|
|
||||
The Blocked Brain Syndrome!By Monika Baker When was the last time you heard about a good idea to reduce unemployment and get this country growing? And if you heard one, where did it come from? From our politicians or bureaucrats, or from our academics, or maybe from any of the many consultants siting on committees? Here in Australia they all seem to suffer from the "Blocked Brain Syndrome" or maybe they are caught in the attitude of "not enough resources"? Other countries seem to be more innovative. Denmark, for example, developed a program so good, that they have practically achieved full employment, for their own population only, not their immigrants, yet quite remarkable! And that happened in only a few years. France created close to 250.000 new jobs through the restriction of overtime and introduction of the 35 hour week. Almost all European countries have maternity leave. German mothers have enjoyed this privilege for as long as I can remember (45 years). So what's wrong with our beautiful country and its great potential, us Australians? Can we fight the blocked brain syndrome, or are we condemned to follow the American lead? A United Nations study from 2000 showed that Amerika had the highest level of poverty in the Western World followed by Ireland. We, the unemployed, believe that this is not good enough.
We came up with a few ideas. They may be simple, they may have been heard
before, but we want to talk about it with all members of our society.
Modell for full employment in AustraliaEach good and solid construction is build on a strong foundation.
Our foundation is build on the principles:
On this foundation stand four pillars which are capable
of carrying a strong roof, which enable all of us to live in a protected
and strong society and to lead a fulfilling life, enjoying the privileges
of employment and other remunerated contributions that come with them. The four pillars are: Functional, flexible, job consultancies, decent vocational
guidance, as is offered in Germany, are essential. They form part of the
Social Security system, as are many other community and advocacy services. Our suggestions to aim for full employment: Pillar 1: Create healthy, less stressful work environments,
eradicate bullying and include staff in decision making and planning activities.
Call on the potential of all staff members. Profit and turnover will rise,
while absenteeism and sickdays will be markedly reduced. Allow family
friendly practices, introduce family leave, by employing an unemployed
person over the period of leave. Restrict overtime and shorten the working
hours per week. Pillar 2: Career Development Everyone, unemployed and employed
should have access to improve their career by accessing appropriate training
or study. Learning fees should be affordable to unemployed people and
be subsidized for employers training their staff. The lifelong learning
sector and the vocational and higher education institutions need to work
more closely and flexibly together with the business and industrial stakeholders,
who in turn should be obliged to project employment trends, so that all
demands in certain sectors can be identified early and appropriate training
measures implemented. Pillar 3: A fair tax system places the heaviest tax burden
on those who made profit from our common goods, while avoiding a tax burden
on those who live in poverty or on low incomes. In Australia unemployed
people starting a job effectively pay a marginal tax rate of nearly 80%.
Pillar 4: Employer support and initiatives Affirmative action is needed (and has been introduced in
Denmark) for mature age employees, people with disabilities and the longtime
unemployed. Should maternity leave, restricted overtime, job sharing
and training/study leave be introduced in a company and they employ long
term unemployed, mature aged people and/or people with a disability in
positions which have become available, there is a chance that this measure
alone will reduce unemployment significantly. Budget SA promises a lot of thinkingWe have commented on the Federal Budget in our May Up-Words. A lot has happened since and continues to happen, and a lot has not happened. We still have no proposal for a new Income Support System, the changes to the Disability Support Pension have been rejected by the Senate, but who knows when the first Senator starts making deals. In the meantime the budget 2002/03 was released by our State government
in SA. A few more teachers, a few more nurses (let's hope there are still
a few unemployed nurses around, otherwise we may have to import them!)
and 1000 new jobs at Mitsubishi. Admittedly, there were grants and programs
for research and development of industries and a few jobs in some of the
suggested infrastructure projects, like the railway developments and a
new police station for Mount Barker. Above all there was money for Committees
to think and sit. Surely, this will create a few jobs and satisfy some in the community,
more hospital beds are great. It also looks as if there has been a firm
commitment to fund unmet needs in the Disability Services areas and to
do something for mental health, although 50% of the budget for mental
health is still eaten up by hospital costs. But what is lacking are innovative
ideas to increase employment. Regional Development Boards maybe are achieving greater employment. Some
regions have turned around, yet other regions have not been helped. Where
are the improvements? Sadly for all young people, the State Government's Youth Traineeship Scheme has not been raised to its former level of 1000 places. Only 500 young people will get a chance to start their careers in the public sector of the State government. Of some consulation ought to be that TAFE fees have been cut by 10% and capped at just over $10,000 per year. It is almost affordable to study at TAFE, especially with the new training vouchers for 390 hours Work for the Dole! AMWU listens!On the 26th of June UPM's chairperson David Rigney addressed the State Conference of the AMWU in SA regarding employment creation and the situation of the unemployed in general. He was well received and many comrades have contacted us since with enquiries and messages of support. David spoke about the benefits of the 35 hour week in France. He also told the delegates about the insidious Work for the Dole scheme which avoids job creation by vreating slave labor for social security recipients. If all the costs for administration were to be paid as wages for the participants, there would be more employment and better outcomes for the participants. Employees and the unemployed must work together to fight the injustices applied to the unemployed but designed to crush the workers! Should Telstra be privatised?By David Farrant This gaffe embarrassed his leader John Howard, who just
hours before, vowed to conduct an audit on Telstra services to determine
if the telco was ready for a further sell-off. Mr Howard said the services
in the bush are getting closer to a point where they can be sold. So the Liberals are thinking of a sell-off this year. I
just hope it is better than the last share float, where initially it did
not perform as the Libs and all their so-called economic experts expected. The SA Farmers Federation president John Lush was contacted
by 'The Advertiser' to comment on the issue of services in the bush and
how they compare to services in the city. He mentioned Internet access
and mobile phones dropping out. He also said that it can take up to six
months for Telstra to put in another phone line for data transmission
or to run a fax. But before he could complete the conversation his mobile
phone dropped out. This is happening while Telstra is winning overseas contracts,
such as the one in China, to provide phone coverage for the 2008 Olympics.
The Democrats, the Greens and Labor presently oppose such a move and I
was reading in the weekend press that all the independents except one
support such a move. I do not believe that Telstra should be privatised. Telstra
would make more money in a few years than we could sell it for. They are
obviously having problems with their mobile phone and Internet access.
The Liberal Party's philosophy to sell everything is just bad business.
So why sell assets that are profitable and that return huge dividends
to the treasury? The government will introduce a system whereby if a Telstra
service is slow, such as phone line maintainance, the Telco will get a
million dollar fine. Well, so the government admits that Telstra is substandard,
but still insists they will sell it. If Telstra is sold, prices will go
up and services will become worse. Would they really need to care about
a small fine of a few millions, when they make that much in a few days?
When any of the government assets are sold, we always have
a restructuring that leaves hundreds unemployed. Selling government-owned assets which don't operate as a monopoly, eg Qantas, Commonwealth Bank, may have some some merit to it, as long as we need the money from the sale. Such a sale should only be done through a share market float and not a sale to the highest bidder. Selling an asset that makes the government a small fortune every year and is a monopoly, eg Telstra, doesn't make sense to me. I was brought up to believe that assets that are monopolies should stay in public hands.
|
||||
|
Contents: Modell for full employment in Australia Budget promises a lot of thinking! Take the test, are you a Cruiser?
Could not find originator as it got send to us! Our Apologies! If anyone knows please send me an e-mail Take a look at this month's additions to the Sleuth Click here to access our previous newsletters:
Have a look at our new campaign site: PO
Box 485 Phone (08) 8352 4950
Come
to our Meetings Join
UPM against Poverty Copy
the membership form here!
|
||||