I
had discovered a document called the “Examination of John
Hocktattler”. I was excited. I quickly wrote to Daniel Hochstetler
to tell him what I had found, only to find out that he had written
about the same document here in the newsletter ten years ago, in 1990.[i]
I was a little disappointed in learning that, but not much. After all,
I’d had the thrill of discovering the document on my own. Here was
an account of our forefather from his own mouth, albeit through a
translator. The traditional story was great, but this account is from
the man himself, and far better.[ii]
Then
I noticed a problem or two. This document is reprinted in two
different works. The first is the Wilderness Chronicles of
Northwestern Pennsylvania.[iii]
The second is Conscience in Crisis.[iv]
Conscience in Crisis is missing part of a sentence and a couple
of paragraphs that Wilderness Chronicles includes. Worse than
that, the two works have different years for the year of Jacob
Hochstetler’s capture. Conscience in Crisis puts it at 1757. Wilderness
Chronicles puts it at 1755.
I
resolved to find out which of the two were accurate. Conscience in
Crisis notes that the original document is in the British Museum[v],
in London, England. The British Museum has a web site on the internet,
and I learned how to get a copy of the original from that.
Because
“The Examination” is a manuscript rather than another document,
such as a book, the museum will not make a direct photocopy of the
manuscript. A copy must first be made from microfiche. Therefore the
copy I received from London is a third generation copy, and it is
difficult to read at best. It is nevertheless legible enough to
ascertain that Conscience in Crisis has omitted some material.
The omission comes at a page break in the book, and perhaps that is
the cause of the error.
The
year of capture in the original document is hard to read. It could be
either 1757 or 1755, and it is easy to see how it could have been
copied in error. However, I believe without question that the year of
capture was 1757, based on other documents. Conscience in Crisis
lists a number of newspaper articles and a military report that tell
of the attack on the Hochstetlers. The day and the month vary, but the
year is 1757 on all of them.[vi]
So
Wilderness Chronicles is in error on the year of capture.
Otherwise it is the more accurate of the two sources. It has only a
couple of minor changes in spelling when compared against the
original.
Jacob
Hochstetler began his escape on April 20th, 1758[vii].
He arrived in Shamokin (Ft. Augusta) on May 5th, 1758, less
than nine months after his capture. This is a correction to the
traditional story, which holds that he was captive for three years.
This
document also has numerous other corrections for the traditional story
in DJH and DBH:
-
Jacob
Hochstetler knew exactly where he went and where he was.
-
After
seeing Presque Isle, he said he was kept prisoner at Buckaloons
“the entire time”. He says nothing of the fort at Detroit,
despite giving detailed information of the other forts he had
seen. This means that it is highly unlikely that he ever saw
Detroit.
-
He
was told about the surrounding area of his captivity five days
before he escaped by “an old Indian”. In my opinion this is
far more plausible than the traditional story, which states that
Jacob caught tidbits from a map drawn on the ground, while he
pretended to pick up sticks.
-
Jacob
could communicate to at least one Native American. Since Jacob’s
birthplace was probably in Alsace, and the Native Americans of the
area were French allies, it is within reason to believe that the
language used was French. This would also explain how Jacob knew
where he was—the French may not have expected that a Swiss
German could understand them in their native language.
-
His
escape started from Buckaloons, near where Irvine, Pennsylvania is
today.
-
The
“examination” or interview was at Shamokin. Ft. Augusta was
located at Shamokin. This gives strong evidence that Jacob was
found there, rather than at Ft. Harris.
Other
conclusions can be drawn from this information. For instance, weather
patterns can be obtained from northwestern Pennsylvania. We can
determine a range of temperature and the amount of precipitation that
Jacob likely experienced during his escape. His escape route can also
be established with a fair degree of accuracy. I am in the midst of
compiling this information, and hope to publish it in the near future.
[i]
Hochstetler,
Daniel E., Ed. “Hochstetler Document Raises New Questions”, Jacob
Hochstetler Family Association Family Newsletter, December,
1990, pp. 4, 7-8. Goshen, IN.
[ii]
This is
more than my personal opinion. McMaster and his co-authors
consider “The Examination of John Hocktatter” to be more
accurate than the traditional story. See the comments under
“Delaware Raid in Berks County”: McMaster, Richard K., with
Samuel L. Horst and Robert F. Ulle. Conscience in Crisis
Mennonites and Other Peace Churches in America. 1739-1789,
Interpretation and Documents, p.122. Scottsdale PA and
Kitchener, OT, 1979. Herald Press. In addition, Steven Nolt
considers this document as more factual than the traditional story
told in DJH and DBH. See: Nolt, Steven M. A History of the
Amish, pp. 66-67. Intercourse, PA, 1992, Good Books.
[iii]
Stevens,
Sylvester K. and Donald H. Kent, eds. Wilderness Chronicles of
Northwestern Pennsylvania, pp. 119-121. Harrisburg, PA, 1941,
Pennsylvania Historical Commission.
[iv]
McMaster, et. al., pp. 125-127.
[v]
The British Museum, Additional MSS., 21658, fol. 132.
[vi]
McMaster, et. al., pp. 122-124.
[vii]
May 5th minus 15 days is April 20th.
© S. A. Miller, March 2001. First printed in the Jacob Hochstetler Family
Newsletter, Volume XV, No. 1, pp. 3, 8.
|