|
The Vidiot's weekly blog: What pissed me off this week? 2/21/2005 (updated every Monday at some point during the day) ...'cause I'm angry and my friends are sick of listening to me... Track your congresscritters here!
Mirror (in case geocities is wacky or, in case of trouble in New York, check it for messages): http://129.79.148.33/vidiotcontact/ Gannongate heats up! (That makes how many "gates" for this administration??) But I don't want to miss the important angle of this story 'cause it's not the sex. OK. Well, the sex makes it A LOT of fun. (I mean,it's not like there hasn't been homosexual scandals in DC before.) But it's really not about the sex. The moral of the story, boys and girls, is this:
Let me explain: Gannon/Guckert. This guy obviously had a checkered past, was not a real journalist, didn't work for a real news outlet and hadn't worked for that for very long, and used an alias to get a press pass that real reporters had to jump through multiple hoops for. Not only that, it seems that he was privy to stuff regular journalists weren't AND used that information in a propagandist way. This guy could have been anybody with any agenda. The secret service would never know that because somebody told them "this guy gets a pass" and the secret service obeyed them. (Or worse, "whomever" just got a press pass for him without even telling the SS who the press pass was for and the SS didn't even question it.) Now, the secret service's job is to protect the president of the United States. That's basically their only job. They're supposed to make the environment as safe as possible and if the environment is not safe, they're supposed to leap into action. Who can bypass the secret service's mandate? Who wields that kind of power in the White House? Not the president. The president defers to their judgment (and Cheney's obviously), if we are to believe the 9/11 narrative that said that he wanted to come back to DC but the SS said "no" so he didn't. Cheney? But why would he bother with the press? That, to me, doesn't seem like his sphere of concern. So who else? Well.... The only one I can think of is Karl Rove. This man's name has been bandied about as the culprit in every major "gate" during this administration's tenure. He's just so slippery (or scary) that there's never been any evidence to be found. And the fact that Bruce Eberle (of GOPUSA) has something to with Gannon AND Rove only makes the connection more plausible. (Also, there are all sorts of rumors about him and McClellan being gay and Rove is very powerful.) Let's think back to 9/11. Michael Rivero over at whatreallyhappened.com came up with an excellent observation: On 9/11, when it was obvious that we were under attack, Bush continued to sit there and read a children's book about goats. Now remember, we were under attack. Supposedly, we didn't know how many planes there were or what their targets were. And Bush's schedule had been announced some time in advance. Anyone with press creds (which, evidently, are not as difficult to acquire as we once thought)or any interest in knowing where he would be, would know where he would be...including any terrorists with access to an airplane. Now, Rivero's astute observation (and others) was that in lieu of all of these unknowns, why did the SS not leap into action to protect him and move him to an alternate location? The only answer is that they were told by somebody that the president wasn't in danger and to stand down. And who could've done/known that? Cheney of course (that would certainly be within his evil purview), but like I said, Cheney probably wouldn't bother with the press/Gannon/Guckert thing, so there's somebody else who wields that kind of power and might've told them to stand down and that would be Rove, (possibly via Cheney, but Rove nonetheless). And why would Rove want Bush sitting there on 9/11 reading about a pet goat? Because for Rove, the manufacturing of the image of a calm, cool, and collected President under pressure was the narrative he had decided upon. Rove's framing of the president post-9/11 was of a president in control. How would it have looked if the SS had swooped the president out of the room? It just wouldn't fit the narrative. (Though, somebody must've said to Rove "Dude. You have to at least give the ILLUSION that we're trying to protect the president" and so the lies about threats to Air Force One and the trip to Nebraska ensued.) <sarcasm> Of course, I'm assuming certain people in our government knew in advance that 9/11 was going to happen...which, we all know is impossible. </sarcasm> Eh, I could be wrong. Oh, and I had the talking-heads Sunday morning shows on in the background and, maybe I missed something, but not ONE of them even mentioned Gannongate! Not ONE! Man! I loathe our main-stream media. (No wonder they're so threatened by the blogs.) Job Site of the Week: Sustainable Business Jobs Junk Site of the Week: Ebaum's world Video of the Week: Reid on the filibuster Funny Video of the Week: Maher on Gannongate Crop Circle of the Week: Hello Kitty Time Waster of the Week: Image Puzzle (I can't get beyond 5) T-shirt of the week: Slayer washroom Utility Site of the Week: Tiny URL Useful Media Site of the Week: Local Media Blaster Sex Scandal Name of the Week: Ruud Programming Note: Next week, I will be in term-paper hell. But I'm going to try something new. This time, instead of not updating, I'm handing the blog over to the Sailor. He'll update the page for 2/28. He makes me laugh, so I suspect he'll do the same for you. (No pressure there, huh?) Ohmygawd
Ohmygawd
Ohmygawd
!!!!!!!!!
Why hasn't the
media made this connection. (Oh wait, I know. 'Cause they're SHITHEADS!
[sigh]) Soon after Bush signed this heinous
bill.
Vioxx comes back on the market.
Now, when it kills a lot of people, nobody's family can sue.Can you say "overt"?? (Read Greg Palast on this.) It's
official
The Iraq "elections" were bogus.
[sigh]
Why is it every time I hear one or those sycophants going on about "Necro-ponte", he sounds like the friggin' second coming of Christ?!
The man is evil, through and through.
Time for a terror alert!
Bad
ideas
All of the recent talk about a National I.D. card makes me nervous. The reason? It's the idiots in charge of the databases that scare me.
Gee, you mean like this? .
Better watch out. They'll sic the IRS on you for evening questioning our Dear Leader. You think I'm being snarky, don't you? Well, sadly, I'm not.
or Syria
Or maybe it'll be both.
Honestly, Syria makes more sense. Look a map. We got troops in Iraq and Afghanistan which is on either side of Syria. You know there's a draft coming when... they're calling
up
80 years olds?
or this.
or this
or this
Life on Mars!
Maybe aliens cause global warming.
Well, the aliens better get cracking. There'swork to be done.
What do we do about all of this crap? I have no idea. Part of me wants to start teach-ins at my local pub. Just go to the bar, rant and rave and inform the idiots who still think Dan Rather is telling them the truth. Another part of me wants to organize a voter observation program to insure that this moron isn't in the White House all the way to 2008. I sincerely believe that if we protected the voting rights of the underprivileged that any Democrat could SWEEP any election. And we'd have to start with the Florida Election for Governor THIS FALL (like these guys!.) I don't think Democrats are the answer. But they are at least a start. At the very least, point your CNN-loving friends to my links page. Just getting started in reading alternate news sites gets people thinking. I have one friend who was very happy-go-lucky, thinking ol' Greta was telling the whole truth until I opened up his eyes a bit. Now, he's all depressed. He'll get over it. You gotta' get depressed before you get angry and you gotta' get angry before you can accomplish anything. We're all in mourning. We have to move through the steps. But we gotta' hurry it up. Read. Inform. Spread the word. Even if it means your friends avoid you for awhile. If they really love you, they'll start to listen.
"POSSE COMITATUS ACT" (18 USC 1385): A Reconstruction Era criminal law proscribing use of Army (later, Air Force) to "execute the laws" except where expressly authorized by Constitution or Congress. Limit on use of military for civilian law enforcement also applies to Navy by regulation. Dec '81 additional laws were enacted (codified 10 USC 371-78) clarifying permissible military assistance to civilian law enforcement agencies--including the Coast Guard--especially in combating drug smuggling into the United States. Posse Comitatus clarifications emphasize supportive and technical assistance (e.g., use of facilities, vessels, aircraft, intelligence, tech aid, surveillance, etc.) while generally prohibiting direct participation of DoD personnel in law enforcement (e.g., search, seizure, and arrests). For example, Coast Guard Law Enforcement Detachments (LEDETS) serve aboard Navy vessels and perform the actual boardings of interdicted suspect drug smuggling vessels and, if needed, arrest their crews). Positive results have been realized especially from Navy ship/aircraft involvement. (Tom Ridge has practically said he'd do away with this act.)
|
|
|