Realpolitik & Outlook

"We want the kids to think they evolved from apes"

Let's set a few things straight: anyone who belongs to the ACLU or supports them is disloyal to the United States of America. Period! We can allow people like this to thrive in our society because we have a First Amendment right to free speech which allows idiots to drool in public. But it also allows us to call someone who drools in public an idiot. The ACLU has relentlessly pursued a socialist-communist agenda aiming at the eventual takeover of the country by altering society along its lines and they wont quit. The only good commie is a dead commie. They think they're atheist but they're really Satanist. Their notion of liberty is to have everything their way, have everyone think their way. I realize that they criticize the far right religionists for believing this too. But their team has been winning lately. They control a lot of public institutions including public education. They would like nothing better than to dumb down everyone to a level of slobbering subservience to them. It makes perfect sense for them to want people to think from the time they're kids that humanity has "evolved" from apes. The message is clear; you're no better than animals and so like animals you can be slaughtered. This too will happen if a correction isn't made, since ideas have a nasty habit of setting certain historical forces in motion.

But as has been consistently said by those heroic enough to get up and say so, Darwinism hasn't a leg to stand on; an Emperor with no clothes. A closer look at the evidence reveals a phony science where a stupid theory has been propped up so long that it's worn out. The data doesn't fit the theory yet it is still being defended and hotly by organized science. Just for openers, where are the f_ing missing links! The article cited mentions "peer review" as a criteria for good science. This too is bullshit! Peer review only guarantees that everyone toes a particular line. It's the equivalent of a modern day Inquisition. It is absolutely no guarantee of anyone doing good science. In fact peer review should be done only AFTER something has been published so that the debate is open to the public. Are there any good reasons for not wanting this debate to be public? Might some tenured professors of science end up looking pretty stupid? Indeed they might. But since when did good science have anything to do with preserving one's professional tenure?

The other reasons for not wanting a scientific debate to be held in public is that some pretty far-reaching political agendas might also come to the light of day and the peons in the galleries might just decide they've had enough and begin storming the stage. This is exactly what the string pullers can't risk.

The fact is that organized science and organized religion have a lot in common. Both are basically politically sanctioned belief systems and both have as much or as little right to be participants in society or the public schools, unless you see it through the eyes of the ACLU.

And nobody has even dared to think that there might be a third possibility for the origins of life on earth, and elsewhere. 1) We know that evolution is NOT how life started here nor how it developed. 2) We know how the Bible was put together and who put it together and there is no basis for believing in a "magical" basis for life on earth, either its beginnings or its continuance. 3) It had to arise through another agency for which at present WE DON'T KNOW is as good an answer as we have right now.

Nobody is going to teach the absolute skeptical view that WE DON'T KNOW how life started here, WE DON'T KNOW the size of the universe, etc. Instead we are going to have our kids fed a politically sanctioned world view that says they are descendants of lifeforms that evolved by random chance operations in a universe that is expanding like a giant soap bubble. A hundred years ago they might have been taught a politically sanctioned world view that said that they were creatures of a supreme being who loved them but could be a stern father if they weren't "good" living in a universe that was created especially for their benefit. Part of this world view accepted as a premise that each person had an immortal soul which survived the death of their bodies. The currently accepted world view officially denies this premise. We are basically reduced to being nothing but meat, "carrion for the birds and passing dogs." The powers that be are preparing us for something. First they get us to feel victimized. Then we become actual victims. That which a person thinks themselves to be, that is what they become.

"Be seeing you..."

The Polar Bear