|
The Vidiot's weekly blog: What pissed me off this week? 11/28/2005 (updated every Monday at some point during the day) ...'cause I'm angry and my friends are sick of listening to me...
Free stuff can be found here Mirror (in case geocities is wacky or, in case of trouble in New York, check it for messages): http://129.79.148.33/vidiotcontact/ Welcome to my Rutgers classmates. The list of the Bush war crimes continues to grow. Now we're finding out that there might have been a plan to bomb Al Jazeera. To put it into a little perspective, it would be like al Qaeda taking out FOX. (Not that getting rid of FOX would be the worse thing to ever happen.) Outrageous enough for you? It was so bad that Blair, who usually sits on GW's lap, had to talk him out of it! (But, as perhaps a conciliatory fig-leaf for the Bushies, Blair is threatening the newspaper that originally published the story with prosecution. But why he'd want to do that is beyond my comprehension.) But it's all part and parcel of this administration's view of the media in general. Destroy and/or manipulate whomever doesn't toe the party line. Motorcycle Gear of the Week: Rear-View Helmet Video of the Week: Carter on Leno. Gizmo of the Week: For world travelers Odd Site of the Week: Who Wants to Marry a Founding Father Obit of the Week: Wax on. Wax off. Activism of the Week: Nominate Cindy Sheehan for Time's Person of the Year Fitzmas update: We're on Rove alert. Hero of the Week Haven't had one of these for a while. A lone woman, standing up to the police state.
All of this harassment is to soften us up so were compliant.
Biggest non-story of the Week A technical glitch put a big "X" over Cheney's face on CNN.
While it is funny, it's not a big deal and some of the bloggers are making way too big a deal of it. Really. Can you say "distraction?" I mean, shouldn't we all be discussing the outrageous similarities between the Iraqi National Congress exiles and their piss-poor intelligence information with this story about Iranian exiles?
Or the pre-Iraq war rhetoric with this pre-Iran war rhetoric?
But I guess it was a slow newsweek. The WaPo did a story on Bob Novak's ill manners.
Shot across the bow Andy Card was almost Wellstoned.
The only person I can think of who hates Card enough to kill him is Karl Rove. Either Card was lucky, or Rove only meant to frighten him, like a cat swatting at a mouse. If I were Card, I'd set up a kill switch. Otherwise, he'll end up like this guy.
They lied about this, so they'll lie about anything. Katie, Matt and Al covered up the story of the rogue M&M at the Macy's parade, probably because the story countered the Administration's Candy Policy.
Can't damage those sponsors, now can they? Is there any wonder why MSM ratings and readership has dropped?
Holy Crap! Did He Really Say That of the Week Scalia blamed Gore for 2000 election woes.
{ahem} Mr. Scalia, sir? The case was Bush v. Gore. Not Gore v. Bush. Jeebus. Holy Crap! Did He Really Say That of the Week Pt. 2 FOX says that the layoffs at GM is good for everyone!
{sigh} Though, it really is all about the pensions. Oh. And guess where the jobs are going.
What's the matter with Texas? The state of Texas will more than likely have to stop funding it's public schools.
What the hell else are property taxes for anyway? I'm sure you heard this but... It bears repeating: Former FEMA head Mike Brown is starting his own disaster preparedness firm.
The only people who'd hire him are Bush cronies and anyone dumb enough to buy the Brooklyn Bridge. What is it about Florida? They seem to have a knack for putting the wrong people on lists.
Media & Stuff It was a slow news week because of the Holiday, so let me offer up a little insight into some of the underpinnings of US foreign policy. The foreign policy of the Bush administration has it’s roots in hegemonist realist political thinking which rests on five propositions: 1) the world is Hobbesian; 2) nation-states are the primary world actors; 3) military power is the superior power; 4) multi-level institutions are optional; and somewhat outside of the standard realist view (thereby making it hegemonist) 5) the US is a unique and great power. So, the Bush administration’s decision to bomb Afghanistan was a logical consequence of the administration’s belief that terrorism is a problem of state behavior and should be dealt with using military power. (Just so you know, I lean towards constructivism.) So, all of those propositions are pretty self-explanatory, right? I'm just bringing it up so I can discuss a little of what's going on with the UN. As you might recall, John Bolton was placed as UN by Bush as a recess appointment. Mostly because there was too much opposition to him in Congress and in the diplomatic corps. Much was written about him and why he was a bad choice. Even conservative bloggers had their concerns. But why place such a polarizing figure in such a position? Well, not only are the Bushies hegemonic realists (who don't like organizations like the UN), they're also a bunch of friggin' neocons, and neocons would love to see the UN either destroyed or at least made into their puppet. Bolton is a neocon, plain and simple.
So what is Bolton up to these days? Threatening the UN, of course.
Don't believe me? From the same article, here's a quote from Phyllis Bennis, a senior fellow at the Washington-based Institute for Policy Studies:
So, it's only speculation, mind you. But I think that the Administration's goal with the UN is get the UN to do all of the US' dirty work. Meaning, use the UN to strong arm countries, use the UN to do the policing, use the UN to carry out US policy under the guise of internationalism. But shock of shocks, the UK, probably the only other bully big enough to challenge the US, is standing up to Bolton!
So we'll have to wait and see how it works out. The Bush administration, with all of its investigations and alleged war crimes of late have lost a lot of their international power. Maybe the UK just sees this as an opportunity to take a hit at the bully while he's in a weakened state. If I were Kreskin, I'd say: Look for the US to continue its bluster at the UN. Look for the UN to at least try (if not succeed on some level) to stand up to the US. But if the US wins its battles there, it will be an anemic win at best. And if the US loses, well, look for another coalition of the coerced to be formed to combat either Syria or Iran, further alienating the US from the mainstream international community. Either way, the US is in a tight spot. I'm not saying the US doesn't have any power left. I'm just saying some really clever monkeys could get some decent shots in right now and if they do, they'll get a lot of bang for their buck. There's no real "media angle" to this story, other than to point out that if the media did its job, I wouldn't feel the need to explain this stuff to anyone.
News of the Weird As if living in self-imposed exile in Cuba for the last couple of decades wasn't bad enough, now Gary Glitter could face the death penalty in Viet Nam.
It's a sad statement indeed when the death of an ugly dog gets more press than the death of an average solider in Iraq.
If only it could be true.
Now THIS is good governance.
What do we do about all of this crap? I have no idea. Part of me wants to start teach-ins at my local pub. Just go to the bar, rant and rave and inform the idiots who still think Brian Williams is telling them the truth. I sincerely believe that if we protected the voting rights of the underprivileged that any Democrat could SWEEP any election. I don't think Democrats are the answer. But they are at least a start. At the very least, point your CNN-loving friends to my links page. Just getting started in reading alternate news sites gets people thinking. I have one friend who was very happy-go-lucky, thinking ol' Greta was telling the whole truth until I opened up his eyes a bit. Now, he's all depressed. He'll get over it. You gotta' get depressed before you get angry and you gotta' get angry before you can accomplish anything. We're all in mourning. We have to move through the steps. But we gotta' hurry it up. Read. Inform. Spread the word. Even if it means your friends avoid you for awhile. If they really love you, they'll start to listen.
"POSSE COMITATUS ACT" (18 USC 1385): A Reconstruction Era criminal law proscribing use of Army (later, Air Force) to "execute the laws" except where expressly authorized by Constitution or Congress. Limit on use of military for civilian law enforcement also applies to Navy by regulation. Dec '81 additional laws were enacted (codified 10 USC 371-78) clarifying permissible military assistance to civilian law enforcement agencies--including the Coast Guard--especially in combating drug smuggling into the United States. Posse Comitatus clarifications emphasize supportive and technical assistance (e.g., use of facilities, vessels, aircraft, intelligence, tech aid, surveillance, etc.) while generally prohibiting direct participation of DoD personnel in law enforcement (e.g., search, seizure, and arrests). For example, Coast Guard Law Enforcement Detachments (LEDETS) serve aboard Navy vessels and perform the actual boardings of interdicted suspect drug smuggling vessels and, if needed, arrest their crews). Positive results have been realized especially from Navy ship/aircraft involvement.
|
Who am I?: I am a biker chick who lives in NYC. This blog is about current events and my left-leaning, acerbic spin on those events. Nobody pays me anything to do this. Nobody tells me what to write. I will NEVER tout anything for anybody's money! EVER! Use this instead of Google: These sites are good at culling stories from a multitude of media sites: buzzflash.com
Bartcop
Ilia
Dreams Blog media-bias exposed:
onlinejournal.com
whatreallyhappened.com
more different :
and
for godsakes, stay away if you must succumb to reading a newspaper:
|
|