How the topics of 10 years ago have continued to follow and drag into now..... Still there is information in the media and attempts to close down the work of Natasha Lakaev, Universal Knowledge/Life Integration Programmes. There are still old enemies rearing their heads but now in the lead of a new breed. I am almost certain that this 'new breed' do not know the half of what they are delving into. I say that in terms of the powers above the initial instigation of this attack. If you think it only exists in the movies, think again. Universal Knowledge has again featured in the newspapers The Daily News, this time supposedly setting up a commune in downtown Burringbar. Another example of extremely poor journalism...no time taken or investigation made and yet another false document created. It is neverending - the exposure this work has sustained over a 10 year period. Not even 'Sandline Affair' retained this much media attention. I think it is up there with Victoria and David Beckhams media hype. This second group, led by Deanna Reginato, consists of:-
Warren & Annette Denny (a partner in the legal firm Flower and Hart in Brisbane CBD and Nurse from Holy Spirit Hospital in Brisbane) - both intent on attacking Natasha Lakaev. Further investigation shows that whilst we can't access their private information, they like many others participated in a few courses and spent 'x' amount on their progression. No more than if you went and did an Avatar program or Anthony Robbins program.

They both have a substantial wage and work in line with their reward so....what has turned their milk sour? Is their inverted unhappiness being blamed on someone else so they don't have to consider it. From a social point of view, they have a nuclear family, healthy children and good jobs. Why is Natasha Lakaev/Universal Knowledge a focus? Don't seem to be any problems here. When you are on a 7 figure salary, should it matter?

Annette Denny has gone through the painstaking process of phoning every business contact of Natasha Lakaev &/or Universal Knowledge and also taken to the time to investigate any other businesses Natasha Lakaev may have her hand in. Again, phoning any business contacts that were made readily available with the intention of removing Natasha Lakaev's ability to earn a living within any business. This style of defamatory and slanderous behaviour from a family that received nothing but support and help (granted paid for through programs) for themselves and their children.

Would her husbands law firm take kindly to giving people free legal services?
Whenever I have phoned for my own investigating purposes I receive unwelcome responses to my enquiries as many people have received legal documentation and are required to make statements. All of this takes a lot of time out of people lives....especially to just provide witness to unsubstantiated information.

Catherine Lock, an unhinged young university student who completed a number of programs by all accounts but cannot actually complete anything else in her life is also possessed by getting Natasha Lakaev? Is the way she is the fault of The Next Evolutionary Step?

She too spends her time on the phone, creating false scenarios of returning phone calls, behaving like a saviour getting people away from Natasha Lakaev all the while not appearing to have any of her own direction.

Then there is Warren Hayden - a hero in Burringbar with his article in the Daily News and laminated in the local general store. Many things have been written about this man from being the town marijuana dealer to attempting bodily harm towards his neighbours and many problems caused by his children if you listen to the gossip of Burringbar. Even to this day things from 10 years ago are very fresh in peoples mind about Glen Hayden and there is talk about his split from wife Carol because of his pursuance of Natasha Lakaev - people in country towns are so forthcoming with their information - makes journalism a breeze.

Don't shake your head at this point and act as if this is all unbelievable - this type of trauma and drama happens for 30 minutes on each of the 'soapies' that you watch on television every night. This is just a real life scenario.

Interestingly enough, all of these people (except Nikos Violaris who has never been directly involved in Universal Knowledge or was ever known to Natasha Lakaev) were asked to leave the sphere of Universal Knowledge as they were caught out for lying. Even though this may appear radical, compare it to a common structure - how do we treat Polititians when they are caught lying. They are immediately ejected from a structure that is based on truth. Think about it. This is not bizaare behaviour, it is sensible. I have since come across a document that you may find of interest. Judge for yourself.
Either that or they resign early and leave to avoid anything coming to the surface...think about it.
Warren Hayden, Warren Denny, Annette Denny, Catherine Lock and Deanna Reginato, it appears that they are in some sort of court case where they are being sued for defamation of Ms Lakaev’s name and that this is their feeble attempt to try to set their case up via the internet, using credible sources to generate a smear campaign.
When the characters in the original story see a rehashing of this data for personal gain they may target the likes of Warren Hayden, Warren Denny, Deanna Reginato, Lisa Webber, Annette Denny, and Catherine Lock and the other parties involved. It seems to be the same people each time.
The group doesn’t expand in size and their tactic doesn’t change. Are they looking for a sudden surge in cash again? You know, it is a shame that sensationalist journalists with no reputation can take such a small amount of information and run with it, and then those who actually have all of the accurate data cannot disclose information for fear of lives being affected (for example their own families).
Those with integrity must sit back and watch poor quality journalists build careers on false data. To actually use this woman on websites like this shows that those who own the sites either; A) Do not have the correct information; B) Have the correct information but are ignoring it because they want their website page to advance on the back of innocents; or C) They are not credible because credible websites would remove information immediately upon being given the facts. I will return with a link as promised with the letters regarding the Brisbane Sunday Mail article published some 10 years ago. One wonders whether this article is relevant in today’s society.

I believe those that are not truly tied to this band of people should consider clearing their names urgently because if you are associated with it you are branded as it.

A couple that were quite heavily involved in this work, down to teaching the information are now themselves in a fantastic financial situation with their dream of adopting or fostering children unravelling in front of their very eyes.

What did Lisa Weber and Mike Domagala know about children or child rearing besides from what they paid money to learn? Why would they be in the position they are right now?

Do they feel they are lying, stealing, cheating, frauding the system because they were unsuccuessful at reproducing and called on other means with which to make their dream come true?