Disclaimer

 

I have seen things that I can't explain...looking throught that window pane
 

"It's very easy to hide behind imagery . . . but I also know speaking to someone quite direct
without wasting time is also very important.  A lot of people I admire who've gone before
us were able to speak on a very personal and universal level.''

- Richard Ashcroft on his songcraft for Urban Hymns 1997


 


 «  Disclaimer  «

 

 

By e-mailing me you are acknowledging the following statement: "I affirm that I am not working for any television or movie production studio/network or affiliated organizations.  I am not employed by, or am a member of a professional organization such as ASCAP or MPAA or any other such group or association. I am not employed by the federal government, affiliated agency or any type of sub-contractor or independent agent. I am not a postal inspector. I will not take any legal action against the webmaster of this page regarding the contents of this page. By e-mailing, you understand that these trades are collector to collector and any incidental costs that may be involved are not for product, but labor."

 

 

 

«A Piece taken from 
the verve: Star Sail, by Sean Egan,
on bootlegs «

 

 

Bootlegs are a perennial bone of contention in the music industry and have been since the first significant one - The  Great White Wonder, Bob Dylan's legendary, unreleased  basement tapes from Big Pink, recorded during his year's sabbatical following a motorbike accident - appeared in 1960. Some record companies and artists consider them artistic theft since all profits from their sale go into the pockets of the
bootleggers and none go to the artists.  There is also the issue of quality: most bootlegs are either poorly recorded live tapes or else studio outtakes; by definition sub-standard sonically or artistically, or both. 

The opposing argument is that bootlegs comprise material that the artist would never officially release anyway, so they are not being robbed of royalties in the real sense.  As for the quality: the fans know the material is usually poor, but don't particularly care, they just want everything they can lay their hands on by their favorite act. And to suggest that bootlegs might somehow reduce sales of official material is absurd since those fans keen enough to acquire bootlegs will almost certainly already own every official release.

 

 


 

 

Back?