continued...

The Church would have us believe (Doctrinal Catechism, Rev. Keenan, p. II a), that when a cleric communicates under both forms of bread and wine, he receives no more than he who receives the form of bread alone. But if as we saw Christ is "whole and entire" in each species with a separate ego, mind and consciousness in each species, then would not a cleric receive two separate and distinct conscious living Christ's, when communicating under both forms of bread and wine and He is present "whole and entire" under each form, just like a person would be eating two oysters who took two oysters exactly alike into his mouth? Or do two separate and distinct Christ-Gods' egos, minds and consciousness merge or immerse into one ego; mind and consciousness when they come into contact with each other? Do the separate egos, minds, wills and consciousness of a single man and woman, merge into one ego, mind, will and consciousness when they get married and become "one flesh?" No. To receive then, two separate species a cleric must receive two "whole and entire." Christ's, must he not? Yes. But it may still be said that to communicate under both, forms one receives no more than he who communicates only under one form, just as one who has two or more copies of the same book has only one and the same truth "whole and entire," and no more, than he who has but one copy of the book. But if one seeks and assimilates the one truth then would he at the very same time read or devour two or more books exactly alike? No. And has each copy' of a book a separate conscious ego, mind and will like each "species," supposed to contain a "whole and entire" Christ-God, has? No.

In view, then, of what we have seen, clerics must then on Christmas, after having said the third Mass, contain within themselves six "whole and entire" Christ-God, each with a separate ego, mind, will and consciousness, unless they should "chase" a few of them "away by sin" between each of the three Masses. Is that not so? Yes. Oh, the blindness that can not see the error in the doctrine of the Real Presence!