for thought, and should not be interpreted as presenting anything other than what we've been presenting all along: the subject of the historical Jesus and the theory that Jesus survived the crucifixion.

[In this section, we will present the view that the Promised Land was Kashmir. Far fetched? The graves of Moses, Aaron, Solomon and Jesus are all said to be located in Kashmir [See, for instance, Nazir Ahmadis' book, Jesus in Heaven on Earth]. The fact that Jews migrated to Kashmir is hardly debated anymore. The fact that a large section of the 10 lost tribes migrated to the Afghanistan and Kashmir has been recorded in many books.

[It appears that the ancient Jews fully undertood that Kashmir was the peaceful place where God had intended them to find refuge. And, for centuries, Kashmir, indeed, has been one of the most peaceful places on earth, until modern times changed all that, unfortunately. Incidentally, this is not to suggest that the State of Israel should now decide to move to Kashmir! Kashmir was to be a place of refuge, not necessarily a political entity. And those tribes of Israelites did find refuge in the peaceful Valley of Kashmir.

[The first part of what follows presents some information located in Holger Kersten's book.. After that, we will reproduce an extensive section of Nazir Ahmad's book regarding the issue of the Promised Land of the ancient Israelites.]

The Bible (Deuteronomy 34) mentions five geographic places that pinpoint the location of Moses' tomb, though one verse ends: "but no man knoweth of his sepulchre unto this day," which seems to be a very strange addition to a long verse that clearly stated precisely where Moses is buried. Those five places are: Mount Nebo in the Abarim Mountains, Beth-peor, the peak of Mount Pisga, Heshbon, and the plains of Moab--all places that point to Kashmir:

"And the Lord said unto him, This is the land which I swore unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, saying, I will give it unto they seed: I have caused thee to see it with thine eyes, but thou shalt not go over thither. So Moses the servant of the Lord died there in the land of Moab, according to the word of the Lord. And he buried him in a valley in the land of Moab, over against Beth-peor: but no man knoweth of his sepulchre unto this day."
(Deuteronomy 34: 4-6)

The meaning of the name Beth-peor is, "a place that opens," such as a valley that spreads out into a plain. Says Kersten:

"The river Jhelum in the north of Kashmir is called "Behat" in Persian, and the small town of Bandipur at the point where the valley of the Jhelum opens out into the broad plan of Lake Wular was once called Behat- poor, which is now called Bandipur in the region of Tehsil Sopore, 80 kilometres north of Srinagar, the capital of Kashmir. Only approximately 18 kilometers northeast of Bandipur lies the small village of Hasba or Hasbal. This is referred to as Hesbon in the Bible (Deuteronomy 4, 46), and is mentioned in connection with Bethpeor and Pisga. On the cliffs of Pisga (now: Pishnag), north of Bandipur and only 1.5 kilometres northeast of the village Aham-Sharif, there is a spring famous for the healing quality of its waters. In the Bible, the valley and the plains of Mowu are called the plains of Moab, ideal pasture land, about five kilometres northwest of Mount Nebo. Mount Nebo is a single mountain in the range of Abarim and is always mentiond in context of Beth-peor [Dummelow, Commentary on the Holy Bible, p. 115]. All five names are to be found within close proximity to one another. Mount Nebo, also called Baal Nebu or Niltoop, offers a splendid view of Bandipur and the entire highlands of Kashmir."
(Jesus Lived In India, p. 53)

So the "placement" of Moses' tomb in Kashmir is not the result of some pious tomb worshippers, as Acharya S [See her book, The Christ Conspiracy] might suggest, or a mere Eastern cultural habit of tomb assigning. There are reasons that it is believed Moses is buried in Kashmir, and those reasons are connected with a Jewish presence in Kashmir in ancient times. This is the reason Jesus could have visited that area after the event of the crucifixion: because he had clear knowledge that Kashmir served as a refuge for his people, the Jews.

The keeper of the tomb of Moses, the Wali Risih, states that the Richis have been caretakers of that tomb for over 2700 years. As Kersten states:

"And in fact the grave is near the plains of Moab, near the top of Pisga, on the mountain of Nebo, across from Beth-peor [all in line with the Biblical account! See above], and from this place one has a splendid view of a fresh and blossoming land, forever green, in which 'milk and honey' flow, a true paradise. In this area, as in other parts of Kashmir, there are numerous places with biblical names, some of them called the "Muquam-I-Musa," i.e., "the place of Moses." To the north of Pisga, (Deuteronomy 4, 44-49) which is today called Hasbal; and south of Srinagar, at Bijbihara, a place on the banks of the river is still referred to as "Moses' Bath".

Concerning the issue of the Promised Land, we now reproduce a very lengthy section of Nazir Ahmad's book, in which he deals with this issue of Kashmir as the Promised Land. Nazir Ahmad wrote his book in 1950, and Kersten's 1986 coverage of the Promised Land issue summarized in brief what Nazir Ahmad had mentioned earlier in 1950. Nazir Ahmad's book was re-published in 1998 under the same title, Jesus in Heaven on Earth: Journey of Jesus to Kashmir, his preaching to the Lost Tribes of Israel and death and burial in Srinagar. The following indented material is a reproduction of Chapter 18 of Nazir Ahmad's book. That chapter is entitled, "Land of Promise." (To secure your own copy of this classic book, Jesus in Heaven on Earth, click here.) Footnote references in the following reproduction have been left out. To see those references, please obtain a copy of Jesus in Heaven on Earth, and read the relevant pages. This reproduction is taken from pages 271 to 277 of that book:

Palestine, often called the Holy Land, was the land of inheritance of the Hebrew nation. This land was promised to them through Abraham:

"And the Lord appeared unto Abram, and said, Unto thy seed will I give this land."

And "this land" was particularly indicated and specified as the land wherein

"...builded he an alter unto the Lord and called upon the name of the Lord."

It was, consequently, at one time deemed to be the birthright of Hebrews to possess this land and to live in it, and that is why it was styled as 'their own land,' for it was the land of their inheritance. The Hebrew nation was, therefore, described as the people of inheritance.

The boundaries of this land were described in the promise to Abraham:

In the same day the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates.

The "river of Egypt" does not refer to the Nile, but to a brook, now identifed with the Wady el-Arish, flowing into the sea about twenty miles south of Gaza. The borders of this land are again in greater detail in the Fourth Book of Moses. But these borders are ideal rather than actual, for the area described there never wholly belonged to the Hebrew nation. It is noteworthy that the eastern border runs in an easterly course to the eastern margin of the sea of Chinnerath (Genasaret) and thence follows the Jordan to the Dead Sea. The eastern border there indicated was really the left bank of the Jordan, while, as already mentioned, the Euphrates is mentioned as the eastern limit in another place. The Biblical phrases: "On this side of Jordan" and "beyond Jordan" thus become intelligent as representing the point of view of the writer or in other words the standpoint of Canaan and, therefore, both these phrases mean on the east side of the Jordan, i.e., beyond the eastern border of the Holy Land.

Moses, after brining them out of Egypt, had to take the Hebrews to this land so that they might possess it and live in it. He exhorted his followers to enter this land, but they refused to go any further and wished to return to Egypt, and it was, therefore, ordained:

"Doubtless ye shall not come into the land, concerning which I sware to make you dwell therein, save Caleb the son of Jephunneh, Joshua the son of Nun."

The "little ones" of the Hebrew nation were, however, the only other exceptions. Moses himself was forbidden fron entering it and he was directed to appoint Joshua as his sucessor, so that he could lead the next generation to the land, and then divide the inheritance among the tribes.

It was because of the iniquities of the Hebrew people that Moses was denied entry into this land of inheritance. Moses, however, prayed for permission to enter the land.

"But the Lord was wroth with me (Moses) for your sakes and would not hear me. Let it suffice thee, speak no more unto me of this matter."

Again,

"Furthermore, the Lord was angry with me for your sakes and sware that I should not go over Jordan, and that I should not go in unto that good land, which the Lord thy God giveth thee for an inheritance."

Moses then prophesied:

"I call heaven and earth to witness against you, this day, that ye shall soon utterly perish from off the land whereunto ye go over Jordan to possess it; ye shall not prolong your days upon it, but shall utterly be destroyed. And the Lord shall scatter you among the nations and ye shall be left few in numbers among the heathens, whither the Lord shall lead you."

Moses prayed for the deliverance of his people and he was made to convey a message of hope:

"When thou art in tribulation, and all these things are come upon thee, even in the latter days, if thou turn to the Lord thy God, and shall be obedient unto His voice. (For the Lord thy God is a merciful God;) He will not forsake thee, neither destroy thee."

And Moses himself was ordered to take a journey in the opposite direction beyond the Jordan; and if we take the eastern border to be the eastern bank of the Euphrates, the journey must have been towards the east beyond the Euphrates.

"And the Lord said unto Moses, Get thee unto the Mount Abarim, see the land which I have given unto the Children of Israel. And when thou hast seen it, thou also shalt be gathered unto thy people."

I pause to observe that this land was meant for the Children of Israel and not for the entire Hebrew nation. On entering this land, "in the valley over against Bethpeor," Moses was made to see this Land of Promise:

"Get thee up unto the top of Pisgah and lift up thine eyes, westward and northward and southward and eastward and behold it with thine eyes, for thou shalt not go over this Jordan."

The eastern border of Palestine, at that time, touched the river Jordan, or, if the description in Genesis is to be considered, the river Euphrates. Moses had not entered the land and, therefore, in either case he must be deemed to be standing on the eastern bank of the Jordan or Euphrates. The direction to look eastward excludes Palestine enterly, and, therefore, it was not the Holy Land which Moses was made to see.

If we follow the trend of the Discourses of Moses, we find that the burden of the first discourse is about the deliverance of the Hebrews from Egypt, their being led to the land of their inheritance, their possession of it and ultimately their dispersion from it. The second discourse begins with verse 44 of Chapter IV of Deuteronomy. In this Moses mentioned many more "testimonies" and the first ones referred to the Land of Promise which God shall give them after their deliverance from captivity. Three places are mentioned in this connection: Beth-peor, Heshbon and Pisgah. In another place Mount Nebo is also mentioned in conjunction with Beth-peor. The location of these four places would enable us to ascertain the Land of Promise. All Biblical commentators have to confess that the sites of these places are still unidentified and that "they combined the literal with the metaphorical" and, therefore, they cannot be located now. Peake contents himself with the remarks that "the sites are unknown." The reason why these scholars have been unable to trace the location of these places is because they were looking for them in Palestine. They should have studied the history of the Lost Ten Tribes and searched for these places in the land where these tribes had settled. I will take these places one by one.

Beth-peor means the house (or place) of gaping or opening. Jhelum River in ancient days was called Behat in Kashmir; And Bandipur, in Tehsil Handwara (Kashmir), was called Behatpoor. It is "the place of gaping or opening" in more than one sense. From this place the Kashmir valley opens out; the river Jhelum also passes through a gap into Wullar Lake. Beth-peor, therefore, really stands for Behatpoor (Bandipur). (See illustration, page 264).

Heshbon is known by the Biblical reference to the pools of Heshbon. Tristran believed the reference to have been to the pools or streams in the valley. And we find that about twelve miles south-west of Behatpoor (Bandipur) in Kashmir is Hashba, a small village, famous for its pools of fish. It adjoins the spot near Auth Wattu--the eight ways--which is locally known as Maqam-i-Musa, the Place of Moses.

Pisgah according to Dummelow is "probably the general name for the mountain range which in Deuteronomy (32:49) is called Abarim." It is a pity that in religious matters and questions of faith probabilities have had to play a great part. Pisgah is a place in Kashmir three miles north-east of Hashba. (See illustration, page 264.)

Mount Nebo is a single peak of Mount Abarim, and, therefore, according to Dummelow is another name for Mount Abarim. It signifies "a lofty place." Moses died there, and was buried there "over against Bethpeor," and the Children of Israel, not the Hebrew nation, wept for him. Baal Nabu (See illustration, page 226), is a peak of a range about eight miles north-west of Behatpoor (Bandipur). From it Bandipur is visible and so is the entire Kashmir valley. There is a tomb on top of thispeak which is known as the tomb of Moses. Mount Abarim is the same as Pisgah of Kashmir.

How is it that all these different places in Kashmir, geographically placed within a range of a few miles of the spot said to contain the tomb of Moses, bear the very same Biblical names which are connected with the place where, according to the Bible, Moses was buried? Is this mere coincidence? There are various other common features which I will discuss when dealing with the tomb of Moses. But even these facts, I think, are sufficient to establish that Kashmir is the Land of Promise which God had promised to Moses and for the Children of Israel. The matter can, however, be taken further...

It can legitimately be contended that the land promised to the Children of Israel, through Moses, must have been some land other than the Holy Land: firstly, because Palestine was never exclusively assigned to the Children of Israel inasmuch as this land was given as an inheritance to the seed of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, i.e., the twelve tribes. Secondly, the followers of Moses from Egypt were the progeny of only a few of the original inhabitants of Palestine and the greater part of the Hebrew nation, having remained behind, was already in possession of the good land. Thirdly, the Children of Israel, having been driven from their own land, never returned to it from their captivity. A promise to them that they would possess certain land could only be about a land which they had neither seen before nor possessed at all. But we need not conjecture or speculate as to the location of this Land of Promise, for the Lord Himself has given us sufficient indications of its distinctive features, and we can fix its identity with almost certainty.

The Land of Promise was to be a "heaven on earth" [Deuteronomy, 11:21] towards the sun-rising [Deuteronomy, 4: 41], and was to be a land of hills and valleys that drinketh water of the rain of heaven [Deuteronomy, 11:11].

The rains shall fall in this land in due season [Deuteronomy, 11:14] and this land will extend "even up to the sea of the plain, under the springs of Pisgah [Deuteronomy, 4:49].

Palestine cannot answer this description. Dr. G.W.G. Masterman, writing on the General Physical Features of Palestine, says:

"Then the climate, in its broad features, is the same everywhere. A short wet winter is followed by a dry summer season with perhaps no drop of rain for five or six months...and the hot dry summer soon withers the spring's glorious promise of verdure. Miles of country in the later summer produce nothing but a few scanty prickly weeds. The scarcity of timber is marked all over the land. Springs are usually small and infrequent, and not a few become intermittent, or dry up altogether, after the summer draught...the dry and parching south-east wind (the sirocco) from the desert spoils so much of the otherwise pleasant weather in spring and autumn."

Peake, as a contrast to this Biblical description of the Land of Promise, points out that a plentiful supply of rain was always a necessity in Palestine. Againk, watering of lands by treadle methods was common in ancient Egypt and Palestine. This was necessary to meetshortage of water at higher levels. But in the Land of Promise irrigation was to be done by natural streams. These descriptions do not apply to Palestine. Of course, the past associations of Kashmiris, being Children of Israel, with Egypt and Palestine, would sometimes make them resort to this kind of device.

But is there any other country, east of the Jordan or Euphrates, except Kashmir, which is famous for its springs, streams and rivers; for its abundance in food and fruits; for the charms of its valleys and meadows? The Land of Promise was to contain a sea of the plain, a huge lake of fresh water. Kashmir has its Wullar Lake. Again, Kashmir has actually been described as Heaven on Earth by many famous writers. The Kashmiri historians call it Bagh-i- Jannat--the Garden of Paradise, and Jannat-ud-Dunia--the Paradise of the World. Saadi, the great Persian poet, sang its praise thus:

"If there is a heaven on earth,

"It is this, and it's this, and it's this.

Again, the Children of Ham, son of Cush, were to migrate to a land of:

"Fat pastures and good, and the land was wide and quiet and peaceable."

I have yet to come across a better description of Kashmir than this Biblical one.

This land was to be the valley of Charashim--the valley of Craftsman (See illustration, page 335). It goes without saying that the only valley in the world which is famous for its craftsmen is Kashmir.

The Prophet Isaiah has described the Land of Promise as:

"A place of broad rivers and streams wherein shall go no galley with oars, neither shall a gallant ship pass thereby."

Both these conditions are inapplicable to Palestine because of its sea-coast, but they befit Kashmir. The reference to the absence of "galleys and oars" and "gallant ships" signifies that no enemy fleet can attack, and none will be needed for defense. The broad rivers of Kashmir are steady, but as soon as they leave the valley they follow a circuitous route through mountains and their beds abound with submerged rocks. The rapids thus formed in the rivers make them unfit for navigation, and even a small canoe cannot pass through them.

The Prophet Isaiah had also spoken regarding the Children of Israel and about their sufferings in their captivity. He said:

"Thou shalt no more be termed Forsaken; neither shall thy land any more be termed Desolate; but thou shalt be called Hephzi-bah, and thy land Beulah: for the Lord delighteth in thee, and thy land shall be married."

The words hephzi-bah and beulah respectively mean: she in whom is my delight and married; but they really are allegorical names applied by Deutero-Isaiah to Israel. It has been suggested that Hephzi-bah is a distortion of the name a Hephzibaal--delight of the Baal, i.e., delight of the husband, and that Jehovah is the Baal or the husband "who delights over the bride of Zion." This idea underlying these expressions is that people of the land as well as the other fruits arise from the fertilizing influence of the land's Baal, i.e., the Divine Husband.

The Mishna and the Talmud have always drawn a distinction between lands artificially irrigated and lands naturally watered, calling the latter the house of Baal or the field of Baal, or the land of Baal. Thus lands fertilized by natural streams, springs and subterranean waters, and not by artificial irrigation, were called the lands of Baal.

In short, the prophecy of Isaiah foretold that after their sufferings in captivity, the Children of Israel should come to a land which would not be desolate but would be fertilized by natural streams and springs and that this land would be married to them or, in other words, they would possess it and live in it.

The Lost Ten Tribes never returned to Palestine. Therefore, Isaiah could not have had the Holy Land in mind at the time he made the prophecy. On the other hand, Kashmir does answer the description. The Lost Tribes did go there and are still today to be found there. In Kashmir, except when water is lifted, by a local contrivance by foot, up to a height of only about six feet, lands are irrigated by natural streams and springs. Indeed, Kashmir is a land of valleys and springs. It is very significant that Baal in Kashmiri language means a spring.

The words translated as valleys in Deuteronomy really stands for meadows. Truly in Kashmir are lofty meadows and natural springs to be found in numbers beyond measure. The term land of Baal if applied to Kashmir becomes literally applicable since many places are known as Baal. I give but a few names [NOTE: Margh means a meadow; Baal means spring]:

4. MODERN DNA COHANIM TESTS DEMONSTRATE CONCLUSIVE LINK OF KASHMIR PEOPLE TO BIBLICAL JEWS

The May 11, 1998 edition of the Wall Street Journal contained an article about a special DNA test that can determine Jewish ancestry. The test was performed on members of the Bene Israel Jews of Alibag, India. Tudor Parfitt and Niel Bradman of the Center for Genetic Anthropology in London conducted this test. The reader may wish to secure a copy of the entire article, as we will only reproduce excerpts. It is significant that the Wall Street Journal article pointed out that,

“Unlike many other lost-tribe adventurers, Mr. Parfitt doesn’t have a political or religious agenda. He isn’t out to populate Israel with clansmen of obscure Jewish sects. Nor does Mr. Parfitt rely on cultural evidence of shared traditions and rituals between these sects and Western Jewry. He also wants biological evidence. ‘DNA is a tool of Jewish history,’ he says.”

Jewish tradition states that the Cohanim are the members of the Jewish priest class who are descended patrilineally from the first high priest, Aaron, who was Moses’s brother. Today, the names Cohn, Cone, Kahn and Kann indicate that people carrying one or the other of those names are descended from Aaron. Parfitt and Bradman looked for genetic traits that are shared by Cohanim in the West:

“The technique examines the Y-chromosome, a long strand of DNA that contains the genetic formula for maleness. The Y-chromosome is passed only from father to son and is unique in that most of the strand doesn’t exchange DNA with a partner chromosome.

“Like an unshuffled deck of cards, the Y-chromosome remains unchanged for thousands of years, except for tiny genetic variations, or mutations. What most Cohanim have in common is that their DNA is stacked in the same order. Messrs. Parfitt and Bradman have confirmed that there is a genetic link between Lemba tribesmen in southern Africa, Jews from Yemen, and now the Bene Israel. The finding, says Mr. Parfitt, validates Islamic sources about the Jews’ path into Africa and could revise the history of ancient Jewish commerce across the Indian Ocean.”

Though this test was performed on the Bene Israel Jews of Alibag India, it is clear that the general Indian traditions regarding the presence of Jews throughout India in ancient times, including Kashmir, are based in truth.