|
The Vidiot's weekly blog: What pissed me off this week? 1/30/2006 (updated every Monday at some point during the day) ...'cause I'm angry and my friends are sick of listening to me...
Free stuff can be found here Mirror (in case geocities is wacky or, in case of trouble in New York, check it for messages): http://129.79.148.33/vidiotcontact/ I just have to mention the weather today. It's over 60 and sunny here in NYC. Which would be fine... IF IT WERE APRIL. Now, it's not like a like being cold or anything. Really. The winter, while fine in theory -- a theory formulated in the middle of July I might add --it's actually a pain in the butt. Cold, coats, socks, stockings, hats, none of it good. Though, honestly I'm not convinced that humans have much to do with global warming. My gut tells me global warming is happening, but we don't have much more to do with it than maybe making it worse or dirtier. I think it has more to do with solar activity and natural cycles. I mean, it was hot for the dinosaurs and there were no cars back then, right? However there are plenty of reasons for the government to address global warming. First off, just doing simple observations will predict what a rise in temperatures will cause -- rising sea-levels, altered or more violent weather patterns (Hence, the spring-like weather here in January, Katrina and Moscow's recent deep freeze.) With these alterations in climate comes changes in living needs for populations. More oil here, less food can be grown there, etc. These basic changes in infrastructure need to be addressed and fast. Our farms need to be reorganized to be able to grow more varied crops and new trade patterns need to be established to adjust for what we can't grow any more. Alternate energy sources have to be found, not necessarily to curb greenhouse gases, but to offer alternatives to areas that need more energy than can be delivered to them along traditional lines. In fact, I'd go so far to say that the Kyoto treaty is a complete waste of time. It should be scrapped. More emphasis on global infrastructure is needed to ensure that all nations are provided for and alternatives are thought about. If it gets colder in the northern hemisphere, the southern hemisphere will have to pick up the agricultural slack. Right now, they don't have the technology to do farming on the scale that the planet needs to stay fed. As draught dries up one area, solutions need to be in place so that the situation doesn't get dire. As oil becomes more and more expensive, alternatives needs to be developed and put into place so that the standard of living doesn't drop too drastically. Kyoto, as it stands now, is mostly masturbatory. (Most large, environmental regimes are actually.) But they could REALLY make Kyoto matter if they changed their agenda from window dressing to actual, nuts and bolts, pragmatic planning for the future. So, when I read stories that Bush is stifling scientists from speaking out about global warming (or cooling as the case may be) and he's not providing any incentive for farms to change their ways of production, my head nearly explodes. Whether or not you believe in global warming is moot at this point. It's clear that the climate changes over time and all will not be the same forever. Flexibility needs to be designed into the system to address that. Am I the only one who gets it? Idea of the Week: Google Search the text of the 4th Amendment Gizmo of the Week: Solar Charger Blog Entry of the Week: Basic Learning: Forgotten Wars Some blogs of the Week: Newshog, New York Hack, NY Transit Worker, and Bad Landlords Art of the Week: Robots Satire of the Week: Q & A: Our Omnipotent President Treat of the Week: Chocolate and Coffee Film Recommendation of the Week: Why We Fight Funny of the Week: Men Are From Mars, Women Are From Venus Video of the Week: Bill Gates Runs Like a Girl. Creampuffs of the Century: Beard Papa's Programming note 1: The State of the Union address is this Tuesday, the 31st. Arm yourself -- here's bingo game and a drinking game. Protest if you can. Here's a look at just how credible the speech is to begin with and just remind yourself of just how much of a dimwit he is, watch Letterman's Top-Ten list of Dumb Bush things. Also, here's a preview of the speech. Programming Note 2: I'm loath to mention anything about Alito, only because anything I say will be useless after today. Programming Note 3: This website will be moving over to blogspot by end of month. I'm morphing this blog into more of a standard blog. More frequent postings and few more POVs will be added to the mix. Stay tuned! Police State Watch This doesn't sound good.
So, we'll have a bunch of jack booted thugs running around, working for the federal government, doing citizen policing. Sounds like a great idea! It seems that we're headed towards a police state (if we're not there already.) I mean, look at what Halliburton got in its Christmas stocking.
Detention camps for "new programs"? Exactly what "new programs" are they referring to? What kind of "new program" would need ample detention space? Now, hold on here, I'm going to stretch the imagination a little bit: What if this recent change in Army execution rules is being done for other reasons?
What if the rules are being changed so that executions can occur at any military prison so that they can INCLUDE detention camps? I mean, if it can be expanded to include Gitmo, then why not a detention camp, set up by the US government, which is all Gitmo is anyway? Just puttin' it out there. There's a reason they bypassed the FISA court, said no to a law that would've made the FISA court even EASIER to deal with (so they'd continue to have an excuse to avoid the FISA court altogether) and are asking for permission to do what they've already been doing, even though why, if they're so confident they're not doing anything wrong, are they asking for Congress to approve it? Eh, they think they can do whatever they want anyway. They're spying on US. We, the people! There are no terrorists. They're not thwarting anything. They're spying on people who don't agree with them, looking for any cohesive opposition movements. Think I'm paranoid? Call me in 20 years, when history starts to come out and tell me I was wrong. I dare you. A few choice words about our MSM You may have been hearing about some of the controversy regarding MSM of late. The ombudsman over at the WaPo touting the GOP's Abramoff debunked talking points and then shutting down the blog comments when the blogosphere pointed out the fallacies of the talking points, Katie Couric shoving the GOP's Abramoff talking points in Howard Dean's face, the Arianna thing, Chris Matthews comparing bin Laden to Michael Moore and then going on the Today Show to back up Katie Couric after her Dean scene (not to mention his stupid assumptions about Hispanic immigrants and their political leanings.) And Russert's annoying questioning of Obama about Harry Belafonte. It just doesn't get any worse. That's why we out here need to challenge these idiots. We need to make as much as noise as the right does, (the noise that pushed these idiots over the edge to begin with). We must call them on their crap. (Like what he said) Every. Single. Time. Blog for political change.
If the media cannot be saved, than neither can our democracy. For instance, when the WaPo shut down their blog comments, some enterprising individual started a blog so people could continue to comment. A Chris Matthews blog and a Tim Russert blog were also started. (Go here for the links to all three of those.) Clever. Publicize these sites. Forward them to your friends. We need to make these the "go to" sites for commentary, only because they're NOT moderated by the people who shouldn't be moderating. But be careful, they WILL come after the internet.
Trust me on that one.
Evo Rocks... thus far anyway. I like this guy already.
What a novel idea! Planet of the dumb apes. OK, this has to be the dumbest, most idiotic thing that man has created using his knowledge and brain power.
Just look at it this way: controlling random pollination is the same as controlling a 15-year-old boy's sex drive. It's all sex. Think you can keep a 15-year-old boy from sex or masturbation? Think that's even possible? I can see it now: Huge die-offs in human population because these suicide genes have gotten into the general seed supply. All over the planet, farmers are unable to get crops to grow because more and more of their seeds are contaminated with the suicide gene. People starve. Farms go bankrupt. Mother Earth is sick and dying. All because some genius thought it would be a clever idea to create seeds that people have to buy every year so they could generate a profit. And speaking of dumb apes... Someone must've told him he'd sound well-read if he mentioned DeTocqueville
Funny thing, though, according to my sociologist boyfriend, "DeTocqueville spoke about how democracy within the US was threatened. He believed that democracy in the US would quickly lead to despotic democracy." Indeed. Hide and go seek. Seems the Bushies have been busy little bees with regards to any pictures that might exist of Bush and Abramoff together.
(Here's a VillageVoice article about it.) And why might a business order comply with Bush's desires? Why, because she's a donor, that's why!
Bush is lying about his connections to Abramoff,
yet the media seems to be ignoring this basic fact.
(Wouldn't be the first story they missed.) There must be something they're worried about.
The dems can do whatever they want. But Bush has a history of thwarting any Abramoff investigation that is going on. (You'd think the media would be interested in that angle as well, wouldn't you?) Hmmmm I can't put my finger on what Bush's plan for Iran is. It's obvious, by the rhetoric, that they want to attack Iran. They're even doing their typical strong-arming to get UN members to comply.
However, Bush has come out in support of a plan that includes Russia as a middleman in Iran's nuclear program.
What gives? The paranoid in me is saying that he's playing the moderate so that when the staged terror event comes and he has to attack Iran, he can say "We were making progress with them. Now look at what they've done." Call me cynical. Everyone else does. I did not know this Here's a new one. One of my readers in Hawaii turned me on to the 13th amendment. No, not THAT thirteenth amendment. This one.
Also from that article:
Interesting, no? Here are a few more articles on the subject (one, two). You decide. Bear in mind though, as I told him, it would've not have saved us from the likes of Tom (the bug killer) Delay. Whatever happened to...
Standing up for liberty I love librarians, and so should you.
If it's ok, why not prove it? What have they got to hide?
Could it be because the damn things can be hacked with only 5 lines of code?!
Which is why we should switch to something more transparent and NOT privately owned.
News of the Weird Only a geek like me would find this funny. In it's entirety:
Think about this for a minute.
Imagine if Al Franken had said that! Why do these idiots work in a public school if they're so damned religious?
I often wondered about this.
This is not news to me.
In simpler terms: Republicans are Racist. What do we do about all of this crap? I have no idea. Part of me wants to start teach-ins at my local pub. Just go to the bar, rant and rave and inform the idiots who still think Brian Williams is telling them the truth. I sincerely believe that if we protected the voting rights of the underprivileged that any Democrat could SWEEP any election. I don't think Democrats are the answer. But they are at least a start. At the very least, point your CNN-loving friends to my links page. Just getting started in reading alternate news sites gets people thinking. I have one friend who was very happy-go-lucky, thinking ol' Greta was telling the whole truth until I opened up his eyes a bit. Now, he's all depressed. He'll get over it. You gotta' get depressed before you get angry and you gotta' get angry before you can accomplish anything. We're all in mourning. We have to move through the steps. But we gotta' hurry it up. Read. Inform. Spread the word. Even if it means your friends avoid you for awhile. If they really love you, they'll start to listen.
"POSSE COMITATUS ACT" (18 USC 1385): A Reconstruction Era criminal law proscribing use of Army (later, Air Force) to "execute the laws" except where expressly authorized by Constitution or Congress. Limit on use of military for civilian law enforcement also applies to Navy by regulation. Dec '81 additional laws were enacted (codified 10 USC 371-78) clarifying permissible military assistance to civilian law enforcement agencies--including the Coast Guard--especially in combating drug smuggling into the United States. Posse Comitatus clarifications emphasize supportive and technical assistance (e.g., use of facilities, vessels, aircraft, intelligence, tech aid, surveillance, etc.) while generally prohibiting direct participation of DoD personnel in law enforcement (e.g., search, seizure, and arrests). For example, Coast Guard Law Enforcement Detachments (LEDETS) serve aboard Navy vessels and perform the actual boardings of interdicted suspect drug smuggling vessels and, if needed, arrest their crews). Positive results have been realized especially from Navy ship/aircraft involvement.
|
Who am I?: I am a biker chick who lives in NYC. This blog is about current events and my left-leaning, acerbic spin on those events. Nobody pays me anything to do this. Nobody tells me what to write. I will NEVER tout anything for anybody's money! EVER! Use this instead of Google: These sites are good at culling stories from a multitude of media sites: buzzflash.com
Bartcop
Ilia
Dreams Blog media-bias exposed:
onlinejournal.com
whatreallyhappened.com
more different :
and
for godsakes, stay away if you must succumb to reading a newspaper:
|
|